Solving two-stage stochastic network design problems to optimality

The Steiner tree problem (STP) is a central and well-studied graph-theoretical combinatorial optimization problem which plays an important role in various applications. It can be stated as follows: Given a weighted graph and a set of terminal vertices, find a subset of edges which connects the terminals at minimum cost. However, in real-world applications the input data might not be given with certainty or it might depend on future decisions. For the STP, for example, edge costs representing the costs of establishing links may be subject to inflations and price deviations. In this thesis we tackle data uncertainty by using the concept of stochastic programming and we study the two-stage stochastic version of the Steiner tree problem (SSTP). Thereby, a set of scenarios defines the possible outcomes of a random variable; each scenario is given by its realization probability and defines a set of terminals and edge costs. A feasible solution consists of a subset of edges in the first stage and edge subsets for all scenarios (second stage) such that each terminal set is connected. The objective is to find a solution that minimizes the expected cost. We consider two approaches for solving the SSTP to optimality: combinatorial algorithms, in particular fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms, and methods from mathematical programming. Regarding the combinatorial algorithms we develop a linear-time algorithm for trees, an FPT algorithm parameterized by the number of terminals, and we consider treewidth-bounded graphs where we give the first FPT algorithm parameterized by the combination of treewidth and number of scenarios. The second approach is based on deriving strong integer programming (IP) formulations for the SSTP. By using orientation properties we introduce new semi-directed cut- and flow-based IP formulations which are shown to be stronger than the undirected models from the literature. To solve these models to optimality we use a decomposition-based two-stage branch&cut algorithm, which is improved by a fast and efficient method for strengthening the optimality cuts. Moreover, we develop new and stronger integer optimality cuts. The computational performance is evaluated in a comprehensive computational study, which shows the superiority of the new formulations, the benefit of the decomposition, and the advantage of using the strengthened optimality cuts. The Steiner forest problem (SFP) is a related problem where sets of terminals need to be connected. On the one hand, the SFP is a generalization of the STP and on the other hand, we show that the SFP is a special case of the SSTP. Therefore, our results are transferable to the SFP and we present the first FPT algorithm for treewidth-bounded graphs and we model new and stronger (semi-)directed cut- and flow-based IP formulations for the SFP. In the second part of this thesis we consider the two-stage stochastic survivable network design problem, an extension of the SSTP where pairs of vertices may demand a higher connectivity. Similarly to the first part we introduce new and stronger semi-directed cut-based models, apply the same decomposition along with the cut strengthening technique, and argue the validity of the newly introduced integer optimality cuts. A computational study shows the benefit, robustness, and good performance of the decomposition and the cut strengthening method

Greedy Algorithms for Steiner Forest

In the Steiner Forest problem, we are given terminal pairs $\{s_i, t_i\}$, and need to find the cheapest subgraph which connects each of the terminal pairs together. In 1991, Agrawal, Klein, and Ravi, and Goemans and Williamson gave primal-dual constant-factor approximation algorithms for this problem; until now, the only constant-factor approximations we know are via linear programming relaxations. We consider the following greedy algorithm: Given terminal pairs in a metric space, call a terminal "active" if its distance to its partner is non-zero. Pick the two closest active terminals (say $s_i, t_j$), set the distance between them to zero, and buy a path connecting them. Recompute the metric, and repeat. Our main result is that this algorithm is a constant-factor approximation. We also use this algorithm to give new, simpler constructions of cost-sharing schemes for Steiner forest. In particular, the first "group-strict" cost-shares for this problem implies a very simple combinatorial sampling-based algorithm for stochastic Steiner forest

Reformulation and decomposition of integer programs

In this survey we examine ways to reformulate integer and mixed integer programs. Typically, but not exclusively, one reformulates so as to obtain stronger linear programming relaxations, and hence better bounds for use in a branch-and-bound based algorithm. First we cover in detail reformulations based on decomposition, such as Lagrangean relaxation, Dantzig-Wolfe column generation and the resulting branch-and-price algorithms. This is followed by an examination of Benders’ type algorithms based on projection. Finally we discuss in detail extended formulations involving additional variables that are based on problem structure. These can often be used to provide strengthened a priori formulations. Reformulations obtained by adding cutting planes in the original variables are not treated here.Integer program, Lagrangean relaxation, column generation, branch-and-price, extended formulation, Benders' algorithm

