E-democracy and values in information systems design

In this paper I demonstrate the utility of a Values in Design (VID) perspective for the assessment, the design and development of e-democracy tools. In the first part, I give some background information on Values in Design and Value-Sensitive Design and their relevance in the context of e-democracy. In part 2, I analyze three different e-democracy tools from a VID-perspective. The paper ends with some conclusions concerning the merits of VID for e-democracy as well as some considerations concerning the dual tasks of philosophers in assessing and promoting value-sensitive technology design

The Effects of Dual Tasks on Balance and Gait in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease: A Critically Appraised Topic

● Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects over 10 million people globally. ● There is evidence to suggest that dual-cognitive tasks negatively impact the gait and balance of patients with PD. ● 19-38% of patients with PD will develop cognitive impairments. ● Higher level cognitive functioning dual tasks exacerbate freezing of gait episodes (FoG). ● Research shows potential improvement with dual-tasks during gait secondary to prioritization of motor task of walking

The workload implications of haptic displays in multi-display environments such as the cockpit: Dual-task interference of within-sense haptic inputs (tactile/proprioceptive) and between-sense inputs (tactile/proprioceptive/auditory/visual)

Visual workload demand within the cockpit is reaching saturation, whereas the haptic sense (proprioceptive and tactile sensation) is relatively untapped, despite studies suggesting the benefits of haptic displays. MRT suggests that inputs from haptic displays will not interfere with inputs from visual or auditory displays. MRT is based on the premise that multisensory integration occurs only after unisensory processing. However, recent neuroscientific findings suggest that the distinction between unisensory versus multisensory processing is much more blurred than previously thought. This programme of work had the following two research objectives: 1. To examine whether multiple haptic inputs can be processed at the same time without performance decrement - Study One 2. To examine whether haptic inputs can be processed at the same time as visual or auditory inputs without performance decrement - Study Two In Study One participants performed dual-tasks, consisting of same-sense tasks (tactile or proprioceptive) or different-sense tasks (tactile and proprioceptive). These tasks also varied in terms of processing code, in line with MRT. The results found significantly more performance decrement for the same-sense dual-tasks than for the different-sense dual-tasks, in accordance with MRT, suggesting that performance will suffer if two haptic displays of the same type are used concurrently. An adjustment to the MRT model is suggested to incorporate these results. In Study Two, participants performed different-sense dual-tasks, consisting of auditory or visual tasks with tactile or proprioceptive tasks. The tasks also varied in terms of processing code. Contrary to MRT, the results found that when processing code was different, there was significant performance decrement for all of the dual-tasks, but not when processing code was the same. These results reveal an exception to two key MRT rules, the sensory resource rule and the processing code rule. It is suggested that MRT may be oversimplistic and other factors highlighted by recent neuroscientific research should be taken into account in theories of dual-task performance

Working memory capacity and strategy use in single and dual-tasks

Research Objectives: A preliminary study (Collin, Patchay & Thompson, 2009) showed that strategy training could improve memory performance in single-tasks, but not in dual-tasks. Here the influence of working memory capacity (WMC) on the impact of strategy use on memory performance in single and dual-tasks is examined. In line with previous findings, it is hypothesised that participants with higher WMC will benefit from strategy use and perform better in both single and dual tasking. Design/Method: Participants completed a memory task and a secondary auditory discrimination task independently and together in a dual-task. They were divided into high and low WMC groups and received training in memory strategies (imagery/association). The number of words recalled on a word list and reaction time on the auditory discrimination task were measured pre- and post-strategy training. Results/Conclusion: In general, performance was better post strategy training. Interestingly, on average the low span group performed better (not all significantly different) on both tasks in single and dual tasking post strategy training. It is suggested that regardless of capacity, strategies impact on performance and could even compensate for reduced WMC

Musical Expertise Has Minimal Impact on Dual Task Performance

Studies investigating effect of practice on dual task performance have yielded conflicting findings, thus supporting different theoretical accounts about the organisation of attentional resources when tasks are performed simultaneously. Because practice has been proven to reduce the demand of attention for the trained task, the impact of long-lasting training on one task is an ideal way to better understand the mechanisms underlying dual task decline in performance. Our study compared performance during dual task execution in expert musicians compared to controls with little if any musical experience. Participants performed a music recognition task and a visuo-spatial task separately (single task) or simultaneously (dual task). Both groups showed a significant but similar performance decline during dual tasks. In addition, the two groups showed a similar decline of dual task performance during encoding and retrieval of the musical information, mainly attributed to a decline in sensitivity. Our results suggest that attention during dual tasks is similarly distributed by expert and non-experts. These findings are in line with previous studies showing a lack of sensitivity to difficulty and lack of practice effect during dual tasks, supporting the idea that different tasks may rely on different and not-sharable attentional resources

