Evolutionary Algorithms for Static and Dynamic Multiobjective Optimization

Many real-world optimization problems consist of a number of conflicting objectives that have to be optimized simultaneously. Due to the presence of multiple conflicting ob- jectives, there is no single solution that can optimize all the objectives. Therefore, the resulting multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs) resort to a set of trade-off op- timal solutions, called the Pareto set in the decision space and the Pareto front in the objective space. Traditional optimization methods can at best find one solution in a sin- gle run, thereby making them inefficient to solve MOPs. In contrast, evolutionary algo- rithms (EAs) are able to approximate multiple optimal solutions in a single run. This strength makes EAs good candidates for solving MOPs. Over the past several decades, there have been increasing research interests in developing EAs or improving their perfor- mance, resulting in a large number of contributions towards the applicability of EAs for MOPs. However, the performance of EAs depends largely on the properties of the MOPs in question, e.g., static/dynamic optimization environments, simple/complex Pareto front characteristics, and low/high dimensionality. Different problem properties may pose dis- tinct optimization difficulties to EAs. For example, dynamic (time-varying) MOPs are generally more challenging than static ones to EAs. Therefore, it is not trivial to further study EAs in order to make them widely applicable to MOPs with various optimization scenarios or problem properties. This thesis is devoted to exploring EAs’ ability to solve a variety of MOPs with dif- ferent problem characteristics, attempting to widen EAs’ applicability and enhance their general performance. To start with, decomposition-based EAs are enhanced by incorpo- rating two-phase search and niche-guided solution selection strategies so as to make them suitable for solving MOPs with complex Pareto fronts. Second, new scalarizing functions are proposed and their impacts on evolutionary multiobjective optimization are exten- sively studied. On the basis of the new scalarizing functions, an efficient decomposition- based EA is introduced to deal with a class of hard MOPs. Third, a diversity-first- and-convergence-second sorting method is suggested to handle possible drawbacks of convergence-first based sorting methods. The new sorting method is then combined with strength based fitness assignment, with the aid of reference directions, to optimize MOPs with an increase of objective dimensionality. After that, we study the field of dynamic multiobjective optimization where objective functions and constraints can change over time. A new set of test problems consisting of a wide range of dynamic characteristics is introduced at an attempt to standardize test environments in dynamic multiobjective optimization, thereby aiding fair algorithm comparison and deep performance analysis. Finally, a dynamic EA is developed to tackle dynamic MOPs by exploiting the advan- tages of both generational and steady-state algorithms. All the proposed approaches have been extensively examined against existing state-of-the-art methods, showing fairly good performance in a variety of test scenarios. The research work presented in the thesis is the output of initiative and novel attempts to tackle some challenging issues in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. This re- search has not only extended the applicability of some of the existing approaches, such as decomposition-based or Pareto-based algorithms, for complex or hard MOPs, but also contributed to moving forward research in the field of dynamic multiobjective optimiza- tion with novel ideas including new test suites and novel algorithm design

Innovative hybrid MOEA/AD variants for solving multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems

Orientador : Aurora Trinidad Ramirez PozoCoorientador : Roberto SantanaTese (doutorado) - Universidade Federal do Paraná, Setor de Ciências Exatas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Informática. Defesa: Curitiba, 16/12/2016Inclui referências : f. 103-116Resumo: Muitos problemas do mundo real podem ser representados como um problema de otimização combinatória. Muitas vezes, estes problemas são caracterizados pelo grande número de variáveis e pela presença de múltiplos objetivos a serem otimizados ao mesmo tempo. Muitas vezes estes problemas são difíceis de serem resolvidos de forma ótima. Suas resoluções tem sido considerada um desafio nas últimas décadas. Os algoritimos metaheurísticos visam encontrar uma aproximação aceitável do ótimo em um tempo computacional razoável. Os algoritmos metaheurísticos continuam sendo um foco de pesquisa científica, recebendo uma atenção crescente pela comunidade. Uma das têndencias neste cenário é a arbordagem híbrida, na qual diferentes métodos e conceitos são combinados objetivando propor metaheurísticas mais eficientes. Nesta tese, nós propomos algoritmos metaheurísticos híbridos para a solução de problemas combinatoriais multiobjetivo. Os principais ingredientes das nossas propostas são: (i) o algoritmo evolutivo multiobjetivo baseado em decomposição (MOEA/D framework), (ii) a otimização por colônias de formigas e (iii) e os algoritmos de estimação de distribuição. Em nossos frameworks, além dos operadores genéticos tradicionais, podemos instanciar diferentes modelos como mecanismo de reprodução dos algoritmos. Além disso, nós introduzimos alguns componentes nos frameworks objetivando balancear a convergência e a diversidade durante a busca. Nossos esforços foram direcionados para a resolução de problemas considerados difíceis na literatura. São eles: a programação quadrática binária sem restrições multiobjetivo, o problema de programação flow-shop permutacional multiobjetivo, e também os problemas caracterizados como deceptivos. Por meio de estudos experimentais, mostramos que as abordagens propostas são capazes de superar os resultados do estado-da-arte em grande parte dos casos considerados. Mostramos que as diretrizes do MOEA/D hibridizadas com outras metaheurísticas é uma estratégia promissora para a solução de problemas combinatoriais multiobjetivo. Palavras-chave: metaheuristicas, otimização multiobjetivo, problemas combinatoriais, MOEA/D, otimização por colônia de formigas, algoritmos de estimação de distribuição, programação quadrática binária sem restrições multiobjetivo, problema de programação flow-shop permutacional multiobjetivo, abordagens híbridas.Abstract: Several real-world problems can be stated as a combinatorial optimization problem. Very often, they are characterized by the large number of variables and the presence of multiple conflicting objectives to be optimized at the same time. These kind of problems are, usually, hard to be solved optimally, and their solutions have been considered a challenge for a long time. Metaheuristic algorithms aim at finding an acceptable approximation to the optimal solution in a reasonable computational time. The research on metaheuristics remains an attractive area and receives growing attention. One of the trends in this scenario are the hybrid approaches, in which different methods and concepts are combined aiming to propose more efficient approaches. In this thesis, we have proposed hybrid metaheuristic algorithms for solving multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems. Our proposals are based on (i) the multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D framework), (ii) the bio-inspired metaheuristic ant colony optimization, and (iii) the probabilistic models from the estimation of distribution algorithms. Our algorithms are considered MOEA/D variants. In our MOEA/D variants, besides the traditional genetic operators, we can instantiate different models as the variation step (reproduction). Moreover, we include some design modifications into the frameworks to control the convergence and the diversity during their search (evolution). We have addressed some important problems from the literature, e.g., the multi-objective unconstrained binary quadratic programming, the multiobjective permutation flowshop scheduling problem, and the problems characterized by deception. As a result, we show that our proposed frameworks are able to solve these problems efficiently by outperforming the state-of-the-art approaches in most of the cases considered. We show that the MOEA/D guidelines hybridized to other metaheuristic components and concepts is a powerful strategy for solving multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems. Keywords: meta-heuristics, multi-objective optimization, combinatorial problems, MOEA/D, ant colony optimization, estimation of distribution algorithms, unconstrained binary quadratic programming, permutation flowshop scheduling problem, hybrid approaches

Effective and Efficient Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization

This thesis was submitted for the award of Doctor of Philosophy and was awarded by Brunel University LondonMany-objective optimization is core to both artificial intelligence and data analytics as real-world problems commonly involve multiple objectives which are required to be optimized simultaneously. A large number of evolutionary algorithms have been developed to search for a set of Pareto optimal solutions for many-objective optimization problems. It is very rare that a many-objective evolutionary algorithm performs well in terms of both effectiveness and efficiency, two key evaluation criteria. Some algorithms may struggle to guide the solutions towards the Pareto front, e.g., Pareto-based algorithms, while other algorithms may have difficulty in diversifying the solutions evenly over the front on certain problems, e.g., decomposition-based algorithms. Furthermore, some effective algorithms may become very computationally expensive as the number of objectives increases, e.g., indicator-based algorithms. The aim of this thesis is to investigate how to make evolutionary algorithms perform well in terms of effectiveness and efficiency in many-objective optimization. After conducting a review of key concepts and the state of the art in the evolutionary many-objective optimization, this thesis shows how to improve the effectiveness of conventional Pareto-based algorithms on a challenging real-world problem in software engineering. This thesis then explores how to further enhance the effectiveness of leading many-objective evolutionary algorithms in general by extending the capability of a very popular and widely cited bi-goal evolution method. Last but not least, this thesis investigates how to strike a balance between effectiveness and efficiency of evolutionary algorithms when solving many-objective optimization problems. The work reported is based on either real-world or recognized synthetic datasets, and the proposed algorithms are compared and evaluated against leading algorithms in the field. The work does not only demonstrate ways of improving the effectiveness and efficiency of many-objective optimization algorithms but also led to promising areas for future research

