37 research outputs found

    Fusion of Multiple Uncertainty Estimators and Propagators for Noise Robust ASR

    Get PDF
    International audienceUncertainty decoding has been successfully used for speech recognition in highly nonstationary noise environments. Yet, accurate estimation of the uncertainty on the denoised signals and propagation to the features remain difficult. In this work, we propose to fuse the uncertainty estimates obtained from different uncertainty estimators and propagators by linear combination. The fusion coefficients are optimized by minimizing a measure of divergence with oracle estimates on development data. Using the Kullback-Leibler divergence, we obtain 18\% relative error rate reduction on the 2nd CHiME Challenge with respect to conventional decoding, that is about twice as much as the reduction achieved by the best single uncertainty estimator and propagator

    Nonparametric uncertainty estimation and propagation for noise robust ASR

    Get PDF
    International audienceWe consider the framework of uncertainty propagation for automatic speech recognition (ASR) in highly non-stationary noise environments. Uncertainty is considered as the variance of speech distortion. Yet, its accurate estimation in the spectral domain and its propagation to the feature domain remain difficult. Existing methods typically rely on a single uncertainty estimator and propagator fixed by mathematical approximation. In this paper, we propose a new paradigm where we seek to learn more powerful mappings to predict uncertainty from data.We investigate two such possible mappings: linear fusion of multiple uncertainty estimators/propagators and nonparametric uncertainty estimation/propagation. In addition, a procedure to propagate the estimated spectral-domain uncertainty to the static Mel frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs), to the log-energy, and to their first- and second-order time derivatives is proposed. This results in a full uncertainty covariance matrix over both static and dynamic MFCCs. Experimental evaluation on Tracks 1 and 2 of the 2nd CHiME Challenge resulted in up to 29% and 28% relative keyword error rate reduction with respect to speech enhancement alone

    An extended experimental investigation of DNN uncertainty propagation for noise robust ASR

    Get PDF
    International audienceAutomatic speech recognition (ASR) in noisy environments remains a challenging goal. Recently, the idea of estimating the uncertainty about the features obtained after speech enhancement and propagating it to dynamically adapt deep neural network (DNN) based acoustic models has raised some interest. However, the results in the literature were reported on simulated noisy datasets for a limited variety of uncertainty estimators. We found that they vary significantly in different conditions. Hence, the main contribution of this work is to assess DNN uncertainty decoding performance for different data conditions and different uncertainty estimation/propagation techniques. In addition, we propose a neural network based uncertainty estima-tor and compare it with other uncertainty estimators. We report detailed ASR results on the CHiME-2 and CHiME-3 datasets. We find that, on average, uncertainty propagation provides similar relative improvement on real and simulated data and that the proposed uncertainty estimator performs significantly better than the one in [1]. We also find that the improvement is consistent, but it depends on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the noise environment

    Track-to-track association methodology for operational surveillance scenarios with radar observations

    Get PDF
    This paper proposes a novel track-to-track association methodology able to detect and catalogue resident space objects (RSOs) from associations of uncorrelated tracks (UCTs) obtained by radar survey sensors. It is a multi-target multi-sensor algorithm approach able to associate data from surveillance sensors to detect and catalogue objects. The association methodology contains a series of steps, each of which reduces the complexity of the combinational problem. The main focus are real operational environments, in which brute-force approaches are computationally unaffordable. The hypotheses are scored in the measurement space by evaluating a figure of merit based on the residuals of the observations. This allows us to filter out most of the false hypotheses that would be present in brute-force approaches, as well as to distinguish between true and false hypotheses. The suitability of the proposed track-to-track association has been assessed with a simulated scenario representative of a real operational environment, corresponding to 2 weeks of radar survey data obtained by a single survey radar. The distribution and evolution of the hypotheses along the association process is analysed and typical association performance metrics are included. Most of the RSOs are detected and catalogued and only one false positive is obtained. Besides, the rate of false positives is kept low, most of them corresponding to particular cases or objects with high eccentricity or limited observability.Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. This project has received funding from the โ€œComunidad de Madridโ€ under โ€œAyudas destinadas a la realizacion doctorados industrialesโ€ program (project IND2017/TIC7700

