3,259 research outputs found
Applications of Finite Model Theory: Optimisation Problems, Hybrid Modal Logics and Games.
There exists an interesting relationships between two seemingly distinct fields: logic from the field of Model Theory, which deals with the truth of statements about discrete structures; and Computational Complexity, which deals with the classification of problems by how much of a particular computer resource is required in order to compute a solution. This relationship is known as Descriptive Complexity and it is the primary application of the tools from Model Theory when they are restricted to the finite; this restriction is commonly called Finite Model Theory.
In this thesis, we investigate the extension of the results of Descriptive Complexity from classes of decision problems to classes of optimisation problems. When dealing with decision problems the natural mapping from true and false in logic to yes and no instances of a problem is used but when dealing with optimisation problems, other features of a logic need to be used. We investigate what these features are and provide results in the form of logical frameworks that can be used for describing optimisation problems in particular classes, building on the existing research into this area.
Another application of Finite Model Theory that this thesis investigates is the relative expressiveness of various fragments of an extension of modal logic called hybrid modal logic. This is achieved through taking the Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé game from Model Theory and modifying it so that it can be applied to hybrid modal logic. Then, by developing winning strategies for the players in the game, results are obtained that show strict hierarchies of expressiveness for fragments of hybrid modal logic that are generated by varying the quantifier depth and the number of proposition and nominal symbols available
Comparing and evaluating extended Lambek calculi
Lambeks Syntactic Calculus, commonly referred to as the Lambek calculus, was
innovative in many ways, notably as a precursor of linear logic. But it also
showed that we could treat our grammatical framework as a logic (as opposed to
a logical theory). However, though it was successful in giving at least a basic
treatment of many linguistic phenomena, it was also clear that a slightly more
expressive logical calculus was needed for many other cases. Therefore, many
extensions and variants of the Lambek calculus have been proposed, since the
eighties and up until the present day. As a result, there is now a large class
of calculi, each with its own empirical successes and theoretical results, but
also each with its own logical primitives. This raises the question: how do we
compare and evaluate these different logical formalisms? To answer this
question, I present two unifying frameworks for these extended Lambek calculi.
Both are proof net calculi with graph contraction criteria. The first calculus
is a very general system: you specify the structure of your sequents and it
gives you the connectives and contractions which correspond to it. The calculus
can be extended with structural rules, which translate directly into graph
rewrite rules. The second calculus is first-order (multiplicative
intuitionistic) linear logic, which turns out to have several other,
independently proposed extensions of the Lambek calculus as fragments. I will
illustrate the use of each calculus in building bridges between analyses
proposed in different frameworks, in highlighting differences and in helping to
identify problems.Comment: Empirical advances in categorial grammars, Aug 2015, Barcelona,
Spain. 201
Extended RDF: Computability and Complexity Issues
ERDF stable model semantics is a recently proposed semantics for
ERDF ontologies and a faithful extension of RDFS semantics on RDF graphs.
In this paper, we elaborate on the computability and complexity issues of the
ERDF stable model semantics. Based on the undecidability result of ERDF
stable model semantics, decidability under this semantics cannot be achieved,
unless ERDF ontologies of restricted syntax are considered. Therefore, we
propose a slightly modified semantics for ERDF ontologies, called ERDF #n-
stable model semantics. We show that entailment under this semantics is, in
general, decidable and also extends RDFS entailment. Equivalence statements
between the two semantics are provided. Additionally, we provide algorithms
that compute the ERDF #n-stable models of syntax-restricted and general
ERDF ontologies. Further, we provide complexity results for the ERDF #nstable
model semantics on syntax-restricted and general ERDF ontologies.
Finally, we provide complexity results for the ERDF stable model semantics
on syntax-restricted ERDF ontologies
Heap Abstractions for Static Analysis
Heap data is potentially unbounded and seemingly arbitrary. As a consequence,
unlike stack and static memory, heap memory cannot be abstracted directly in
terms of a fixed set of source variable names appearing in the program being
analysed. This makes it an interesting topic of study and there is an abundance
of literature employing heap abstractions. Although most studies have addressed
similar concerns, their formulations and formalisms often seem dissimilar and
some times even unrelated. Thus, the insights gained in one description of heap
abstraction may not directly carry over to some other description. This survey
is a result of our quest for a unifying theme in the existing descriptions of
heap abstractions. In particular, our interest lies in the abstractions and not
in the algorithms that construct them.
In our search of a unified theme, we view a heap abstraction as consisting of
two features: a heap model to represent the heap memory and a summarization
technique for bounding the heap representation. We classify the models as
storeless, store based, and hybrid. We describe various summarization
techniques based on k-limiting, allocation sites, patterns, variables, other
generic instrumentation predicates, and higher-order logics. This approach
allows us to compare the insights of a large number of seemingly dissimilar
heap abstractions and also paves way for creating new abstractions by
mix-and-match of models and summarization techniques.Comment: 49 pages, 20 figure
Model Checking One-clock Priced Timed Automata
We consider the model of priced (a.k.a. weighted) timed automata, an
extension of timed automata with cost information on both locations and
transitions, and we study various model-checking problems for that model based
on extensions of classical temporal logics with cost constraints on modalities.
We prove that, under the assumption that the model has only one clock,
model-checking this class of models against the logic WCTL, CTL with
cost-constrained modalities, is PSPACE-complete (while it has been shown
undecidable as soon as the model has three clocks). We also prove that
model-checking WMTL, LTL with cost-constrained modalities, is decidable only if
there is a single clock in the model and a single stopwatch cost variable
(i.e., whose slopes lie in {0,1}).Comment: 28 page
A Goal-Directed Implementation of Query Answering for Hybrid MKNF Knowledge Bases
Ontologies and rules are usually loosely coupled in knowledge representation
formalisms. In fact, ontologies use open-world reasoning while the leading
semantics for rules use non-monotonic, closed-world reasoning. One exception is
the tightly-coupled framework of Minimal Knowledge and Negation as Failure
(MKNF), which allows statements about individuals to be jointly derived via
entailment from an ontology and inferences from rules. Nonetheless, the
practical usefulness of MKNF has not always been clear, although recent work
has formalized a general resolution-based method for querying MKNF when rules
are taken to have the well-founded semantics, and the ontology is modeled by a
general oracle. That work leaves open what algorithms should be used to relate
the entailments of the ontology and the inferences of rules. In this paper we
provide such algorithms, and describe the implementation of a query-driven
system, CDF-Rules, for hybrid knowledge bases combining both (non-monotonic)
rules under the well-founded semantics and a (monotonic) ontology, represented
by a CDF Type-1 (ALQ) theory. To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic
Programming (TPLP
The Grail theorem prover: Type theory for syntax and semantics
As the name suggests, type-logical grammars are a grammar formalism based on
logic and type theory. From the prespective of grammar design, type-logical
grammars develop the syntactic and semantic aspects of linguistic phenomena
hand-in-hand, letting the desired semantics of an expression inform the
syntactic type and vice versa. Prototypical examples of the successful
application of type-logical grammars to the syntax-semantics interface include
coordination, quantifier scope and extraction.This chapter describes the Grail
theorem prover, a series of tools for designing and testing grammars in various
modern type-logical grammars which functions as a tool . All tools described in
this chapter are freely available
Clausal Resolution for Modal Logics of Confluence
We present a clausal resolution-based method for normal multimodal logics of
confluence, whose Kripke semantics are based on frames characterised by
appropriate instances of the Church-Rosser property. Here we restrict attention
to eight families of such logics. We show how the inference rules related to
the normal logics of confluence can be systematically obtained from the
parametrised axioms that characterise such systems. We discuss soundness,
completeness, and termination of the method. In particular, completeness can be
modularly proved by showing that the conclusions of each newly added inference
rule ensures that the corresponding conditions on frames hold. Some examples
are given in order to illustrate the use of the method.Comment: 15 pages, 1 figure. Preprint of the paper accepted to IJCAR 201
Interrupt Timed Automata: verification and expressiveness
We introduce the class of Interrupt Timed Automata (ITA), a subclass of
hybrid automata well suited to the description of timed multi-task systems with
interruptions in a single processor environment. While the reachability problem
is undecidable for hybrid automata we show that it is decidable for ITA. More
precisely we prove that the untimed language of an ITA is regular, by building
a finite automaton as a generalized class graph. We then establish that the
reachability problem for ITA is in NEXPTIME and in PTIME when the number of
clocks is fixed. To prove the first result, we define a subclass ITA- of ITA,
and show that (1) any ITA can be reduced to a language-equivalent automaton in
ITA- and (2) the reachability problem in this subclass is in NEXPTIME (without
any class graph). In the next step, we investigate the verification of real
time properties over ITA. We prove that model checking SCL, a fragment of a
timed linear time logic, is undecidable. On the other hand, we give model
checking procedures for two fragments of timed branching time logic. We also
compare the expressive power of classical timed automata and ITA and prove that
the corresponding families of accepted languages are incomparable. The result
also holds for languages accepted by controlled real-time automata (CRTA), that
extend timed automata. We finally combine ITA with CRTA, in a model which
encompasses both classes and show that the reachability problem is still
decidable. Additionally we show that the languages of ITA are neither closed
under complementation nor under intersection
- …