Improved time-space trade-offs for computing Voronoi diagrams

Let P be a planar set of n sites in general position. For k∈{1,…,n−1}, the Voronoi diagram of order k for P is obtained by subdividing the plane into cells such that points in the same cell have the same set of nearest k neighbors in P. The (nearest site) Voronoi diagram (NVD) and the farthest site Voronoi diagram (FVD) are the particular cases of k=1 and k=n−1, respectively. For any given K∈{1,…,n−1}, the family of all higher-order Voronoi diagrams of order k=1,…,K for P can be computed in total time O(nK2+nlogn) using O(K2(n−K)) space [Aggarwal et al., DCG'89; Lee, TC'82]. Moreover, NVD and FVD for P can be computed in O(nlogn) time using O(n) space [Preparata, Shamos, Springer'85]. For s∈{1,…,n} , an s-workspace algorithm has random access to a read-only array with the sites of P in arbitrary order. Additionally, the algorithm may use O(s) words, of Θ(logn) bits each, for reading and writing intermediate data. The output can be written only once and cannot be accessed or modified afterwards. We describe a deterministic s -workspace algorithm for computing NVD and FVD for P that runs in O((n2/s)logs) time. Moreover, we generalize our s-workspace algorithm so that for any given K∈O(s√), we compute the family of all higher-order Voronoi diagrams of order k=1,…,K for P in total expected time O(n2K5s(logs+K2O(log∗K))) or in total deterministic time O(n2K5s(logs+KlogK)). Previously, for Voronoi diagrams, the only known s-workspace algorithm runs in expected time O((n2/s)logs+nlogslog∗s) [Korman et al., WADS'15] and only works for NVD (i.e., k=1). Unlike the previous algorithm, our new method is very simple and does not rely on advanced data structures or random sampling techniques

Improved Time-Space Trade-Offs for Computing Voronoi Diagrams

Let P be a planar n-point set in general position. For k between 1 and n-1, the Voronoi diagram of order k is obtained by subdividing the plane into regions such that points in the same cell have the same set of nearest k neighbors in P. The (nearest point) Voronoi diagram (NVD) and the farthest point Voronoi diagram (FVD) are the particular cases of k=1 and k=n-1, respectively. It is known that the family of all higher-order Voronoi diagrams of order 1 to K for P can be computed in total time O(n K^2 + n log n) using O(K^2(n-K)) space. Also NVD and FVD can be computed in O(n log n) time using O(n) space. For s in {1, ..., n}, an s-workspace algorithm has random access to a read-only array with the sites of P in arbitrary order. Additionally, the algorithm may use O(s) words of Theta(log n) bits each for reading and writing intermediate data. The output can be written only once and cannot be accessed afterwards. We describe a deterministic s-workspace algorithm for computing an NVD and also an FVD for P that runs in O((n^2/s) log s) time. Moreover, we generalize our s-workspace algorithm for computing the family of all higher-order Voronoi diagrams of P up to order K in O(sqrt(s)) in total time O( (n^2 K^6 / s) log^(1+epsilon)(K) (log s / log K)^(O(1)) ) for any fixed epsilon > 0. Previously, for Voronoi diagrams, the only known s-workspace algorithm was to find an NVD for P in expected time O((n^2/s) log s + n log s log^*s). Unlike the previous algorithm, our new method is very simple and does not rely on advanced data structures or random sampling techniques

A Time-Space Tradeoff for Triangulations of Points in the Plane

In this paper, we consider time-space trade-offs for reporting a triangulation of points in the plane. The goal is to minimize the amount of working space while keeping the total running time small. We present the first multi-pass algorithm on the problem that returns the edges of a triangulation with their adjacency information. This even improves the previously best known random-access algorithm

Time-Space Trade-Offs for Computing Euclidean Minimum Spanning Trees

In the limited-workspace model, we assume that the input of size $n$ lies in a random access read-only memory. The output has to be reported sequentially, and it cannot be accessed or modified. In addition, there is a read-write workspace of $O(s)$ words, where $s \in \{1, \dots, n\}$ is a given parameter. In a time-space trade-off, we are interested in how the running time of an algorithm improves as $s$ varies from $1$ to $n$. We present a time-space trade-off for computing the Euclidean minimum spanning tree (EMST) of a set $V$ of $n$ sites in the plane. We present an algorithm that computes EMST$(V)$ using $O(n^3\log s /s^2)$ time and $O(s)$ words of workspace. Our algorithm uses the fact that EMST$(V)$ is a subgraph of the bounded-degree relative neighborhood graph of $V$, and applies Kruskal's MST algorithm on it. To achieve this with limited workspace, we introduce a compact representation of planar graphs, called an $s$-net which allows us to manipulate its component structure during the execution of the algorithm

Space Efficient Algorithms for Breadth-Depth Search

Continuing the recent trend, in this article we design several space-efficient algorithms for two well-known graph search methods. Both these search methods share the same name {\it breadth-depth search} (henceforth {\sf BDS}), although they work entirely in different fashion. The classical implementation for these graph search methods takes $O(m+n)$ time and $O(n \lg n)$ bits of space in the standard word RAM model (with word size being $\Theta(\lg n)$ bits), where $m$ and $n$ denotes the number of edges and vertices of the input graph respectively. Our goal here is to beat the space bound of the classical implementations, and design $o(n \lg n)$ space algorithms for these search methods by paying little to no penalty in the running time. Note that our space bounds (i.e., with $o(n \lg n)$ bits of space) do not even allow us to explicitly store the required information to implement the classical algorithms, yet our algorithms visits and reports all the vertices of the input graph in correct order.Comment: 12 pages, This work will appear in FCT 201