    ๊ฐ•์ธํ•œ ์Œ์„ฑ์ธ์‹์„ ์œ„ํ•œ DNN ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์Œํ–ฅ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ „๊ธฐยท์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2019. 2. ๊น€๋‚จ์ˆ˜.๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐ•์ธํ•œ ์Œ์„ฑ์ธ์‹์„ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ DNN์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ์Œํ–ฅ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋“ค์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€์˜ DNN ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋Š” DNN์ด ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์žก์Œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐ•์ธํ•จ์„ ๋ณด์กฐ ํŠน์ง• ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ๋Œ€๋กœ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์Œํ–ฅ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ DNN์€ ์™œ๊ณก๋œ ์Œ์„ฑ, ๊นจ๋—ํ•œ ์Œ์„ฑ, ์žก์Œ ์ถ”์ •์น˜, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์Œ์†Œ ํƒ€๊ฒŸ๊ณผ์˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์›ํ™œํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•™์Šตํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์€ Aurora-5 DB ์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋ณด์กฐ ์žก์Œ ํŠน์ง• ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ ์ ์‘ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ธ ์žก์Œ ์ธ์ง€ ํ•™์Šต (noise-aware training, NAT) ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋›ฐ์–ด๋„˜๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋Š” DNN์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๋‹ค ์ฑ„๋„ ํŠน์ง• ํ–ฅ์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋‹ค ์ฑ„๋„ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค์—์„œ๋Š” ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ธ ๋น”ํฌ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ ๋‹จ์ผ ์†Œ์Šค ์Œ์„ฑ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ถœํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ทธ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์Œ์„ฑ์ธ์‹์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋น”ํฌ๋ฐ ์ค‘์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์  ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ธ delay-and-sum (DS) ๋น”ํฌ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๊ณผ DNN์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•œ ๋‹ค ์ฑ„๋„ ํŠน์ง• ํ–ฅ์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” DNN์€ ์ค‘๊ฐ„ ๋‹จ๊ณ„ ํŠน์ง• ๋ฒกํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ๊ณต๋™ ํ•™์Šต ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์™œ๊ณก๋œ ๋‹ค ์ฑ„๋„ ์ž…๋ ฅ ์Œ์„ฑ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋“ค๊ณผ ๊นจ๋—ํ•œ ์Œ์„ฑ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์™€์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์€ multichannel wall street journal audio visual (MC-WSJAV) corpus์—์„œ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ, ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋‹ค์ฑ„๋„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋“ค๋ณด๋‹ค ๋›ฐ์–ด๋‚œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ž„์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ๋ถˆํ™•์ •์„ฑ ์ธ์ง€ ํ•™์Šต (Uncertainty-aware training, UAT) ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค. ์œ„์—์„œ ์†Œ๊ฐœ๋œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋“ค์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ•์ธํ•œ ์Œ์„ฑ์ธ์‹์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ DNN ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋“ค์€ ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ํƒ€๊ฒŸ์„ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์žˆ์–ด์„œ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ก ์ ์ธ ์ถ”์ • ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์ถ”์ •์น˜์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์ •์„ฑ ๋ฌธ์ œ ํ˜น์€ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ ์„ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” UAT ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์€ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ก ์ ์ธ ๋ณ€ํ™” ์ถ”์ •์„ ํ•™์Šตํ•˜๊ณ  ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‰ด๋Ÿด ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ธ ๋ณ€ํ™” ์˜คํ† ์ธ์ฝ”๋” (variational autoencoder, VAE) ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. UAT๋Š” ์™œ๊ณก๋œ ์Œ์„ฑ ํŠน์ง• ๋ฒกํ„ฐ์™€ ์Œ์†Œ ํƒ€๊ฒŸ๊ณผ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋งค๊ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฐ•์ธํ•œ ์€๋‹‰ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊นจ๋—ํ•œ ์Œ์„ฑ ํŠน์ง• ๋ฒกํ„ฐ ์ถ”์ •์น˜์˜ ๋ถ„ํฌ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋งํ•œ๋‹ค. UAT์˜ ์€๋‹‰ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์€ ๋”ฅ ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์Œํ–ฅ ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋œ uncertainty decoding (UD) ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์œ ๋„๋œ ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์šฐ๋„ ๊ธฐ์ค€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ํ•™์Šต๋œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์€ Aurora-4 DB์™€ CHiME-4 DB์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ DNN ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋“ค์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋›ฐ์–ด๋„˜๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค.In this thesis, we propose three acoustic modeling techniques for robust automatic speech recognition (ASR). Firstly, we propose a DNN-based acoustic modeling technique which makes the best use of the inherent noise-robustness of DNN is proposed. By applying this technique, the DNN can automatically learn the complicated relationship among the noisy, clean speech and noise estimate to phonetic target smoothly. The proposed method