A non-uniform predictor-observer for a networked control system

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12555-011-0621-5This paper presents a Non-Uniform Predictor-Observer (NUPO) based control approach in order to deal with two of the main problems related to Networked Control Systems (NCS) or Sensor Networks (SN): time-varying delays and packet loss. In addition, if these delays are longer than the sampling period, the packet disordering phenomenon can appear. Due to these issues, a (scarce) nonuniform, delayed measurement signal could be received by the controller. But including the NUPO proposal in the control system, the delay will be compensated by the prediction stage, and the nonavailable data will be reconstructed by the observer stage. So, a delay-free, uniformly sampled controller design can be adopted. To ensure stability, the predictor must satisfy a feasibility problem based on a time-varying delay-dependent condition expressed in terms of Linear Matrix Inequalities (LMI). Some aspects like the relation between network delay and robustness/performance trade-off are empirically studied. A simulation example shows the benefits (robustness and control performance improvement) of the NUPO approach by comparison to another similar proposal. © ICROS, KIEE and Springer 2011.This work was supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia Projects DPI2008-06737-C02-01 and DPI2009-14744-C03-03, by Generalitat Valenciana Project GV/2010/018, by Universidad Politecnica de Valencia Project PAID06-08.Cuenca Lacruz, ÁM.; García Gil, PJ.; Albertos Pérez, P.; Salt Llobregat, JJ. (2011). A non-uniform predictor-observer for a networked control system. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems. 9(6):1194-1202. doi:10.1007/s12555-011-0621-5S1194120296K. Ogata, Discrete-time Control Systems, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1987.Y. Tipsuwan and M. Chow, “Control methodologies in networked control systems,” Control Eng. Practice, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1099–1111, 2003.T. Jia, Y. Niu, and X. Wang, “H ∞ control for networked systems with data packet dropout,” Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 198–203, 2010.Y. Wang and G. Yang, “Robust H ∞ model reference tracking control for networked control systems with communication constraints,” Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 992–1000, 2009.H. Gao and T. Chen, “Network-based H ∞ output tracking control,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 655–667, 2008.H. Karimi, “Robust H ∞ filter design for uncertain linear systems over network with network-induced delays and output quantization,” Modeling, Identification and Control, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 27–37, 2009.H. R. Karimi, “Delay-range-dependent linear matrix inequality approach to quantized H ∞ control of linear systems with network-induced delays and norm-bounded uncertainties,” Proc. of the Inst. of Mech. Eng., Part I: J. of Syst. and Control Eng., vol. 224, no. 6, pp. 689–700, 2010.K. Lee, S. Lee, and M. Lee, “Remote fuzzy logic control of networked control system via Profibus-DP,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 784–792, 2003.Y. Tipsuwan and M.-Y. Chow, “Gain scheduler middleware: a methodology to enable existing controllers for networked control and teleoperationpart I: networked Control,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1218–1227, December 2004.A. Sala, A. Cuenca, and J. Salt, “A retunable PID multi-rate controller for a networked control system,” Inform. Sci., vol. 179, no. 14, pp. 2390–2402, June 2009.A. Cuenca, J. Salt, V. Casanova, and R. Piza, “An approach based on an adaptive multi-rate Smith predictor and gain scheduling for a networked control system: implementation over Profibus-DP,” Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 473–481, April 2010.A. Cuenca, J. Salt, A. Sala, and R. Piza, “A delay-dependent dual-rate PID controller over an Ethernet network,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 18–29, Feb. 2011.Y. Tian and D. Levy, “Compensation for control packet dropout in networked control systems,” Inform. Sci., vol. 178, no. 5, pp. 1263–1278, 2008.Y. Zhao, G. Liu, and D. Rees, “Modeling and stabilization of continuous-time packet-based networked control systems.” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. B, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1646–1652, Dec. 2009.X. Zhao, S. Fei, and C. Sun, “Impulsive controller design for singular networked control systems with packet dropouts,” Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1020–1025, 2009.H. Gao and T. Chen, “H ∞ estimation for uncertain systems with limited communication capacity,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 2070–2084, 2007.S. Oh, L. Schenato, P. Chen, and S. Sastry, “Tracking and coordination of multiple agents using sensor networks: System design, algorithms and experiments,” Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 234–254, 2007.M. Moayedi, Y. Foo, and Y. Soh, “Optimal and suboptimal minimum-variance filtering in networked systems with mixed uncertainties of random sensor delays, packet dropouts and missing measurements,” Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1179–1188, 2010.W. Zhang, M. Branicky, and S. Phillips, “Stability of networked control systems,” IEEE Control Syst. Mag., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 84–99, 2001.J. Hespanha, P. Naghshtabrizi, and Y. Xu, “A survey of recent results in networked control systems,” Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 138–162, 2007.J. Baillieul and P. Antsaklis, “Control and communication challenges in networked real-time systems,” Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 9–28, 2007.P. Garcia, P. Castillo, R. Lozano, and P. Albertos, “Robustness with respect to delay uncertainties of a predictor-observer based discrete-time controller,” Proc. of the 45th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, pp. 199–204, 2006.C. Lien, “Robust observer-based control of systems with state perturbations via LMI approach,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 1365–1370, 2004.A. Sala, “Computer control under time-varying sampling period: an LMI gridding approach,” Automatica, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 2077–2082, Dec. 2005.J. Li, Q. Zhang, Y. Wang, and M. Cai, “H ∞ control of networked control systems with packet disordering,” IET Control Theory Appl., vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 1463–1475, March 2009.Y. Zhao, G. Liu, and D. Rees, “Improved predictive control approach to networked control systems,” IET Control Theory Appl., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 675–681, Aug. 2008.K. Astrom, “Event based control,” Analysis and Design of Nonlinear Control Systems, pp. 127–147, 2007.A. Cuenca, P. García, K. Arzén, and P. Albertos, “A predictor-observer for a networked control system with time-varying delays and non-uniform sampling,” Proc. Eur. Control Conf., pp. 946–951, 2009.J. Xiong and J. Lam, “Stabilization of linear systems over networks with bounded packet loss,” Automatica, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 80–87, 2007.H. Song, L. Yu, and A. Liu, “H ∞ filtering for network-based systems with communication constraints and packet dropouts,” Proc. of the 7th Asian Control Conf., pp. 220–225, 2009.P. Garcia, A. Gonzalez, P. Castillo, R. Lozano, and P. Albertos, “Robustness of a discrete-time predictor-based controller for time-varying measurement delay,” Proc. of the 9th IFAC Workshop on Time Delay Systems, 2010.J. Sturm, “Using SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones,” Optimization methods and software, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 625–653, 1999.T. Henningsson and K. Astrom, “Log-concave observers,” Proc. of the 17th Int. Symp. on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems, pp. 2163–2170, 2006.D. Davison and E. Hwang, “Automating radiotherapy cancer treatment: use of multirate observer-based control,” Proc. of American Control Conf., vol. 2, pp. 1194–1199, 2003

Optimal Control for Aperiodic Dual-Rate Systems With Time-Varying Delays

[EN] In this work, we consider a dual-rate scenario with slow input and fast output. Our objective is the maximization of the decay rate of the system through the suitable choice of the n-input signals between two measures (periodic sampling) and their times of application. The optimization algorithm is extended for time-varying delays in order to make possible its implementation in networked control systems. We provide experimental results in an air levitation system to verify the validity of the algorithm in a real plant.This work was supported in part by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) under the Projects DPI2012-31303 and DPI2014-55932-C2-2-R.Aranda-Escolástico, E.; Salt Llobregat, JJ.; Guinaldo, M.; Chacon, J.; Dormido, S. (2018). Optimal Control for Aperiodic Dual-Rate Systems With Time-Varying Delays. Sensors. 18(5):1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051491S119185Mansano, R., Godoy, E., & Porto, A. (2014). The Benefits of Soft Sensor and Multi-Rate Control for the Implementation of Wireless Networked Control Systems. Sensors, 14(12), 24441-24461. doi:10.3390/s141224441Shao, Q. M., & Cinar, A. (2015). System identification and distributed control for multi-rate sampled systems. Journal of Process Control, 34, 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2015.06.010Albertos, P., & Salt, J. (2011). Non-uniform sampled-data control of MIMO systems. Annual Reviews in Control, 35(1), 65-76. doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2011.03.004Cuenca, A., & Salt, J. (2012). RST controller design for a non-uniform multi-rate control system. Journal of Process Control, 22(10), 1865-1877. doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2012.09.010Cuenca, Á., Ojha, U., Salt, J., & Chow, M.-Y. (2015). A non-uniform multi-rate control strategy for a Markov chain-driven Networked Control System. Information Sciences, 321, 31-47. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2015.05.035Kalman, R. E., & Bertram, J. E. (1959). General synthesis procedure for computer control of single-loop and multiloop linear systems (an optimal sampling system). Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, Part II: Applications and Industry, 77(6), 602-609. doi:10.1109/tai.1959.6371508Khargonekar, P., Poolla, K., & Tannenbaum, A. (1985). Robust control of linear time-invariant plants using periodic compensation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 30(11), 1088-1096. doi:10.1109/tac.1985.1103841Bamieh, B., Pearson, J. B., Francis, B. A., & Tannenbaum, A. (1991). A lifting technique for linear periodic systems with applications to sampled-data control. Systems & Control Letters, 17(2), 79-88. doi:10.1016/0167-6911(91)90033-bLi, D., Shah, S. L., Chen, T., & Qi, K. Z. (2001). Application of dual-rate modeling to CCR octane quality inferential control. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 34(25), 353-357. doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)33849-1Salt, J., & Albertos, P. (2005). Model-based multirate controllers design. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 13(6), 988-997. doi:10.1109/tcst.2005.857410Nemani, M., Tsao, T.-C., & Hutchinson, S. (1994). Multi-Rate Analysis and Design of Visual Feedback Digital Servo-Control System. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 116(1), 45-55. doi:10.1115/1.2900680Sim, T. P., Lim, K. B., & Hong, G. S. (2002). Multirate predictor control scheme for visual servo control. IEE Proceedings - Control Theory and Applications, 149(2), 117-124. doi:10.1049/ip-cta:20020238Xinghui Huang, Nagamune, R., & Horowitz, R. (2006). A comparison of multirate robust track-following control synthesis techniques for dual-stage and multisensing servo systems in hard disk drives. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 42(7), 1896-1904. doi:10.1109/tmag.2006.875353Wu, Y., Liu, Y., & Zhang, W. (2013). A Discrete-Time Chattering Free Sliding Mode Control with Multirate Sampling Method for Flight Simulator. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, 1-8. doi:10.1155/2013/865493Salt, J., & Tomizuka, M. (2014). Hard disk drive control by model based dual-rate controller. Computation saving by interlacing. Mechatronics, 24(6), 691-700. doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.12.003Salt, J., Casanova, V., Cuenca, A., & Pizá, R. (2013). Multirate control with incomplete information over Profibus-DP network. International Journal of Systems Science, 45(7), 1589-1605. doi:10.1080/00207721.2013.844286Liu, F., Gao, H., Qiu, J., Yin, S., Fan, J., & Chai, T. (2014). Networked Multirate Output Feedback Control for Setpoints Compensation and Its Application to Rougher Flotation Process. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 61(1), 460-468. doi:10.1109/tie.2013.2240640Khargonekar, P. P., & Sivashankar, N. (1991). 2 optimal control for sampled-data systems. Systems & Control Letters, 17(6), 425-436. doi:10.1016/0167-6911(91)90082-pTornero, J., Albertos, P., & Salt, J. (2001). Periodic Optimal Control of Multirate Sampled Data Systems. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 34(12), 195-200. doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)34084-3Kim, C. H., Park, H. J., Lee, J., Lee, H. W., & Lee, K. D. (2015). Multi-rate optimal controller design for electromagnetic suspension systems via linear matrix inequality optimization. Journal of Applied Physics, 117(17), 17B506. doi:10.1063/1.4906588LEE, J. H., GELORMINO, M. S., & MORARIH, M. (1992). Model predictive control of multi-rate sampled-data systems: a state-space approach. International Journal of Control, 55(1), 153-191. doi:10.1080/00207179208934231Mizumoto, I., Ikejiri, M., & Takagi, T. (2015). Stable Adaptive Predictive Control System Design via Adaptive Output Predictor for Multi-rate Sampled Systems∗∗This work was partially supported by KAKENHI, the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 25420444, from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(8), 1039-1044. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.09.105Carpiuc, S., & Lazar, C. (2016). Real-Time Multi-Rate Predictive Cascade Speed Control of Synchronous Machines in Automotive Electrical Traction Drives. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 1-1. doi:10.1109/tie.2016.2561881Roshany-Yamchi, S., Cychowski, M., Negenborn, R. R., De Schutter, B., Delaney, K., & Connell, J. (2013). Kalman Filter-Based Distributed Predictive Control of Large-Scale Multi-Rate Systems: Application to Power Networks. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 21(1), 27-39. doi:10.1109/tcst.2011.2172444Donkers, M. C. F., Tabuada, P., & Heemels, W. P. M. H. (2012). Minimum attention control for linear systems. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, 24(2), 199-218. doi:10.1007/s10626-012-0155-xQuevedo, D. E., Ma, W.-J., & Gupta, V. (2015). Anytime Control Using Input Sequences With Markovian Processor Availability. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 60(2), 515-521. doi:10.1109/tac.2014.2335311Aranda Escolastico, E., Guinaldo, M., Cuenca, A., Salt, J., & Dormido, S. (2017). Anytime Optimal Control Strategy for Multi-Rate Systems. IEEE Access, 5, 2790-2797. doi:10.1109/access.2017.2671906Guinaldo, M., Sánchez, J., & Dormido, S. (2017). Control en red basado en eventos: de lo centralizado a lo distribuido. Revista Iberoamericana de Automática e Informática Industrial RIAI, 14(1), 16-30. doi:10.1016/j.riai.2016.09.007Van Loan, C. (1977). The Sensitivity of the Matrix Exponential. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 14(6), 971-981. doi:10.1137/0714065Hazan, E. (2016). Introduction to Online Convex Optimization. Foundations and Trends® in Optimization, 2(3-4), 157-325. doi:10.1561/2400000013Sala, A., Cuenca, Á., & Salt, J. (2009). A retunable PID multi-rate controller for a networked control system. Information Sciences, 179(14), 2390-2402. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2009.02.017Chacon, J., Saenz, J., Torre, L., Diaz, J., & Esquembre, F. (2017). Design of a Low-Cost Air Levitation System for Teaching Control Engineering. Sensors, 17(10), 2321. doi:10.3390/s1710232

On general systems with network-enhanced complexities

In recent years, the study of networked control systems (NCSs) has gradually become an active research area due to the advantages of using networked media in many aspects such as the ease of maintenance and installation, the large flexibility and the low cost. It is well known that the devices in networks are mutually connected via communication cables that are of limited capacity. Therefore, some network-induced phenomena have inevitably emerged in the areas of signal processing and control engineering. These phenomena include, but are not limited to, network-induced communication delays, missing data, signal quantization, saturations, and channel fading. It is of great importance to understand how these phenomena influence the closed-loop stability and performance properties

Mathematical control of complex systems 2013

Mathematical control of complex systems have already become an ideal research area for control engineers, mathematicians, computer scientists, and biologists to understand, manage, analyze, and interpret functional information/dynamical behaviours from real-world complex dynamical systems, such as communication systems, process control, environmental systems, intelligent manufacturing systems, transportation systems, and structural systems. This special issue aims to bring together the latest/innovative knowledge and advances in mathematics for handling complex systems. Topics include, but are not limited to the following: control systems theory (behavioural systems, networked control systems, delay systems, distributed systems, infinite-dimensional systems, and positive systems); networked control (channel capacity constraints, control over communication networks, distributed filtering and control, information theory and control, and sensor networks); and stochastic systems (nonlinear filtering, nonparametric methods, particle filtering, partial identification, stochastic control, stochastic realization, system identification)

Stochastic model predictive control for constrained networked control systems with random time delay

In this paper the continuous time stochastic constrained optimal control problem is formulated for the class of networked control systems assuming that time delays follow a discrete-time, finite Markov chain . Polytopic overapproximations of the system's trajectories are employed to produce a polyhedral inner approximation of the non-convex constraint set resulting from imposing the constraints in continuous time. The problem is cast in a Markov jump linear systems (MJLS) framework and a stochastic MPC controller is calculated explicitly, oine, coupling dynamic programming with parametric piecewise quadratic (PWQ) optimization. The calculated control law leads to stochastic stability of the closed loop system, in the mean square sense and respects the state and input constraints in continuous time

Performance analysis with network-enhanced complexities: On fading measurements, event-triggered mechanisms, and cyber attacks

Copyright © 2014 Derui Ding et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Nowadays, the real-world systems are usually subject to various complexities such as parameter uncertainties, time-delays, and nonlinear disturbances. For networked systems, especially large-scale systems such as multiagent systems and systems over sensor networks, the complexities are inevitably enhanced in terms of their degrees or intensities because of the usage of the communication networks. Therefore, it would be interesting to (1) examine how this kind of network-enhanced complexities affects the control or filtering performance; and (2) develop some suitable approaches for controller/filter design problems. In this paper, we aim to survey some recent advances on the performance analysis and synthesis with three sorts of fashionable network-enhanced complexities, namely, fading measurements, event-triggered mechanisms, and attack behaviors of adversaries. First, these three kinds of complexities are introduced in detail according to their engineering backgrounds, dynamical characteristic, and modelling techniques. Then, the developments of the performance analysis and synthesis issues for various networked systems are systematically reviewed. Furthermore, some challenges are illustrated by using a thorough literature review and some possible future research directions are highlighted.This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 61134009, 61329301, 61203139, 61374127, and 61374010, the Royal Society of the UK, and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation of Germany