Locally checkable proofs

This work studies decision problems from the perspective of nondeterministic distributed algorithms. For a yes-instance there must exist a proof that can be verified with a distributed algorithm: all nodes must accept a valid proof, and at least one node must reject an invalid proof. We focus on locally checkable proofs that can be verified with a constant-time distributed algorithm. For example, it is easy to prove that a graph is bipartite: the locally checkable proof gives a 2-colouring of the graph, which only takes 1 bit per node. However, it is more difficult to prove that a graph is not bipartite—it turns out that any locally checkable proof requires Ω(log n) bits per node. In this work we classify graph problems according to their local proof complexity, i.e., how many bits per node are needed in a locally checkable proof. We establish tight or near-tight results for classical graph properties such as the chromatic number. We show that the proof complexities form a natural hierarchy of complexity classes: for many classical graph problems, the proof complexity is either 0, Θ(1), Θ(log n), or poly(n) bits per node. Among the most difficult graph properties are symmetric graphs, which require Ω(n2) bits per node, and non-3-colourable graphs, which require Ω(n2/log n) bits per node—any pure graph property admits a trivial proof of size O(n2).Peer reviewe

Brief Announcement: Distributed Quantum Proofs for Replicated Data

This paper tackles the issue of checking that all copies of a large data set replicated at several nodes of a network are identical. The fact that the replicas may be located at distant nodes prevents the system from verifying their equality locally, i.e., by having each node consult only nodes in its vicinity. On the other hand, it remains possible to assign certificates to the nodes, so that verifying the consistency of the replicas can be achieved locally. However, we show that, as the replicated data is large, classical certification mechanisms, including distributed Merlin-Arthur protocols, cannot guarantee good completeness and soundness simultaneously, unless they use very large certificates. The main result of this paper is a distributed quantum Merlin-Arthur protocol enabling the nodes to collectively check the consistency of the replicas, based on small certificates, and in a single round of message exchange between neighbors, with short messages. In particular, the certificate-size is logarithmic in the size of the data set, which gives an exponential advantage over classical certification mechanisms

Trade-Offs in Distributed Interactive Proofs

The study of interactive proofs in the context of distributed network computing is a novel topic, recently introduced by Kol, Oshman, and Saxena [PODC 2018]. In the spirit of sequential interactive proofs theory, we study the power of distributed interactive proofs. This is achieved via a series of results establishing trade-offs between various parameters impacting the power of interactive proofs, including the number of interactions, the certificate size, the communication complexity, and the form of randomness used. Our results also connect distributed interactive proofs with the established field of distributed verification. In general, our results contribute to providing structure to the landscape of distributed interactive proofs

New Classes of Distributed Time Complexity

A number of recent papers -- e.g. Brandt et al. (STOC 2016), Chang et al. (FOCS 2016), Ghaffari & Su (SODA 2017), Brandt et al. (PODC 2017), and Chang & Pettie (FOCS 2017) -- have advanced our understanding of one of the most fundamental questions in theory of distributed computing: what are the possible time complexity classes of LCL problems in the LOCAL model? In essence, we have a graph problem $\Pi$ in which a solution can be verified by checking all radius-$O(1)$ neighbourhoods, and the question is what is the smallest $T$ such that a solution can be computed so that each node chooses its own output based on its radius-$T$ neighbourhood. Here $T$ is the distributed time complexity of $\Pi$. The time complexity classes for deterministic algorithms in bounded-degree graphs that are known to exist by prior work are $\Theta(1)$, $\Theta(\log^* n)$, $\Theta(\log n)$, $\Theta(n^{1/k})$, and $\Theta(n)$. It is also known that there are two gaps: one between $\omega(1)$ and $o(\log \log^* n)$, and another between $\omega(\log^* n)$ and $o(\log n)$. It has been conjectured that many more gaps exist, and that the overall time hierarchy is relatively simple -- indeed, this is known to be the case in restricted graph families such as cycles and grids. We show that the picture is much more diverse than previously expected. We present a general technique for engineering LCL problems with numerous different deterministic time complexities, including $\Theta(\log^{\alpha}n)$ for any $\alpha\ge1$, $2^{\Theta(\log^{\alpha}n)}$ for any $\alpha\le 1$, and $\Theta(n^{\alpha})$ for any $\alpha <1/2$ in the high end of the complexity spectrum, and $\Theta(\log^{\alpha}\log^* n)$ for any $\alpha\ge 1$, $\smash{2^{\Theta(\log^{\alpha}\log^* n)}}$ for any $\alpha\le 1$, and $\Theta((\log^* n)^{\alpha})$ for any $\alpha \le 1$ in the low end; here $\alpha$ is a positive rational number

