483 research outputs found

    Discriminating Crop, Weeds and Soil Surface with a Terrestrial LIDAR Sensor

    Get PDF
    In this study, the evaluation of the accuracy and performance of a light detection and ranging (LIDAR) sensor for vegetation using distance and reflection measurements aiming to detect and discriminate maize plants and weeds from soil surface was done. The study continues a previous work carried out in a maize field in Spain with a LIDAR sensor using exclusively one index, the height profile. The current system uses a combination of the two mentioned indexes. The experiment was carried out in a maize field at growth stage 12โ€“14, at 16 different locations selected to represent the widest possible density of three weeds: Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P.Beauv., Lamium purpureum L., Galium aparine L.and Veronica persica Poir.. A terrestrial LIDAR sensor was mounted on a tripod pointing to the inter-row area, with its horizontal axis and the field of view pointing vertically downwards to the ground, scanning a vertical plane with the potential presence of vegetation. Immediately after the LIDAR data acquisition (distances and reflection measurements), actual heights of plants were estimated using an appropriate methodology. For that purpose, digital images were taken of each sampled area. Data showed a high correlation between LIDAR measured height and actual plant heights (R 2 = 0.75). Binary logistic regression between weed presence/absence and the sensor readings (LIDAR height and reflection values) was used to validate the accuracy of the sensor. This permitted the discrimination of vegetation from the ground with an accuracy of up to 95%. In addition, a Canonical Discrimination Analysis (CDA) was able to discriminate mostly between soil and vegetation and, to a far lesser extent, between crop and weeds. The studied methodology arises as a good system for weed detection, which in combination with other principles, such as vision-based technologies, could improve the efficiency and accuracy of herbicide spraying

    Using ICESAT\u27s geoscience laser altimeter system to assess large scale forest disturbance caused by Hurricane Katrina

    Get PDF
    We assessed the use of GLAS data as a tool to quantify large-scale forest damage. GLAS data for the year prior to and following Hurricane Katrina were compared to wind speed, forest cover, and MODIS NPV maps to analyze senor sampling, and changes in mean canopy height. We detected significant losses in mean canopy height post-Katrina that increased with wind intensity, from โˆผ.5m in forests hit by tropical storm winds to โˆผ4m in forests experiencing category two force winds. Season of data acquisition was shown to influence calculations of mean canopy height. There was insufficient sampling to adequately detect changes at one degree resolution and less. We observed a strong relationship between delta NPV and post storm mean canopy heights. Changes in structure were converted into loss of standing carbon estimates using a height structured ecosystem model, yielding above ground carbon storage losses of โˆผ30Tg over the domain

    Estimation of the Conifer-Broadleaf Ratio in Mixed Forests Based on Time-Series Data

    Get PDF
    Most natural forests are mixed forests, a mixed broadleaf-conifer forest is essentially a heterogeneously mixed pixel in remote sensing images. Satellite missions rely on modeling to acquire regional or global vegetation parameter products. However, these retrieval models often assume homogeneous conditions at the pixel level, resulting in a decrease in the inversion accuracy, which is an issue for heterogeneous forests. Therefore, information on the canopy composition of a mixed forest is the basis for accurately retrieving vegetation parameters using remote sensing. Medium and high spatial resolution multispectral time-series data are important sources for canopy conifer-broadleaf ratio estimation because these data have a high frequency and wide coverage. This paper highlights a successful method for estimating the conifer-broadleaf ratio in a mixed forest with diverse tree species and complex canopy structures. Experiments were conducted in the Purple Mountain, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province of China, where we collected leaf area index (LAI) time-series and forest sample plot inventory data. Based on the Invertible Forest Reflectance Model (INFORM), we simulated the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) time-series of different conifer-broadleaf ratios. A time-series similarity analysis was performed to determine the typical separable conifer-broadleaf ratios. Fifteen Gaofen-1 (GF-1) satellite images of 2015 were acquired. The conifer-broadleaf ratio estimation was based on the GF-1 NDVI time-series and semi-supervised k-means cluster method, which yielded a high overall accuracy of 83.75%. This study demonstrates the feasibility of accurately estimating separable conifer-broadleaf ratios using field measurement data and GF-1 time series in mixed broadleaf-conifer forests

    ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๊ทœ๋ชจ LiDAR ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๋„์‹œ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ฐ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ํ˜‘๋™๊ณผ์ • ์กฐ๊ฒฝํ•™, 2021.8. ์†ก์˜๊ทผ.Integrated multiscale light detection and ranging (LiDAR) datasets are required for managing urban ecosystems because 1) LiDAR datasets can represent various spatial structures across the urban landscape and 2) the multitemporal LiDAR approach can derive the changes of urban landscape structures. This dissertation aimed to find the various spatiotemporal availabilities (i.e., from the tree-level spatial scale to the city-level regional scale with the multitemporal approach) of LiDAR or laser scanning (LS) datasets for monitoring urban ecosystems in the following three chapters. Chapter 2: Collecting tree inventory data in urban areas is important for managing green areas. Surveying using airborne laser scanning (ALS) is effective for collecting urban tree structures but less efficient regarding the economic costs and its operation. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), and mobile laser scanning (MLS) datasets could have the potential in complementing those of ALS in the respect to efficiency. However, to the best of my knowledge, there were limited studies for seeking the similarities and variations among the canopy metrics derived from various LiDAR platforms. In Chapter 2, I compared structural canopy metrics among ALS, TLS, and MLS datasets in the urban parks. The purpose of Chapter 2 was to test whether the estimates of tree metrics differed depending on single or clustered trees and to test whether the errors in LiDAR-derived metrics were related to the tree structures. Small, urban parks were selected for surveying trees using the three LiDAR platforms. The ALS datasets were acquired on 14 May, 2017. The TLS and MLS datasets were acquired from 10โ€“11 May, 2017, and 21โ€“25 April, 2020, respectively. The tree point clouds were classified into single and clustered trees. The structural metrics were compared in each pair (i.e., ALS and TLS, ALS and MLS, and TLS and MLS pairs). The heights related metrics (e.g., percentile heights and the distribution of the heights values), the complexity metric (e.g., the Rumple index) and area were calculated for comparisons. The root mean square error (RMSE), bias, and the Pearsonโ€™s correlation coefficient (r) were calculated to evaluate the difference in each metric among the LiDAR platforms. The results showed that ZMAX, max and mean CHM, and area showed good consistencies (RMSE% 0.900). Especially, the biases of CHM-derived metrics did not present significant differences (p > 0.05) regardless of single or clustered trees. Moreover, the biases from the comparisons in each pair showed linear relations with the tree heights and vertical canopy complexity (i.e., Pearsonโ€™s correlation coefficient showed significant; r >0.29, p < 0.05). My results could be references when combining multiple LiDAR systems to estimate the canopy structures of urban park areas. Chapter 3: Understanding forest dynamics is important for assessing the health of urban forests, which experience various disturbances, both natural (e.g., treefall events) and artificial (e.g., making space for agricultural fields). Therefore, quantifying three-dimensional (3D) changes in canopies is a helpful way to manage and understand urban forests better. Multitemporal ALS datasets enable me to quantify the vertical and lateral growth of trees across a landscape scale. The goal of Chapter 3 is to assess the annual changes in the 3-D structures of canopies and forest gaps in an urban forest using annual airborne LiDAR datasets for 2012โ€“2015. The canopies were classified as high canopies and low canopies by a 5 m height threshold. Then, I generated pixel- and plot-level canopy height models and conducted change detection annually. The vertical growth rates and leaf area index showed consistent values year by year in both canopies, while the spatial distributions of the canopy and leaf area profile (e.g., leaf area density) showed inconsistent changes each year in both