outperformed noise-aware training (NAT), i.e., the conventional auxiliary-feature-based model adaptation technique in Aurora-5 DB. The second method is multi-channel feature enhancement technique. In the general multi-channel speech recognition scenario, the enhanced single speech signal source is extracted from the multiple inputs using beamforming, i.e., the conventional signal-processing-based technique and the speech recognition process is performed by feeding that source into the acoustic model. We propose the multi-channel feature enhancement DNN algorithm by properly combining the delay-and-sum (DS) beamformer, which is one of the conventional beamforming techniques and DNN. Through the experiments using multichannel wall street journal audio visual (MC-WSJ-AV) corpus, it has been shown that the proposed method outperformed the conventional multi-channel feature enhancement techniques. Finally, uncertainty-aware training (UAT) technique is proposed. The most of the existing DNN-based techniques including the techniques introduced above, aim to optimize the point estimates of the targets (e.g., clean features, and acoustic model parameters). This tampers with the reliability of the estimates. In order to overcome this issue, UAT employs a modified structure of variational autoencoder (VAE), a neural network model which learns and performs stochastic variational inference (VIF). UAT models the robust latent variables which intervene the mapping between the noisy observed features and the phonetic target using the distributive information of the clean feature estimates. The proposed technique outperforms the conventional DNN-based techniques on Aurora-4 and CHiME-4 databases.Abstract i Contents iv List of Figures ix List of Tables xiii 1 Introduction 1 2 Background 9 2.1 Deep Neural Networks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.2 Experimental Database . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.2.1 Aurora-4 DB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.2.2 Aurora-5 DB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.2.3 MC-WSJ-AV DB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.2.4 CHiME-4 DB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3 Two-stage Noise-aware Training for Environment-robust Speech Recognition 25 iii 3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.2 Noise-aware Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3.3 Two-stage NAT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.3.1 Lower DNN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.3.2 Upper DNN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.3.3 Joint Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.4 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.4.1 GMM-HMM System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.4.2 Training and Structures of DNN-based Techniques . . . . . . 37 3.4.3 Performance Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 3.5 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 4 DNN-based Feature Enhancement for Robust Multichannel Speech Recognition 45 4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 4.2 Observation Model in Multi-Channel Reverberant Noisy Environment 49 4.3 Proposed Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.3.1 Lower DNN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 4.3.2 Upper DNN and Joint Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 4.4 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 4.4.1 Recognition System and Feature Extraction . . . . . . . . . . 56 4.4.2 Training and Structures of DNN-based Techniques . . . . . . 58 4.4.3 Dropout . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 4.4.4 Performance Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 4.5 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 iv 5 Uncertainty-aware Training for DNN-HMM System using Varia- tional Inference 67 5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 5.2 Uncertainty Decoding for Noise Robustness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 5.3 Variational Autoencoder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 5.4 VIF-based uncertainty-aware Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 5.4.1 Clean Uncertainty Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 5.4.2 Environment Uncertainty Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 5.4.3 Prediction Network and Joint Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 5.5 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 5.5.1 Experimental Setup: Feature Extraction and ASR System . . 96 5.5.2 Network Structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 5.5.3 Eects of CUN on the Noise Robustness . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 5.5.4 Uncertainty Representation in Dierent SNR Condition . . . 105 5.5.5 Result of Speech Recognition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 5.5.6 Result of Speech Recognition with LSTM-HMM . . . . . . . 114 5.6 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 6 Conclusions 127 Bibliography 131 ์š”์•ฝ 145Docto

    Sensors Fault Diagnosis Trends and Applications

    Get PDF
    Fault diagnosis has always been a concern for industry. In general, diagnosis in complex systems requires the acquisition of information from sensors and the processing and extracting of required features for the classification or identification of faults. Therefore, fault diagnosis of sensors is clearly important as faulty information from a sensor may lead to misleading conclusions about the whole system. As engineering systems grow in size and complexity, it becomes more and more important to diagnose faulty behavior before it can lead to total failure. In the light of above issues, this book is dedicated to trends and applications in modern-sensor fault diagnosis
    corecore