The Drosophila genome nexus: a population genomic resource of 623 Drosophila melanogaster genomes, including 197 from a single ancestral range population.

Hundreds of wild-derived Drosophila melanogaster genomes have been published, but rigorous comparisons across data sets are precluded by differences in alignment methodology. The most common approach to reference-based genome assembly is a single round of alignment followed by quality filtering and variant detection. We evaluated variations and extensions of this approach and settled on an assembly strategy that utilizes two alignment programs and incorporates both substitutions and short indels to construct an updated reference for a second round of mapping prior to final variant detection. Utilizing this approach, we reassembled published D. melanogaster population genomic data sets and added unpublished genomes from several sub-Saharan populations. Most notably, we present aligned data from phase 3 of the Drosophila Population Genomics Project (DPGP3), which provides 197 genomes from a single ancestral range population of D. melanogaster (from Zambia). The large sample size, high genetic diversity, and potentially simpler demographic history of the DPGP3 sample will make this a highly valuable resource for fundamental population genetic research. The complete set of assemblies described here, termed the Drosophila Genome Nexus, presently comprises 623 consistently aligned genomes and is publicly available in multiple formats with supporting documentation and bioinformatic tools. This resource will greatly facilitate population genomic analysis in this model species by reducing the methodological differences between data sets

Progressive Mauve: Multiple alignment of genomes with gene flux and rearrangement

Multiple genome alignment remains a challenging problem. Effects of recombination including rearrangement, segmental duplication, gain, and loss can create a mosaic pattern of homology even among closely related organisms. We describe a method to align two or more genomes that have undergone large-scale recombination, particularly genomes that have undergone substantial amounts of gene gain and loss (gene flux). The method utilizes a novel alignment objective score, referred to as a sum-of-pairs breakpoint score. We also apply a probabilistic alignment filtering method to remove erroneous alignments of unrelated sequences, which are commonly observed in other genome alignment methods. We describe new metrics for quantifying genome alignment accuracy which measure the quality of rearrangement breakpoint predictions and indel predictions. The progressive genome alignment algorithm demonstrates markedly improved accuracy over previous approaches in situations where genomes have undergone realistic amounts of genome rearrangement, gene gain, loss, and duplication. We apply the progressive genome alignment algorithm to a set of 23 completely sequenced genomes from the genera Escherichia, Shigella, and Salmonella. The 23 enterobacteria have an estimated 2.46Mbp of genomic content conserved among all taxa and total unique content of 15.2Mbp. We document substantial population-level variability among these organisms driven by homologous recombination, gene gain, and gene loss. Free, open-source software implementing the described genome alignment approach is available from http://gel.ahabs.wisc.edu/mauve .Comment: Revision dated June 19, 200

On the Inversion-Indel Distance

Willing E, Zaccaria S, Dias Vieira Braga M, Stoye J. On the Inversion-Indel Distance. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14(Suppl 15: Proc. of RECOMB-CG 2013): S3.Background The inversion distance, that is the distance between two unichromosomal genomes with the same content allowing only inversions of DNA segments, can be computed thanks to a pioneering approach of Hannenhalli and Pevzner in 1995. In 2000, El-Mabrouk extended the inversion model to allow the comparison of unichromosomal genomes with unequal contents, thus insertions and deletions of DNA segments besides inversions. However, an exact algorithm was presented only for the case in which we have insertions alone and no deletion (or vice versa), while a heuristic was provided for the symmetric case, that allows both insertions and deletions and is called the inversion-indel distance. In 2005, Yancopoulos, Attie and Friedberg started a new branch of research by introducing the generic double cut and join (DCJ) operation, that can represent several genome rearrangements (including inversions). Among others, the DCJ model gave rise to two important results. First, it has been shown that the inversion distance can be computed in a simpler way with the help of the DCJ operation. Second, the DCJ operation originated the DCJ-indel distance, that allows the comparison of genomes with unequal contents, considering DCJ, insertions and deletions, and can be computed in linear time. Results In the present work we put these two results together to solve an open problem, showing that, when the graph that represents the relation between the two compared genomes has no bad components, the inversion-indel distance is equal to the DCJ-indel distance. We also give a lower and an upper bound for the inversion-indel distance in the presence of bad components