MULTI-OBJECTIVE POWER SYSTEM SCHEDULING USING EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS

Ph.DDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPH

Enhancing robustness of the inverted PBI scalarizing method in MOEA/D

The scalarizing function design is an important issue influencing significantly the performance of a decomposition based multi-objective optimization algorithm (MOEA/D). Recently, an inverted penalty-based boundary intersection (IPBI) scalarizing function was proposed to improve the spread of solutions obtained by MOEA/D. Despite its effectiveness, MOEA/D with IPBI scalarizing function (MOEA/D-IPBI) still has several shortcomings: MOEA/D-IPBI often fails to obtain any solution within certain Pareto front (PF) regions. Furthermore, it may produce and retain unwanted dominated solutions outside the PF for some problems. In this work, we first analyze the reasons for the above two shortcomings of the IPBI scalarizing function, and then propose two improvement strategies, i.e., the adaptive reference point setting strategy and the adaptive subproblem replacement strategy, to overcome the two shortcomings of the IPBI scalarizing function respectively, giving rise to an enhanced MOEA/D with robust IPBI scalarizing method (R-IPBI). Experimental studies on WFG benchmark problems and the real-world reservoir flood control operation problems suggest that the two improvement strategies are very effective in overcoming the two shortcomings of the IPBI scalarizing function. As a result, the proposed R-IPBI algorithm is shown to be able to outperform the original MOEA/D-IPBI reliably

Enhanced Harris's Hawk algorithm for continuous multi-objective optimization problems

Multi-objective swarm intelligence-based (MOSI-based) metaheuristics were proposed to solve multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs) with conflicting objectives. Harris’s hawk multi-objective optimizer (HHMO) algorithm is a MOSIbased algorithm that was developed based on the reference point approach. The reference point is determined by the decision maker to guide the search process to a particular region in the true Pareto front. However, HHMO algorithm produces a poor approximation to the Pareto front because lack of information sharing in its population update strategy, equal division of convergence parameter and randomly generated initial population. A two-step enhanced non-dominated sorting HHMO (2SENDSHHMO) algorithm has been proposed to solve this problem. The algorithm includes (i) a population update strategy which improves the movement of hawks in the search space, (ii) a parameter adjusting strategy to control the transition between exploration and exploitation, and (iii) a population generating method in producing the initial candidate solutions. The population update strategy calculates a new position of hawks based on the flush-and-ambush technique of Harris’s hawks, and selects the best hawks based on the non-dominated sorting approach. The adjustment strategy enables the parameter to adaptively changed based on the state of the search space. The initial population is produced by generating quasi-random numbers using Rsequence followed by adapting the partial opposition-based learning concept to improve the diversity of the worst half in the population of hawks. The performance of the 2S-ENDSHHMO has been evaluated using 12 MOPs and three engineering MOPs. The obtained results were compared with the results of eight state-of-the-art multi-objective optimization algorithms. The 2S-ENDSHHMO algorithm was able to generate non-dominated solutions with greater convergence and diversity in solving most MOPs and showed a great ability in jumping out of local optima. This indicates the capability of the algorithm in exploring the search space. The 2S-ENDSHHMO algorithm can be used to improve the search process of other MOSI-based algorithms and can be applied to solve MOPs in applications such as structural design and signal processing