Space-Time Tradeoffs for Distributed Verification

Verifying that a network configuration satisfies a given boolean predicate is a fundamental problem in distributed computing. Many variations of this problem have been studied, for example, in the context of proof labeling schemes (PLS), locally checkable proofs (LCP), and non-deterministic local decision (NLD). In all of these contexts, verification time is assumed to be constant. Korman, Kutten and Masuzawa [PODC 2011] presented a proof-labeling scheme for MST, with poly-logarithmic verification time, and logarithmic memory at each vertex. In this paper we introduce the notion of a $t$-PLS, which allows the verification procedure to run for super-constant time. Our work analyzes the tradeoffs of $t$-PLS between time, label size, message length, and computation space. We construct a universal $t$-PLS and prove that it uses the same amount of total communication as a known one-round universal PLS, and $t$ factor smaller labels. In addition, we provide a general technique to prove lower bounds for space-time tradeoffs of $t$-PLS. We use this technique to show an optimal tradeoff for testing that a network is acyclic (cycle free). Our optimal $t$-PLS for acyclicity uses label size and computation space $O((\log n)/t)$. We further describe a recursive $O(\log^* n)$ space verifier for acyclicity which does not assume previous knowledge of the run-time $t$.Comment: Pre-proceedings version of paper presented at the 24th International Colloquium on Structural Information and Communication Complexity (SIROCCO 2017

Planarity is (almost) locally checkable in constant-time

Locally checkable proofs for graph properties were introduced by G\"o\"os and Suomela \cite{GS}. Roughly speaking, a graph property \cP is locally checkable in constant-time, if the vertices of a graph having the property can be convinced, in a short period of time not depending on the size of the graph, that they are indeed vertices of a graph having the given property. For a given \eps>0, we call a property \cP \eps-locally checkable in constant-time if the vertices of a graph having the given property can be convinced at least that they are in a graph \eps-close to the given property. We say that a property \cP is almost locally checkable in constant-time, if for all \eps>0, \cP is \eps-locally checkable in constant-time. It is not hard to see that in the universe of bounded degree graphs planarity is not locally checkable in constant-time. However, the main result of this paper is that planarity of bounded degree graphs is almost locally checkable in constant-time. The proof is based on the surprising fact that although graphs cannot be convinced by their planarity or hyperfiniteness, planar graphs can be convinced by their own hyperfiniteness. The reason behind this fact is that the class of planar graphs are not only hyperfinite but possesses Property A of Yu.Comment: 13 page

Brief Announcement: Local Certification of Graph Decompositions and Applications to Minor-Free Classes

Local certification consists in assigning labels to the nodes of a network to certify that some given property is satisfied, in such a way that the labels can be checked locally. In the last few years, certification of graph classes received a considerable attention. The goal is to certify that a graph G belongs to a given graph class ?. Such certifications with labels of size O(log n) (where n is the size of the network) exist for trees, planar graphs and graphs embedded on surfaces. Feuilloley et al. ask if this can be extended to any class of graphs defined by a finite set of forbidden minors. In this paper, we develop new decomposition tools for graph certification, and apply them to show that for every small enough minor H, H-minor-free graphs can indeed be certified with labels of size O(log n). We also show matching lower bounds with a new simple proof technique

Brief Announcement: Distributed Quantum Interactive Proofs

The study of distributed interactive proofs was initiated by Kol, Oshman, and Saxena [PODC 2018] as a generalization of distributed decision mechanisms (proof-labeling schemes, etc.), and has received a lot of attention in recent years. In distributed interactive proofs, the nodes of an n-node network G can exchange short messages (called certificates) with a powerful prover. The goal is to decide if the input (including G itself) belongs to some language, with as few turns of interaction and as few bits exchanged between nodes and the prover as possible. There are several results showing that the size of certificates can be reduced drastically with a constant number of interactions compared to non-interactive distributed proofs. In this brief announcement, we introduce the quantum counterpart of distributed interactive proofs: certificates can now be quantum bits, and the nodes of the network can perform quantum computation. The main result of this paper shows that by using quantum distributed interactive proofs, the number of interactions can be significantly reduced. More precisely, our main result shows that for any constant k, the class of languages that can be decided by a k-turn classical (i.e., non-quantum) distributed interactive protocol with f(n)-bit certificate size is contained in the class of languages that can be decided by a 5-turn distributed quantum interactive protocol with O(f(n))-bit certificate size. We also show that if we allow to use shared randomness, the number of turns can be reduced to 3-turn. Since no similar turn-reduction classical technique is currently known, our result gives evidence of the power of quantum computation in the setting of distributed interactive proofs as well