canopies. In total, high canopies expanded their foliage from 12 m height, while forest gap edge canopies (including low canopies) expanded their canopies from 5 m height. Annual change detection with LiDAR datasets might inform about both steady growth rates and different characteristics in the changes of vertical canopy structures for both high and low canopies in urban forests. Chapter 4: Although many studies have considered urban structure when investigating urban ecological networks, few have considered the 3D structure of buildings as well as urban green spaces. In Chapter 4, I examined an urban ecological network using the 3D structure of both green spaces and buildings. Using breeding-season bird species observations and ALS data collected, I assessed the influence of 3D structural variables on species diversity. I used correlation analyses to determine if vertical distribution, volume, area, and height of both buildings and vegetation were related to bird species diversity. Then I conducted circuit theory-based current flow betweenness centrality (CFBC) analysis using the LiDAR-derived structural variables. I found that the volumes of buildings and 8โ€“10 m vegetation heights were both highly correlated with species richness per unit area. There were significant differences between 2D and 3D connectivity analysis using LiDAR-derived variables among urban forest patches, boulevards, and apartment complexes. Within urban forest patches and parks, 3D CFBC represented canopy structural characteristics well, by showing high variance in spatial distributions. The 3D CFBC results indicated that adjacent high-rise buildings, dense apartment complexes, and densely urbanized areas were isolated, as characterized by low centrality values, but that vegetation planted in open spaces between buildings could improve connectivity by linking isolated areas to core areas. My research highlights the importance of considering 3D structure in planning and managing urban ecological connectivity. In this dissertation, the availability of integrated multiscale LiDAR datasets was found via three standalone studies. It was revealed that 3D information could enhance the quality of urban landscape monitoring and ecological connectivity analysis by elaborately explaining spatial structures. However, the spatiotemporal scales of each standalone study were limited to the city scale and to five years. The recently launched Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) would help to solve these limitations. Furthermore, the GEDI dataset could help researchers understand the relationship between ecosystem structures and their functions.๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ์—์„œ ๋„์‹œ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง์„ ์œ„ํ•œ LiDAR ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๊ณผ ์ƒํƒœ์  ์˜๋ฏธ ๋„์ถœ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ๋‹ค๋ฃฌ๋‹ค. LiDAR๋ž€ Light Detection and Ranging์˜ ์•ฝ์–ด๋กœ, LiDAR ์„ผ์„œ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ๋œ ๋ ˆ์ด์ €๊ฐ€ ๋Œ€์ƒ์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•œ ๋’ค ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ๋˜์–ด ๋Œ์•„์˜ค๋Š” ๋ ˆ์ด์ €์˜ ์„ธ๊ธฐ์™€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜์—ฌ ๋Œ€์ƒ์˜ ์œ„์น˜ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ 3์ฐจ์› ์ ๊ตฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•ด์ฃผ๋Š” ๋Šฅ๋™ํ˜• ์›๊ฒฉํƒ์‚ฌ ๋„๊ตฌ์ด๋‹ค. LiDAR ์›๊ฒฉํƒ์‚ฌ ๋„๊ตฌ์˜ ๋“ฑ์žฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ž์—ฐ๊ณผ ๋„์‹œ์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด์˜ ์ทจ๋“์ด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅํ•ด์ง์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ, ์„œ์‹์ง€์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด์™€ ์ƒ๋ฌผ ์ข… ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„ ๋„์ถœ, ์‹œ๊ณ„์—ด LiDAR ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๋…น์ง€ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋“ฑ์ด ์ด๋ค„์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ํ•ญ๊ณต LiDAR(ALS), ์ง€์ƒ LiDAR(TLS), ์ด๋™ํ˜• LiDAR(MLS) ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ LiDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ชฉ์ ์— ์•Œ๋งž์€ ์‹œ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ทจ๋“ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋„์‹œ๋…น์ง€๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ LiDAR ์›๊ฒฉํƒ์‚ฌ ๋„๊ตฌ์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ ์ ์šฉ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ, Chapter 2 ํ•ญ๊ณต, ์ง€์ƒ, ์ด๋™ํ˜• LiDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์‚ฌ์ด ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์˜ ์ผ์น˜์„ฑ ํ‰๊ฐ€, Chapter 3 ์‹œ๊ณ„์—ด ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ๋„์‹œ๋…น์ง€ ๋™ํƒœ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง, Chapter 4 ๋„์‹œ์˜ ์ƒํƒœ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Chapter 2: ๋„์‹œ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ทจ๋“ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋„์‹œ๋…น์ง€ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์— ์žˆ์–ด ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด๋‹ค. LiDAR ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ๋ฐœ๋‹ฌ๋กœ ๋„์‹œ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ทจ๋“ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ๋†’์ด์™€ ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ๊ตฌ์กฐ, ์ง€์ƒ ๋ฐ”์ด์˜ค๋งค์Šค ๋“ฑ์„ ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋กœ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•ญ๊ณต LiDAR๋Š” ๋„“์€ ๋ฒ”์œ„์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋กœ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ง€๋…€ ์‚ฐ๋ฆผ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ํ™œ๋ฐœํžˆ ํ™œ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ํ•ญ๊ณต LiDAR ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ์ทจ๋“์€ ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ธฐ ์šด์šฉ๋น„, ์žฅ๋น„๊ด€๋ จ ๋ง‰๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋น„์šฉ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๊ณ  ์šด์šฉ์— ์žˆ์–ด ์ „๋ฌธ์„ฑ์„ ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋Œ€์ƒ์˜ ์ ๊ตฐ๋ฐ€๋„๊ฐ€ ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚ฎ๋‹ค๋Š” ๋‹จ์ ์„ ์ง€๋‹Œ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ์ง€์ƒ LiDAR์™€ ์ด๋™ํ˜• LiDAR๋Š” ์šด์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ํŽธ๋ฆฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๋†’์€ ์ ๊ตฐ๋ฐ€๋„๋ฅผ ์ถœ๋ ฅํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์—์„œ ํ•ญ๊ณต LiDAR์˜ ๋‹จ์ ์„ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ LiDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๋“ฑ์žฅ๊ณผ ์ด๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„ ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋ง ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์‹œ๋„๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ LiDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ฐ„ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์šด์šฉ๊ณผ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ๋ณด์™„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์ด ์š”๊ตฌ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ํ˜„์žฌ๊นŒ์ง€ ALS, TLS, MLS์˜ 3๊ฐœ์˜ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ทจ๋“๋œ ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์„œ๋กœ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ณ , ์„œ๋กœ ๋Œ€์ฒด๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋งŽ์ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋œ ๋ฐ” ์—†๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ Chapter 2์—์„œ๋Š” ALS, TLS, MLS ํ†ตํ•ด ์ทจ๋“๋œ ๋„์‹œ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์„œ๋กœ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ผ์น˜์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ , ์–ด๋– ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ด€๋ จ ์ง€ํ‘œ๊ฐ€ ์„ธ LiDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์‚ฌ์ด์—์„œ ๋Œ€์ฒด๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ์ง€ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์„ธ๋ถ€์ ์œผ๋กœ Chapter 2๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ด€๋ จ ์ง€ํ‘œ๊ฐ€ ๋‹จ๋ชฉ์ฐจ์›๊ณผ ๊ตฐ์ง‘์ฐจ์›, ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ๊ตฌ์กฐ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ALS, TLS, MLS ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š”์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ๋‹ด๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒœ์•ˆ์‹œ ๋„์‹œ๊ณต์› 9๊ฐœ์†Œ์—์„œ ALS ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” 2017๋…„ 5์›” 14์ผ, TLS ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” 2017๋…„ 5์›” 10์ผ๊ณผ 11์ผ, MLS ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” 2020๋…„ 4์›” 21์—์„œ 25์ผ ์ทจ๋“๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ทจ๋“๋œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์…‹์€ ์ˆ˜๊ด€์˜ ๊ฒน์นจ ์—ฌ๋ถ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹จ๋ชฉ๊ณผ ๊ตฐ์ง‘์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, 3๊ฐœ์˜ ํŽ˜์–ด(ALS-TLS, MLS-TLS, ALS-MLS)๋กœ ์ˆ˜๊ด€์˜ ํผ์„ผํƒ€์ผ ๋†’์ด, ์ˆ˜๊ด€๋ณต์žก์„ฑ, ๋ฉด์  ๋“ฑ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์„ 1:1 ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•ญ๊ณต LiDAR ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋„์ถœ๋œ ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์„ ์ฐธ์กฐ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‰๊ท ์ œ๊ณฑ๊ทผ์˜ค์ฐจ(RMSE), ํŽธํ–ฅ(bias), ํ”ผ์–ด์Šจ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ณ„์ˆ˜(r) ๋“ฑ์„ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์„ธ LiDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์ผ์น˜์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ZMAX, CHM๊ด€๋ จ ์ˆ˜๊ด€๋†’์ด ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ˆ˜๊ด€๋ฉด์ ์ด ๋†’์€ ์ผ์น˜์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค(RMSE% 0.900). ํŠนํžˆ CHM์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋„์ถœ๋œ ์ˆ˜๊ด€๋†’์ด ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์€ ๋‹จ๋ชฉ๊ณผ ๊ตฐ์ง‘์—์„œ ์„ธ๊ฐœ์˜ LiDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ฐ„ ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์ธ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค(p > 0.05). ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ํผ์„ผํƒ€์ผ ์ˆ˜๊ด€๋†’์ด์™€ ํ‰๊ท  ์ˆ˜๊ด€๋†’์ด ๋“ฑ์€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ผ์น˜์„ฑ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์„ธ ํŽ˜์–ด์—์„œ ๋„์ถœ๋œ ํŽธํ–ฅ์€ ์ˆ˜๊ณ , ์ˆ˜๊ด€๋ณต์žก์„ฑ๊ณผ ์•ฝํ•œ ์„ ํ˜•๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค(r >, p < 0.05). Chapter 3: ์ˆ˜๊ด€๋™ํƒœ๋Š” ์ˆฒ์˜ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ์ž์—ฐ์ ยท์ธ์œ„์ ์ธ ๊ต๋ž€์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ ์ˆฒํ‹ˆ์€ ์ˆฒ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์— ๋น›์˜ ํˆฌ๊ณผ์œจ, ์˜จ๋„, ์Šต๋„ ๋“ฑ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ผ์ณ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ˆฒํ‹ˆ์„ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ชจ๋‹ˆํ„ฐ๋งํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ˆฒ์˜ ๋™ํƒœ๋ฅผ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์žˆ์–ด ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ํ•ญ๊ณต LiDAR ์„ผ์„œ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์œ„์„ฑ์˜์ƒ์ด๋‚˜ ํ•ญ๊ณต์‚ฌ์ง„ ๋“ฑ 2์ฐจ์› ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์šด ์ˆฒํ‹ˆ ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ฐฉ๊ณต๊ฐ„์˜ ํƒ์ง€์™€ ์ˆ˜๊ด€์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ํ˜•์ƒ์˜ ์ทจ๋“์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค. Chapter 3์—์„œ๋Š” 2012๋…„๋„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 2015๋…„๋„ 4๊ฐœ๋…„์˜ ํ•ญ๊ณต LiDAR๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž์—ฐํ˜• ๋„์‹œ๊ณต์›(๋ด‰์„œ์‚ฐ)์˜ ์ˆ˜๊ด€๊ณผ ์ˆฒํ‹ˆ์˜ ์ˆ˜ํ‰์  ์ˆ˜์ง์  ๋ณ€ํ™”์–‘์ƒ์„ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜๊ด€์€ ๋†’์ด 5m๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์ธต๋ถ€์™€ ํ•˜์ธต๋ถ€ ์ˆ˜๊ด€์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ˆ˜๊ด€๋†’์ด๋ชจ๋ธ(canopy height model, CHM)์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฐ๊ฐ„๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ํƒ์ง€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ƒ์ธต๋ถ€ ๋ฐ ํ•˜์ธต๋ถ€ ์ˆ˜๊ด€์˜ ์ˆ˜์ง์ƒ์žฅ๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ์—ฝ๋ฉด์ ์ง€์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ผ์ •ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ฐ„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์–‘์ƒ์„ ๋ณด์ธ ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, ์ˆ˜ํ‰์  ๋ณ€ํ™”์™€ ์—ฝ๋ฉด์ ๋ฐ€๋„๋Š” ๋ถˆ๊ทœ์น™์ ์ธ ์—ฐ๊ฐ„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์–‘์ƒ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์ธต๋ถ€ ์ˆ˜๊ด€์€ ๋†’์ด 12m์—์„œ ์ธก๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์ƒ์žฅ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ•˜์ธต๋ถ€ ์ˆ˜๊ด€ ์ค‘ ์ˆฒํ‹ˆ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋†’์ด 5m์—์„œ ์ธก๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์ƒ์žฅ์ด ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. LiDAR ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฐ„ ๋ณ€ํ™” ํƒ์ง€๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ž์—ฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ˜•์„ฑ๋œ ์ˆฒํ‹ˆ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ƒ์žฅ๊ณผ ๊ต๋ž€ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋งค์šฐ ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•œ ๋™ํƒœ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ธ์œ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ˜•์„ฑ๋œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐฉ๊ณต๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ˆ˜๊ด€์˜ ๋™ํƒœ๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค์†Œ ์นจ์ฒด๋จ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Chapter 4๋Š” ๋„์‹œ ๋‚ด ๊ฑด๋ฌผ๊ณผ ๋…น์ง€์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ž…๋ ฅ์ž๋ฃŒ๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋„์‹œ์˜ ์ƒํƒœ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋ฃฌ๋‹ค. ๋„์‹œ ๋‚ด ์ƒํƒœ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ ๋„์ถœ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋„์‹œ์™€ ๋…น์ง€์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ ๋“ฑ์„ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ง„ํ–‰์ด ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ 3์ฐจ์›์ ์ธ ํŠน์„ฑ์ธ ๋„์‹œ ๊ฑด๋ฌผ์˜ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ, ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ง์ ์ธ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋“ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„์€ ๋งŽ์ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋œ ๋ฐ” ์—†๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ง€๋Š” ์ฒœ์•ˆ์‹œ ์‹œ์ฒญ์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœํ•œ 4 km ร— 4 km ์ง€์—ญ์œผ๋กœ, 2015๋…„์— ์ทจ๋“๋œ ํ•ญ๊ณต LiDAR์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ํ•ด ์ทจ๋“๋œ ์กฐ๋ฅ˜ ์ข… ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 1)๋„์‹œ ๋‚ด ๊ฑด๋ฌผ๊ณผ ๋…น์ง€์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ๊ตฌ์กฐ์™€ ์กฐ๋ฅ˜ ์ข… ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ ์‚ฌ์ด ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์‚ดํ”ผ๊ณ , 2)์กฐ๋ฅ˜ ์ข… ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” 3์ฐจ์› ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ „๋ฅ˜ํ๋ฆ„๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋งค๊ฐœ์ค‘์‹ฌ์„ฑ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„(CFBC)์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ฑด์ถ•๋ฌผ์˜ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ์™€ ์ˆ˜๋ชฉ๋†’์ด 8-10m์˜ ๋…น์ง€ ๋ถ€ํ”ผ๋น„๊ฐ€ ๋ฉด์ ๋‹น ์กฐ๋ฅ˜ ์ข… ํ’๋ถ€๋„์™€ ์Šคํ”ผ์–ด๋งŒ ์ˆœ์œ„์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„์—์„œ ๋†’์€ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„(ฯ> 0.6)๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ ๋ถ„์„์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ž…๋ ฅ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ฐจ์›(2D ๋ฐ 3D)์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ๋„์‹œ์ˆฒ, ๋Œ€๋กœ๋ณ€, ์•„ํŒŒํŠธ๋‹จ์ง€๋‚ด ๋…น์ง€ ๋“ฑ์—์„œ 2D ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ CFBC์™€ 3D๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ CFBC๋Š” ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋„์‹œ๋…น์ง€์˜ 3D ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ CFBC์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋…น์ง€ ๋ฉด์ ์ž„์—๋„ ์ˆ˜๊ด€์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ์ธ ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋†’์€ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 3D CFBC ๋ถ„์„๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ณ ์ธต ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ์ฃผ๋ณ€๋ถ€, ๊ณ ๋ฐ€๋„ ์•„ํŒŒํŠธ๋‹จ์ง€, ๊ณ ๋ฐ€ ์‹œ๊ฐ€ํ™”์ง€์—ญ ๋“ฑ์ด ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ ๊ณ ๋ฆฝ์ง€์—ญ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ์‚ฌ์ด ๊ณต์ง€ ๋‚ด ์‹์ƒ์€ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์ด ๊ณ ๋ฆฝ๋œ ์ง€์—ญ๊ณผ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ง€์—ญ์„ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋ƒˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ LiDAR ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹จ๋ชฉ, ๊ฒฝ๊ด€ ์ง€์—ญ๋‹จ์œ„ ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ์—์„œ์˜ ๋„์‹œ๊ฒฝ๊ด€๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ถ„์„, ๋„์‹œ๋…น์ง€๊ตฌ์กฐ์™€ ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ ๋“ฑ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์  ๋ณ€ํ™”์–‘์ƒ, ๋„์‹œ๊ฒฝ๊ด€๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ์ƒํƒœ์  ์˜๋ฏธ ๋“ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ–ฅํ›„ Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation(GEDI) ๋ฏธ์…˜์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๋Š” ์ง€์—ญ๊ทœ๋ชจ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€๋‹จ์œ„, ๋Œ€๋ฅ™๋‹จ์œ„ ๋“ฑ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์žฅํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ฉฐ ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋„์‹œ์ƒํƒœ๊ณ„ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์™€ ๊ทธ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ์‚ฌ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๋„์›€์„ ์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1. Background 1 1.1. Urbanization and the importance of urban green spaces 1 1.2. Urban landscape and Light detection and ranging application 1 2. Purpose 6 Chapter 2. Comparing tree structures derived among multiple LiDAR