Risk assessment of blasting operations in open pit mines using FAHP method

Purpose. In the mining blasting operation, fragmentation is the most important output. Fly rock, ground vibration, air blast, and environmental effects are detrimental effects of blasting operations. Identifying and ranking the risk of blasting operations is considered as the most important stage in project management. Methods. In this research, the problem of identifying and ranking the factors constituting the risk in blasting operations is considered with the methodology of the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP). Criteria and sub-criteria have been determined based on historical research studies, field studies, and expert opinions for designing a hierarchical process. Findings. Based on FAHP scores, non-control of the sub-criterion of health and safety (C3), blast operation results (C18) and knowledge, and skill and staffing (C2) with a score of 0.377, 0.334, and 0.294 respectively are the most effective sub-criterion for the creation of blasting operations risk. According to the score, the sub-criterion C18 is the most effective sub-criterion in providing the blasting operations risk. Effects and results of blasting operations (D8), with a score of 0.334 as the most effective criterion, and natural hazards (D10), with a score of 0.015, were the last priorities in the factors causing blasting operations risk. Originality. Regarding the risk rating of blasting operations, the control of the sub-criteria C3, C18, and C2, and the D8 criterion, is of particular importance in reducing the risk of blasting operations and improving project management. Practical implications. The evaluation of human resource performance and increase in the level of knowledge and skills and occupational safety and control of all outputs of blasting operations is necessary. Therefore, selecting the most important project risks and taking actions to remove them is essential for risk management.Мета. Визначення ризиків проведення вибухових робіт та їх оцінка на основі використанням нечіткого методу аналізу ієрархій (НМАІ) для покращення управління якістю проектів. Методика. В рамках даного дослідження, проблеми визначення та оцінки ризиків вибухових робіт розглядалися із застосуванням нечіткого методу аналізу ієрархій. На базі аналізу історичних даних і польового дослідження з урахуванням експертних оцінок були визначені критерії та підкритерії для побудови ієрархій. Результати. За результатами НМАІ, неконтролюючий підкритерій здоров’я та безпеки (С3), підкритерій результатів вибухових робіт (С18), знань, умінь і кадрів (С2) зі значеннями 0.377, 0.334 і 0.294 відповідно найбільш ефективні в появі ризику проведення вибухових робіт. Підкритерій С18 чинить найбільший вплив на ризик проведення вибухових робіт. Критерій результатів і наслідків вибухових робіт (D8) з найефективнішим значенням 0.334 та критерій природних катастроф (D10) зі значенням 0.015 є останніми пріоритетами серед чинників, які визначають ризик проведення вибухових робіт. Наукова новизна. Отримав доповнення та подальший розвиток науково-методичний підхід до визначення ризиків при проведенні вибухових робіт, заснований на їх ранжуванні з використанням системи виявлених критеріїв і підкритеріїв методом НМАІ. Практична значимість. Для успішного керування проектом важливо визначати найсерйозніші ризики проекту й вжити заходів щодо їх усунення. Відносно ранжирування ризиків проведення вибухових робіт управління підкритеріями C3, C18 і C2, а також критерієм D8, особливо важливо для зниження цих ризиків та покращення якості управління проектом.Цель. Определение рисков проведения взрывных работ и их оценка на основе использования нечеткого метода анализа иерархий (НМАИ) для улучшения управления качеством проектов. Методика. В рамках данного исследования, проблемы определения и оценки рисков взрывных работ рассматривались с применением нечеткого метода анализа иерархий. На базе анализа исторических данных и полевого исследования с учетом экспертных оценок были определены, критерии и подкритерии для построения иерархий. Результаты. По результатам НМАИ, неконтролирующий подкритерий здоровья и безопасности (С3), подкритерий результатов взрывных работ (С18), знаний, умений и кадров (С2) со значениями 0.377, 0.334 и 0.294 соответственно наиболее эффективны в появлении риска проведения взрывных работ. Подкритерий С18 оказывает самое большое влияние на риск проведения взрывных работ. Критерий результатов и последствий взрывных работ (D8) с самым эффективным значением 0.334 и критерий природных катастроф (D10) со значением 0.015 являются последними приоритетами среди факторов, которые определяют риск проведения взрывных работ. Научная новизна. Получил дополнение и дальнейшее развитие научно-методический подход к определению рисков при проведении взрывных работ, основанный на их ранжировании с использованием системы выявленных критериев и подкритериев методом НМАИ. Практическая значимость. Для успешного руководства проектом важно определять самые серьезные риски проекта и предпринять действия по их устранению. В отношении ранжирования рисков проведения взрывных работ управление подкритериями C3, C18 и C2, а также критерием D8, особенно важно для снижения этих рисков и улучшения руководства проектом.The authors would like to thank Mining Engineering Department, Islamic Azad University (South Tehran Branch) for supporting this research