Impact of two different dual tasks on obstacle crossing in elderly

O desempenho de uma dupla tarefa pode aumentar o risco de quedas durante a marcha em idosos. O impacto de uma dupla tarefa pode depender de sua complexidade em relação ao processamento de informação. Diferentes configurações de duplas tarefas deduzem diferentes demandas para o processamento de informação. Neste estudo investigamos se diferentes configurações de duplas tarefas podem afetar o desempenho da transposição de obstáculo na marcha de idosos. Dez idosos independentes foram avaliados durante a marcha cruzando um obstáculo vertical enquanto desempenhando duas duplas tarefas: (a) com input auditório (variação da tarefa de Stroop), e (b) sem imput auditório (falar os dias da semana em ordem reversa). Nós hipotetizamos que um efeito da dupla tarefa seria relacionado com o tipo de seu input, e o input auditório requereria maior processamento de informação; portanto, poderia ter maior impacto na marcha. Nós encontramos que o desempanho de transpor obstáculo foi similar nas duas condições de dupla tarefa. Sendo assim, ambas duplas tarefas testadas afetam a transposição de obstáculo na mesma medida em idosos.El desempeño de una doble tarea puede aumentar el riesgo de caídas durante la marcha en personas mayores. El impacto de una doble tarea puede depender de su complejidad en cuanto al procesamiento de información. Las distintas configuraciones de dobles tareas infieren distintas demandas para dicho procesamiento. En este estudio se investigó si las distintas configuraciones de dobles tareas pueden afectar el rendimiento de la transposición de obstáculo en la marcha de personas mayores. Han participado diez personas mayores independientes y evaluadas durante la marcha cruzando un obstáculo vertical mientras hacían dos dobles tareas: (a) con input auditorio (variación de la tarea de Stroop) y (b) sin input auditorio (hablar los días de semana en orden reverso). Se dedujo que el rendimiento de la doble tarea estaría relacionado con el tipo de su input, y el input auditorio exigía un mayor procesamiento de información; por lo tanto, podría tener un mayor impacto en la marcha. Se encontró que el rendimiento en la superación de obstáculos fue semejante en las dos condiciones de doble tarea evaluadas. Así, ambas afectan a la superación del obstáculo en igual medida en personas mayores.The performance of a dual task increases risk of falling during walking in the elderly. Such impact of a dual task may depend on its complexity regarding information processing. Therefore, different dual task configurations may elicit different demands for information processing. We investigated whether different dual task configurations can differently affect the performance of obstacle crossing in the gait of elderly. Ten independent elderly performed vertical obstacle crossing while performing two dual tasks during walking: (a) with auditory input (variation of Stroop task), and (b) without auditory input (report the days of the week in reverse sequence). We hypothesized that a dual task effect would be related with the type of dual task input, and the auditory input would require further information processing and therefore could have larger impact on gait. We found that performance of obstacle crossing was similar regardless of the dual task configuration. Both dual task conditions affect the obstacle crossing in the same extent in the elderly

Competing tasks as an index of intelligence

[Abstract]: Most studies involving competing (or dual) tasks have been concerned with the investigation of models of attention and have stressed the importance of task characteristics in determining competing-task performance. The relatively few studies which have looked at indi¬vidual differences in competing-task performance suggest that measures of this performance could reflect operations which are central to cognitive functioning. This paper examines two key questions which stem from this research: is there a separate ability involved in competing-task performance? Is competing-task performance more indicative of general intellectual functioning? A battery composed of both single and competing tasks was presented to 91 Ss. Two sets of scores, primary and `secondary', were obtained from the competing tasks. The results indicate that `single' and `primary' scores are basically measuring the same thing but that secondary' scores measure what is perhaps a time-sharing factor. There is also some evidence that primary and secondary scores are more indicative of the general factor, as measured by this battery, than their single counterparts