78 research outputs found

    Treebank-based acquisition of a Chinese lexical-functional grammar

    Get PDF
    Scaling wide-coverage, constraint-based grammars such as Lexical-Functional Grammars (LFG) (Kaplan and Bresnan, 1982; Bresnan, 2001) or Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammars (HPSG) (Pollard and Sag, 1994) from fragments to naturally occurring unrestricted text is knowledge-intensive, time-consuming and (often prohibitively) expensive. A number of researchers have recently presented methods to automatically acquire wide-coverage, probabilistic constraint-based grammatical resources from treebanks (Cahill et al., 2002, Cahill et al., 2003; Cahill et al., 2004; Miyao et al., 2003; Miyao et al., 2004; Hockenmaier and Steedman, 2002; Hockenmaier, 2003), addressing the knowledge acquisition bottleneck in constraint-based grammar development. Research to date has concentrated on English and German. In this paper we report on an experiment to induce wide-coverage, probabilistic LFG grammatical and lexical resources for Chinese from the Penn Chinese Treebank (CTB) (Xue et al., 2002) based on an automatic f-structure annotation algorithm. Currently 96.751% of the CTB trees receive a single, covering and connected f-structure, 0.112% do not receive an f-structure due to feature clashes, while 3.137% are associated with multiple f-structure fragments. From the f-structure-annotated CTB we extract a total of 12975 lexical entries with 20 distinct subcategorisation frame types. Of these 3436 are verbal entries with a total of 11 different frame types. We extract a number of PCFG-based LFG approximations. Currently our best automatically induced grammars achieve an f-score of 81.57% against the trees in unseen articles 301-325; 86.06% f-score (all grammatical functions) and 73.98% (preds-only) against the dependencies derived from the f-structures automatically generated for the original trees in 301-325 and 82.79% (all grammatical functions) and 67.74% (preds-only) against the dependencies derived from the manually annotated gold-standard f-structures for 50 trees randomly selected from articles 301-325

    Treebank-Based Acquisition of a Chinese Lexical-Functional Grammar

    Get PDF
    Scaling wide-coverage, constraint-based grammars such as Lexical-Functional Grammars (LFG) (Kaplan and Bresnan, 1982; Bresnan, 2001) or Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammars (HPSG) (Pollard and Sag, 1994) from fragments to naturally occurring unrestricted text is knowledge-intensive, time-consuming and (often prohibitively) expensive. A number of researchers have recently presented methods to automatically acquire wide-coverage, probabilistic constraint-based grammatical resources from treebanks (Cahill et al., 2002, Cahill et al., 2003; Cahill et al., 2004; Miyao et al., 2003; Miyao et al., 2004; Hockenmaier and Steedman, 2002; Hockenmaier, 2003), addressing the knowledge acquisition bottleneck in constraint-based grammar development. Research to date has concentrated on English and German. In this paper we report on an experiment to induce wide-coverage, probabilistic LFG grammatical and lexical resources for Chinese from the Penn Chinese Treebank (CTB) (Xue et al., 2002) based on an automatic f-structure annotation algorithm. Currently 96.751% of the CTB trees receive a single, covering and connected f-structure, 0.112% do not receive an fstructure due to feature clashes, while 3.137% are associated with multiple f-structure fragments. From the f-structure-annotated CTB we extract a total of 12975 lexical entries with 20 distinct subcategorisation frame types. Of these 3436 are verbal entries with a total of 11 different frame types. We extract a number of PCFG-based LFG approximations. Currently our best automatically induced grammars achieve an f-score of 81.57% against the trees in unseen articles 301-325; 86.06% f-score (all grammatical functions) and 73.98% (preds-only) against the dependencies derived from the f-structures automatically generated for the original trees in 301-325 and 82.79% (all grammatical functions) and 67.74% (preds-only) against the dependencies derived from the manually annotated gold-standard f-structures for 50 trees randomly selected from articles 301-325

    ChinGram: A TRALE Implementation of an HPSG Fragment of Mandarin Chinese

    Get PDF

    Pengembangan tata bahasa baku bahasa Indonesia (TBBI) daring terpadu

    Get PDF
    Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa (Badan Bahasa) di bawah naungan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia, sebagai instansi pemerintah yang ditugaskan untuk menangani masalah kebahasaan dan kesastraan di Indonesia, menerbitkan berbagai produk kebahasaan. Dua produk yang sering dimanfaatkan para pemelajar bahasa Indonesia adalah Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI) dan Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia (TBBI). KBBI terbaru edisi kelima (Amalia 2016) diluncurkan pada tahun 2016 dalam tiga versi: cetak, daring, dan luring (Moeljadi et al. 2017). Sejak diluncurkan pada 28 Oktober 2016, KBBI Daring mendapat sambutan hangat masyarakat, baik dari dalam maupun luar negeri. KBBI Daring memudahkan pemelajar bahasa Indonesia dan masyarakat umum menggunakan kamus pada era digital ini. Hal yang serupa dapat dilakukan untuk TBBI. Makalah ini membahas tahap awal pengembangan pangkalan data dan laman TBBI Daring Terpadu dengan menggunakan tata bahasa komputasional bahasa Indonesia INDRA (Indonesian Resource Grammar) (Moeljadi et al. 2015) yang dikembangkan dengan metode rekayasa tata bahasa dengan mengacu pada buku-buku referensi tata bahasa baku bahasa Indonesia, terutama TBBI (Alwi et al. 2014) dan Indonesian Reference Grammar (Sneddon et al. 2010). TBBI Daring Terpadu akan memuat aturan-aturan tata bahasa bahasa Indonesia baku, dipadukan dengan leksikon dan contoh-contoh dari korpus bahasa Indonesia baku yang telah dianotasi secara sintaksis dan semantis. Penulis berharap TBBI Daring Terpadu dapat menjadi acuan utama tata bahasa baku bahasa Indonesia yang dapat diakses dengan mudah oleh para penggunanya, misalnya pemelajar Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing (BIPA), dan dapat memperkaya KBBI Daring dalam penggolongan kelas kata yang lebih spesifik, serta mendorong kemajuan bidang linguistik komputasional dan pemrosesan bahasa alami bahasa Indonesia, misalnya dalam penerjemahan mesin dan pengembangan sistem pemeriksaan gramatika dan leksikon bahasa Indonesia baku