Developing new models for flyrock distance assessment in open-pit mines

Peer ReviewedObjectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible::9 - Indústria, Innovació i InfraestructuraPostprint (published version

Application of artificial intelligence techniques for predicting the flyrock, Sungun mine, Iran

Flyrock is known as one of the main problems in open pit mining operations. This phenomenon can threaten the safety of mine personnel, equipment and buildings around the mine area. One way to reduce the risk of accidents due to flyrock is to accurately predict that the safe area can be identified and also with proper design of the explosion pattern, the amount of flyrock can be greatly reduced. For this purpose, 14 effective parameters on flyrock have been selected in this paper i.e. burden, blasthole diameter, sub-drilling, number of blastholes, spacing, total length, amount of explosives and a number of other effective parameters, predicting the amount of flyrock in a case study, Songun mine, using linear multivariate regression (LMR) and artificial intelligence algorithms such as Gray Wolf Optimization algorithm (GWO), Moth-Flame Optimization algorithm (MFO), Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Ant Lion Optimizer (ALO) and Multi-Verse Optimizer (MVO). Results showed that intelligent algorithms have better capabilities than linear regression method and finally method MVO showed the best performance for predicting flyrock. Moreover, the results of the sensitivity analysis show that the burden, ANFO, total rock blasted, total length and blast hole diameter are the most significant factors to determine flyrock, respectively, while dynamite has the lowest impact on flyrock generation.Peer ReviewedObjectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible::9 - Indústria, Innovació i InfraestructuraPostprint (published version

ISTRAŽIVANJE OPERACIJA MINIRANJA KORISTEĆI METODU ODLUČIVANJA

Blasting is one of the most important operations in the mining projects. Inappropriate blasting pattern may lead to unwanted events such as poor fragmentation, back break, fly rock etc. and affect the whole operation physically and economically. In fact selecting of the most suitable pattern among previously performed patterns can be considered as a Multi Attribute Decision MakingMiniranje je jedna od najvažnijih operacija pri projektiranju u rudarstvu. Nedovoljno dobar uzorak može pridonijeti nastanku neželjenih događaja kao što su fragmentizacija, pucanje, \u27fly rock\u27 itd. te utjecati na razvoj cijele operacije fizički i ekonomski. U principu, odabir najboljeg uzorka može se smatrati važnom odlukom

Prediction of fly-rock using gene expression programming and teaching– learning-based optimization algorithm

Peer ReviewedObjectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible::12 - Producció i Consum ResponsablesObjectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible::12 - Producció i Consum Responsables::12.2 - Per a 2030, assolir la gestió sostenible i l’ús eficient dels recursos naturalsPostprint (published version

Intelligence prediction of some selected environmental issues of blasting: A review

Background: Blasting is commonly used for loosening hard rock during excavation for generating the desired rock fragmentation required for optimizing the productivity of downstream operations. The environmental impacts resulting from such blasting operations include the generation of flyrock, ground vibrations, air over pressure (AOp) and rock fragmentation. Objective: The purpose of this research is to evaluate the suitability of different computational techniques for the prediction of these environmental effects and to determine the key factors which contribute to each of these effects. This paper also identifies future research needs for the prediction of the environmental effects of blasting operations in hard rock. Methods: The various computational techniques utilized by the researchers in predicting blasting environmental issues such as artificial neural network (ANN), fuzzy interface system (FIS), imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA), and particle swarm optimization (PSO), were reviewed. Results: The results indicated that ANN, FIS and ANN-ICA were the best models for prediction of flyrock distance. FIS model was the best technique for the prediction of AOp and ground vibration. On the other hand, ANN was found to be the best for the assessment of fragmentation. Conclusion and Recommendation: It can be concluded that FIS, ANN-PSO, ANN-ICA models perform better than ANN models for the prediction of environmental issues of blasting using the same database. This paper further discusses how some of these techniques can be implemented by mining engineers and blasting team members at operating mines for predicting blast performance

Rock mass classification for predicting environmental impact of blasting on tropically weathered rock

Tropical climate and post tectonic impact on the rock mass cause severe and deep weathering in complex rock formations. The uniqueness of tropical influence on the geoengineering properties of rock mass leads to significant effects on blast performance especially in the developmental stage. Different rock types such as limestone and granite exhibit different weathering effects which require special attention for classifying rock mass for blastability purpose. Rock mass classification systems have been implemented for last century for various applications to simplify complexity of rock mass. Several research studies have been carried out on rock mass and material properties for five classes of weathered rock- fresh, slightly, moderately, highly and completely weathered rock. There is wide variation in rock mass properties- heterogeneity and strength of weathered rocks in different weathering zones which cause environmental effects due to blasting. Several researchers have developed different techniques for prediction of air overpressure (AOp), peak particle velocity (PPV) and flyrock primarily for production blast. These techniques may not be suitable for prediction of blast performance in development benches in tropically weathered rock mass. In this research, blast monitoring program were carried out from a limestone quarry and two granite quarries. Due to different nature of properties, tropically weathered rock mass was classified as massive, blocky and fractured rock for simpler evaluation of development blast performance. Weathering Index (WI) is introduced based on porosity, water absorption and Point Load Index (PLI) strength properties of rock. Weathering index, porosity index, water absorption index and point load index ratio showed decreasing trend from massive to fractured tropically weathered rock. On the other hand, Block Weathering Index (BWI) was developed based on hypothetical values of exploration data and computational model. Ten blasting data sets were collected for analysis with blasting data varying from 105 to 166 per data set for AOp, PPV and flyrock. For granite, one data set each was analyzed for AOp and PPV and balance five data sets were analyzed for flyrock in granite by variation in input parameters. For prediction of blasting performance, varied techniques such as empirical equations, multivariable regression analysis (MVRA), hypothetical model, computational techniques (artificial intelligence-AI, machine learning- ML) and graphical charts. Measured values of blast performance was also compared with prediction techniques used by previous researchers. Blastability Index (BI), powder factor, WI are found suitable for prediction of all blast performance. Maximum charge per delay, distance of monitoring point are found to be critical factors for prediction of AOp and PPV. Stiffness ratio is found to be a crucial factor for flyrock especially during developmental blast. Empirical equations developed for prediction of PPV in fractured, blocky, and massive limestone showed R2 (0.82, 0.54, and 0.23) respectively confirming that there is an impact of weathering on blasting performance. Best fit equation was developed with multivariable regression analysis (MVRA) with measured blast performance values and input parameters. Prediction of flyrock for granite with MVRA for massive, blocky and fractured demonstrated R2 (0.8843, 0.86, 0.9782) respectively. WI and BWI were interchangeably used and results showed comparable results. For limestone, AOp analysed with model PSO-ANN showed R2(0.961); PPV evaluated with model FA-ANN produced R2 (0.966). For flyrock in granite with prediction model GWO-ANFIS showed R2 (1) The same data set was analysed by replacing WI with BWI showed equivalent results. Model ANFIS produced R2 (1). It is found the best performing models were PSO-ANN for AOp, FA-ANN for PPV and GWO-ANFIS for flyrock. Prediction charts were developed for AOp, PPV and flyrock for simple in use by site personnel. Blastability index and weathering index showed variation with reclassified weathering zones – massive, blocky and fractured and they are useful input parameters for prediction of blast performance in tropically weathered rock

