Using a simulated student to repair difficulties in collaborative learning

We describe the use of a simulated student in a synchronous but distributed collaborative learning environment in the domain of programming. The role of the simulated student is to detect and repair difficulties in collaborative learning amongst the human students, for example when a human student is too passive or when the students start chatting about off-topic conversations. The simulated student intervenes by posting messages in the shared "chat" window, just like the human students and was believed to be another human student by them. The paper describes the rules by which the simulated student operates and briefly outlines an evaluation of the system with university first year programming students. The system proved to be successful both in detecting a range of difficulties and in intervening effectively

Does like seek like?: the formation of working groups in a programming project

In a course of the degree of computer science, the programming project has changed from individual to teamed work, tentatively in couples (pair programming). Students have full freedom to team up with minimum intervention from teachers. The analysis of the couples made indicates that students do not tend to associate with students with a similar academic performance, maybe because general cognitive parameters do not govern the choice of academic partners. Pair programming seems to give great results, so the efforts of future research in this field should focus precisely on how these pairs are formed, underpinning the mechanisms of human social interactionsPeer Reviewe

Incorporating learning styles in a computer-supported collaborative learning model

Collaborative learning enables individual learners to combine their own expertise, experience and ability to accomplish a mutual learning goal. The grouping of learners, and learning from social interactions with peer-learners, are two basic characteristics of collaborative learning. For individual learners to benefit from collaborative learning, individual learners with different characteristics must be grouped together. In this paper, we propose a computer-supported collaborative learning model which incorporates learning styles for improving collaborative learning. The proposed model is novel since it can provide overall support for collaborative learning. In addition, the way we have incorporated learning styles in the model is a new approach to constituting heterogeneous groups containing learners with dissimilar learning styles and detect learning styles through monitoring collaborative interactions

Adaptive group formation to promote desired behaviours

BACKGROUND There is substantial literature that shows the benefits of collaborative work, though these benefits vary enormously with circumstances. Irrespective of their structure and composition, groups usually exist for a particular reason and implicitly or explicitly target one or more outcomes. The achievements of group outcomes depend on many factors, including the individual behaviour of each group member. These behaviours are, in turn, affected by the individual characteristics, the context and the group composition. Constructing groups in a way that maximises the achievement of a specific outcome is complex with the optimal group composition depending on the attributes of the group members. Previous work has in most cases considered group formation based on one particular attribute, such as learning style, gender, personality, etc. Less common are instances of group formation rules being adjusted systematically to accommodate changes in an individualâs attributes or disposition. PURPOSE This paper considers how the multi-factorial nature of group performance and the variations in desired behaviour across different circumstances can be addressed within a consistent framework. DESIGN/METHOD The methodology consisted of two main stages. In the first stage, a simulation was encoded in MatLab to assess the conceptual approach of progressively updating rules for group formation. The method uses an unsupervised learning algorithm and correlation factors between quantifiable group characteristics (average age, degree of motivation, etc.) and resultant behaviours of the groups that are actually formed (level of dialogue, interface interactions, etc.) to update the rules used for group formation, and hence progressively construct groups that are more likely to behave in desired ways. The second stage involved an evaluation of this approach in a real world scenario using remotely accessible laboratories where engineering students voluntarily participated in a study in April 2012. RESULTS The simulation results show that under certain conditions the desired behaviour chosen with the intention of improving specific learning outcomes can be optimized and that groups can be constructed that are more likely to exhibit desired behaviour. The paper also reports preliminary evidence that shows the feasibility of this approach in selecting group participants in an engineering class to promote a desired outcome in this case independent learning. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a set of individual characteristics of group members to form groups that are more likely to have desired group behaviours and that these characteristics can be monitored and updated to dynamically alter group formation to account for changes in any individualâs characteristics. This has potential to allow groups formation decisions to be made dynamically to achieve a desired outcome, for example promote collaborative learning

Group Formation Using Multi Objectives Ant Colony System for Collaborative Learning

Collaborative learning is widely applied in education. One of the key aspects of collaborative learning is group formation. A challenge in group formation is to determine appropriate attributes and attribute types to gain good group results. This paper studies the use of an improved ant colony system (ACS), called Multi Objective Ant Colony System (MOACS), for group formation. Unlike ACS that transforms all attribute values into a single value, thus making any attributes are not optimally worth, MOACS tries to gain optimal values of all attributes simultaneously. MOACS is designed for various combinations of attributes and can be used for homogeneous, heterogeneous or mixed attributes. In this paper, sensing/intuitive learning styles (LSSI) and interests in subjects (I) are used in homogeneous group formation, while active/reflective learning style (LSAR) and previous knowledge (KL) are used for heterogeneous or mixed group formation. Experiments were conducted for measuring the average goodness of attributes (avgGA) and standard deviation of goodness of attributes (stdGA). The objectives of MOACS for homogeneous attributes were minimum avgGA and stdGA, while those for heterogeneous attributes were maximum avgGA and minimum stdGA. As a conclusion, MOACS was appropriate for group formation with homogeneous or mixed

Applying New Technologies to Upgrade Non-English Speakers’ English Speaking Skills