    Treebank-based acquisition of Chinese LFG resources for parsing and generation

    Get PDF
    This thesis describes a treebank-based approach to automatically acquire robust,wide-coverage Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG) resources for Chinese parsing and generation, which is part of a larger project on the rapid construction of deep, large-scale, constraint-based, multilingual grammatical resources. I present an application-oriented LFG analysis for Chinese core linguistic phenomena and (in cooperation with PARC) develop a gold-standard dependency-bank of Chinese f-structures for evaluation. Based on the Penn Chinese Treebank, I design and implement two architectures for inducing Chinese LFG resources, one annotation-based and the other dependency conversion-based. I then apply the f-structure acquisition algorithm together with external, state-of-the-art parsers to parsing new text into "proto" f-structures. In order to convert "proto" f-structures into "proper" f-structures or deep dependencies, I present a novel Non-Local Dependency (NLD) recovery algorithm using subcategorisation frames and f-structure paths linking antecedents and traces in NLDs extracted from the automatically-built LFG f-structure treebank. Based on the grammars extracted from the f-structure annotated treebank, I develop a PCFG-based chart generator and a new n-gram based pure dependency generator to realise Chinese sentences from LFG f-structures. The work reported in this thesis is the first effort to scale treebank-based, probabilistic Chinese LFG resources from proof-of-concept research to unrestricted, real text. Although this thesis concentrates on Chinese and LFG, many of the methodologies, e.g. the acquisition of predicate-argument structures, NLD resolution and the PCFG- and dependency n-gram-based generation models, are largely language and formalism independent and should generalise to diverse languages as well as to labelled bilexical dependency representations other than LFG

    Head finalization reordering for Chinese-to-Japanese machine translation.” in

    Get PDF
    Abstract In Statistical Machine Translation, reordering rules have proved useful in extracting bilingual phrases and in decoding during translation between languages that are structurally different. Linguistically motivated rules have been incorporated into Chineseto-Englis

    Handbook of Lexical Functional Grammar

    Get PDF
    Lexical Functional Grammar (LFG) is a nontransformational theory of linguistic structure, first developed in the 1970s by Joan Bresnan and Ronald M. Kaplan, which assumes that language is best described and modeled by parallel structures representing different facets of linguistic organization and information, related by means of functional correspondences. This volume has five parts. Part I, Overview and Introduction, provides an introduction to core syntactic concepts and representations. Part II, Grammatical Phenomena, reviews LFG work on a range of grammatical phenomena or constructions. Part III, Grammatical modules and interfaces, provides an overview of LFG work on semantics, argument structure, prosody, information structure, and morphology. Part IV, Linguistic disciplines, reviews LFG work in the disciplines of historical linguistics, learnability, psycholinguistics, and second language learning. Part V, Formal and computational issues and applications, provides an overview of computational and formal properties of the theory, implementations, and computational work on parsing, translation, grammar induction, and treebanks. Part VI, Language families and regions, reviews LFG work on languages spoken in particular geographical areas or in particular language families. The final section, Comparing LFG with other linguistic theories, discusses LFG work in relation to other theoretical approaches

    Modeling information structure in a cross-linguistic perspective

    Get PDF
    This study makes substantial contributions to both the theoretical and computational treatment of information structure, with a specific focus on creating natural language processing applications such as multilingual machine translation systems. The present study first provides cross-linguistic findings in regards to information structure meanings and markings. Building upon such findings, the current model represents information structure within the HPSG/MRS framework using Individual Constraints. The primary goal of the present study is to create a multilingual grammar model of information structure for the LinGO Grammar Matrix system. The present study explores the construction of a grammar library for creating customized grammar incorporating information structure and illustrates how the information structure-based model improves performance of transfer-based machine translation

    Massive Choice, Ample Tasks (MaChAmp): A Toolkit for Multi-task Learning in NLP

    Get PDF
    Transfer learning, particularly approaches that combine multi-task learning with pre-trained contextualized embeddings and fine-tuning, have advanced the field of Natural Language Processing tremendously in recent years. In this paper we present MaChAmp, a toolkit for easy fine-tuning of contextualized embeddings in multi-task settings. The benefits of MaChAmp are its flexible configuration options, and the support of a variety of natural language processing tasks in a uniform toolkit, from text classification and sequence labeling to dependency parsing, masked language modeling, and text generation.Comment: https://machamp-nlp.github.io
    corecore