604 research outputs found

    Prediction of Alzheimer's disease dementia with MRI beyond the short-term: Implications for the design of predictive models

    Get PDF
    Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumetric measures have become a standard tool for the detection of in-cipientAlzheimer'sDisease(AD)dementiainmildcognitiveimpairment(MCI).Focusedonprovidinganearlierand more accurate diagnosis, sophisticated MRI machine learning algorithms have been developed over therecentyears,mostofthemlearningtheirnon-diseasepatternsfromMCIthatremainedstableover2โ€“3years.Inthis work, we analyzed whether these stable MCI over short-term periods are actually appropriate trainingexamples of non-disease patterns. To this aim, we compared the diagnosis of MCI patients at 2 and 5years offollow-up and investigated its impact on the predictive performance of baseline volumetric MRI measures pri-marily involved in AD, i.e., hippocampal and entorhinal cortex volumes. Predictive power was evaluated interms ofthe areaunder the ROCcurve(AUC), sensitivity,andspecificity inatrialsample of248 MCIpatientsfollowed-up over 5years. We further compared the sensitivity in those MCI that converted before 2years andthose that converted after 2years. Our results indicate that 23% of the stable MCI at 2years progressed in thenextthreeyearsandthatMRIvolumetricmeasuresaregoodpredictorsofconversiontoADdementiaevenatthemid-term, showing a better specificity and AUC as follow-up time increases. The combination of hippocampusand entorhinal cortex yielded an AUC that was significantly higher for the 5-year follow-up (AUC=73% at2yearsvs.AUC=84%at5years),aswellasforspecificity(56%vs.71%).Sensitivityshowedanon-significantslightdecrease(81%vs.78%).Remarkably,theperformanceofthismodelwascomparabletomachinelearningmodels at the same follow-up times. MRI correctly identified most of the patients that converted after 2years(with sensitivity>60%), and these patients showed a similar degree of abnormalities to those that convertedbefore 2years. This implies that most of the MCI patients that remained stable over short periods and subse-quentlyprogressedtoADdementiahadevidentatrophiesatbaseline.Therefore,machinelearningmodelsthatuse these patients to learn non-disease patterns are including an important fraction of patients with evidentpathological changes related to the disease, something that might result in reduced performance and lack ofbiological interpretability.This work was partially supported by the project PI16/01416(ISCIIIco-fundedFEDER) and RYC-2015/17430 (RamรณnyCajal,Pablo Aguiar). Data collection and sharing for this project was funded by the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)(National Institutes of Health Grant U01AG024904) and DODADNI (Department of Defense award number W81XWH-12-2-0012)S

    Baseline MRI Predictors of Conversion from MCI to Probable AD in the ADNI Cohort

    Get PDF
    The Alzheimerโ€™s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is a multi-center study assessing neuroimaging in diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring. Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) often represents a prodromal form of dementia, conferring a 10-15% annual risk of converting to probable AD. We analyzed baseline 1.5T MRI scans in 693 participants from the ADNI cohort divided into four groups by baseline diagnosis and one year MCI to probable AD conversion status to identify neuroimaging phenotypes associated with MCI and AD and potential predictive markers of imminent conversion. MP-RAGE scans were analyzed using publicly available voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and automated parcellation methods. Measures included global and hippocampal grey matter (GM) density, hippocampal and amygdalar volumes, and cortical thickness values from entorhinal cortex and other temporal and parietal lobe regions. The overall pattern of structural MRI changes in MCI (n=339) and AD (n=148) compared to healthy controls (HC, n=206) was similar to prior findings in smaller samples. MCI-Converters (n=62) demonstrated a very similar pattern of atrophic changes to the AD group up to a year before meeting clinical criteria for AD. Finally, a comparison of effect sizes for contrasts between the MCI-Converters and MCI-Stable (n=277) groups on MRI metrics indicated that degree of neurodegeneration of medial temporal structures was the best antecedent MRI marker of imminent conversion, with decreased hippocampal volume (left > right) being the most robust. Validation of imaging biomarkers is important as they can help enrich clinical trials of disease modifying agents by identifying individuals at highest risk for progression to AD

