Machine Learning for SAT: Restricted Heuristics and New Graph Representations

Boolean satisfiability (SAT) is a fundamental NP-complete problem with many applications, including automated planning and scheduling. To solve large instances, SAT solvers have to rely on heuristics, e.g., choosing a branching variable in DPLL and CDCL solvers. Such heuristics can be improved with machine learning (ML) models; they can reduce the number of steps but usually hinder the running time because useful models are relatively large and slow. We suggest the strategy of making a few initial steps with a trained ML model and then releasing control to classical heuristics; this simplifies cold start for SAT solving and can decrease both the number of steps and overall runtime, but requires a separate decision of when to release control to the solver. Moreover, we introduce a modification of Graph-Q-SAT tailored to SAT problems converted from other domains, e.g., open shop scheduling problems. We validate the feasibility of our approach with random and industrial SAT problems

Improving probability selection based weights for satisfiability problems

Boolean Satisfiability problem (SAT) plays a prominent role in many domains of computer science and artificial intelligence due to its significant importance in both theory and applications. Algorithms for solving SAT problems can be categorized into two main classes: complete algorithms and incomplete algorithms (typically stochastic local search (SLS) algorithms). SLS algorithms are among the most effective for solving uniform random SAT problems, while hybrid algorithms achieved great breakthroughs for solving hard random SAT (HRS) problem recently. However, there is a lack of algorithms that can effectively solve both uniform random SAT and HRS problems. In this paper, a new SLS algorithm named SelectNTS is proposed aiming at solving both uniform random SAT and HRS problem effectively. SelectNTS is essentially an improved probability selection based local search algorithm, the core of which includes new clause and variable selection heuristics: a new clause weighting scheme and a biased random walk strategy are utilized to select a clause, while a new probability selection strategy with the variation of configuration checking strategy is used to select a variable. Extensive experimental results show that SelectNTS outperforms the state-of-the-art random SAT algorithms and hybrid algorithms in solving both uniform random SAT and HRS problems effectively

On Improving Local Search for Unsatisfiability

Stochastic local search (SLS) has been an active field of research in the last few years, with new techniques and procedures being developed at an astonishing rate. SLS has been traditionally associated with satisfiability solving, that is, finding a solution for a given problem instance, as its intrinsic nature does not address unsatisfiable problems. Unsatisfiable instances were therefore commonly solved using backtrack search solvers. For this reason, in the late 90s Selman, Kautz and McAllester proposed a challenge to use local search instead to prove unsatisfiability. More recently, two SLS solvers - Ranger and Gunsat - have been developed, which are able to prove unsatisfiability albeit being SLS solvers. In this paper, we first compare Ranger with Gunsat and then propose to improve Ranger performance using some of Gunsat's techniques, namely unit propagation look-ahead and extended resolution

Proceedings of SAT Competition 2020 : Solver and Benchmark Descriptions

Non peer reviewe