MIRACLE at ImageCLEFphoto 2007: Evaluation of Merging Strategies for Multilingual and Multimedia Information Retrieval.

This paper describes the participation of MIRACLE research consortium at the ImageCLEF Photographic Retrieval task of ImageCLEF 2007. For this campaign, the main purpose of our experiments was to thoroughly study different merging strategies, i.e. methods of combination of textual and visual retrieval techniques. Whereas we have applied all the well known techniques which had already been used in previous campaigns, for both textual and visual components of the system, our research has primarily focused on the idea of performing all possible combinations of those techniques in order to evaluate which ones may offer the best results and analyze if the combined results may improve (in terms of MAP) the individual ones

MIRACLE-FI at ImageCLEFphoto 2008: Experiences in merging text-based and content-based retrievals

This paper describes the participation of the MIRACLE consortium at the ImageCLEF Photographic Retrieval task of ImageCLEF 2008. In this is new participation of the group, our first purpose is to evaluate our own tools for text-based retrieval and for content-based retrieval using different similarity metrics and the aggregation OWA operator to fuse the three topic images. From the MIRACLE last year experience, we implemented a new merging module combining the text-based and the content-based information in three different ways: FILTER-N, ENRICH and TEXT-FILTER. The former approaches try to improve the text-based baseline results using the content-based results lists. The last one was used to select the relevant images to the content-based module. No clustering strategies were analyzed. Finally, 41 runs were submitted: 1 for the text-based baseline, 10 content-based runs, and 30 mixed experiments merging text and content-based results. Results in general can be considered nearly acceptable comparing with the best results of other groups. Obtained results from textbased retrieval are better than content-based. Merging both textual and visual retrieval we improve the text-based baseline when applying the ENRICH merging algorithm although visual results are lower than textual ones. From these results we were going to try to improve merged results by clustering methods applied to this image collection

Diversity in image retrieval: DCU at ImageCLEFPhoto 2008

DCU participated in the ImageCLEF 2008 photo retrieval task, submitting runs for both the English and Random language annotation conditions. Our approaches used text-based and image-based retrieval approaches to give baseline retrieval runs, with the highest-ranked images from these baseline runs clustered using K-Means clustering of the text annotations. Finally, each cluster was represented by its most relevant image and these images were ranked for the nal submission. For random annotation language runs, we used TextCat1 to identify German annotation documents, which were then translated into English using Systran Version:3.0 Machine Translator. We also compared results from these translated runs with untranslated runs. Our results showed that, as expected, runs that combine image and text outperform text alone and image alone. Our baseline image+text runs (i.e. without clustering) give our best MAP score, and these runs also outperformed the mean and median ImageCLEFPhoto submissions for CR@20. Clustering approaches consistently gave a large improvement in CR@20 over the baseline, unclustered results. Pseudo relevance feedback consistently improved MAP while also consistently decreasing CR@20. We also found that the performance of untranslated random runs was quite close to that of translated random runs for CR@20, indicating that we could achieve similar diversity in our results without translating the documents

Convolutional Sparse Kernel Network for Unsupervised Medical Image Analysis

The availability of large-scale annotated image datasets and recent advances in supervised deep learning methods enable the end-to-end derivation of representative image features that can impact a variety of image analysis problems. Such supervised approaches, however, are difficult to implement in the medical domain where large volumes of labelled data are difficult to obtain due to the complexity of manual annotation and inter- and intra-observer variability in label assignment. We propose a new convolutional sparse kernel network (CSKN), which is a hierarchical unsupervised feature learning framework that addresses the challenge of learning representative visual features in medical image analysis domains where there is a lack of annotated training data. Our framework has three contributions: (i) We extend kernel learning to identify and represent invariant features across image sub-patches in an unsupervised manner. (ii) We initialise our kernel learning with a layer-wise pre-training scheme that leverages the sparsity inherent in medical images to extract initial discriminative features. (iii) We adapt a multi-scale spatial pyramid pooling (SPP) framework to capture subtle geometric differences between learned visual features. We evaluated our framework in medical image retrieval and classification on three public datasets. Our results show that our CSKN had better accuracy when compared to other conventional unsupervised methods and comparable accuracy to methods that used state-of-the-art supervised convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Our findings indicate that our unsupervised CSKN provides an opportunity to leverage unannotated big data in medical imaging repositories.Comment: Accepted by Medical Image Analysis (with a new title 'Convolutional Sparse Kernel Network for Unsupervised Medical Image Analysis'). The manuscript is available from following link (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2019.06.005

Multimedia Retrieval by Means of Merge of Results from Textual and Content Based Retrieval Subsystems

The main goal of this paper it is to present our experiments in ImageCLEF 2009 Campaign (photo retrieval task). In 2008 we proved empirically that the Text-based Image Retrieval (TBIR) methods defeats the Content-based Image Retrieval CBIR “quality” of results, so this time we developed several experiments in which the CBIR helps the TBIR. The TBIR System [6] main improvement is the named-entity sub-module. In case of the CBIR system [3] the number of low-level features has been increased from the 68 component used at ImageCLEF 2008 up to 114 components, and only the Mahalanobis distance has been used. We propose an ad-hoc management of the topics delivered, and the generation of XML structures for 0.5 million captions of the photographs (corpus) delivered. Two different merging algorithms were developed and the third one tries to improve our previous cluster level results promoting the diversity. Our best run for precision metrics appeared in position 16th, in the 19th for MAP score, and for diversity value in position 11th, for a total of 84 submitted experiments. Our best and “only textual” experiment was the 6th one over 41

Multimedia Retrieval: Survey Of Methods And Approaches

As we know there are numbers of applications present where multimedia retrieval is used and also numbers of sources are present. So accuracy is the major issue in retrieval process. There are number of techniques and datasets available to retrieve information. Some techniques uses only text-based image retrieval (TBIR), some uses content-based image retrieval (CBIR) while some are using combination of both. In this paper we are focusing on both TBIR and CBIR results and then fusing these two results. For fusing we are using late fusion. TBIR captures conceptual meaning while CBIR used to avoid false results. So final results are more accurate. In this paper our main goal is to take review of different methods and approaches used for Multimedia Retrieval