    Prediction of Cognitive Decline in Healthy Older Adults using fMRI

    Get PDF
    Few studies have examined the extent to which structural and functional MRI, alone and in combination with genetic biomarkers, can predict future cognitive decline in asymptomatic elders. This prospective study evaluated individual and combined contributions of demographic information, genetic risk, hippocampal volume, and fMRI activation for predicting cognitive decline after an 18-month retest interval. Standardized neuropsychological testing, an fMRI semantic memory task (famous name discrimination), and structural MRI (sMRI) were performed on 78 healthy elders (73% female; mean age = 73 years, range = 65 to 88 years). Positive family history of dementia and presence of one or both apolipoprotein E (APOE) ฮต4 alleles occurred in 51.3% and 33.3% of the sample, respectively. Hippocampal volumes were traced from sMRI scans. At follow-up, all participants underwent a repeat neuropsychological examination. At 18 months, 27 participants (34.6%) declined by at least 1 SD on one of three neuropsychological measures. Using logistic regression, demographic variables (age, years of education, gender) and family history of dementia did not predict future cognitive decline. Greater fMRI activity, absence of an APOE ฮต4 allele, and larger hippocampal volume were associated with reduced likelihood of cognitive decline. The most effective combination of predictors involved fMRI brain activity and APOE ฮต4 status. Brain activity measured from task-activated fMRI, in combination with APOE ฮต4 status, was successful in identifying cognitively intact individuals at greatest risk for developing cognitive decline over a relatively brief time period. These results have implications for enriching prevention clinical trials designed to slow AD progression

    Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Semantic Memory as a Presymptomatic Biomarker of Alzheimerโ€™s Disease Risk

    Get PDF
    Extensive research efforts have been directed toward strategies for predicting risk of developing Alzheimer\u27s disease (AD) prior to the appearance of observable symptoms. Existing approaches for early detection of AD vary in terms of their efficacy, invasiveness, and ease of implementation. Several non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging strategies have been developed for predicting decline in cognitively healthy older adults. This review will survey a number of studies, beginning with the development of a famous name discrimination task used to identify neural regions that participate in semantic memory retrieval and to test predictions of several key theories of the role of the hippocampus in memory. This task has revealed medial temporal and neocortical contributions to recent and remote memory retrieval, and it has been used to demonstrate compensatory neural recruitment in older adults, apolipoprotein E ฮต4 carriers, and amnestic mild cognitive impairment patients. Recently, we have also found that the famous name discrimination task provides predictive value for forecasting episodic memory decline among asymptomatic older adults. Other studies investigating the predictive value of semantic memory tasks will also be presented. We suggest several advantages associated with the use of semantic processing tasks, particularly those based on person identification, in comparison to episodic memory tasks to study AD risk. Future directions for research and potential clinical uses of semantic memory paradigms are also discussed. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Imaging Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative disease

    ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ตฐ์ง‘ํ™” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ FDG PET์—์„œ ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ๋‡Œ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ํŒจํ„ด์˜ ํŠน์ง•์  ์•„ํ˜• ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์œตํ•ฉ๊ณผํ•™๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ๋ถ„์ž์˜ํ•™ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ”์ด์˜ค์ œ์•ฝํ•™๊ณผ, 2022.2. ์ด๋™์ˆ˜.์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์€ ์•„๋ฐ€๋กœ์ด๋“œ์™€ ํƒ€์šฐ ์นจ์ฐฉ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ณ‘๋ฆฌํ•™์  ํŠน์ง•์„ ๊ณต์œ ํ•จ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์ž„์ƒ๋ณ‘๋ฆฌํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ตฐ์ง‘ํ™” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ FDG PET ์˜์ƒ์—์„œ ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘ ํŠน์ง•์  ์•„ํ˜•์„ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ ํ‡ดํ–‰์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ๋‡Œ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ๋‡Œ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ํŒจํ„ด์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ •์˜๋œ ์•„ํ˜•์˜ ์ž„์ƒ๋ณ‘๋ฆฌํ•™์  ํŠน์ง•์„ ๋ฐํžˆ๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Alzheimerโ€™s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative(ADNI) ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ฒซ๋ฒˆ์งธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธ ๋ฐ ์ถ”์  ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘, ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€์žฅ์• , ์ธ์ง€ ์ •์ƒ๊ตฐ์˜ ์ด 3620๊ฐœ์˜ FDG ๋‡Œ ์–‘์ „์ž๋‹จ์ธต์ดฌ์˜(PET) ์˜์ƒ์„ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์—์„œ ์งˆ๋ณ‘์˜ ์ง„ํ–‰ ์™ธ์˜ ๋‡Œ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ํ‘œํ˜„(representation)์„ ์ฐพ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์กฐ๊ฑด๋ถ€ ๋ณ€์ดํ˜• ์˜คํ† ์ธ์ฝ”๋”(conditional variational autoencoder)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉ๋œ ํ‘œํ˜„์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ตฐ์ง‘ํ™”(clustering)๋ฅผ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์˜ ๋‡Œ FDG PET (n=838)๊ณผ CDR-SB(Clinical Demetria Rating Scale Sum of Boxes) ์ ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ cVAE ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์ž…๋ ฅ๊ฐ’์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ตฐ์ง‘ํ™”์—๋Š” k-means ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ›ˆ๋ จ๋œ ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€์žฅ์• ๊ตฐ (n=1761)์˜ ๋‡Œ FDG PET์— ์ „์ด(transfer)๋˜์–ด ๊ฐ ์•„ํ˜•์˜ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ถค์ (trajectory)๊ณผ ์˜ˆํ›„๋ฅผ ๋ฐํžˆ๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ†ต๊ณ„์  ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ ์ง€๋„์ž‘์„ฑ๋ฒ•(Statistical Parametric Mapping, SPM)์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ ๊ตฐ์ง‘์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ํŒจํ„ด์„ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™” ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฐ ๊ตฐ์ง‘์˜ ์ž„์ƒ์  ๋ฐ ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ํŠน์ง•์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์•„ํ˜• ๋ณ„ ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€์žฅ์• ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์œผ๋กœ ์ „ํ™˜๋˜๋Š” ๋น„์œจ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ตฐ์ง‘ํ™” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ 4๊ฐœ์˜ ํŠน์ง•์  ์•„ํ˜•์ด ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. (i) S1 (angular): ๋ชจ์ด๋ž‘(angular gyrus)์—์„œ ํ˜„์ €ํ•œ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ๋œ ํ”ผ์งˆ์˜ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ์ €ํ•˜ ํŒจํ„ด, ๋‚จ์„ฑ์—์„œ ๋นˆ๋„ ๋†’์Œ, ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์•„๋ฐ€๋กœ์ด๋“œ ์นจ์ฐฉ, ๋” ์ ์€ ํƒ€์šฐ ์นจ์ฐฉ, ๋” ์‹ฌํ•œ ํ•ด๋งˆ ์œ„์ถ•, ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์˜ ์ธ์ง€ ์ €ํ•˜์˜ ํŠน์ง•์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. (ii) S2 (occipital): ํ›„๋‘์—ฝ(occipital) ํ”ผ์งˆ์—์„œ ํ˜„์ €ํ•œ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ ํ›„๋ถ€ ์šฐ์„ธํ•œ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ์ €ํ•˜ ํŒจํ„ด, ๋” ์ ์€ ์—ฐ๋ น, ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ํƒ€์šฐ, ๋” ์ ์€ ํ•ด๋งˆ ์œ„์ถ•, ๋” ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ง‘ํ–‰ ๋ฐ ์‹œ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ ์ˆ˜, ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€์žฅ์• ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์œผ๋กœ์˜ ๋น ๋ฅธ ์ „ํ™˜์˜ ํŠน์ง•์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. (iii) S3(orbitofrontal): ์•ˆ์™€์ „๋‘(orbitofrontal) ํ”ผ์งˆ์—์„œ ํ˜„์ €ํ•œ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ ์ „๋ฐฉ ์šฐ์„ธํ•œ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ์ €ํ•˜ ํŒจํ„ด, ๋” ๋†’์€ ์—ฐ๋ น, ๋” ์ ์€ ์•„๋ฐ€๋กœ์ด๋“œ ์นจ์ฐฉ, ๋” ์‹ฌํ•œ ํ•ด๋งˆ ์œ„์ถ•, ๋” ๋†’์€ ์ง‘ํ–‰ ๋ฐ ์‹œ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ ์ˆ˜์˜ ํŠน์ง•์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. (iv) S4(minimal): ์ตœ์†Œ์˜ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ ์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ž„, ์—ฌ์„ฑ์—์„œ ๋นˆ๋„ ๋†’์Œ, ๋” ์ ์€ ์•„๋ฐ€๋กœ์ด๋“œ ์นจ์ฐฉ, ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ํƒ€์šฐ ์นจ์ฐฉ, ๋” ์ ์€ ํ•ด๋งˆ ์œ„์ถ•, ๋” ๋†’์€ ์ธ์ง€๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ์ ์ˆ˜์˜ ํŠน์ง•์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋‡Œ ๋ณ‘๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ์ž„์ƒ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์˜ ํŠน์ง•์  ์•„ํ˜•์„ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€์žฅ์• ๊ตฐ์— ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ „์ด๋˜์–ด ์•„ํ˜• ๋ณ„ ๊ฒฝ๋„์ธ์ง€์žฅ์• ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์œผ๋กœ ์ „ํ™˜๋˜๋Š” ์˜ˆํ›„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” FDG PET์—์„œ ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์˜ ํŠน์ง•์  ์•„ํ˜•์€ ๊ฐœ์ธ์˜ ์ž„์ƒ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ , ๋ณ‘ํƒœ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์•Œ์ธ ํ•˜์ด๋จธ๋ณ‘์˜ ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ์ŠคํŽ™ํŠธ๋Ÿผ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๋‹จ์„œ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค.Alzheimerโ€™s disease (AD) presents a broad spectrum of clinicopathologic profiles, despite common pathologic features including amyloid and tau deposition. Here, we aimed to identify AD subtypes using deep learning-based clustering on FDG PET images to understand distinct spatial patterns of neurodegeneration. We also aimed to investigate clinicopathologic features of subtypes defined by spatial brain metabolism patterns. A total of 3620 FDG brain PET images with AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and cognitively normal controls (CN) at baseline and follow-up visits were obtained from Alzheimerโ€™s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. In order to identify representations of brain metabolism patterns different from disease progression in AD, a conditional variational autoencoder (cVAE) was used, followed by clustering using the encoded representations. FDG brain PET images with AD (n=838) and Clinical Demetria Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) scores were used as inputs of cVAE model and the k-means algorithm was applied for the clustering. The trained deep learning model was also transferred to FDG brain PET image with MCI (n=1761) to identify differential trajectories and prognosis of subtypes. Statistical parametric maps were generated to visualize spatial patterns of clusters, and clinical and biological characteristics were compared among the clusters. The conversion rate from MCI to AD was also compared among the subtypes. Four distinct subtypes were identified by deep learning-based FDG PET clusters: (i) S1 (angular), showing prominent hypometabolism in the angular gyrus with a diffuse cortical hypometabolism pattern; frequent in males; more amyloid; less tau; more hippocampal atrophy; cognitive decline in the earlier stage. (ii) S2 (occipital), showing prominent hypometabolism in the occipital cortex with a posterior-predominant hypometabolism pattern; younger age; more tau; less hippocampal atrophy; lower executive and visuospatial scores; faster conversion from MCI to AD. (iii) S3 (orbitofrontal), showing prominent hypometabolism in the orbitofrontal cortex with an anterior-predominant hypometabolism pattern; older age; less amyloid; more hippocampal atrophy; higher executive and visuospatial scores. (iv) S4 (minimal), showing minimal hypometabolism; frequent in females; less amyloid; more tau; less hippocampal atrophy; higher cognitive scores. In conclusion, we could identify distinct subtypes in AD with different brain pathologies and clinical profiles. Also, our deep learning model was successfully transferred to MCI to predict the prognosis of subtypes for conversion from MCI to AD. Our results suggest that distinct AD subtypes on FDG PET may have implications for the individual clinical outcomes and provide a clue to understanding a broad spectrum of AD in terms of pathophysiology.1. Introduction 1 1.1 Heterogeneity of Alzheimer's disease 1 1.2 FDG PET as a biomarker of Alzheimer's disease 1 1.3 Biologic subtypes of Alzheimer's disease 2 1.4 Dimensionality reduction methods 5 1.5 Variational autoencoder for clustering 8 1.6 Final goal of the study 10 2. Methods 11 2.1 Subjects 11 2.2 FDG PET data acquisition and preprocessing 12 2.3 Deep learning-based model for representations of FDG PET in AD 12 2.4 Clustering method for AD subtypes on FDG PET 17 2.5 Transfer of deep learning-based FDG PET cluster model for MCI subtypes 17 2.6 Visualization of subtype-specific spatial brain metabolism pattern 21 2.7 Clinical and biological characterization 21 2.8 Prognosis prediction of MCI subtypes 22 2.9 Generation of subtype-specific FDG PET images 22 2.10 Statistical analysis 23 3. Results 24 3.1 Deep learning-based FDG PET clusters 24 3.2 Spatial brain metabolism pattern in AD subtypes 27 3.3 Clinical and biological characterization in AD subtypes 32 3.4 Subtype-specific spatial metabolism patterns resemble in MCI 43 3.5 Clinical and biological characterization in MCI subtypes 50 3.6 Prognosis prediction of subtypes for conversion from MCI to AD 56 3.7 Generating FDG PET images of AD subtypes 61 4. Discussion 66 4.1 Limitations of previous subtyping approach 68 4.2 Interpretation of results 68 4.3 Strength of our deep learning-based clustering approach 73 4.4 Strength of our deep learning-based AD subtypes 77 4.5 Limitations and future directions 82 5. Conclusion 83 References 84 Supplementary Figures 99 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ ์ดˆ๋ก 101๋ฐ•

