763 research outputs found
Improving the Price of Anarchy for Selfish Routing via Coordination Mechanisms
We reconsider the well-studied Selfish Routing game with affine latency
functions. The Price of Anarchy for this class of games takes maximum value
4/3; this maximum is attained already for a simple network of two parallel
links, known as Pigou's network. We improve upon the value 4/3 by means of
Coordination Mechanisms.
We increase the latency functions of the edges in the network, i.e., if
is the latency function of an edge , we replace it by
with for all . Then an
adversary fixes a demand rate as input. The engineered Price of Anarchy of the
mechanism is defined as the worst-case ratio of the Nash social cost in the
modified network over the optimal social cost in the original network.
Formally, if \CM(r) denotes the cost of the worst Nash flow in the modified
network for rate and \Copt(r) denotes the cost of the optimal flow in the
original network for the same rate then [\ePoA = \max_{r \ge 0}
\frac{\CM(r)}{\Copt(r)}.]
We first exhibit a simple coordination mechanism that achieves for any
network of parallel links an engineered Price of Anarchy strictly less than
4/3. For the case of two parallel links our basic mechanism gives 5/4 = 1.25.
Then, for the case of two parallel links, we describe an optimal mechanism; its
engineered Price of Anarchy lies between 1.191 and 1.192.Comment: 17 pages, 2 figures, preliminary version appeared at ESA 201
An improved bound for the price of anarchy for related machine scheduling
In this paper, we introduce an improved upper bound for the efficiency of
Nash equilibria in utilitarian scheduling games on related machines. The
machines have varying speeds and adhere to the Shortest Processing Time (SPT)
policy as the global order for job processing. The goal of each job is to
minimize its completion time, while the social objective is to minimize the sum
of completion times. Our main result provides an upper bound of
on the price of anarchy for the general case of
machines. We improve this bound to 3/2 for the case of two machines, and to
for the general case of machines when the machines
have divisible speeds
Privacy-Preserving Public Information for Sequential Games
In settings with incomplete information, players can find it difficult to
coordinate to find states with good social welfare. For example, in financial
settings, if a collection of financial firms have limited information about
each other's strategies, some large number of them may choose the same
high-risk investment in hopes of high returns. While this might be acceptable
in some cases, the economy can be hurt badly if many firms make investments in
the same risky market segment and it fails. One reason why many firms might end
up choosing the same segment is that they do not have information about other
firms' investments (imperfect information may lead to `bad' game states).
Directly reporting all players' investments, however, raises confidentiality
concerns for both individuals and institutions.
In this paper, we explore whether information about the game-state can be
publicly announced in a manner that maintains the privacy of the actions of the
players, and still suffices to deter players from reaching bad game-states. We
show that in many games of interest, it is possible for players to avoid these
bad states with the help of privacy-preserving, publicly-announced information.
We model behavior of players in this imperfect information setting in two ways
-- greedy and undominated strategic behaviours, and we prove guarantees on
social welfare that certain kinds of privacy-preserving information can help
attain. Furthermore, we design a counter with improved privacy guarantees under
continual observation
Designing Networks with Good Equilibria under Uncertainty
We consider the problem of designing network cost-sharing protocols with good
equilibria under uncertainty. The underlying game is a multicast game in a
rooted undirected graph with nonnegative edge costs. A set of k terminal
vertices or players need to establish connectivity with the root. The social
optimum is the Minimum Steiner Tree. We are interested in situations where the
designer has incomplete information about the input. We propose two different
models, the adversarial and the stochastic. In both models, the designer has
prior knowledge of the underlying metric but the requested subset of the
players is not known and is activated either in an adversarial manner
(adversarial model) or is drawn from a known probability distribution
(stochastic model).
In the adversarial model, the designer's goal is to choose a single,
universal protocol that has low Price of Anarchy (PoA) for all possible
requested subsets of players. The main question we address is: to what extent
can prior knowledge of the underlying metric help in the design? We first
demonstrate that there exist graphs (outerplanar) where knowledge of the
underlying metric can dramatically improve the performance of good network
design. Then, in our main technical result, we show that there exist graph
metrics, for which knowing the underlying metric does not help and any
universal protocol has PoA of , which is tight. We attack this
problem by developing new techniques that employ powerful tools from extremal
combinatorics, and more specifically Ramsey Theory in high dimensional
hypercubes.
Then we switch to the stochastic model, where each player is independently
activated. We show that there exists a randomized ordered protocol that
achieves constant PoA. By using standard derandomization techniques, we produce
a deterministic ordered protocol with constant PoA.Comment: This version has additional results about stochastic inpu
Improving the Price of Anarchy for Selfish Routing via Coordination Mechanisms
We reconsider the well-studied Selfish Routing game with affine latency functions. The Price of Anarchy for this class of games takes maximum value 4/3; this maximum is attained already for a simple network of two parallel links, known as Pigou's network. We improve upon the value 4/3 by means of Coordination Mechanisms. We increase the latency functions of the edges in the network, i.e., if is the latency function of an edge , we replace it by with for all . Then an adversary fixes a demand rate as input. The engineered Price of Anarchy of the mechanism is defined as the worst-case ratio of the Nash social cost in the modified network over the optimal social cost in the original network. Formally, if \CM(r) denotes the cost of the worst Nash flow in the modified network for rate and \Copt(r) denotes the cost of the optimal flow in the original network for the same rate then [\ePoA = \max_{r \ge 0} \frac{\CM(r)}{\Copt(r)}.] We first exhibit a simple coordination mechanism that achieves for any network of parallel links an engineered Price of Anarchy strictly less than 4/3. For the case of two parallel links our basic mechanism gives 5/4 = 1.25. Then, for the case of two parallel links, we describe an optimal mechanism; its engineered Price of Anarchy lies between 1.191 and 1.192
Nash Social Welfare in Selfish and Online Load Balancing (Short Paper)
In load balancing problems there is a set of clients, each wishing to select a resource from a set of permissible ones, in order to execute a certain task. Each resource has a latency function, which depends on its workload, and a client's cost is the completion time of her chosen resource. Two fundamental variants of load balancing problems are selfish load balancing (aka. load balancing games), where clients are non-cooperative selfish players aimed at minimizing their own cost solely, and online load balancing, where clients appear online and have to be irrevocably assigned to a resource without any knowledge about future requests. We revisit both problems under the objective of minimizing the Nash Social Welfare, i.e., the geometric mean of the clients' costs. To the best of our knowledge, despite being a celebrated welfare estimator in many social contexts, the Nash Social Welfare has not been considered so far as a benchmarking quality measure in load balancing problems. We provide tight bounds on the price of anarchy of pure Nash equilibria and on the competitive ratio of the greedy algorithm under very general latency functions, including polynomial ones. For this particular class, we also prove that the greedy strategy is optimal, as it matches the performance of any possible online algorithm
- …