As technologies are getting more and more advanced, modernized information technologies start to step into the field of education. The application of multimedia- assisted instruction is getting more and more popular. This can stimulate students’ interests as well as promote students’ development and improve teaching efficiency. Teachers’ work should be student centered, and teachers’ function is to provide help and guidance in students’ studies. With the introduction of new technologies, students start to be fond of having classes. They start to have interests in studies. This can create a positive learning environment to students, which meets the social requirements of this era. This project is to provide some ideas and methods of applying new technologies in English instruction to expose students in a more authentic learning environment and improve their speaking skills

ピアアセスメントのための項目反応理論と整数計画法を用いたグループ構成最適化

In recent years, large-scale e-learning environments such as Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs) have become increasingly popular. In such environments, peer assessment, which is mutual assessment among learners, has been used to evaluate reports and programming assignments. When the number of learners increases as in MOOCs, peer assessment is often conducted by dividing learners into multiple groups to reduce the learners’ assessment workload. In this case, however, the accuracy of peer assessment depends on the way to form groups. To solve the problem, this study proposes a group optimization method based on item response theory (IRT) and integer programming. The proposed group optimization method is formulated as an integer programming problem that maximizes the Fisher information, which is a widely used index of ability assessment accuracy in IRT. Experimental results, however, show that the proposed method cannot sufficiently improve the accuracy compared to the random group formulation. To overcome this limitation, this study introduces the concept of external raters and proposes an external rater selection method that assigns a few appropriate external raters to each learner after the groups were formed using the proposed group optimization method. In this study, an external rater is defined as a peer-rater who belongs to different groups. The proposed external rater selection method is formulated as an integer programming problem that maximizes the lower bound of the Fisher information of the estimated ability of the learners by the external raters. Experimental results using both simulated and real-world peer assessment data show that the introduction of external raters is useful to improve the accuracy sufficiently. The result also demonstrates that the proposed external rater selection method based on IRT models can significantly improve the accuracy of ability assessment than the random selection.近年，MOOCsなどの大規模型eラーニングが普及してきた．大規模な数の学習者が参加している場合には，教師が一人で学習者のレポートやプログラム課題などを評価することは難しい．大規模の学習者の評価手法の一つとして，学習者同士によるピアアセスメントが注目されている．MOOCsのように学習者数が多い場合のピアアセスメントは，評価の負担を軽減するために学習者を複数のグループに分割してグループ内のメンバ同士で行うことが多い．しかし，この場合，グループ構成の仕方によって評価結果が大きく変化してしまう問題がある．この問題を解決するために，本研究では，項目反応理論と整数計画法を用いて，グループで行うピアアセスメントの精度を最適化するグループ構成手法を提案する．具体的には，項目反応理論において学習者の能力測定精度を表すフィッシャー情報量を最大化する整数計画問題としてグループ構成問題を定式化する．実験の結果，ランダムグループ構成と比べて，提案手法はおおむね測定精度を改善したが，それは限定的な結果であることが明らかとなった．そこで，本研究ではさらに，異なるグループから数名の学習者を外部評価者として各学習者に割り当て外部評価者選択手法を提案する．シミュレーションと実データ実験により，提案手法を用いることで能力測定精度を大幅に改善できることを示す．電気通信大学201

Developing a group model for student software engineering teams

Work on developing team models for use in adaptive systems generally and intelligent tutoring systems more specifically has largely focused on the task skills or learning efficacy of teams working on short-term projects in highly-controlled virtual environments. In this work, we report on the development of a balanced team model that takes into account task skills, teamwork behaviours and team workflow that has been empirically evaluated via an uncontrolled real-world long-term pilot study of student software engineering teams. We also discuss the use of the the J4.8 machine learning algorithm with our team model in the construction of a team performance prediction system

Koostöise loovliikumise rakendamisvõimalused õppimise toetamisel põhikooli II kooliastmes ühe klassi näitel

https://www.ester.ee/record=b5253934*es

Adapting Collaborative Learning Tools to Support Group Peer Mentorship

Group peer mentorship is a relatively new addition to the area of collaborative learning. We see an untapped potential in supporting this model of mentorship with the existing collaborative learning tools like peer review and wiki. Therefore, we proposed to use a modified peer review system and a modified wiki system. From our preliminary studies using both peer review and wiki systems, we found that participants preferred the peer-review system to the wiki system in supporting them for mentorship. Therefore, this dissertation specifically addresses how to adapt the peer review system to support group peer mentorship. We proposed a modified peer review system, which comprises seven stages – initial submission of the first draft of the paper by the author, the review of author’s paper by peer reviewers, release of review feedback to the author, back-evaluation of their reviews by the authors, modification of the paper by the author, submission of the final paper and the final stage where both authors and reviewers provide an evaluation of the peer review process with respect to their learning, their perception of the helpfulness of the process, and their satisfaction with the process. We also proposed to use our group matching algorithm, based on some constraints and the principles of the Hungarian algorithm, to achieve a diversified grouping of peers for each peer review session. With these, we conducted six peer review studies with the graduate and undergraduate students at the University of Saskatchewan and teachers in Chile. This dissertation reports on the findings from these studies. We found that peer review, with some modifications, is a good tool to facilitate group peer mentorship. An evaluation of the performance of our group matching algorithm showed an improvement over three other algorithms, with respect to three metrics – knowledge gain of peers, time and space consumption of the algorithm. Finally, this dissertation also shows that wiki has the potential to support group peer mentorship, but needs further research