    Multimodal brain imaging reveals structural differences in Alzheimer's disease polygenic risk carriers: A study in healthy young adults

    Get PDF
    Background Recent genome-wide association studies have identified genetic loci that jointly make a considerable contribution to risk of developing Alzheimerโ€™s disease (AD). Because neuropathological features of AD can be present several decades before disease onset, we investigated whether effects of polygenic risk are detectable by neuroimaging in young adults. We hypothesized that higher polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for AD would be associated with reduced volume of the hippocampus and other limbic and paralimbic areas. We further hypothesized that AD PRSs would affect the microstructure of fiber tracts connecting the hippocampus with other brain areas. Methods We analyzed the association between AD PRSs and brain imaging parameters using T1-weighted structural (n = 272) and diffusion-weighted scans (n = 197). Results We found a significant association between AD PRSs and left hippocampal volume, with higher risk associated with lower left hippocampal volume (p = .001). This effect remained when the APOE gene was excluded (p = .031), suggesting that the relationship between hippocampal volume and AD is the result of multiple genetic factors and not exclusively variability in the APOE gene. The diffusion tensor imaging analysis revealed that fractional anisotropy of the right cingulum was inversely correlated with AD PRSs (p = .009). We thus show that polygenic effects of AD risk variants on brain structure can already be detected in young adults. Conclusions This finding paves the way for further investigation of the effects of AD risk variants and may become useful for efforts to combine genotypic and phenotypic data for risk prediction and to enrich future prevention trials of AD
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore