8 research outputs found

    Prefrontal and posterior parietal contributions to the perceptual awareness of touch

    Get PDF
    Which brain regions contribute to the perceptual awareness of touch remains largely unclear. We collected structural magnetic resonance imaging scans and neurological examination reports of 70 patients with brain injuries or stroke in S1 extending into adjacent parietal, temporal or pre-/frontal regions. We applied voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping to identify brain areas that overlap with an impaired touch perception (i.e., hypoesthesia). As expected, patients with hypoesthesia (n = 43) presented lesions in all Brodmann areas in S1 on postcentral gyrus (BA 1, 2, 3a, 3b). At the anterior border to BA 3b, we additionally identified motor area BA 4p in association with hypoesthesia, as well as further ventrally the ventral premotor cortex (BA 6, BA 44), assumed to be involved in whole-body perception. At the posterior border to S1, we found hypoesthesia associated effects in attention-related areas such as the inferior parietal lobe and intraparietal sulcus. Downstream to S1, we replicated previously reported lesion-hypoesthesia associations in the parietal operculum and insular cortex (i.e., ventral pathway of somatosensory processing). The present findings extend this pathway from S1 to the insular cortex by prefrontal and posterior parietal areas involved in multisensory integration and attention processes

    Adaptation of cortical activity to sustained pressure stimulation on the fingertip

    Get PDF
    Background Tactile adaptation is a phenomenon of the sensory system that results in temporal desensitization after an exposure to sustained or repetitive tactile stimuli. Previous studies reported psychophysical and physiological adaptation where perceived intensity and mechanoreceptive afferent signals exponentially decreased during tactile adaptation. Along with these studies, we hypothesized that somatosensory cortical activity in the human brain also exponentially decreased during tactile adaptation. The present neuroimaging study specifically investigated temporal changes in the human cortical responses to sustained pressure stimuli mediated by slow-adapting type I afferents. Methods We applied pressure stimulation for up to 15 s to the right index fingertip in 21 healthy participants and acquired functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data using a 3T MRI system. We analyzed cortical responses in terms of the degrees of cortical activation and inter-regional connectivity during sustained pressure stimulation. Results Our results revealed that the degrees of activation in the contralateral primary and secondary somatosensory cortices exponentially decreased over time and that intra- and inter-hemispheric inter-regional functional connectivity over the regions associated with tactile perception also linearly decreased or increased over time, during pressure stimulation. Conclusion These results indicate that cortical activity dynamically adapts to sustained pressure stimulation mediated by SA-I afferents, involving changes in the degrees of activation on the cortical regions for tactile perception as well as in inter-regional functional connectivity among them. We speculate that these adaptive cortical activity may represent an efficient cortical processing of tactile information.open

    Dynamic causal modeling of neural responses to an orofacial pneumotactile velocity array

    Get PDF
    The effective connectivity of neuronal networks during orofacial pneumotactile stimulation with different velocities is still unknown. The present study aims to characterize the effectivity connectivity elicited by three different saltatory velocities (5, 25, and 65 cm/s) over the lower face using dynamic causal modeling on functional magnetic resonance imaging data of twenty neurotypical adults. Our results revealed the contralateral SI and SII as the most likely sources of the driving inputs within the sensorimotor network for the pneumotactile stimuli, suggesting parallel processing of the orofacial pneumotactile stimuli. The 25 cm/s pneumotactile stimuli modulated forward interhemispheric connection from the contralateral SII to the ipsilateral SII, suggesting a serial interhemispheric connection between the bilateral SII. Moreover, the velocity pneumotactile stimuli influenced the contralateral M1 through contralateral SI and SII, indicating that passive pneumotactile stimulation may positively impact motor function rehabilitation. Furthermore, the medium velocity 25 cm/s pneumotactile stimuli modulated both forward and backward connections between the right cerebellar lobule VI and the contralateral left SI and M1. This result suggests that the right cerebellar lobule VI plays a role in the sensorimotor network through feedforward and feedback neuronal pathways. This study is the first to map similarities and differences of effective connectivity across the three-velocity orofacial pneumotactile stimulation. Our findings shed light on the potential therapeutic use of passive orofacial pneumotactile stimuli using the Galileo system

    A touch of hierarchy: population receptive fields reveal fingertip integration in Brodmann areas in human primary somatosensory cortex

    Get PDF
    Several neuroimaging studies have shown the somatotopy of body part representations in primary somatosensory cortex (S1), but the functional hierarchy of distinct subregions in human S1 has not been adequately addressed. The current study investigates the functional hierarchy of cyto-architectonically distinct regions, Brodmann areas BA3, BA1, and BA2, in human S1. During functional MRI experiments, we presented participants with vibrotactile stimulation of the fingertips at three different vibration frequencies. Using population Receptive Field (pRF) modeling of the fMRI BOLD activity, we identified the hand region in S1 and the somatotopy of the fingertips. For each voxel, the pRF center indicates the finger that most effectively drives the BOLD signal, and the pRF size measures the spatial somatic pooling of fingertips. We find a systematic relationship of pRF sizes from lower-order areas to higher-order areas. Specifically, we found that pRF sizes are smallest in BA3, increase slightly towards BA1, and are largest in BA2, paralleling the increase in visual receptive field size as one ascends the visual hierarchy. Additionally, we find that the time-to-peak of the hemodynamic response in BA3 is roughly 0.5 s earlier compared to BA1 and BA2, further supporting the notion of a functional hierarchy of subregions in S1. These results were obtained during stimulation of different mechanoreceptors, suggesting that different afferent fibers leading up to S1 feed into the same cortical hierarchy

    Hierarchical and Nonlinear Dynamics in Prefrontal Cortex Regulate the Precision of Perceptual Beliefs

    Get PDF
    Actions are shaped not only by the content of our percepts but also by our confidence in them. To study the cortical representation of perceptual precision in decision making, we acquired functional imaging data whilst participants performed two vibrotactile forced-choice discrimination tasks: a fast-slow judgment, and a same-different judgment. The first task requires a comparison of the perceived vibrotactile frequencies to decide which one is faster. However, the second task requires that the estimated difference between those frequencies is weighed against the precision of each perceptβ€”if both stimuli are very precisely perceived, then any slight difference is more likely to be identified than if the percepts are uncertain. We additionally presented either pure sinusoidal or temporally degraded β€œnoisy” stimuli, whose frequency/period differed slightly from cycle to cycle. In this way, we were able to manipulate the perceptual precision. We report a constellation of cortical regions in the rostral prefrontal cortex (PFC), dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC) and superior frontal gyrus (SFG) associated with the perception of stimulus difference, the presence of stimulus noise and the interaction between these factors. Dynamic causal modeling (DCM) of these data suggested a nonlinear, hierarchical model, whereby activity in the rostral PFC (evoked by the presence of stimulus noise) mutually interacts with activity in the DLPFC (evoked by stimulus differences). This model of effective connectivity outperformed competing models with serial and parallel interactions, hence providing a unique insight into the hierarchical architecture underlying the representation and appraisal of perceptual belief and precision in the PFC

    Dynamic causal modeling suggests serial processing of tactile vibratory stimuli in the human somatosensory cortex: An fMRI study

    No full text
    Sensitivity to location and frequency of tactile stimuli is a characterizing feature of human primary (S1), and secondary (S2) somatosensory cortices. Recent evidence suggests that S1 is predominantly receptive to stimulus location, while S2 is attuned to stimulus frequency. Although it is well established in humans that tactile frequency information is relayed serially from S1 to S2, a recent study, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in combination with dynamic causal modeling (DCM), suggested that somatosensory inputs are processed in parallel in S1 and S2. In the present fMRI/DCM study, we revisited this controversy and investigated the specialization of the human somatosensory cortical areas with regard to tactile stimulus representations, as well as their effective connectivity. During brain imaging, 14 participants performed a somatosensory discrimination task on vibrotactile stimuli. Importantly, the model space for DCM was chosen to allow for direct inference on the question of interest by systematically varying the information transmission from pure parallel to pure serial implementations. Bayesian model comparison on the level of model families strongly favors a serial, instead of a parallel processing route for tactile stimulus information along the somatosensory pathway. Our fMRI/DCM data thus support previous suggestions of a sequential information transmission from S1 to S2 in humans

    Cortical Orchestra Conducted by Purpose and Function

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(박사)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :μžμ—°κ³Όν•™λŒ€ν•™ ν˜‘λ™κ³Όμ • λ‡Œκ³Όν•™μ „κ³΅,2020. 2. μ •μ²œκΈ°.촉각과 μžκΈ°μˆ˜μš©κ°κ°μ€ 우리의 생쑴 및 μΌμƒμƒν™œμ— μ ˆλŒ€μ μΈ 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” μ€‘μš”ν•œ 감각 κΈ°λŠ₯이닀. λ§μ΄ˆμ‹ κ²½κ³„μ—μ„œ 이 두 가지 κΈ°λŠ₯듀에 ν•„μš”ν•œ 정보λ₯Ό μˆ˜μ§‘ν•˜κ³  μ „λ‹¬ν•˜λŠ” 기계적 수용기 및 κ·Έ ꡬ심성 신경듀에 λŒ€ν•œ μ‹ ν˜Έ 전달 λ©”μ»€λ‹ˆμ¦˜ 및 κ·Έ νŠΉμ§•λ“€μ€ μƒλŒ€μ μœΌλ‘œ 잘 μ•Œλ €μ Έ μžˆλŠ” νŽΈμ΄λ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜, 촉각과 μžκΈ°μˆ˜μš©κ°κ°μ„ ν˜•μ„±ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•œ 인간 λ‡Œμ˜ ν”Όμ§ˆμ—μ„œμ˜ 정보 처리 λ©”μ»€λ‹ˆμ¦˜μ— λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ μš°λ¦¬κ°€ ν˜„μž¬ μ•Œκ³  μžˆλŠ” λ°”λŠ” 극히 일뢀뢄이닀. 이 λ…Όλ¬Έμ—μ„œ μ œμ‹œν•˜λŠ” 일련의 연ꡬ듀은 인간 λ‡Œ ν”Όμ§ˆ λ‹¨κ³„μ—μ„œ 촉각과 자기수용감각의 지각적 μ²˜λ¦¬κ³Όμ •μ— λŒ€ν•œ κ±°μ‹œμ  신경계 μ •λ³΄μ²˜λ¦¬ λ©”μ»€λ‹ˆμ¦˜μ„ 닀룬닀. 첫 번째 μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” λ‡Œν”Όμ§ˆλ‡ŒνŒŒλ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ 인간 일차 및 이차 체성감각 ν”Όμ§ˆμ—μ„œ 인곡적인 자극과 μΌμƒμƒν™œμ—μ„œ μ ‘ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” μžκ·Ήμ„ ν¬ν•¨ν•˜λŠ” λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ 진동촉감각 및 질감 μžκ·Ήμ— λŒ€ν•œ κ±°μ‹œμ  신경계 μ •λ³΄μ²˜λ¦¬ νŠΉμ„±μ„ λ°ν˜”λ‹€. 이 μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” 일차 및 이차 체성감각 ν”Όμ§ˆμ˜ 촉감각 주파수 특이적인 ν•˜μ΄-감마 μ˜μ—­ μ‹ κ²½ν™œλ™μ΄ 자극 μ£ΌνŒŒμˆ˜μ— 따라 각각 μƒμ΄ν•œ μ‹œκ°„μ  λ‹€μ΄λ‚˜λ―ΉμŠ€λ₯Ό 가지고 λ³€ν™”ν•˜λŠ” 것을 ν™•μΈν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ˜ν•œ, μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ ν•˜μ΄-감마 ν™œλ™μ€ μ„±κΈ΄ 질감과 λ―Έμ„Έν•œ μž…μžκ°μ„ 가진 μžμ—°μŠ€λŸ¬μš΄ 질감 μžκ·Ήμ— λŒ€ν•΄μ„œλ„ μ§„λ™μ΄‰κ°κ°μ˜ κ²½μš°μ™€ μœ μ‚¬ν•œ νŒ¨ν„΄μ„ λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 결과듀은 μΈκ°„μ˜ 진동촉감각이 맀우 λ‹¨μˆœν•œ ν˜•νƒœμ— μžκ·ΉμΌμ§€λΌλ„ λŒ€λ‡Œ 체성감각 μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ— μžˆμ–΄ κ±°μ‹œμ μΈ 닀쀑 μ˜μ—­μ—μ„œμ˜ 계측적 μ •λ³΄μ²˜λ¦¬λ₯Ό λ™λ°˜ν•œλ‹€λŠ” 점을 μ‹œμ‚¬ν•œλ‹€. 두 번째 μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” μΈκ°„μ˜ μ›€μ§μž„κ³Ό κ΄€λ ¨λœ 두정엽 μ˜μ—­μ—μ„œμ˜ ν•˜μ΄-감마 λ‡Œν™œμ„±μ΄ 자기수용감각과 같은 λ§μ΄ˆμ‹ κ²½κ³„λ‘œλΆ€ν„°μ˜ 체성감각 ν”Όλ“œλ°±μ„ 주둜 λ°˜μ˜ν•˜λŠ”μ§€, μ•„λ‹ˆλ©΄ μ›€μ§μž„ μ€€λΉ„ 및 μ œμ–΄λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ ν”Όμ§ˆ κ°„ μ‹ κ²½ ν”„λ‘œμ„ΈμŠ€μ— λŒ€ν•œ ν™œλ™μ„ λ°˜μ˜ν•˜λŠ”μ§€λ₯Ό μ‘°μ‚¬ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 연ꡬ κ²°κ³Ό, 자발적 μš΄λ™ 쀑 λŒ€λ‡Œ μš΄λ™κ°κ°λ Ήμ—μ„œμ˜ ν•˜μ΄-감마 ν™œλ™μ€ 일차 μ²΄μ„±κ°κ°ν”Όμ§ˆμ΄ 일차 μš΄λ™ν”Όμ§ˆλ³΄λ‹€ 더 지배적인 κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. λ˜ν•œ 이 μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ”, μ›€μ§μž„κ³Ό κ΄€λ ¨λœ 일차 μ²΄μ„±κ°κ°ν”Όμ§ˆμ—μ„œμ˜ ν•˜μ΄-감마 λ‡Œν™œλ™μ€ λ§μ΄ˆμ‹ κ²½κ³„λ‘œλΆ€ν„°μ˜ 자기수용감각과 촉각에 λŒ€ν•œ 신경계 μ •λ³΄μ²˜λ¦¬λ₯Ό 주둜 λ°˜μ˜ν•˜λŠ” 것을 λ°ν˜”λ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 연ꡬ듀을 λ°”νƒ•μœΌλ‘œ, λ§ˆμ§€λ§‰ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” 인간 λŒ€λ‡Œμ—μ„œμ˜ 체성감각 지각 ν”„λ‘œμ„ΈμŠ€μ— λŒ€ν•œ κ±°μ‹œμ  ν”Όμ§ˆ κ°„ λ„€νŠΈμ›Œν¬λ₯Ό 규λͺ…ν•˜κ³ μž ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄, 51λͺ…μ˜ λ‡Œμ „μ¦ ν™˜μžμ—κ²Œμ„œ 체성감각을 μœ λ°œν–ˆλ˜ λ‡Œν”Όμ§ˆμ „κΈ°μžκ·Ή 데이터와 46λͺ…μ˜ ν™˜μžμ—κ²Œμ„œ 촉감각 자극 및 μš΄λ™ μˆ˜ν–‰ 쀑에 μΈ‘μ •ν•œ λ‡Œν”Όμ§ˆλ‡ŒνŒŒ ν•˜μ΄-감마 맀핑 데이터λ₯Ό μ’…ν•©μ μœΌλ‘œ λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. κ·Έ κ²°κ³Ό, 체성감각 지각 ν”„λ‘œμ„ΈμŠ€λŠ” λŒ€λ‡Œμ—μ„œ 넓은 μ˜μ—­μ— 걸쳐 λΆ„ν¬ν•˜λŠ” 체성감각 κ΄€λ ¨ λ„€νŠΈμ›Œν¬μ˜ μ‹ κ²½ ν™œμ„±μ„ μˆ˜λ°˜ν•œλ‹€λŠ” 것을 μ•Œμ•„λƒˆλ‹€. λ˜ν•œ, λ‡Œν”Όμ§ˆμ „κΈ°μžκ·Ήμ„ ν†΅ν•œ λŒ€λ‡Œ 지도와 ν•˜μ΄-감마 맀핑을 ν†΅ν•œ λŒ€λ‡Œ μ§€λ„λŠ” μ„œλ‘œ μƒλ‹Ήν•œ μœ μ‚¬μ„±μ„ λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€. ν₯λ―Έλ‘­κ²Œλ„, λ‡Œν”Όμ§ˆμ „κΈ°μžκ·Ήκ³Ό ν•˜μ΄-감마 ν™œλ™μ„ μ’…ν•©ν•œ λ‡Œμ§€λ„λ“€λ‘œλΆ€ν„° 체성감각 κ΄€λ ¨ λ‡Œ μ˜μ—­μ˜ 곡간적 뢄포가 체성감각 κΈ°λŠ₯에 따라 μ„œλ‘œ λ‹¬λžκ³ , 그에 ν•΄λ‹Ήν•˜λŠ” 각 μ˜μ—­λ“€μ€ μ„œλ‘œ λšœλ ·ν•˜κ²Œ λ‹€λ₯Έ μ‹œκ°„μ  λ‹€μ΄λ‚˜λ―ΉμŠ€λ₯Ό 가지고 순차적으둜 ν™œμ„±ν™”λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 결과듀은 체성감각에 λŒ€ν•œ κ±°μ‹œμ  신경계 ν”„λ‘œμ„ΈμŠ€κ°€ κ·Έ 지각적 κΈ°λŠ₯에 따라 뚜렷이 λ‹€λ₯Έ 계측적 λ„€νŠΈμ›Œν¬λ₯Ό κ°€μ§„λ‹€λŠ” 점을 μ‹œμ‚¬ν•œλ‹€. 더 λ‚˜μ•„κ°€, λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œμ˜ 결과듀은 체성감각 μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ˜ 지각-행동 κ΄€λ ¨ μ‹ κ²½ν™œλ™ 흐름에 κ΄€ν•œ 이둠적인 가섀에 λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ 섀득λ ₯ μžˆλŠ” 증거λ₯Ό μ œμ‹œν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€.Tactile and proprioceptive perceptions are crucial for our daily life as well as survival. At the peripheral level, the transduction mechanisms and characteristics of mechanoreceptive afferents containing information required for these functions, have been well identified. However, our knowledge about the cortical processing mechanism for them in human is limited. The present series of studies addressed the macroscopic neural mechanism for perceptual processing of tactile and proprioceptive perception in human cortex. In the first study, I investigated the macroscopic neural characteristics for various vibrotactile and texture stimuli including artificial and naturalistic ones in human primary and secondary somatosensory cortices (S1 and S2, respectively) using electrocorticography (ECoG). I found robust tactile frequency-specific high-gamma (HG, 50–140 Hz) activities in both S1 and S2 with different temporal dynamics depending on the stimulus frequency. Furthermore, similar HG patterns of S1 and S2 were found in naturalistic stimulus conditions such as coarse/fine textures. These results suggest that human vibrotactile sensation involves macroscopic multi-regional hierarchical processing in the somatosensory system, even during the simplified stimulation. In the second study, I tested whether the movement-related HG activities in parietal region mainly represent somatosensory feedback such as proprioception from periphery or primarily indicate cortico-cortical neural processing for movement preparation and control. I found that sensorimotor HG activities are more dominant in S1 than in M1 during voluntary movement. Furthermore, the results showed that movement-related HG activities in S1 mainly represent proprioceptive and tactile feedback from periphery. Given the results of previous two studies, the final study aimed to identify the large-scale cortical networks for perceptual processing in human. To do this, I combined direct cortical stimulation (DCS) data for eliciting somatosensation and ECoG HG band (50 to 150 Hz) mapping data during tactile stimulation and movement tasks, from 51 (for DCS mapping) and 46 patients (for HG mapping) with intractable epilepsy. The results showed that somatosensory perceptual processing involves neural activation of widespread somatosensory-related network in the cortex. In addition, the spatial distributions of DCS and HG functional maps showed considerable similarity in spatial distribution between high-gamma and DCS functional maps. Interestingly, the DCS-HG combined maps showed distinct spatial distributions depending on the somatosensory functions, and each area was