A Second Step Towards Complexity-Theoretic Analogs of Rice's Theorem

Rice's Theorem states that every nontrivial language property of the recursively enumerable sets is undecidable. Borchert and Stephan initiated the search for complexity-theoretic analogs of Rice's Theorem. In particular, they proved that every nontrivial counting property of circuits is UP-hard, and that a number of closely related problems are SPP-hard. The present paper studies whether their UP-hardness result itself can be improved to SPP-hardness. We show that their UP-hardness result cannot be strengthened to SPP-hardness unless unlikely complexity class containments hold. Nonetheless, we prove that every P-constructibly bi-infinite counting property of circuits is SPP-hard. We also raise their general lower bound from unambiguous nondeterminism to constant-ambiguity nondeterminism.Comment: 14 pages. To appear in Theoretical Computer Scienc

Credimus

We believe that economic design and computational complexity---while already important to each other---should become even more important to each other with each passing year. But for that to happen, experts in on the one hand such areas as social choice, economics, and political science and on the other hand computational complexity will have to better understand each other's worldviews. This article, written by two complexity theorists who also work in computational social choice theory, focuses on one direction of that process by presenting a brief overview of how most computational complexity theorists view the world. Although our immediate motivation is to make the lens through which complexity theorists see the world be better understood by those in the social sciences, we also feel that even within computer science it is very important for nontheoreticians to understand how theoreticians think, just as it is equally important within computer science for theoreticians to understand how nontheoreticians think

Is Complexity a Source of Incompleteness?

In this paper we prove Chaitin's ``heuristic principle'', {\it the theorems of a finitely-specified theory cannot be significantly more complex than the theory itself}, for an appropriate measure of complexity. We show that the measure is invariant under the change of the G\"odel numbering. For this measure, the theorems of a finitely-specified, sound, consistent theory strong enough to formalize arithmetic which is arithmetically sound (like Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with choice or Peano Arithmetic) have bounded complexity, hence every sentence of the theory which is significantly more complex than the theory is unprovable. Previous results showing that incompleteness is not accidental, but ubiquitous are here reinforced in probabilistic terms: the probability that a true sentence of length $n$ is provable in the theory tends to zero when $n$ tends to infinity, while the probability that a sentence of length $n$ is true is strictly positive.Comment: 15 pages, improved versio

On end extensions of models of subsystems of peano arithmetic

AbstractWe survey results and problems concerning subsystems of Peano Arithmetic. In particular, we deal with end extensions of models of such theories. First, we discuss the results of Paris and Kirby (Logic Colloquium ’77, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978, pp. 199–209) and of Clote (Fund. Math. 127 (1986) 163; Fund. Math. 158 (1998) 301), which generalize the MacDowell and Specker theorem (Proc. Symp. on Foundation of Mathematics, Warsaw, 1959, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1961, p. 257–263) we also discuss a related problem of Kaufmann (On existence of Σn end extensions, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 859, Springer, Berlin, 1980, pp. 92). Then we sketch an alternative proof of Clote's theorem, using the arithmetized completeness theorem in the spirit of McAloon (Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 239 (1978) 253) and Paris (Some conservation results for fragments of arithmetic, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 890, Springer, Berlin, 1981, p. 251)

Relations between diagonalization, proof systems, and complexity gaps

AbstractIn this paper we study diagonal processes over time bounded computations of one-tape Turing machines by diagonalizing only over those machines for which there exist formal proofs that they operate in the given time bound. This replaces the traditional “clock” in resource bounded diagonalization by formal proofs about running times and establishes close relations between properties of proof systems and existence of sharp time bounds for one-tape Turing machine complexity classes. These diagonalization methods also show that the Gap Theorem for resource bounded computations can hold only for those complexity classes which differ from the corresponding provable complexity classes. Furthermore, we show that there exist recursive time bounds T(n) such that the class of languages for which we can formally prove the existence of Turing machines which accept them in time T(n) differs from the class of languages accepted by Turing machines for which we can prove formally that they run in time T(n). We also investigate the corresponding problems for tape bound computations and discuss the difference time and tapebounded computations

Resource Bounded Unprovability of Computational Lower Bounds

This paper introduces new notions of asymptotic proofs, PT(polynomial-time)-extensions, PTM(polynomial-time Turing machine)-omega-consistency, etc. on formal theories of arithmetic including PA (Peano Arithmetic). This paper shows that P not= NP (more generally, any super-polynomial-time lower bound in PSPACE) is unprovable in a PTM-omega-consistent theory T, where T is a consistent PT-extension of PA. This result gives a unified view to the existing two major negative results on proving P not= NP, Natural Proofs and relativizable proofs, through the two manners of characterization of PTM-omega-consistency. We also show that the PTM-omega-consistency of T cannot be proven in any PTM-omega-consistent theory S, where S is a consistent PT-extension of T.Comment: 78 page

Incompleteness Theorems, Large Cardinals, and Automata over Finite Words

International audienceWe prove that one can construct various kinds of automata over finite words for which some elementary properties are actually independent from strong set theories like Tn =:ZFC + "There exist (at least) n inaccessible cardinals", for integers n ≥ 0. In particular, we prove independence results for languages of finite words generated by context-free grammars, or accepted by 2-tape or 1-counter automata. Moreover we get some independence results for weighted automata and for some related finitely generated subsemigroups of the set Z ^{3×3} of 3-3 matrices with integer entries. Some of these latter results are independence results from the Peano axiomatic system PA