101 research outputs found

    COLAB:A Collaborative Multi-factor Scheduler for Asymmetric Multicore Processors

    Get PDF
    Funding: Partially funded by the UK EPSRC grants Discovery: Pattern Discovery and Program Shaping for Many-core Systems (EP/P020631/1) and ABC: Adaptive Brokerage for Cloud (EP/R010528/1); Royal Academy of Engineering under the Research Fellowship scheme.Increasingly prevalent asymmetric multicore processors (AMP) are necessary for delivering performance in the era of limited power budget and dark silicon. However, the software fails to use them efficiently. OS schedulers, in particular, handle asymmetry only under restricted scenarios. We have efficient symmetric schedulers, efficient asymmetric schedulers for single-threaded workloads, and efficient asymmetric schedulers for single program workloads. What we do not have is a scheduler that can handle all runtime factors affecting AMP for multi-threaded multi-programmed workloads. This paper introduces the first general purpose asymmetry-aware scheduler for multi-threaded multi-programmed workloads. It estimates the performance of each thread on each type of core and identifies communication patterns and bottleneck threads. The scheduler then makes coordinated core assignment and thread selection decisions that still provide each application its fair share of the processor's time. We evaluate our approach using the GEM5 simulator on four distinct big.LITTLE configurations and 26 mixed workloads composed of PARSEC and SPLASH2 benchmarks. Compared to the state-of-the art Linux CFS and AMP-aware schedulers, we demonstrate performance gains of up to 25% and 5% to 15% on average depending on the hardware setup.Postprin

    PMCTrack: Delivering performance monitoring counter support to the OS scheduler

    Get PDF
    Hardware performance monitoring counters (PMCs) have proven effective in characterizing application performance. Because PMCs can only be accessed directly at the OS privilege level, kernellevel tools must be developed to enable the end-user and userspace programs to access PMCs. A large body of work has demonstrated that the OS can perform effective runtime optimizations in multicore systems by leveraging performance-counter data. Special attention has been paid to optimizations in the OS scheduler. While existing performance monitoring tools greatly simplify the collection of PMC application data from userspace, they do not provide an architecture-agnostic kernel-level mechanism that is capable of exposing high-level PMC metrics to OS components, such as the scheduler. As a result, the implementation of PMC-based OS scheduling schemes is typically tied to specific processor models. To address this shortcoming we present PMCTrack, a novel tool for the Linux kernel that provides a simple architecture-independent mechanism that makes it possible for the OS scheduler to access per-thread PMC data. Despite being an OSoriented tool, PMCTrack still allows the gathering of monitoring data from userspace, enabling kernel developers to carry out the necessary offline analysis and debugging to assist them during the scheduler design process. In addition, the tool provides both the OS and the user-space PMCTrack components with other insightful metrics available in modern processors and which are not directly exposed as PMCs, such as cache occupancy or energy consumption. This information is also of great value when it comes to analyzing the potential benefits of novel scheduling policies on real systems. In this paper, we analyze different case studies that demonstrate the flexibility, simplicity and powerful features of PMCTrack.Facultad de InformáticaInstituto de Investigación en Informátic

    PMCTrack: Delivering performance monitoring counter support to the OS scheduler

    Get PDF
    Hardware performance monitoring counters (PMCs) have proven effective in characterizing application performance. Because PMCs can only be accessed directly at the OS privilege level, kernellevel tools must be developed to enable the end-user and userspace programs to access PMCs. A large body of work has demonstrated that the OS can perform effective runtime optimizations in multicore systems by leveraging performance-counter data. Special attention has been paid to optimizations in the OS scheduler. While existing performance monitoring tools greatly simplify the collection of PMC application data from userspace, they do not provide an architecture-agnostic kernel-level mechanism that is capable of exposing high-level PMC metrics to OS components, such as the scheduler. As a result, the implementation of PMC-based OS scheduling schemes is typically tied to specific processor models. To address this shortcoming we present PMCTrack, a novel tool for the Linux kernel that provides a simple architecture-independent mechanism that makes it possible for the OS scheduler to access per-thread PMC data. Despite being an OSoriented tool, PMCTrack still allows the gathering of monitoring data from userspace, enabling kernel developers to carry out the necessary offline analysis and debugging to assist them during the scheduler design process. In addition, the tool provides both the OS and the user-space PMCTrack components with other insightful metrics available in modern processors and which are not directly exposed as PMCs, such as cache occupancy or energy consumption. This information is also of great value when it comes to analyzing the potential benefits of novel scheduling policies on real systems. In this paper, we analyze different case studies that demonstrate the flexibility, simplicity and powerful features of PMCTrack.Facultad de InformáticaInstituto de Investigación en Informátic

    Planificación consciente de la contención y gestión de recursos en arquitecturas multicore emergentes

    Get PDF
    Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Informática, Departamento de Arquitectura de Computadores y Automática, leída el 14-12-2021Chip multicore processors (CMPs) currently constitute the architecture of choice for mosto general-pùrpose computing systems, and they will likely continue to be dominant in the near future. Advances in technology have enabled to pack an increasing number of cores and bigger caches on the same chip. Nevertheless, contention on shared resources on CMPs -present since the advent of these architectures- still poses a big challenge. Cores in a CMP typically share a last-level cache (LLC) and other memory-related resources with the remaining cores, such as a DRAM controller and an interconnection network. This causes that co-running applications may intensively compete with each other for these shared resources, leading to substantial and uneven performance degradation...Los procesadores multinúcleo o CMPs (Chip Multicore Processors) son actualmente la arquitectura más usada por la mayoría de sistemas de computación de propósito general, y muy probablemente se mantendrían en esa posición dominante en el futuro cercano. Los avances tecnológicos han permitido integrar progresivamente en el mismo chip más cores y aumentar los tamaños de los distintos niveles de cache. No obstante, la contención de recursos compartidos en CMPs {presente desde la aparición de estas arquitecturas{ todavía representa un reto importante que afrontar. Los cores en un CMP comparten en la mayor parte de los diseños una cache de último nivel o LLC (Last-Level Cache) y otros recursos, como el controlador de DRAM o una red de interconexión. La existencia de dichos recursos compartidos provoca en ocasiones que cuando se ejecutan dos o más aplicaciones simultáneamente en el sistema, se produzca una degradación sustancial y potencialmente desigual del rendimiento entre aplicaciones...Fac. de InformáticaTRUEunpu

    Collaborative Heterogeneity-Aware OS Scheduler for Asymmetric Multicore Processors

    Get PDF
    Funding: This work is supported in part by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2020TQ0169), the ShuiMu Tsinghua Scholar fellowship (2019SM131), National Key R&D Program of China (2020AAA0105200), National Natural Science Foundation of China (U20A20226), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (4202031), Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence BAAI), the UK EPSRC grants Discovery: Pattern Discovery and Program Shaping for Manycore Systems (EP/P020631/1). This work is also supported by the Royal Academy of Engineering under the Research Fellowship scheme.Asymmetric multicore processors (AMP) offer multiple types of cores under the same programming interface. Extracting the full potential of AMPs requires intelligent scheduling decisions, matching each thread with the right kind of core, the core that will maximize performance or minimize wasted energy for this thread. Existing OS schedulers are not up to this task. While they may handle certain aspects of asymmetry in the system, none can handle all runtime factors affecting AMPs for the general case of multi-threaded multi-programmed workloads. We address this problem by introducing COLAB, a general purpose asymmetry-aware scheduler targeting multi-threaded multi-programmed workloads. It estimates the performance and power of each thread on each type of core and identifies communication patterns and bottleneck threads. With this information, the scheduler makes coordinated core assignment and thread selection decisions that still provide each application its fair share of the processor’s time. We evaluate our approach using both the GEM5 simulator on four distinct big.LITTLE configurations and a development board with ARM Cortex-A73/A53 processors and mixed workloads composed of PARSEC and SPLASH2 benchmarks. Compared to the state-of-the art Linux CFS and AMP-aware schedulers, we demonstrate performance gains of up to 25% and 5% to 15% on average,together with an average 5% energy saving depending on the hardware setup.PostprintPeer reviewe

    PMCTrack: Delivering performance monitoring counter support to the OS scheduler

    Get PDF
    Hardware performance monitoring counters (PMCs) have proven effective in characterizing application performance. Because PMCs can only be accessed directly at the OS privilege level, kernellevel tools must be developed to enable the end-user and userspace programs to access PMCs. A large body of work has demonstrated that the OS can perform effective runtime optimizations in multicore systems by leveraging performance-counter data. Special attention has been paid to optimizations in the OS scheduler. While existing performance monitoring tools greatly simplify the collection of PMC application data from userspace, they do not provide an architecture-agnostic kernel-level mechanism that is capable of exposing high-level PMC metrics to OS components, such as the scheduler. As a result, the implementation of PMC-based OS scheduling schemes is typically tied to specific processor models. To address this shortcoming we present PMCTrack, a novel tool for the Linux kernel that provides a simple architecture-independent mechanism that makes it possible for the OS scheduler to access per-thread PMC data. Despite being an OSoriented tool, PMCTrack still allows the gathering of monitoring data from userspace, enabling kernel developers to carry out the necessary offline analysis and debugging to assist them during the scheduler design process. In addition, the tool provides both the OS and the user-space PMCTrack components with other insightful metrics available in modern processors and which are not directly exposed as PMCs, such as cache occupancy or energy consumption. This information is also of great value when it comes to analyzing the potential benefits of novel scheduling policies on real systems. In this paper, we analyze different case studies that demonstrate the flexibility, simplicity and powerful features of PMCTrack.Facultad de InformáticaInstituto de Investigación en Informátic

    Evaluación de algoritmos de planificación sobre un prototipo de sistema multicore asimétrico

    Get PDF
    Los procesadores multicore asimétricos con repertorio común de instrucciones -AMPs (Asymmetric Multicore Processors)-han sido propuestos como alternativa de bajo consumo a los procesadores multicore simétricos convencionales. Los AMPs combinan cores rápidos y complejos, de alto rendimiento, con cores lentos de consumo reducido. Trabajos previos han propuesto distintos algoritmos de planificación para AMPs, que en su mayoría han sido evaluados empleando plataformas asimétricas emuladas o simuladores. En este artículo se lleva a cabo un análisis experimental de algunas de las estrategias de planificación más relevantes para AMPs sobre el Intel QuickIA, un prototipo de sistema multicore asimétrico. Para el análisis se han realizado implementaciones de estas estrategias en un sistema operativo real y se lleva a cabo una evaluación completa de las mismas empleando cargas de trabajo multiprogramadas. Un aspecto clave de la implementación de los algoritmos es la metodología que se propone para aproximar en tiempo de ejecución el beneficio relativo que una aplicación obtiene al ejecutar en un core rápido con respecto a un core lento.IX Workshop en Arquitectura, Redes y Sistemas OperativosRed de Universidades con Carreras de Informática (RedUNCI
    corecore