sequentially activated with distinct temporal dynamics. These results suggest that macroscopic neural processing for somatosensation has distinct hierarchical networks depending on the perceptual functions. In addition, the results of the present study provide evidence for the perception and action related neural streams of somatosensory system. Throughout this series of studies, I suggest that macroscopic somatosensory network and structures of our brain are intrinsically organized by perceptual function and its purpose, not by somatosensory modality or submodality itself. Just as there is a purpose for human behavior, so is our brain.PART I. INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1: Somatosensory System 1 1.1. Mechanoreceptors in the Periphery 2 1.2. Somatosensory Afferent Pathways 4 1.3. Cortico-cortical Connections among Somatosensory-related Areas 7 1.4. Somatosensory-related Cortical Regions 8 CHAPTER 2: Electrocorticography 14 2.1. Intracranial Electroencephalography 14 2.2. High-Gamma Band Activity 18 CHAPTER 3: Purpose of This Study 24 PART II. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY 26 CHAPTER 4: Apparatus Design 26 4.1. Piezoelectric Vibrotactile Stimulator 26 4.2. Magnetic Vibrotactile Stimulator 29 4.3. Disc-type Texture Stimulator 33 4.4. Drum-type Texture Stimulator 36 CHAPTER 5: Vibrotactile and Texture Study 41 5.1. Introduction 42 5.2. Materials and Methods 46 5.2.1. Patients 46 5.2.2. Apparatus 47 5.2.3. Experimental Design 49 5.2.4. Data Acquisition and Preprocessing 50 5.2.5. Analysis 51 5.3. Results 54 5.3.1. Frequency-specific S1/S2 HG Activities 54 5.3.2. S1 HG Attenuation during Flutter and Vibration 62 5.3.3. Single-trial Vibration Frequency Classification 64 5.3.4. S1/S2 HG Activities during Texture Stimuli 65 5.4. Discussion 69 5.4.1. Comparison with Previous Findings 69 5.4.2. Tactile Frequency-dependent Neural Adaptation 70 5.4.3. Serial vs. Parallel Processing between S1 and S2 72 5.4.4. Conclusion of Chapter 5 73 CHAPTER 6: Somatosensory Feedback during Movement 74 6.1. Introduction 75 6.2. Materials and Methods 79 6.2.1. Subjects 79 6.2.2. Tasks 80 6.2.3. Data Acquisition and Preprocessing 82 6.2.4. S1-M1 HG Power Difference 85 6.2.5. Classification 86 6.2.6. Timing of S1 HG Activity 86 6.2.7. Correlation between HG and EMG signals 87 6.3. Results 89 6.3.1. HG Activities Are More Dominant in S1 than in M1 89 6.3.2. HG Activities in S1 Mainly Represent Somatosensory Feedback 94 6.4. Discussion 100 6.4.1. S1 HG Activity Mainly Represents Somatosensory Feedback 100 6.4.2. Further Discussion and Future Direction in BMI 102 6.4.3. Conclusion of Chapter 6 103 CHAPTER 7: Cortical Maps of Somatosensory Function 104 7.1. Introduction 106 7.2. Materials and Methods 110 7.2.1. Participants 110 7.2.2. Direct Cortical Stimulation 114 7.2.3. Classification of Verbal Feedbacks 115 7.2.4. Localization of Electrodes 115 7.2.5. Apparatus 116 7.2.6. Tasks 117 7.2.7. Data Recording and Processing 119 7.2.8. Mapping on the Brain 120 7.2.9. ROI-based Analysis 122 7.3. Results 123 7.3.1. DCS Mapping 123 7.3.2. Three and Four-dimensional HG Mapping 131 7.3.3. Neural Characteristics among Somatosensory-related Areas 144 7.4. Discussion 146 7.4.1. DCS on the Non-Primary Areas 146 7.4.2. Two Streams of Somatosensory System 148 7.4.3. Functional Role of ventral PM 151 7.4.4. Limitation and Perspective 152 7.4.5. Conclusion of Chapter 7 155 PART III. CONCLUSION 156 CHAPTER 8: Conclusion and Perspective 156 8.1. Perspective and Future Work 157 References 160 Abstract in Korean 173Docto