Advances in Computational Intelligence Applications in the Mining Industry

This book captures advancements in the applications of computational intelligence (artificial intelligence, machine learning, etc.) to problems in the mineral and mining industries. The papers present the state of the art in four broad categories: mine operations, mine planning, mine safety, and advances in the sciences, primarily in image processing applications. Authors in the book include both researchers and industry practitioners

Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration at a limestone quarry : an artificial intelligence approach

Ground vibration is one of the most unfavourable environmental effects of blasting activities, which can cause serious damage to neighboring homes and structures. As a result, effective forecasting of their severity is critical to controlling and reducing their recurrence. There are several conventional vibration predictor equations available proposed by different researchers but most of them are based on only two parameters, i.e., explosive charge used per delay and distance between blast face to the monitoring point. It is a well-known fact that blasting results are influenced by a number of blast design parameters, such as burden, spacing, powder factor, etc. but these are not being considered in any of the available conventional predictors and due to that they show a high error in predicting blast vibrations. Nowadays, artificial intelligence has been widely used in blast engineering. Thus, three artificial intelligence approaches, namely Gaussian process regression (GPR), extreme learning machine (ELM) and backpropagation neural network (BPNN) were used in this study to estimate ground vibration caused by blasting in Shree Cement Ras Limestone Mine in India. To achieve that aim, 101 blasting datasets with powder factor, average depth, distance, spacing, burden, charge weight, and stemming length as input parameters were collected from the mine site. For comparison purposes, a simple multivariate regression analysis (MVRA) model as well as, a nonparametric regression-based technique known as multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) was also constructed using the same datasets. This study serves as a foundational study for the comparison of GPR, BPNN, ELM, MARS and MVRA to ascertain their respective predictive performances. Eighty-one (81) datasets representing 80% of the total blasting datasets were used to construct and train the various predictive models while 20 data samples (20%) were utilized for evaluating the predictive capabilities of the developed predictive models. Using the testing datasets, major indicators of performance, namely mean squared error (MSE), variance accounted for (VAF), correlation coefficient (R) and coefficient of determination (R2) were compared as statistical evaluators of model performance. This study revealed that the GPR model exhibited superior predictive capability in comparison to the MARS, BPNN, ELM and MVRA. The GPR model showed the highest VAF, R and R2 values of 99.1728%, 0.9985 and 0.9971 respectively and the lowest MSE of 0.0903. As a result, the blast engineer can employ GPR as an effective and appropriate method for forecasting blast-induced ground vibration. © 2022 by the authors

Prediction of blasting mean fragment size using support vector regression combined with five optimization algorithms

The main purpose of blasting operation is to produce desired and optimum mean size rock fragments. Smaller or fine fragments cause the loss of ore during loading and transportation, whereas large or coarser fragments need to be further processed, which enhances production cost. Therefore, accurate prediction of rock fragmentation is crucial in blasting operations. Mean fragment size (MFS) is a crucial index that measures the goodness of blasting designs. Over the past decades, various models have been proposed to evaluate and predict blasting fragmentation. Among these models, artificial intelligence (AI)-based models are becoming more popular due to their outstanding prediction results for multi-influential factors. In this study, support vector regression (SVR) techniques are adopted as the basic prediction tools, and five types of optimization algorithms, i.e. grid search (GS), grey wolf optimization (GWO), particle swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithm (GA) and salp swarm algorithm (SSA), are implemented to improve the prediction performance and optimize the hyper-parameters. The prediction model involves 19 influential factors that constitute a comprehensive blasting MFS evaluation system based on AI techniques. Among all the models, the GWO-v-SVR-based model shows the best comprehensive performance in predicting MFS in blasting operation. Three types of mathematical indices, i.e. mean square error (MSE), coefficient of determination (R2) and variance accounted for (VAF), are utilized for evaluating the performance of different prediction models. The R2, MSE and VAF values for the training set are 0.8355, 0.00138 and 80.98, respectively, whereas 0.8353, 0.00348 and 82.41, respectively for the testing set. Finally, sensitivity analysis is performed to understand the influence of input parameters on MFS. It shows that the most sensitive factor in blasting MFS is the uniaxial compressive strength. © 2021 Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Science