Artificial Intelligence and Systems Theory: Applied to Cooperative Robots

This paper describes an approach to the design of a population of cooperative robots based on concepts borrowed from Systems Theory and Artificial Intelligence. The research has been developed under the SocRob project, carried out by the Intelligent Systems Laboratory at the Institute for Systems and Robotics - Instituto Superior Tecnico (ISR/IST) in Lisbon. The acronym of the project stands both for "Society of Robots" and "Soccer Robots", the case study where we are testing our population of robots. Designing soccer robots is a very challenging problem, where the robots must act not only to shoot a ball towards the goal, but also to detect and avoid static (walls, stopped robots) and dynamic (moving robots) obstacles. Furthermore, they must cooperate to defeat an opposing team. Our past and current research in soccer robotics includes cooperative sensor fusion for world modeling, object recognition and tracking, robot navigation, multi-robot distributed task planning and coordination, including cooperative reinforcement learning in cooperative and adversarial environments, and behavior-based architectures for real time task execution of cooperating robot teams

An efficacious method to assemble a modern multi-modal robotic team: dilemmas, challenges, possibilities and solutions

A modern multiagent robotic platform consists of a cooperative team of humans which develop a collaborative team of robots. The multi-modal nature of both the system and the team causes a complex problem which needs to be solved for optimum performance. Both the management and the technical aspect of a modern robotic team are explored in this Chapter in the platform of the RoboCup Competition. RoboCup is an example of such an environment where researchers from different disciplines join to develop a robotic team for completion as an evaluation challenge (Robocup, 2011). RoboCup competitions were first proposed by Mackworth in 1993. The main goal of this scientific competition is to exploit, improve and integrate the methods and techniques from robotics, machine vision and artificial intelligence disciplines to create an autonomous team of soccer playing robots(Kitano, 1997a; Kitano, 1997b; Kitano et al., 1997). Such experiment includes several challenges, from inviting an expert of specific field to the team to choosing bolts and nuts for each part of the robots. Usually each challenge has several possible solutions and choosing the best one is often challenging. We have participated in several world wide RoboCup competitions (Abdollahi, Samani et al. 2002, 2003 & 2004) and share our experience as an extensive instruction for setting up a modern robotic team including management and technical issues.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

Architecting centralized coordination of soccer robots based on principle solution

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Advanced Robotics on 2015, available online:http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01691864.2015.1017534Coordination strategy is a relevant topic in multi-robot systems, and robot soccer offers a suitable domain to conduct research in multi-robot coordination. Team strategy collects and uses environmental information to derive optimal team reactions, through cooperation among individual soccer robots. This paper presents a diagrammatic approach to architecting the coordination strategy of robot soccer teams by means of a principle solution. The proposed model focuses on robot soccer leagues that possess a central decision-making system, involving the dynamic selection of the roles and behaviors of the robot soccer players. The work sets out from the conceptual design phase, facilitating cross-domain development efforts, where different layers must be interconnected and coordinated to perform multiple tasks. The principle solution allows for intuitive design and the modeling of team strategies in a highly complex robot soccer environment with changing game conditions. Furthermore, such an approach enables systematic realization of collaborative behaviors among the teammates.This work was partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) under the CICYT project Mission Based Control (COBAMI): DPI2011-28507-C02-01/02. Jose G. Guarnizo was supported by a scholarship from the Administrative Department of Science, Technology and Innovation COLCIENCIAS, Colombia.Guarnizo Marín, JG.; Mellado Arteche, M.; Low, CY.; Blanes Noguera, F. (2015). Architecting centralized coordination of soccer robots based on principle solution. Advanced Robotics. 29(15):989-1004. https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2015.1017534S98910042915Farinelli, A., Iocchi, L., & Nardi, D. (2004). Multirobot Systems: A Classification Focused on Coordination. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 34(5), 2015-2028. doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2004.832155Tews, A., & Wyeth, G. (2000). MAPS: a system for multi-agent coordination. Advanced Robotics, 14(1), 37-50. doi:10.1163/156855300741429Stulp, F., Utz, H., Isik, M., & Mayer, G. (2010). Implicit Coordination with Shared Belief: A Heterogeneous Robot Soccer Team Case Study. Advanced Robotics, 24(7), 1017-1036. doi:10.1163/016918610x496964Guarnizo, J. G., Mellado, M., Low, C. Y., & Aziz, N. (2013). Strategy Model for Multi-Robot Coordination in Robotic Soccer. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 393, 592-597. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.393.592Riley, P., & Veloso, M. (2002). Recognizing Probabilistic Opponent Movement Models. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 453-458. doi:10.1007/3-540-45603-1_59Ros, R., Arcos, J. L., Lopez de Mantaras, R., & Veloso, M. (2009). A case-based approach for coordinated action selection in robot soccer. Artificial Intelligence, 173(9-10), 1014-1039. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2009.02.004Atkinson, J., & Rojas, D. (2009). On-the-fly generation of multi-robot team formation strategies based on game conditions. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 6082-6090. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.039Costelha, H., & Lima, P. (2012). Robot task plan representation by Petri nets: modelling, identification, analysis and execution. Autonomous Robots, 33(4), 337-360. doi:10.1007/s10514-012-9288-xAbreu, P. H., Silva, D. C., Almeida, F., & Mendes-Moreira, J. (2014). Improving a simulated soccer team’s performance through a Memory-Based Collaborative Filtering approach. Applied Soft Computing, 23, 180-193. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2014.06.021Duan, Y., Liu, Q., & Xu, X. (2007). Application of reinforcement learning in robot soccer. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 20(7), 936-950. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2007.01.003Hwang, K.-S., Jiang, W.-C., Yu, H.-H., & Li, S.-Y. (2011). Cooperative Reinforcement Learning Based on Zero-Sum Games. Mobile Robots - Control Architectures, Bio-Interfacing, Navigation, Multi Robot Motion Planning and Operator Training. doi:10.5772/26620Gausemeier, J., Dumitrescu, R., Kahl, S., & Nordsiek, D. (2011). Integrative development of product and production system for mechatronic products. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 27(4), 772-778. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2011.02.005Klančar, G., Zupančič, B., & Karba, R. (2007). Modelling and simulation of a group of mobile robots. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 15(6), 647-658. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2007.02.002Gausemeier, J., Frank, U., Donoth, J., & Kahl, S. (2009). Specification technique for the description of self-optimizing mechatronic systems. Research in Engineering Design, 20(4), 201-223. doi:10.1007/s00163-008-0058-

Multi-Agent Task Allocation for Robot Soccer

This is the published version. Copyright De GruyterThis paper models and analyzes task allocation methodologies for multiagent systems. The evaluation process was implemented as a collection of simulated soccer matches. A soccer-simulation software package was used as the test-bed as it provided the necessary features for implementing and testing the methodologies. The methodologies were tested through competitions with a number of available soccer strategies. Soccer game scores, communication, robustness, fault-tolerance, and replanning capabilities were the parameters used as the evaluation criteria for the mul1i-agent systems