Using Genetic Algorithm to solve Median Problem and Phylogenetic Inference

Genome rearrangement analysis has attracted a lot of attentions in phylogenetic com- putation and comparative genomics. Solving the median problems based on various distance definitions has been a focus as it provides the building blocks for maximum parsimony analysis of phylogeny and ancestral genomes. The Median Problem (MP) has been proved to be NP-hard and although there are several exact or heuristic al- gorithms available, these methods all are difficulty to compute distant three genomes containing high evolution events. Such as current approaches, MGR[1] and GRAPPA [2], are restricted on small collections of genomes and low-resolution gene order data of a few hundred rearrangement events. In my work, we focus on heuristic algorithms which will combine genomic sorting algorithm with genetic algorithm (GA) to pro- duce new methods and directions for whole-genome median solver, ancestor inference and phylogeny reconstruction. In equal median problem, we propose a DCJ sorting operation based genetic algorithms measurements, called GA-DCJ. Following classic genetic algorithm frame, we develop our algorithms for every procedure and substitute for each traditional genetic algorithm procedure. The final results of our GA-based algorithm are optimal median genome(s) and its median score. In limited time and space, especially in large scale and distant datasets, our algorithm get better results compared with GRAPPA and AsMedian. Extending the ideas of equal genome median solver, we develop another genetic algorithm based solver, GaDCJ-Indel, which can solve unequal genomes median prob- lem (without duplication). In DCJ-Indel model, one of the key steps is still sorting operation[3]. The difference with equal genomes median is there are two sorting di- rections: minimal DCJ operation path or minimal indel operation path. Following different sorting path, in each step scenario, we can get various genome structures to fulfill our population pool. Besides that, we adopt adaptive surcharge-triangle inequality instead of classic triangle inequality in our fitness function in order to fit unequal genome restrictions and get more efficient results. Our experiments results show that GaDCJ-Indel method not only can converge to accurate median score, but also can infer ancestors that are very close to the true ancestors. An important application of genome rearrangement analysis is to infer ancestral genomes, which is valuable for identifying patterns of evolution and for modeling the evolutionary processes. However, computing ancestral genomes is very difficult and we have to rely on heuristic methods that have various limitations. We propose a GA-Tree algorithm which adapts meta-population [4], co-evolution and repopulation pool methods In this paper, we describe and illuminate the first genetic algorithm for ancestor inference step by step, which uses fitness scores designed to consider co- evolution and uses sorting-based methods to initialize and evolve populations. Our extensive experiments show that compared with other existing tools, our method is accurate and can infer ancestors that are much closer to true ancestors

Mutational signatures in tumours induced by high and low energy radiation in Trp53 deficient mice.

Ionising radiation (IR) is a recognised carcinogen responsible for cancer development in patients previously treated using radiotherapy, and in individuals exposed as a result of accidents at nuclear energy plants. However, the mutational signatures induced by distinct types and doses of radiation are unknown. Here, we analyse the genetic architecture of mammary tumours, lymphomas and sarcomas induced by high (56Fe-ions) or low (gamma) energy radiation in mice carrying Trp53 loss of function alleles. In mammary tumours, high-energy radiation is associated with induction of focal structural variants, leading to genomic instability and Met amplification. Gamma-radiation is linked to large-scale structural variants and a point mutation signature associated with oxidative stress. The genomic architecture of carcinomas, sarcomas and lymphomas arising in the same animals are significantly different. Our study illustrates the complex interactions between radiation quality, germline Trp53 deficiency and tissue/cell of origin in shaping the genomic landscape of IR-induced tumours

Generalizations of the genomic rank distance to indels

MOTIVATION: The rank distance model represents genome rearrangements in multi-chromosomal genomes as matrix operations, which allows the reconstruction of parsimonious histories of evolution by rearrangements. We seek to generalize this model by allowing for genomes with different gene content, to accommodate a broader range of biological contexts. We approach this generalization by using a matrix representation of genomes. This leads to simple distance formulas and sorting algorithms for genomes with different gene contents, but without duplications. RESULTS: We generalize the rank distance to genomes with different gene content in two different ways. The first approach adds insertions, deletions and the substitution of a single extremity to the basic operations. We show how to efficiently compute this distance. To avoid genomes with incomplete markers, our alternative distance, the rank-indel distance, only uses insertions and deletions of entire chromosomes. We construct phylogenetic trees with our distances and the DCJ-Indel distance for simulated data and real prokaryotic genomes, and compare them against reference trees. For simulated data, our distances outperform the DCJ-Indel distance using the Quartet metric as baseline. This suggests that rank distances are more robust for comparing distantly related species. For real prokaryotic genomes, all rearrangement-based distances yield phylogenetic trees that are topologically distant from the reference (65% similarity with Quartet metric), but are able to cluster related species within their respective clades and distinguish the Shigella strains as the farthest relative of the Escherichia coli strains, a feature not seen in the reference tree. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and instructions are available at https://github.com/meidanis-lab/rank-indel. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online

Gene Orthology Inference via Large-Scale Rearrangements for Partially Assembled Genomes

Recently we developed a gene orthology inference tool based on genome rearrangements (Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology 19:6, 2021). Given a set of genomes our method first computes all pairwise gene similarities. Then it runs pairwise ILP comparisons to compute optimal gene matchings, which minimize, by taking the similarities into account, the weighted rearrangement distance between the analyzed genomes (a problem that is NP-hard). The gene matchings are then integrated into gene families in the final step. Although the ILP is quite efficient and could conceptually analyze genomes that are not completely assembled but split in several contigs, our tool failed in completing that task. The main reason is that each ILP pairwise comparison includes an optimal capping that connects each end of a linear segment of one genome to an end of a linear segment in the other genome, producing an exponential increase of the search space. In this work, we design and implement a heuristic capping algorithm that replaces the optimal capping by clustering (based on their gene content intersections) the linear segments into m ? 1 subsets, whose ends are capped independently. Furthermore, in each subset, instead of allowing all possible connections, we let only the ends of content-related segments be connected. Although there is no guarantee that m is much bigger than one, and with the possible side effect of resulting in sub-optimal instead of optimal gene matchings, the heuristic works very well in practice, from both the speed performance and the quality of computed solutions. Our experiments on real data show that we can now efficiently analyze fruit fly genomes with unfinished assemblies distributed in hundreds or even thousands of contigs, obtaining orthologies that are more similar to FlyBase orthologies when compared to orthologies computed by other inference tools. Moreover, for complete assemblies the version with heuristic capping reports orthologies that are very similar to the orthologies computed by the optimal version of our tool. Our approach is implemented into a pipeline incorporating the pre-computation of gene similarities