ImageCLEF 2013: The vision, the data and the open challenges

This paper presents an overview of the ImageCLEF 2013 lab. Since its first edition in 2003, ImageCLEF has become one of the key initiatives promoting the benchmark evaluation of algorithms for the cross-language annotation and retrieval of images in various domains, such as public and personal images, to data acquired by mobile robot platforms and botanic collections. Over the years, by providing new data collections and challenging tasks to the community of interest, the ImageCLEF lab has achieved an unique position in the multi lingual image annotation and retrieval research landscape. The 2013 edition consisted of three tasks: the photo annotation and retrieval task, the plant identification task and the robot vision task. Furthermore, the medical annotation task, that traditionally has been under the ImageCLEF umbrella and that this year celebrates its tenth anniversary, has been organized in conjunction with AMIA for the first time. The paper describes the tasks and the 2013 competition, giving an unifying perspective of the present activities of the lab while discussion the future challenges and opportunities.This work has been partially supported by the Halser Foundation (B. C.),by the LiMoSINe FP7 project under grant # 288024 (B. T.), by the Khresmoi (grant# 257528) and PROMISE ( grant # 258191) FP 7 projects (H.M.) and by the tranScriptorium FP7 project under grant # 600707 (M. V., R. P.)Caputo ., B.; Muller ., H.; Thomee ., B.; Villegas, M.; Paredes Palacios, R.; Zellhofer ., D.; Goeau ., H.... (2013). ImageCLEF 2013: The vision, the data and the open challenges. En Information Access Evaluation. Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Visualization. Springer Verlag (Germany). 8138:250-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40802-1_26S2502688138Muller, H., Clough, P., Deselaers, T., Caputo, B.: ImageCLEF: experimental evaluation in visual information retrieval. Springer (2010)Tsikrika, T., Seco de Herrera, A.G., Müller, H.: Assessing the scholarly impact of imageCLEF. In: Forner, P., Gonzalo, J., Kekäläinen, J., Lalmas, M., de Rijke, M. (eds.) CLEF 2011. LNCS, vol. 6941, pp. 95–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Huiskes, M., Lew, M.: The MIR Flickr retrieval evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 39–43 (2008)Huiskes, M., Thomee, B., Lew, M.: New trends and ideas in visual concept detection. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval, Philadelphia, PA, USA, pp. 527–536 (2010)Villegas, M., Paredes, R.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2012 Scalable Web Image Annotation Task. In: CLEF 2012 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes, Rome, Italy (2012)Zellhöfer, D.: Overview of the Personal Photo Retrieval Pilot Task at ImageCLEF 2012. In: CLEF 2012 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes, Rome, Italy (2012)Villegas, M., Paredes, R., Thomee, B.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2013 Scalable Concept Image Annotation Subtask. In: CLEF 2013 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes, Valencia, Spain (2013)Zellhöfer, D.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2013 Personal Photo Retrieval Subtask. In: CLEF 2013 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes, Valencia, Spain (2013)Leafsnap (2011)Plantnet (2013)Mobile flora (2013)Folia (2012)Goëau, H., Bonnet, P., Joly, A., Bakic, V., Boujemaa, N., Barthelemy, D., Molino, J.F.: The imageclef 2013 plant identification task. In: ImageCLEF 2013 Working Notes (2013)Pronobis, A., Xing, L., Caputo, B.: Overview of the CLEF 2009 robot vision track. In: Peters, C., Caputo, B., Gonzalo, J., Jones, G.J.F., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Müller, H., Tsikrika, T. (eds.) CLEF 2009. LNCS, vol. 6242, pp. 110–119. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Pronobis, A., Caputo, B.: The robot vision task. In: Muller, H., Clough, P., Deselaers, T., Caputo, B. (eds.) ImageCLEF. The Information Retrieval Series, vol. 32, pp. 185–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Pronobis, A., Christensen, H.I., Caputo, B.: Overview of the imageCLEF@ICPR 2010 robot vision track. In: Ünay, D., Çataltepe, Z., Aksoy, S. (eds.) ICPR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6388, pp. 171–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Martinez-Gomez, J., Garcia-Varea, I., Caputo, B.: Overview of the imageclef 2012 robot vision task. In: CLEF 2012 Working Notes (2012)Rusu, R., Cousins, S.: 3d is here: Point cloud library (pcl). In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2011)Bosch, A., Zisserman, A., Munoz, X.: Image classification using random forests and ferns. In: International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1–8. Citeseer (2007)Dalal, N., Triggs, B.: Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2005, vol. 1, pp. 886–893. IEEE (2005)Linde, O., Lindeberg, T.: Object recognition using composed receptive field histograms of higher dimensionality. In: Proc. ICPR. Citeseer (2004)Orabona, F., Castellini, C., Caputo, B., Luo, J., Sandini, G.: Indoor place recognition using online independent support vector machines. In: Proc. BMVC, vol. 7 (2007)Orabona, F., Castellini, C., Caputo, B., Jie, L., Sandini, G.: On-line independent support vector machines. Pattern Recognition 43, 1402–1412 (2010)Orabona, F., Jie, L., Caputo, B.: Online-Batch Strongly Convex Multi Kernel Learning. In: Proc. of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR (2010)Orabona, F., Jie, L., Caputo, B.: Multi kernel learning with online-batch optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research 13, 165–191 (2012)Clough, P., Müller, H., Sanderson, M.: The CLEF 2004 cross-language image retrieval track. In: Peters, C., Clough, P., Gonzalo, J., Jones, G.J.F., Kluck, M., Magnini, B. (eds.) CLEF 2004. LNCS, vol. 3491, pp. 597–613. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Clough, P., Müller, H., Deselaers, T., Grubinger, M., Lehmann, T.M., Jensen, J., Hersh, W.: The CLEF 2005 cross–language image retrieval track. In: Peters, C., Gey, F.C., Gonzalo, J., Müller, H., Jones, G.J.F., Kluck, M., Magnini, B., de Rijke, M., Giampiccolo, D. (eds.) CLEF 2005. LNCS, vol. 4022, pp. 535–557. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Müller, H., Deselaers, T., Deserno, T., Clough, P., Kim, E., Hersh, W.: Overview of the imageCLEFmed 2006 medical retrieval and medical annotation tasks. In: Peters, C., Clough, P., Gey, F.C., Karlgren, J., Magnini, B., Oard, D.W., de Rijke, M., Stempfhuber, M. (eds.) CLEF 2006. LNCS, vol. 4730, pp. 595–608. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Müller, H., Deselaers, T., Deserno, T., Kalpathy–Cramer, J., Kim, E., Hersh, W.: Overview of the imageCLEFmed 2007 medical retrieval and medical annotation tasks. In: Peters, C., Jijkoun, V., Mandl, T., Müller, H., Oard, D.W., Peñas, A., Petras, V., Santos, D. (eds.) CLEF 2007. LNCS, vol. 5152, pp. 472–491. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Müller, H., Kalpathy–Cramer, J., Eggel, I., Bedrick, S., Radhouani, S., Bakke, B., Kahn Jr., C.E., Hersh, W.: Overview of the CLEF 2009 medical image retrieval track. In: Peters, C., Caputo, B., Gonzalo, J., Jones, G.J.F., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Müller, H., Tsikrika, T. (eds.) CLEF 2009, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6242, pp. 72–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Tommasi, T., Caputo, B., Welter, P., Güld, M.O., Deserno, T.M.: Overview of the CLEF 2009 medical image annotation track. In: Peters, C., Caputo, B., Gonzalo, J., Jones, G.J.F., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Müller, H., Tsikrika, T. (eds.) CLEF 2009. LNCS, vol. 6242, pp. 85–93. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Müller, H., Clough, P., Deselaers, T., Caputo, B. (eds.): ImageCLEF – Experimental Evaluation in Visual Information Retrieval. The Springer International Series on Information Retrieval, vol. 32. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Müller, H., Bedrick, S., Eggel, I., García Seco de Herrera, A., Tsikrika, T.: The CLEF 2011 medical image retrieval and classification tasks. In: Working Notes of CLEF 2011 (Cross Language Evaluation Forum) (2011)Müller, H., García Seco de Herrera, A., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Demner Fushman, D., Antani, S., Eggel, I.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2012 medical image retrieval and classification tasks. In: Working Notes of CLEF 2012 (Cross Language Evaluation Forum) (2012)García Seco de Herrera, A., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Demner Fushman, D., Antani, S., Müller, H.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2013 medical tasks. In: Working Notes of CLEF 2013 (Cross Language Evaluation Forum) (2013

ImageCLEF 2014: Overview and analysis of the results

This paper presents an overview of the ImageCLEF 2014 evaluation lab. Since its first edition in 2003, ImageCLEF has become one of the key initiatives promoting the benchmark evaluation of algorithms for the annotation and retrieval of images in various domains, such as public and personal images, to data acquired by mobile robot platforms and medical archives. Over the years, by providing new data collections and challenging tasks to the community of interest, the ImageCLEF lab has achieved an unique position in the image annotation and retrieval research landscape. The 2014 edition consists of four tasks: domain adaptation, scalable concept image annotation, liver CT image annotation and robot vision. This paper describes the tasks and the 2014 competition, giving a unifying perspective of the present activities of the lab while discussing future challenges and opportunities.This work has been partially supported by the tranScriptorium FP7 project under grant #600707 (M. V., R. P.).Caputo, B.; Müller, H.; Martinez-Gomez, J.; Villegas Santamaría, M.; Acar, B.; Patricia, N.; Marvasti, N.... (2014). ImageCLEF 2014: Overview and analysis of the results. En Information Access Evaluation. Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction: 5th International Conference of the CLEF Initiative, CLEF 2014, Sheffield, UK, September 15-18, 2014. Proceedings. Springer Verlag (Germany). 192-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11382-1_18S192211Bosch, A., Zisserman, A.: Image classification using random forests and ferns. In: Proc. CVPR (2007)Caputo, B., Müller, H., Martinez-Gomez, J., Villegas, M., Acar, B., Patricia, N., Marvasti, N., Üsküdarlı, S., Paredes, R., Cazorla, M., Garcia-Varea, I., Morell, V.: ImageCLEF 2014: Overview and analysis of the results. In: Kanoulas, E., et al. (eds.) CLEF 2014. LNCS, vol. 8685, Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Caputo, B., Patricia, N.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2014 Domain Adaptation Task. In: CLEF 2014 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes (2014)de Carvalho Gomes, R., Correia Ribas, L., Antnio de Castro Jr., A., Nunes Gonalves, W.: CPPP/UFMS at ImageCLEF 2014: Robot Vision Task. In: CLEF 2014 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes (2014)Del Frate, F., Pacifici, F., Schiavon, G., Solimini, C.: Use of neural networks for automatic classification from high-resolution images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 45(4), 800–809 (2007)Feng, S.L., Manmatha, R., Lavrenko, V.: Multiple bernoulli relevance models for image and video annotation. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2004, vol. 2, p. II–1002. IEEE (2004)Friedl, M.A., Brodley, C.E.: Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 61(3), 399–409 (1997)Goh, K.-S., Chang, E.Y., Li, B.: Using one-class and two-class svms for multiclass image annotation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 17(10), 1333–1346 (2005)Gong, B., Shi, Y., Sha, F., Grauman, K.: Geodesic flow kernel for unsupervised domain adaptation. In: Proc. CVPR. Extended Version Considering its Additional MaterialJie, L., Tommasi, T., Caputo, B.: Multiclass transfer learning from unconstrained priors. In: Proc. ICCV (2011)Kim, S., Park, S., Kim, M.: Image classification into object / non-object classes. In: Enser, P.G.B., Kompatsiaris, Y., O’Connor, N.E., Smeaton, A.F., Smeulders, A.W.M. (eds.) CIVR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3115, pp. 393–400. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Ko, B.C., Lee, J., Nam, J.Y.: Automatic medical image annotation and keyword-based image retrieval using relevance feedback. Journal of Digital Imaging 25(4), 454–465 (2012)Kökciyan, N., Türkay, R., Üsküdarlı, S., Yolum, P., Bakır, B., Acar, B.: Semantic Description of Liver CT Images: An Ontological Approach. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (2014)Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., Ponce, J.: Beyond bags of features: Spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. In: 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol.  2, pp. 2169–2178. IEEE (2006)Martinez-Gomez, J., Garcia-Varea, I., Caputo, B.: Overview of the imageclef 2012 robot vision task. In: CLEF (Online Working Notes/Labs/Workshop) (2012)Martinez-Gomez, J., Garcia-Varea, I., Cazorla, M., Caputo, B.: Overview of the imageclef 2013 robot vision task. In: CLEF 2013 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes (2013)Martinez-Gomez, J., Cazorla, M., Garcia-Varea, I., Morell, V.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2014 Robot Vision Task. In: CLEF 2014 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes (2014)Mueen, A., Zainuddin, R., Baba, M.S.: Automatic multilevel medical image annotation and retrieval. Journal of Digital Imaging 21(3), 290–295 (2008)Muller, H., Clough, P., Deselaers, T., Caputo, B.: ImageCLEF: experimental evaluation in visual information retrieval. Springer (2010)Park, S.B., Lee, J.W., Kim, S.K.: Content-based image classification using a neural network. Pattern Recognition Letters 25(3), 287–300 (2004)Patricia, N., Caputo, B.: Learning to learn, from transfer learning to domain adaptation: a unifying perspective. In: Proc. CVPR (2014)Pronobis, A., Caputo, B.: The robot vision task. In: Muller, H., Clough, P., Deselaers, T., Caputo, B. (eds.) ImageCLEF. The Information Retrieval Series, vol. 32, pp. 185–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Pronobis, A., Christensen, H., Caputo, B.: Overview of the imageclef@ icpr 2010 robot vision track. In: Recognizing Patterns in Signals, Speech, Images and Videos, pp. 171–179 (2010)Qi, X., Han, Y.: Incorporating multiple svms for automatic image annotation. Pattern Recognition 40(2), 728–741 (2007)Reshma, I.A., Ullah, M.Z., Aono, M.: KDEVIR at ImageCLEF 2014 Scalable Concept Image Annotation Task: Ontology based Automatic Image Annotation. In: CLEF 2014 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes. Sheffield, UK, September 15-18 (2014)Saenko, K., Kulis, B., Fritz, M., Darrell, T.: Adapting visual category models to new domains. In: Daniilidis, K., Maragos, P., Paragios, N. (eds.) ECCV 2010, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 6314, pp. 213–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Sahbi, H.: CNRS - TELECOM ParisTech at ImageCLEF 2013 Scalable Concept Image Annotation Task: Winning Annotations with Context Dependent SVMs. In: CLEF 2013 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes, Valencia, Spain, September 23-26 (2013)Sethi, I.K., Coman, I.L., Stan, D.: Mining association rules between low-level image features and high-level concepts. In: Aerospace/Defense Sensing, Simulation, and Controls, pp. 279–290. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2001)Shi, R., Feng, H., Chua, T.-S., Lee, C.-H.: An adaptive image content representation and segmentation approach to automatic image annotation. In: Enser, P.G.B., Kompatsiaris, Y., O’Connor, N.E., Smeaton, A.F., Smeulders, A.W.M. (eds.) CIVR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3115, pp. 545–554. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Tommasi, T., Caputo, B.: Frustratingly easy nbnn domain adaptation. In: Proc. ICCV (2013)Tommasi, T., Quadrianto, N., Caputo, B., Lampert, C.H.: Beyond dataset bias: Multi-task unaligned shared knowledge transfer. In: Lee, K.M., Matsushita, Y., Rehg, J.M., Hu, Z. (eds.) ACCV 2012, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7724, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Tsikrika, T., de Herrera, A.G.S., Müller, H.: Assessing the scholarly impact of imageCLEF. In: Forner, P., Gonzalo, J., Kekäläinen, J., Lalmas, M., de Rijke, M. (eds.) CLEF 2011. LNCS, vol. 6941, pp. 95–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Ünay, D., Soldea, O., Akyüz, S., Çetin, M., Erçil, A.: Medical image retrieval and automatic annotation: Vpa-sabanci at imageclef 2009. In: The Cross-Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF) (2009)Vailaya, A., Figueiredo, M.A., Jain, A.K., Zhang, H.J.: Image classification for content-based indexing. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 10(1), 117–130 (2001)Villegas, M., Paredes, R.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2012 Scalable Web Image Annotation Task. In: Forner, P., Karlgren, J., Womser-Hacker, C. (eds.) CLEF 2012 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes, Rome, Italy, September 17-20 (2012), http://mvillegas.info/pub/Villegas12_CLEF_Annotation-Overview.pdfVillegas, M., Paredes, R.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2014 Scalable Concept Image Annotation Task. In: CLEF 2014 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes, Sheffield, UK, September 15-18 (2014), http://mvillegas.info/pub/Villegas14_CLEF_Annotation-Overview.pdfVillegas, M., Paredes, R., Thomee, B.: Overview of the ImageCLEF 2013 Scalable Concept Image Annotation Subtask. In: CLEF 2013 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes, Valencia, Spain, September 23-26 (2013), http://mvillegas.info/pub/Villegas13_CLEF_Annotation-Overview.pdfVillena Román, J., González Cristóbal, J.C., Goñi Menoyo, J.M., Martínez Fernández, J.L.: MIRACLE’s naive approach to medical images annotation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 28(7), 1088–1099 (2005)Wong, R.C., Leung, C.H.: Automatic semantic annotation of real-world web images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 30(11), 1933–1944 (2008)Yang, C., Dong, M., Fotouhi, F.: Image content annotation using bayesian framework and complement components analysis. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP 2005, vol. 1, pp. I–1193. IEEE (2005)Yılmaz, K.Y., Cemgil, A.T., Simsekli, U.: Generalised coupled tensor factorisation. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2151–2159 (2011)Zhang, Y., Qin, J., Chen, F., Hu, D.: NUDTs Participation in ImageCLEF Robot Vision Challenge 2014. In: CLEF 2014 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes (2014