Analysis and optimization of highly reliable systems

In the field of network design, the survivability property enables the network to maintain a certain level of network connectivity and quality of service under failure conditions. In this thesis, survivability aspects of communication systems are studied. Aspects of reliability and vulnerability of network design are also addressed. The contributions are three-fold. First, a Hop Constrained node Survivable Network Design Problem (HCSNDP) with optional (Steiner) nodes is modelled. This kind of problems are N P-Hard. An exact integer linear model is built, focused on networks represented by graphs without rooted demands, considering costs in arcs and in Steiner nodes. In addition to the exact model, the calculation of lower and upper bounds to the optimal solution is included. Models were tested over several graphs and instances, in order to validate it in cases with known solution. An Approximation Algorithm is also developed in order to address a particular case of SNDP: the Two Node Survivable Star Problem (2NCSP) with optional nodes. This problem belongs to the class of N P-Hard computational problems too. Second, the research is focused on cascading failures and target/random attacks. The Graph Fragmentation Problem (GFP) is the result of a worst case analysis of a random attack. A fixed number of individuals for protection can be chosen, and a non-protected target node immediately destroys all reachable nodes. The goal is to minimize the expected number of destroyed nodes in the network. This problem belongs to the N P-Hard class. A mathematical programming formulation is introduced and exact resolution for small instances as well as lower and upper bounds to the optimal solution. In addition to exact methods, we address the GFP by several approaches: metaheuristics, approximation algorithms, polytime methods for specific instances and exact methods in exponential time. Finally, the concept of separability in stochastic binary systems is here introduced. Stochastic Binary Systems (SBS) represent a mathematical model of a multi-component on-off system subject to independent failures. The reliability evaluation of an SBS belongs to the N P-Hard class. Therefore, we fully characterize separable systems using Han-Banach separation theorem for convex sets. Using this new concept of separable systems and Markov inequality, reliability bounds are provided for arbitrary SBS

10261 Abstracts Collection -- Algorithm Engineering

From June 27 to July 2, the Dagstuhl Seminar 10261 ``Algorithm Engineering \u27\u27 was held in Schloss Dagstuhl~--~Leibniz Center for Informatics. During the seminar, several participants presented their current research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section describes the seminar topics and goals in general. Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available

Greedy Algorithms for Online Survivable Network Design

In an instance of the network design problem, we are given a graph G=(V,E), an edge-cost function c:E -> R^{>= 0}, and a connectivity criterion. The goal is to find a minimum-cost subgraph H of G that meets the connectivity requirements. An important family of this class is the survivable network design problem (SNDP): given non-negative integers r_{u v} for each pair u,v in V, the solution subgraph H should contain r_{u v} edge-disjoint paths for each pair u and v. While this problem is known to admit good approximation algorithms in the offline case, the problem is much harder in the online setting. Gupta, Krishnaswamy, and Ravi [Gupta et al., 2012] (STOC\u2709) are the first to consider the online survivable network design problem. They demonstrate an algorithm with competitive ratio of O(k log^3 n), where k=max_{u,v} r_{u v}. Note that the competitive ratio of the algorithm by Gupta et al. grows linearly in k. Since then, an important open problem in the online community [Naor et al., 2011; Gupta et al., 2012] is whether the linear dependence on k can be reduced to a logarithmic dependency. Consider an online greedy algorithm that connects every demand by adding a minimum cost set of edges to H. Surprisingly, we show that this greedy algorithm significantly improves the competitive ratio when a congestion of 2 is allowed on the edges or when the model is stochastic. While our algorithm is fairly simple, our analysis requires a deep understanding of k-connected graphs. In particular, we prove that the greedy algorithm is O(log^2 n log k)-competitive if one satisfies every demand between u and v by r_{uv}/2 edge-disjoint paths. The spirit of our result is similar to the work of Chuzhoy and Li [Chuzhoy and Li, 2012] (FOCS\u2712), in which the authors give a polylogarithmic approximation algorithm for edge-disjoint paths with congestion 2. Moreover, we study the greedy algorithm in the online stochastic setting. We consider the i.i.d. model, where each online demand is drawn from a single probability distribution, the unknown i.i.d. model, where every demand is drawn from a single but unknown probability distribution, and the prophet model in which online demands are drawn from (possibly) different probability distributions. Through a different analysis, we prove that a similar greedy algorithm is constant competitive for the i.i.d. and the prophet models. Also, the greedy algorithm is O(log n)-competitive for the unknown i.i.d. model, which is almost tight due to the lower bound of [Garg et al., 2008] for single connectivity

Model-based dependability analysis : state-of-the-art, challenges and future outlook

Abstract: Over the past two decades, the study of model-based dependability analysis has gathered significant research interest. Different approaches have been developed to automate and address various limitations of classical dependability techniques to contend with the increasing complexity and challenges of modern safety-critical system. Two leading paradigms have emerged, one which constructs predictive system failure models from component failure models compositionally using the topology of the system. The other utilizes design models - typically state automata - to explore system behaviour through fault injection. This paper reviews a number of prominent techniques under these two paradigms, and provides an insight into their working mechanism, applicability, strengths and challenges, as well as recent developments within these fields. We also discuss the emerging trends on integrated approaches and advanced analysis capabilities. Lastly, we outline the future outlook for model-based dependability analysis