7,460 research outputs found
Game Theory Meets Network Security: A Tutorial at ACM CCS
The increasingly pervasive connectivity of today's information systems brings
up new challenges to security. Traditional security has accomplished a long way
toward protecting well-defined goals such as confidentiality, integrity,
availability, and authenticity. However, with the growing sophistication of the
attacks and the complexity of the system, the protection using traditional
methods could be cost-prohibitive. A new perspective and a new theoretical
foundation are needed to understand security from a strategic and
decision-making perspective. Game theory provides a natural framework to
capture the adversarial and defensive interactions between an attacker and a
defender. It provides a quantitative assessment of security, prediction of
security outcomes, and a mechanism design tool that can enable
security-by-design and reverse the attacker's advantage. This tutorial provides
an overview of diverse methodologies from game theory that includes games of
incomplete information, dynamic games, mechanism design theory to offer a
modern theoretic underpinning of a science of cybersecurity. The tutorial will
also discuss open problems and research challenges that the CCS community can
address and contribute with an objective to build a multidisciplinary bridge
between cybersecurity, economics, game and decision theory
Dynkin games with incomplete and asymmetric information
We study the value and the optimal strategies for a two-player zero-sum
optimal stopping game with incomplete and asymmetric information. In our
Bayesian set-up, the drift of the underlying diffusion process is unknown to
one player (incomplete information feature), but known to the other one
(asymmetric information feature). We formulate the problem and reduce it to a
fully Markovian setup where the uninformed player optimises over stopping times
and the informed one uses randomised stopping times in order to hide their
informational advantage. Then we provide a general verification result which
allows us to find the value of the game and players' optimal strategies by
solving suitable quasi-variational inequalities with some non-standard
constraints. Finally, we study an example with linear payoffs, in which an
explicit solution of the corresponding quasi-variational inequalities can be
obtained.Comment: 31 pages, 5 figures, small changes in the terminology from game
theor
An Investigation Report on Auction Mechanism Design
Auctions are markets with strict regulations governing the information
available to traders in the market and the possible actions they can take.
Since well designed auctions achieve desirable economic outcomes, they have
been widely used in solving real-world optimization problems, and in
structuring stock or futures exchanges. Auctions also provide a very valuable
testing-ground for economic theory, and they play an important role in
computer-based control systems.
Auction mechanism design aims to manipulate the rules of an auction in order
to achieve specific goals. Economists traditionally use mathematical methods,
mainly game theory, to analyze auctions and design new auction forms. However,
due to the high complexity of auctions, the mathematical models are typically
simplified to obtain results, and this makes it difficult to apply results
derived from such models to market environments in the real world. As a result,
researchers are turning to empirical approaches.
This report aims to survey the theoretical and empirical approaches to
designing auction mechanisms and trading strategies with more weights on
empirical ones, and build the foundation for further research in the field
Dynamical selection of Nash equilibria using Experience Weighted Attraction Learning: emergence of heterogeneous mixed equilibria
We study the distribution of strategies in a large game that models how
agents choose among different double auction markets. We classify the possible
mean field Nash equilibria, which include potentially segregated states where
an agent population can split into subpopulations adopting different
strategies. As the game is aggregative, the actual equilibrium strategy
distributions remain undetermined, however. We therefore compare with the
results of Experience-Weighted Attraction (EWA) learning, which at long times
leads to Nash equilibria in the appropriate limits of large intensity of
choice, low noise (long agent memory) and perfect imputation of missing scores
(fictitious play). The learning dynamics breaks the indeterminacy of the Nash
equilibria. Non-trivially, depending on how the relevant limits are taken, more
than one type of equilibrium can be selected. These include the standard
homogeneous mixed and heterogeneous pure states, but also \emph{heterogeneous
mixed} states where different agents play different strategies that are not all
pure. The analysis of the EWA learning involves Fokker-Planck modeling combined
with large deviation methods. The theoretical results are confirmed by
multi-agent simulations.Comment: 35 pages, 16 figure
Contagion through learning
We study learning in a large class of complete information normal form games. Players continually face new strategic situations and must form beliefs by extrapolation from similar past situations. We characterize the long-run outcomes of learning in terms of iterated dominance in a related incomplete information game with subjective priors. The use of extrapolations in learning may generate contagion of actions across games even if players learn only from games with payoffs very close to the current ones. Contagion may lead to unique long-run outcomes where multiplicity would occur if players learned through repeatedly playing the same game. The process of contagion through learning is formally related to contagion in global games, although the outcomes generally differ.Similarity, learning, contagion, case-based reasoning, global games
- …