20 research outputs found

    Expected Improvement in Efficient Global Optimization Through Bootstrapped Kriging - Replaces CentER DP 2010-62

    Get PDF
    This article uses a sequentialized experimental design to select simulation input com- binations for global optimization, based on Kriging (also called Gaussian process or spatial correlation modeling); this Kriging is used to analyze the input/output data of the simulation model (computer code). This design and analysis adapt the clas- sic "expected improvement" (EI) in "efficient global optimization" (EGO) through the introduction of an unbiased estimator of the Kriging predictor variance; this estimator uses parametric bootstrapping. Classic EI and bootstrapped EI are com- pared through various test functions, including the six-hump camel-back and several Hartmann functions. These empirical results demonstrate that in some applications bootstrapped EI finds the global optimum faster than classic EI does; in general, however, the classic EI may be considered to be a robust global optimizer.Simulation;Optimization;Kriging;Bootstrap

    Identification of quasi-optimal regions in the design space using surrogate modeling

    Get PDF
    The use of Surrogate Based Optimization (SBO) is widely spread in engineering design to find optimal performance characteristics of expensive simulations (forward analysis: from input to optimal output). However, often the practitioner knows a priori the desired performance and is interested in finding the associated input parameters (reverse analysis: from desired output to input). A popular method to solve such reverse (inverse) problems is to minimize the error between the simulated performance and the desired goal. However, there might be multiple quasi-optimal solutions to the problem. In this paper, the authors propose a novel method to efficiently solve inverse problems and to sample Quasi-Optimal Regions (QORs) in the input (design) space more densely. The development of this technique, based on the probability of improvement criterion and kriging models, is driven by a real-life problem from bio-mechanics, i.e., determining the elasticity of the (rabbit) tympanic membrane, a membrane that converts acoustic sound wave into vibrations of the middle ear ossicular bones

    Conditional simulation for efficient global optimization

    Get PDF

    ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ ๋ฌผ์„ฑ์น˜ MCMC ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ฐ„์ ‘ ์ถ”์ •์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ด€์ธก ์œ„์น˜ ์ˆœ์ฐจ์  ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ฑด์„คํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2019. 2. ์†ก์ค€ํ˜ธ.Structures deteriorate naturally when they are used for a long time. Therefore, it is essential to accurately check the degree of deterioration of a structure in order to prevent accidents such as collapse. However, numerical values to detect the degree of deterioration such as the effective thickness are often difficult to measure directly. Thus, it is required to indirectly estimate values associated with deterioration by using direct observations such as strain or displacement obtained from a loading test. In this case, if the number of measurable direct observation is limited due to external factors, it is desirable to choose direct observation locations that can improve the accuracy of indirect estimations under a small number of direct observations. This study proposes a sequential measurement location optimization method to improve the accuracy of an effective thickness indirect estimation of a structure when the number of strain observations is limited. For this goal, the effective thickness distribution of the structure is approximated first by using Karhunen-Loรจve expansion. Second, system identification based on Bayesian updating using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation is performed to estimate mean and standard deviation of the effective thickness under given strain measurements. Third, three sequential direct observation selection methods are proposed using the estimated mean and standard deviation of the effective thickness. This study compares the accuracy of the sequentially selected observation locations with simultaneously selected observation locations by applied to the structure. The accuracy of the three sequential measurement location selection methods is also compared. Through the proposed methods, it is possible to determine the next strain measurement location, which can effectively improve the accuracy of the effective thickness estimation, and can maximize the accuracy of the effective thickness estimation under a small number of strain observation locations. It is expected that the proposed methods can be applied to improve the accuracy of estimation of various properties related to the structural deterioration, which can be estimated indirectly.๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์ด ์˜ค๋ž˜๋ ์ˆ˜๋ก ์ž์—ฐํžˆ ์—ดํ™”๋˜๋ฏ€๋กœ, ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ ๋ถ•๊ดด ๋“ฑ์˜ ์‚ฌ๊ณ ๋ฅผ ๋ฏธ์—ฐ์— ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ์—ดํ™” ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ์ •ํ™•ํžˆ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ์—ดํ™” ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์œ ํšจ ๋‘๊ป˜ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜๋“ค์€ ์ง์ ‘ ์ธก์ •์ด ํž˜๋“  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ ํ•˜์ค‘ ์žฌํ•˜ ์‹œํ—˜ ๋“ฑ์—์„œ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ณ€ํ˜•๋„๋‚˜ ๋ณ€์œ„ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์—ญํ•™์ ์ธ ๊ด€์ธก๊ฐ’์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ„์ ‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”์ •ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋•Œ, ์™ธ๋ถ€ ์š”์ธ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์ง์ ‘ ์ธก์ • ์œ„์น˜ ๊ฐœ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ํ•œ์ •๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค๋ฉด, ํ•œ์ •๋œ ๊ฐœ์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ด€์ธก๊ฐ’ ํ•˜์—์„œ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ฐ„์ ‘ ์ถ”์ • ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ง์ ‘ ์ธก์ • ์œ„์น˜ ์„ ์ •์„ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ณ€ํ˜•๋„ ์ธก์ • ์œ„์น˜ ๊ฐœ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์ œํ•œ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์„ ๋•Œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ์œ ํšจ๋‘๊ป˜ ๊ฐ„์ ‘ ์ถ”์ •์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ˆœ์ฐจ์  ์ธก์ • ์œ„์น˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ € ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ์œ ํšจ ๋‘๊ป˜ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ Karhunen- Loรจve ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ทผ์‚ฌ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ•œ ๋’ค, ๋งˆ๋ฅด์ฝ”ํ”„ ์—ฐ์‡„ ๋ชฌํ…Œ์นด๋ฅผ๋กœ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฒ ์ด์ฆˆ ์ถ”๋ก ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ์—ญํ•ด์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ๋ณ€ํ˜•๋„ ์ธก์ •๊ฐ’ ํ•˜์—์„œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ ์ „์ฒด์˜ ์œ ํšจ๋‘๊ป˜์˜ ์ถ”์ •๊ฐ’๊ณผ ํŽธ์ฐจ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”์ •๋œ ์œ ํšจ๋‘๊ป˜์˜ ์ถ”์ •๊ฐ’๊ณผ ํŽธ์ฐจ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ด€์ธก ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€์˜ ๊ด€์ธก ์œ„์น˜ ์„ ์ • ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์„ ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ์— ์ ์šฉํ•ด์„œ ๊ด€์ธก ์œ„์น˜ ์„ ์ • ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ณ , ๋˜ํ•œ ๋™์‹œ์— ๊ด€์ธก ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์„ ์ •ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์™€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ํšจ๋‘๊ป˜ ์ถ”์ •๊ฐ’์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ ๋ณ€์œ„ ์ธก์ • ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ•œ์ •๋œ ๊ด€์ธก ์œ„์น˜ ๊ฐœ์ˆ˜ ํ•˜ ์—์„œ ์œ ํšจ๋‘๊ป˜ ์ถ”์ •์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋ฐฉ์‹์€ ์œ ํšจ๋‘๊ป˜๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ, ์ƒ˜ํ”Œ๋ง์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ„์ ‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”๋ก ํ•ด๋‚ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฌผ ์—ดํ™” ๊ด€๋ จ ๋ฌผ์„ฑ์น˜ ์ถ”์ •์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์—๋„ ์ ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋œ๋‹ค.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Research Background 1 1.2. Research Objectives 4 1.3. Outline 6 Chapter 2. System Identification of Structures by Physical Measurements 7 2.1. Karhunen-Loรจve Expansion 7 2.2. Obtain Samples of KL Random Variables by Bayesian Inference and Markov Chain Monte Carlo 9 2.3. Estimate Distribution of the Effective Thickness 11 Chapter 3. Sequential Selection Technique of Measurement Locations 17 3.1. Goal of Measurement Locations Selection 17 3.2. Methods to Generate Sample Effective Thickness 19 3.2.1. Scheme 1: Sampling specific effective thickness 19 3.2.2. Scheme 2: Sampling whole effective thickness 22 3.2.3. Scheme 3: Sampling random variables of K-L expansion 23 3.2.4. Comparison between sample effective thickness generation methods 26 3.3. Methods to Determine Additional Measurement Location Using Samples 27 Chapter 4. Numerical Example 33 4.1. Structure Overview 33 4.2. Numerical Example 1: Use the Sum of Two SSVs 40 4.3. Numerical Example 2: Use Two SSVs Respectively 45 Chapter 5. Conclusion 51 References 53 ์ดˆ๋ก 56Maste

    Robust optimal design of FOPID controller for five bar linkage robot in a cyber-physical system: a new simulation-optimization approach

    Get PDF
    This paper aims to further increase the reliability of optimal results by setting the simulation conditions to be as close as possible to the real or actual operation to create a Cyber-Physical System (CPS) view for the installation of the Fractional-Order PID (FOPID) controller. For this purpose, we consider two different sources of variability in such a CPS control model. The first source refers to the changeability of a target of the control model (multiple setpoints) because of environmental noise factors and the second source refers to an anomaly in sensors that is raised in a feedback loop. We develop a new approach to optimize two objective functions under uncertainty including signal energy control and response error control while obtaining the robustness among the source of variability with the lowest computational cost. A new hybrid surrogate-metaheuristic approach is developed using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to update the Gaussian Process (GP) surrogate for a sequential improvement of the robust optimal result. The application of efficient global optimization is extended to estimate surrogate prediction error with less computational cost using a jackknife leave-one-out estimator. This paper examines the challenges of such a robust multi-objective optimization for FOPID control of a five-bar linkage robot manipulator. The results show the applicability and effectiveness of our proposed method in obtaining robustness and reliability in a CPS control system by tackling required computational efforts
    corecore