systems in urban parks 10 1. Introduction 10 2. Methods and materials 12 2.1. Study site and tree classification 12 2.2. LiDAR survey and processing 14 2.3. Deriving the structural variables of the parks 17 2.4. Assessing the accuracy of the LiDAR-derived indices 18 3. Results 19 3.1. Comparing height metrics among the three LiDAR systems 19 3.2. Comparing CHM-derived canopy height metrics from each LiDAR systems 22 3.3. Comparing the area and the Rumple index determined using the LiDAR systems 23 4. Discussion 25 4.1. LiDAR configurations and data acquisition time intervals 25 4.2. Uncertainty of the structural indices derived from the three LiDAR systems 28 Chapter 3. Urban forest growth and gap dynamics detected by yearly repeated airborne LiDAR 31 1. Introduction 31 2. Methods and Materials 33 2.1. Field survey 33 2.2. Canopy opening detection 34 2.3. Airborne LiDAR dataset acquisition and registration 35 2.4. Generation of height models and change detection 36 2.5. Gap detection and classification 38 2.6. Estimating changes of vertical canopy distribution and canopy complexity 38 3. Results 39 3.1. Pixel and hexagon height model-based change detection 39 3.2. Continuous one-year vertical growth area 41 3.3. Open canopy change detection 42 3.4. Changes in vertical canopy structures in High Canopy and Open Canopy 43 4. Discussion 45 4.1. What are the differences between the canopy structural changes derived from annual change detections and three-year interval change detection? 45 4.2. What are the characteristics of the structural changes according to the different canopy classes (e.g., high canopies and low canopies) in the urban forest? 46 Chapter 4. LiDAR-derived three-dimensional ecological connectivity mapping 49 1. Introduction 49 2. Materials and Methods 51 2.1. Study area and avian species observation 52 2.2. Airborne LiDAR acquisition, preprocessing and classification and deriving structural variables 53 2.3. Correlation analysis and selection of structural variables 55 2.4. 2D and 3D ecological networks 55 3. Results 56 3.1. Avian species survey 56 3.2. Correlation analyses and variable selection 56 3.3. Connectivity analysis results 58 3.4. Correlation between connectivity results with bird species diversity 59 3.5. Differences between 2D- and 3D-based CFBCs 60 4. Discussion 61 4.1. Vegetation and building structures and bird species diversity 61 4.2. 3D-based connectivity results 62 4.3. Differences between 2D and 3D network analyses 64 4.3.1. Forest and artificial green area 65 4.3.2. Roads and residential areas 66 Appendix 67 Chapter 5. Conclusion 70 1. Combination with multiple LiDAR data for surveying structures of urban green spaces 70 2. Multi-temporal urban forest gap monitoring 71 3. Ecological connectivity analysis using LiDAR 71 4. LiDAR application to Urban ecosystem monitoring 72 5. Expanding spatiotemporal scale and further works 73 Acknowledgments 75 Reference 76 Abstract in Korean 85๋ฐ•

    Height to Crown Base Modelling for the Main Tree Species in an Even-Aged Pedunculate Oak Forest: A Case Study from Central Croatia

    Get PDF
    The height to crown base (hcb) is a critical measure used in many investigations as an input variable to investigate the vigour of the stands, the social position of the trees, and to evaluate the behaviour of forest fires, among other uses. Though measuring height-related variables in the field is always time-consuming, the foremost benefits offered by modelling hcb are that it permits to generalize and average a very uneven attribute and, furthermore, provides insights about which tree and stand variables have a significant impact on hcb. However, there are many species in which models of the crown base height have not been developed in Croatia. The objective of this research was to develop a height to base crown model for each of the main species present in the two-layered mixed stands of this study. According to previous investigations, logistic models provide the highest precision and require the lowest inventory cost owing to less frequent measurements. Tree- and plot-level variables with distance-independent competition indexes were studied in the fitting model. In this research, we obtained models for the main stand species: Acer campestre (root mean squared error (RMSE) = 2.28 m, R2 = 82.80%); Alnus glutinosa (RMSE = 1.78 m, R2 = 85.36%); Carpinus betulus (RMSE = 2.47 m, R2 = 67.55%); Fraxinus angustifolia (RMSE = 2.46 m, R2 = 82.45%); Quercus robur (RMSE = 2.60 m, R2 = 80.57%); Tilia sp. (RMSE = 2.01 m, R2 = 89.07%); and Ulmus laevis (RMSE = 1.71 m, R2 = 92.42%). The combination of the total height, tree, and plot-level variables with distance-independent competition indexes contributed to the prediction accuracy of proposed model significantly

    Investigating within-canopy variation of functional traits and cellular structure of sugar maple (Acer saccharum) leaves

    Get PDF
    Patterns of increasing leaf mass per area (LMA), area-based leaf nitrogen (Narea), and carbon isotope composition (ฮด13C) with increasing height in the canopy have been attributed to light gradients or hydraulic limitation in tall trees. Theoretical optimal distributions of LMA and Narea that scale with light maximize canopy photosynthesis; however, sub-optimal distributions are often observed due to hydraulic constraints on leaf development. Using observational, experimental, and modeling approaches, we investigated the response of leaf functional traits (LMA, density, thickness, and leaf nitrogen), leaf carbon isotope composition (ฮด13C), and cellular structure to light availability, height, and leaf water potential (ฮจl) in an Acer saccharum forest to tease apart the influence of light and hydraulic limitations. LMA, leaf and palisade layer thickness, and leaf density were greater at greater light availability but similar heights, highlighting the strong control of light on leaf morphology and cellular structure. Experimental shading decreased both LMA and area-based leaf nitrogen (Narea) and revealed that LMA and Narea were more strongly correlated with height earlier in the growing season and with light later in the growing season. The supply of CO2 to leaves at higher heights appeared to be constrained by stomatal sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit (VPD) or midday leaf water potential, as indicated by increasing ฮด13C and VPD and decreasing midday ฮจl with height. Model simulations showed that daily canopy photosynthesis was biased during the early growing season when seasonality was not accounted for, and was biased throughout the growing season when vertical gradients in LMA and Narea were not accounted for. Overall, our results suggest that leaves acclimate to light soon after leaf expansion, through an accumulation of leaf carbon, thickening of palisade layers and increased LMA, and reduction in stomatal sensitivity to ฮจl or VPD. This period of light acclimation in leaves appears to optimize leaf function over time, despite height-related constraints early in the growing season. Our results imply that vertical gradients in leaf functional traits and leaf acclimation to light should be incorporated in canopy function models in order to refine estimates of canopy photosynthesis

    Changes in the Lepidoptera of Monks Wood NNR (1974-2003)

    Get PDF
    Introduction Monks Wood has been noted for the richness of its Lepidoptera, particularly butterflies, sinceat least the middle of the 19th century. In 1828 the black hairstreak was discovered for the first time in Britain in Monks Wood. A total of 48 butterfly species have been recorded in the Monks Wood area but today only 30 species (including two non-resident migrants) can be found there. Most of the losses had occurred by the time the Monks Wood book (Steele & Welch 1973) was published (Table 1). Less is known historically about the moth fauna. Steele & Welch (1973) listed some 129 microlepidoptera and 332 macrolepidoptera (hereafter referred to as macro-moths). These records came from variety of sources collated from the many collectors who had visited Monks Wood for well over a century. The list includes some species that have not been recorded in recent decades, some of which are almost certainly extinct in the wood (Table 2). The number of microlepidoptera recorded in the wood has greatly increased but no current list has been compiled. The current list of macro-moths stands at 460 species. Monks Wood has contributed to national recording schemes for both butterflies (Butterfly Monitoring Scheme โ€“ BMS) and moths (Rothamsted Insect Survey) for three decades and it is these standardised observations that allow an examination of change within Monks Wood and a comparison with national statistics. An earlier study by Pollard and others (1998), using these data, concluded that an increase in coarse grasses had benefited Lepidoptera feeding on them at the expense of those feeding on finer grasses. Several possible causes included ride management practices, the colonisation of the wood by muntjac, and an increase in atmospheric nitrogen deposition. In the current study we examine both the butterfly transect data and the Rothamsted Insect Survey (light trap) moth data for changes over the last 30 year
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore