475 research outputs found

    Bregman Voronoi Diagrams: Properties, Algorithms and Applications

    Get PDF
    The Voronoi diagram of a finite set of objects is a fundamental geometric structure that subdivides the embedding space into regions, each region consisting of the points that are closer to a given object than to the others. We may define many variants of Voronoi diagrams depending on the class of objects, the distance functions and the embedding space. In this paper, we investigate a framework for defining and building Voronoi diagrams for a broad class of distance functions called Bregman divergences. Bregman divergences include not only the traditional (squared) Euclidean distance but also various divergence measures based on entropic functions. Accordingly, Bregman Voronoi diagrams allow to define information-theoretic Voronoi diagrams in statistical parametric spaces based on the relative entropy of distributions. We define several types of Bregman diagrams, establish correspondences between those diagrams (using the Legendre transformation), and show how to compute them efficiently. We also introduce extensions of these diagrams, e.g. k-order and k-bag Bregman Voronoi diagrams, and introduce Bregman triangulations of a set of points and their connexion with Bregman Voronoi diagrams. We show that these triangulations capture many of the properties of the celebrated Delaunay triangulation. Finally, we give some applications of Bregman Voronoi diagrams which are of interest in the context of computational geometry and machine learning.Comment: Extend the proceedings abstract of SODA 2007 (46 pages, 15 figures

    Farthest-Polygon Voronoi Diagrams

    Get PDF
    Given a family of k disjoint connected polygonal sites in general position and of total complexity n, we consider the farthest-site Voronoi diagram of these sites, where the distance to a site is the distance to a closest point on it. We show that the complexity of this diagram is O(n), and give an O(n log^3 n) time algorithm to compute it. We also prove a number of structural properties of this diagram. In particular, a Voronoi region may consist of k-1 connected components, but if one component is bounded, then it is equal to the entire region

    Metric combinatorics of convex polyhedra: cut loci and nonoverlapping unfoldings

    Full text link
    This paper is a study of the interaction between the combinatorics of boundaries of convex polytopes in arbitrary dimension and their metric geometry. Let S be the boundary of a convex polytope of dimension d+1, or more generally let S be a `convex polyhedral pseudomanifold'. We prove that S has a polyhedral nonoverlapping unfolding into R^d, so the metric space S is obtained from a closed (usually nonconvex) polyhedral ball in R^d by identifying pairs of boundary faces isometrically. Our existence proof exploits geodesic flow away from a source point v in S, which is the exponential map to S from the tangent space at v. We characterize the `cut locus' (the closure of the set of points in S with more than one shortest path to v) as a polyhedral complex in terms of Voronoi diagrams on facets. Analyzing infinitesimal expansion of the wavefront consisting of points at constant distance from v on S produces an algorithmic method for constructing Voronoi diagrams in each facet, and hence the unfolding of S. The algorithm, for which we provide pseudocode, solves the discrete geodesic problem. Its main construction generalizes the source unfolding for boundaries of 3-polytopes into R^2. We present conjectures concerning the number of shortest paths on the boundaries of convex polyhedra, and concerning continuous unfolding of convex polyhedra. We also comment on the intrinsic non-polynomial complexity of nonconvex polyhedral manifolds.Comment: 47 pages; 21 PostScript (.eps) figures, most in colo

    Minkowski Sum Construction and other Applications of Arrangements of Geodesic Arcs on the Sphere

    Full text link
    We present two exact implementations of efficient output-sensitive algorithms that compute Minkowski sums of two convex polyhedra in 3D. We do not assume general position. Namely, we handle degenerate input, and produce exact results. We provide a tight bound on the exact maximum complexity of Minkowski sums of polytopes in 3D in terms of the number of facets of the summand polytopes. The algorithms employ variants of a data structure that represents arrangements embedded on two-dimensional parametric surfaces in 3D, and they make use of many operations applied to arrangements in these representations. We have developed software components that support the arrangement data-structure variants and the operations applied to them. These software components are generic, as they can be instantiated with any number type. However, our algorithms require only (exact) rational arithmetic. These software components together with exact rational-arithmetic enable a robust, efficient, and elegant implementation of the Minkowski-sum constructions and the related applications. These software components are provided through a package of the Computational Geometry Algorithm Library (CGAL) called Arrangement_on_surface_2. We also present exact implementations of other applications that exploit arrangements of arcs of great circles embedded on the sphere. We use them as basic blocks in an exact implementation of an efficient algorithm that partitions an assembly of polyhedra in 3D with two hands using infinite translations. This application distinctly shows the importance of exact computation, as imprecise computation might result with dismissal of valid partitioning-motions.Comment: A Ph.D. thesis carried out at the Tel-Aviv university. 134 pages long. The advisor was Prof. Dan Halperi

    Symmetry in Regular Polyhedra Seen as 2D Mรถbius Transformations: Geodesic and Panel Domes Arising from 2D Diagrams

    Get PDF
    This paper shows a methodology for reducing the complex design process of space structures to an adequate selection of points lying on a plane. This procedure can be directly implemented in a bi-dimensional plane when we substitute (i) Euclidean geometry by bi-dimensional projection of the elliptic geometry and (ii) rotations/symmetries on the sphere by Mรถbius transformations on the plane. These graphs can be obtained by sites, specific points obtained by homological transformations in the inversive plane, following the analogous procedure defined previously in the three-dimensional space. From the sites, it is possible to obtain different partitions of the plane, namely, power diagrams, Voronoi diagrams, or Delaunay triangulations. The first would generate geo-tangent structures on the sphere; the second, panel structures; and the third, lattice structures

    ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก์„  ๋ฐ ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ต์ฐจ ๊ฒ€์ถœ ๋ฐ ์ œ๊ฑฐ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€,2020. 2. ๊น€๋ช…์ˆ˜.Offset curves and surfaces have many applications in computer-aided design and manufacturing, but the self-intersections and redundancies must be trimmed away for their practical use. We present a new method for offset curve and surface trimming that detects the self-intersections and eliminates the redundant parts of an offset curve and surface that are closer than the offset distance to the original curve and surface. We first propose an offset trimming method based on constructing geometric constraint equations. We formulate the constraint equations of the self-intersections of an offset curve and surface in the parameter domain of the original curve and surface. Numerical computations based on the regularity and intrinsic properties of the given input curve and surface is carried out to compute the solution of the constraint equations. The method deals with numerical instability around near-singular regions of an offset surface by using osculating tori that can be constructed in a highly stable way, i.e., by offsetting the osculating torii of the given input regular surface. We reveal the branching structure and the terminal points from the complete self-intersection curves of the offset surface. From the observation that the trimming method based on the multivariate equation solving is computationally expensive, we also propose an acceleration technique to trim an offset curve and surface. The alternative method constructs a bounding volume hierarchy specially designed to enclose the offset curve and surface and detects the self-collision of the bounding volumes instead. In the case of an offset surface, the thickness of the bounding volumes is indirectly determined based on the maximum deviations of the positions and the normals between the given input surface patches and their osculating tori. For further acceleration, the bounding volumes are pruned as much as possible during self-collision detection using various geometric constraints imposed on the offset surface. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the new trimming method using several non-trivial test examples of offset trimming. Lastly, we investigate the problem of computing the Voronoi diagram of a freeform surface using the offset trimming technique for surfaces. By trimming the offset surface with a gradually changing offset radius, we compute the boundary of the Voronoi cells that appear in the concave side of the given input surface. In particular, we interpret the singular and branching points of the self-intersection curves of the trimmed offset surfaces in terms of the boundary elements of the Voronoi diagram.์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก์„  ๋ฐ ๊ณก๋ฉด์€ computer-aided design (CAD)์™€ computer-aided manufacturing (CAM)์—์„œ ๋„๋ฆฌ ์ด์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์—ฐ์‚ฐ๋“ค ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ด๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์ธ ํ™œ์šฉ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก์„  ๋ฐ ๊ณก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ƒ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ต์ฐจ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก์„  ๋ฐ ๊ณก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์›๋ž˜์˜ ๊ณก์„  ๋ฐ ๊ณก๋ฉด์— ๊ฐ€๊นŒ์šด ๋ถˆํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์˜์—ญ์„ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก์„  ๋ฐ ๊ณก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ƒ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ต์ฐจ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ณ , ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก์„  ๋ฐ ๊ณก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ƒ๊ธฐ๋Š” ๋ถˆํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์˜์—ญ์„ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•˜๋Š” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์šฐ์„  ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก์„  ๋ฐ ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ต์ฐจ์ ๋“ค๊ณผ ๊ทธ ๊ต์ฐจ์ ๋“ค์ด ๊ธฐ์ธํ•œ ์›๋ž˜ ๊ณก์„  ๋ฐ ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ์ ๋“ค์ด ์ด๋ฃจ๋Š” ํ‰๋ฉด ์ด๋“ฑ๋ณ€ ์‚ผ๊ฐํ˜• ๊ด€๊ณ„๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก์„  ๋ฐ ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ต์ฐจ์ ์˜ ์ œ์•ฝ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹๋“ค์„ ์„ธ์šด๋‹ค. ์ด ์ œ์•ฝ์‹๋“ค์€ ์›๋ž˜ ๊ณก์„  ๋ฐ ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์—์„œ ํ‘œํ˜„๋˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹๋“ค์˜ ํ•ด๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์˜ ํ•ด๋ฅผ ๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” solver๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์›๋ž˜ ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ์ฃผ๊ณก๋ฅ  ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๊ฐ€ ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๋ฐ˜์ง€๋ฆ„์˜ ์—ญ์ˆ˜์™€ ๊ฐ™์„ ๋•Œ ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด ์ •์˜๊ฐ€ ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ํŠน์ด์ ์ด ์ƒ๊ธฐ๋Š”๋ฐ, ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ต์ฐจ ๊ณก์„ ์ด ์ด ๋ถ€๊ทผ์„ ์ง€๋‚  ๋•Œ๋Š” ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ต์ฐจ ๊ณก์„ ์˜ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์ด ๋ถˆ์•ˆ์ •ํ•ด์ง„๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ต์ฐจ ๊ณก์„ ์ด ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ํŠน์ด์  ๋ถ€๊ทผ์„ ์ง€๋‚  ๋•Œ๋Š” ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก๋ฉด์„ ์ ‘์ด‰ ํ† ๋Ÿฌ์Šค๋กœ ์น˜ํ™˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋” ์•ˆ์ •๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ต์ฐจ ๊ณก์„ ์„ ๊ตฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋œ ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ต์ฐจ ๊ณก์„ ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ต์ฐจ ๊ณก์„ ์˜ xyzxyz-๊ณต๊ฐ„์—์„œ์˜ ๋ง๋‹จ ์ , ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋“ฑ์„ ๋ฐํžŒ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ฐ”์šด๋”ฉ ๋ณผ๋ฅจ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก์„  ๋ฐ ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ต์ฐจ ๊ณก์„  ๊ฒ€์ถœ์„ ๊ฐ€์†ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ”์šด๋”ฉ ๋ณผ๋ฅจ์€ ๊ธฐ์ € ๊ณก์„  ๋ฐ ๊ณก๋ฉด์„ ๋‹จ์ˆœํ•œ ๊ธฐํ•˜๋กœ ๊ฐ์‹ธ๊ณ  ๊ธฐํ•˜ ์—ฐ์‚ฐ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๊ฐ€์†ํ™”์— ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ต์ฐจ ๊ณก์„ ์„ ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ, ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ๋ฐ”์šด๋”ฉ ๋ณผ๋ฅจ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์ € ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ๋ฐ”์šด๋”ฉ ๋ณผ๋ฅจ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์ € ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ๋ฒ•์„  ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ๋ฐ”์šด๋”ฉ ๋ณผ๋ฅจ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ด๋•Œ ๊ฐ ๋ฐ”์šด๋”ฉ ๋ณผ๋ฅจ์˜ ๋‘๊ป˜๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋ฐ”์šด๋”ฉ ๋ณผ๋ฅจ ์ค‘์—์„œ ์‹ค์ œ ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก์„  ๋ฐ ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ต์ฐจ์— ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๋ถ€๋ถ„์„ ๊นŠ์€ ์žฌ๊ท€ ์ „์— ์ฐพ์•„์„œ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์กฐ๊ฑด๋“ค์„ ๋‚˜์—ดํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ•œํŽธ, ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ต์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ์ œ๊ฑฐ๋œ ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก์„  ๋ฐ ๊ณก๋ฉด์€ ๊ธฐ์ € ๊ณก์„  ๋ฐ ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ๋ณด๋กœ๋…ธ์ด ๊ตฌ์กฐ์™€ ๊นŠ์€ ๊ด€๋ จ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ž์œ  ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ์—ฐ์†๋œ ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก๋ฉด๋“ค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ž์œ  ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ๋ณด๋กœ๋…ธ์ด ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์œ ์ถ”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ์˜คํ”„์…‹ ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ต์ฐจ ๊ณก์„  ์ƒ์—์„œ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ ์ด๋‚˜ ๋ง๋‹จ ์ ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ํŠน์ด์ ๋“ค์ด ์ž์œ  ๊ณก๋ฉด์˜ ๋ณด๋กœ๋…ธ์ด ๊ตฌ์กฐ์—์„œ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ํ•ด์„๋˜๋Š”์ง€ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค.1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background and Motivation 1 1.2 Research Objectives and Approach 7 1.3 Contributions and Thesis Organization 11 2. Preliminaries 14 2.1 Curve and Surface Representation 14 2.1.1 Bezier Representation 14 2.1.2 B-spline Representation 17 2.2 Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces 19 2.2.1 Differential Geometry of Curves 19 2.2.2 Differential Geometry of Surfaces 21 3. Previous Work 23 3.1 Offset Curves 24 3.2 Offset Surfaces 27 3.3 Offset Curves on Surfaces 29 4. Trimming Offset Curve Self-intersections 32 4.1 Experimental Results 35 5. Trimming Offset Surface Self-intersections 38 5.1 Constraint Equations for Offset Self-Intersections 38 5.1.1 Coplanarity Constraint 39 5.1.2 Equi-angle Constraint 40 5.2 Removing Trivial Solutions 40 5.3 Removing Normal Flips 41 5.4 Multivariate Solver for Constraints 43 5.A Derivation of f(u,v) 46 5.B Relationship between f(u,v) and Curvatures 47 5.3 Trimming Offset Surfaces 50 5.4 Experimental Results 53 5.5 Summary 57 6. Acceleration of trimming offset curves and surfaces 62 6.1 Motivation 62 6.2 Basic Approach 67 6.3 Trimming an Offset Curve using the BVH 70 6.4 Trimming an Offset Surface using the BVH 75 6.4.1 Offset Surface BVH 75 6.4.2 Finding Self-intersections in Offset Surface Using BVH 87 6.4.3 Tracing Self-intersection Curves 98 6.5 Experimental Results 100 6.6 Summary 106 7. Application of Trimming Offset Surfaces: 3D Voronoi Diagram 107 7.1 Background 107 7.2 Approach 110 7.3 Experimental Results 112 7.4 Summary 114 8. Conclusion 119 Bibliography iDocto

    Layered Fields for Natural Tessellations on Surfaces

    Get PDF
    Mimicking natural tessellation patterns is a fascinating multi-disciplinary problem. Geometric methods aiming at reproducing such partitions on surface meshes are commonly based on the Voronoi model and its variants, and are often faced with challenging issues such as metric estimation, geometric, topological complications, and most critically parallelization. In this paper, we introduce an alternate model which may be of value for resolving these issues. We drop the assumption that regions need to be separated by lines. Instead, we regard region boundaries as narrow bands and we model the partition as a set of smooth functions layered over the surface. Given an initial set of seeds or regions, the partition emerges as the solution of a time dependent set of partial differential equations describing concurrently evolving fronts on the surface. Our solution does not require geodesic estimation, elaborate numerical solvers, or complicated bookkeeping data structures. The cost per time-iteration is dominated by the multiplication and addition of two sparse matrices. Extension of our approach in a Lloyd's algorithm fashion can be easily achieved and the extraction of the dual mesh can be conveniently preformed in parallel through matrix algebra. As our approach relies mainly on basic linear algebra kernels, it lends itself to efficient implementation on modern graphics hardware.Comment: Natural tessellations, surface fields, Voronoi diagrams, Lloyd's algorith
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore