OPR

The ability to reproduce a parallel execution is desirable for debugging and program reliability purposes. In debugging (13), the programmer needs to manually step back in time, while for resilience (6) this is automatically performed by the the application upon failure. To be useful, replay has to faithfully reproduce the original execution. For parallel programs the main challenge is inferring and maintaining the order of conflicting operations (data races). Deterministic record and replay (R&R) techniques have been developed for multithreaded shared memory programs (5), as well as distributed memory programs (14). Our main interest is techniques for large scale scientific (3; 4) programming models

Handling Parallelism in a Concurrency Model

Programming models for concurrency are optimized for dealing with nondeterminism, for example to handle asynchronously arriving events. To shield the developer from data race errors effectively, such models may prevent shared access to data altogether. However, this restriction also makes them unsuitable for applications that require data parallelism. We present a library-based approach for permitting parallel access to arrays while preserving the safety guarantees of the original model. When applied to SCOOP, an object-oriented concurrency model, the approach exhibits a negligible performance overhead compared to ordinary threaded implementations of two parallel benchmark programs.Comment: MUSEPAT 201

An assessment of DREAM, appendix E

The design realization, evaluation and modelling (DREAM) system is evaluated. A short history of the DREAM research project is given as well as the significant characteristics of DREAM as a development environment. The design notation which is the basis for the DREAM system is reviewed, and the development tools envisioned as part of DREAM are discussed. Insights into development environments and their production are presented and used to make suggestions for future work in the area of development environments

Parallel symbolic state-space exploration is difficult, but what is the alternative?

State-space exploration is an essential step in many modeling and analysis problems. Its goal is to find the states reachable from the initial state of a discrete-state model described. The state space can used to answer important questions, e.g., "Is there a dead state?" and "Can N become negative?", or as a starting point for sophisticated investigations expressed in temporal logic. Unfortunately, the state space is often so large that ordinary explicit data structures and sequential algorithms cannot cope, prompting the exploration of (1) parallel approaches using multiple processors, from simple workstation networks to shared-memory supercomputers, to satisfy large memory and runtime requirements and (2) symbolic approaches using decision diagrams to encode the large structured sets and relations manipulated during state-space generation. Both approaches have merits and limitations. Parallel explicit state-space generation is challenging, but almost linear speedup can be achieved; however, the analysis is ultimately limited by the memory and processors available. Symbolic methods are a heuristic that can efficiently encode many, but not all, functions over a structured and exponentially large domain; here the pitfalls are subtler: their performance varies widely depending on the class of decision diagram chosen, the state variable order, and obscure algorithmic parameters. As symbolic approaches are often much more efficient than explicit ones for many practical models, we argue for the need to parallelize symbolic state-space generation algorithms, so that we can realize the advantage of both approaches. This is a challenging endeavor, as the most efficient symbolic algorithm, Saturation, is inherently sequential. We conclude by discussing challenges, efforts, and promising directions toward this goal

TOWARDS GENERIC SYSTEM OBSERVATION MANAGEMENT

Едно от най-големите предизвикателства на информатиката е да създава правилно работещи компютърни системи. За да се гарантира коректността на една система, по време на дизайн могат де се прилагат формални методи за моделиране и валидация. Този подход е за съжаление труден и скъп за приложение при мнозинството компютърни системи. Алтернативният подход е да се наблюдава и анализира поведението на системата по време на изпълнение след нейното създаване. В този доклад представям научната си работа по въпроса за наблюдение на копютърните системи. Предлагам един общ поглед на три основни страни на проблема: как трябва да се наблюдават компютърните системи, как се използват наблюденията при недетерминистични системи и как се работи по отворен, гъвкав и възпроизводим начин с наблюдения.One of the biggest challenges in computer science is to produce correct computer systems. One way of ensuring system correction is to use formal techniques to validate the system during its design. This approach is compulsory for critical systems but difficult and expensive for most computer systems. The alternative consists in observing and analyzing systems' behavior during execution. In this thesis, I present my research on system observation. I describe my contributions on generic observation mechanisms, on the use of observations for debugging nondeterministic systems and on the definition of an open, flexible and reproducible management of observations.Un des plus grands défis de l'informatique est de produire des systèmes corrects. Une manière d'assurer la correction des systèmes est d'utiliser des méthodes formelles de modélisation et de validation.Obligatoire dans le domaine des systèmes critiques, cette approche est difficile et coûteuse à mettre en place dans la plupart des systèmes informatiques.L'alternative est de vérifier le comportement des systèmes déjà développés en observant et analysant leur comportement à l'exécution.Ce mémoire présente mes contributions autour de l'observation des systèmes. Il discute de la définition de mécanismes génériques d'observation, de l'exploitation des observations pour le débogage de systèmes non déterministes et de la gestion ouverte, flexible et reproductible d'observations

Constraint-based automatic symmetry detection

10.1109/ASE.2013.66930622013 28th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE 2013 - Proceedings15-2

Reasoning About Foreign Function Interfaces Without Modelling the Foreign Language

Foreign function interfaces (FFIs) allow programs written in one language (called the host language) to call functions written in another language (called the guest language), and are widespread throughout modern programming languages, with C FFIs being the most prevalent. Unfortunately, reasoning about C FFIs can be very challenging, particularly when using traditional methods which necessitate a full model of the guest language in order to guarantee anything about the whole language. To address this, we propose a framework for defining whole language semantics of FFIs without needing to model the guest language, which makes reasoning about C FFIs feasible. We show that with such a semantics, one can guarantee some form of soundness of the overall language, as well as attribute errors in well-typed host language programs to the guest language. We also present an implementation of this scheme, Poseidon Lua, which shows a speedup over a traditional Lua C FFI