8,570 research outputs found
Locating and Total Dominating Sets of Direct Products of Complete Graphs
A set S of vertices in a graph G = (V,E) is a metric-locating-total dominating set of G if every vertex of V is adjacent to a vertex in S and for every u ≠v in V there is a vertex x in S such that d(u,x) ≠d(v,x). The metric-location-total domination number \gamma^M_t(G) of G is the minimum cardinality of a metric-locating-total dominating set in G. For graphs G and H, the direct product G × H is the graph with vertex set V(G) × V(H) where two vertices (x,y) and (v,w) are adjacent if and only if xv in E(G) and yw in E(H). In this paper, we determine the lower bound of the metric-location-total domination number of the direct products of complete graphs. We also determine some exact values for some direct products of two complete graphs
Locating-total dominating sets in twin-free graphs: a conjecture
A total dominating set of a graph is a set of vertices of such
that every vertex of has a neighbor in . A locating-total dominating set
of is a total dominating set of with the additional property that
every two distinct vertices outside have distinct neighbors in ; that
is, for distinct vertices and outside , where denotes the open neighborhood of . A graph is twin-free if
every two distinct vertices have distinct open and closed neighborhoods. The
location-total domination number of , denoted , is the minimum
cardinality of a locating-total dominating set in . It is well-known that
every connected graph of order has a total dominating set of size at
most . We conjecture that if is a twin-free graph of order
with no isolated vertex, then . We prove the
conjecture for graphs without -cycles as a subgraph. We also prove that if
is a twin-free graph of order , then .Comment: 18 pages, 1 figur
Location-domination in line graphs
A set of vertices of a graph is locating if every two distinct
vertices outside have distinct neighbors in ; that is, for distinct
vertices and outside , , where
denotes the open neighborhood of . If is also a dominating set (total
dominating set), it is called a locating-dominating set (respectively,
locating-total dominating set) of . A graph is twin-free if every two
distinct vertices of have distinct open and closed neighborhoods. It is
conjectured [D. Garijo, A. Gonzalez and A. Marquez, The difference between the
metric dimension and the determining number of a graph. Applied Mathematics and
Computation 249 (2014), 487--501] and [F. Foucaud and M. A. Henning.
Locating-total dominating sets in twin-free graphs: a conjecture. The
Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 23 (2016), P3.9] respectively, that any
twin-free graph without isolated vertices has a locating-dominating set of
size at most one-half its order and a locating-total dominating set of size at
most two-thirds its order. In this paper, we prove these two conjectures for
the class of line graphs. Both bounds are tight for this class, in the sense
that there are infinitely many connected line graphs for which equality holds
in the bounds.Comment: 23 pages, 2 figure
Locating-dominating sets in twin-free graphs
A locating-dominating set of a graph is a dominating set of with
the additional property that every two distinct vertices outside have
distinct neighbors in ; that is, for distinct vertices and outside
, where denotes the open neighborhood
of . A graph is twin-free if every two distinct vertices have distinct open
and closed neighborhoods. The location-domination number of , denoted
, is the minimum cardinality of a locating-dominating set in .
It is conjectured [D. Garijo, A. Gonz\'alez and A. M\'arquez. The difference
between the metric dimension and the determining number of a graph. Applied
Mathematics and Computation 249 (2014), 487--501] that if is a twin-free
graph of order without isolated vertices, then . We prove the general bound ,
slightly improving over the bound of Garijo et
al. We then provide constructions of graphs reaching the bound,
showing that if the conjecture is true, the family of extremal graphs is a very
rich one. Moreover, we characterize the trees that are extremal for this
bound. We finally prove the conjecture for split graphs and co-bipartite
graphs.Comment: 11 pages; 4 figure
Resolving sets for breaking symmetries of graphs
This paper deals with the maximum value of the difference between the
determining number and the metric dimension of a graph as a function of its
order. Our technique requires to use locating-dominating sets, and perform an
independent study on other functions related to these sets. Thus, we obtain
lower and upper bounds on all these functions by means of very diverse tools.
Among them are some adequate constructions of graphs, a variant of a classical
result in graph domination and a polynomial time algorithm that produces both
distinguishing sets and determining sets. Further, we consider specific
families of graphs where the restrictions of these functions can be computed.
To this end, we utilize two well-known objects in graph theory: -dominating
sets and matchings.Comment: 24 pages, 12 figure
Locating-dominating sets and identifying codes in graphs of girth at least 5
Locating-dominating sets and identifying codes are two closely related
notions in the area of separating systems. Roughly speaking, they consist in a
dominating set of a graph such that every vertex is uniquely identified by its
neighbourhood within the dominating set. In this paper, we study the size of a
smallest locating-dominating set or identifying code for graphs of girth at
least 5 and of given minimum degree. We use the technique of vertex-disjoint
paths to provide upper bounds on the minimum size of such sets, and construct
graphs who come close to meet these bounds.Comment: 20 pages, 9 figure
Coloring, location and domination of corona graphs
A vertex coloring of a graph is an assignment of colors to the vertices
of such that every two adjacent vertices of have different colors. A
coloring related property of a graphs is also an assignment of colors or labels
to the vertices of a graph, in which the process of labeling is done according
to an extra condition. A set of vertices of a graph is a dominating set
in if every vertex outside of is adjacent to at least one vertex
belonging to . A domination parameter of is related to those structures
of a graph satisfying some domination property together with other conditions
on the vertices of . In this article we study several mathematical
properties related to coloring, domination and location of corona graphs.
We investigate the distance- colorings of corona graphs. Particularly, we
obtain tight bounds for the distance-2 chromatic number and distance-3
chromatic number of corona graphs, throughout some relationships between the
distance- chromatic number of corona graphs and the distance- chromatic
number of its factors. Moreover, we give the exact value of the distance-
chromatic number of the corona of a path and an arbitrary graph. On the other
hand, we obtain bounds for the Roman dominating number and the
locating-domination number of corona graphs. We give closed formulaes for the
-domination number, the distance- domination number, the independence
domination number, the domatic number and the idomatic number of corona graphs.Comment: 18 page
New results on metric-locating-dominating sets of graphs
A dominating set of a graph is a metric-locating-dominating set if each
vertex of the graph is uniquely distinguished by its distances from the
elements of , and the minimum cardinality of such a set is called the
metric-location-domination number. In this paper, we undertake a study that, in
general graphs and specific families, relates metric-locating-dominating sets
to other special sets: resolving sets, dominating sets, locating-dominating
sets and doubly resolving sets. We first characterize classes of trees
according to certain relationships between their metric-location-domination
number and their metric dimension and domination number. Then, we show
different methods to transform metric-locating-dominating sets into
locating-dominating sets and doubly resolving sets. Our methods produce new
bounds on the minimum cardinalities of all those sets, some of them involving
parameters that have not been related so far.Comment: 13 pages, 3 figure
- …