    Behavioural and neural correlates of vibrotactile discrimination and uncertainty

    Full text link
    Decisions pervade everyday life, from the mundane to those that induce anxiety. The act of making simple decisions may be examined experimentally with the vibrotactile discrimination task, where the manipulation of task factors challenge the way people make decisions. The objective of this thesis is to examine how the human brain maintains above-chance levels of performance despite challenging experimental conditions that alter the way people perceive presented sensory stimuli. Two behavioural investigations of perceptual decision making and two separate analyses of a functional neuroimaging experiment were conducted. In the first experiment, we examine the influence of the time-order effect whereby prior information from task stimuli biases decision making on a current trial. In the second study, different delay periods between vibration pairs were used to examine how the working memory representation of a vibrotactile stimulus drifts over time by observing changes in accuracy and sensitivity. The neural correlates of explicit factors used in the task, including stimulus noise and context judgements, were then studied through a functional neuroimaging experiment. A number of distinct prefrontal neural regions were identified, a selection of which were then used in the model-driven network based technique of dynamic causal modelling. This thesis makes the following conclusions: Even when not explicitly incorporated into experimental design, the history of previously presented stimuli can quickly establish an internal standard and exert a powerful influence on decision making. The time-order effect exhibits its influence on decision making in a nonlinear fashion across short interval delay periods between paired stimuli, in a way that depends upon prior experience with time-dependent tasks. Distinct prefrontal cortex regions including the inferior frontal gyrus pars triangularis and the superior frontal gyrus, are engaged when precision estimates of stimulus representations are required for decision making. These prefrontal regions exert their influence through nonlinear, hierarchical network connections. The findings of this thesis could be extended to elucidate cognitive disturbances in depression where deficits in decision making are a debilitating daily experience
    corecore