Automatic text summarization with Maximal Frequent Sequences

En las últimas dos décadas un aumento exponencial de la información electrónica ha provocado una gran necesidad de entender rápidamente grandes volúmenes de información. En este libro se desarrollan los métodos automáticos para producir un resumen. Un resumen es un texto corto que transmite la información más importante de un documento o de una colección de documentos. Los resúmenes utilizados en este libro son extractivos: una selección de las oraciones más importantes del texto. Otros retos consisten en generar resúmenes de manera independiente de lenguaje y dominio. Se describe la identificación de cuatro etapas para generación de resúmenes extractivos. La primera etapa es la selección de términos, en la que uno tiene que decidir qué unidades contarían como términos individuales. El proceso de estimación de la utilidad de los términos individuales se llama etapa de pesado de términos. El siguiente paso se denota como pesado de oraciones, donde todas las secuencias reciben alguna medida numérica de acuerdo con la utilidad de términos. Finalmente, el proceso de selección de las oraciones más importantes se llama selección de oraciones. Los diferentes métodos para generación de resúmenes extractivos pueden ser caracterizados como representan estas etapas. En este libro se describe la etapa de selección de términos, en la que la detección de descripciones multipalabra se realiza considerando Secuencias Frecuentes Maximales (sfms), las cuales adquieren un significado importante, mientras Secuencias Frecuentes (sf) no maximales, que son partes de otros sf, no deben de ser consideradas. En la motivación se consideró costo vs. beneficio: existen muchas sf no maximales, mientras que la probabilidad de adquirir un significado importante es baja. De todos modos, las sfms representan todas las sfs en el modo compacto: todas las sfs podrían ser obtenidas a partir de todas las sfms explotando cada sfm al conjunto de todas sus subsecuencias. Se presentan los nuevos métodos basados en grafos, algoritmos de agrupamiento y algoritmos genéticos, los cuales facilitan la tarea de generación de resúmenes de textos. Se ha experimentado diferentes combinaciones de las opciones de selección de términos, pesado de términos, pesado de oraciones y selección de oraciones para generar los resúmenes extractivos de textos independientes de lenguaje y dominio para una colección de noticias. Se ha analizado algunas opciones basadas en descripciones multipalabra considerándolas en los métodos de grafos, algoritmos de agrupamiento y algoritmos genéticos. Se han obtenido los resultados superiores al de estado de arte. Este libro está dirigido a los estudiantes y científicos del área de Lingüística Computacional, y también a quienes quieren saber sobre los recientes avances en las investigaciones de generación automática de resúmenes de textos.In the last two decades, an exponential increase in the available electronic information causes a big necessity to quickly understand large volumes of information. It raises the importance of the development of automatic methods for detecting the most relevant content of a document in order to produce a shorter text. Automatic Text Summarization (ats) is an active research area dedicated to generate abstractive and extractive summaries not only for a single document, but also for a collection of documents. Other necessity consists in finding method for ats in a language and domain independent way. In this book we consider extractive text summarization for single document task. We have identified that a typical extractive summarization method consists in four steps. First step is a term selection where one should decide what units will count as individual terms. The process of estimating the usefulness of the individual terms is called term weighting step. The next step denotes as sentence weighting where all the sentences receive some numerical measure according to the usefulness of its terms. Finally, the process of selecting the most relevant sentences calls sentence selection. Different extractive summarization methods can be characterized how they perform these steps. In this book, in the term selection step, we describe how to detect multiword descriptions considering Maximal Frequent Sequences (mfss), which bearing important meaning, while non-maximal frequent sequences (fss), those that are parts of another fs, should not be considered. Our additional motivation was cost vs. benefit considerations: there are too many non-maximal fss while their probability to bear important meaning is lower. In any case, mfss represent all fss in a compact way: all fss can be obtained from all mfss by bursting each mfs into a set of all its subsequences.New methods based on graph algorithms, genetic algorithms, and clustering algorithms which facilitate the text summarization task are presented. We have tested different combinations of term selection, term weighting, sentence weighting and sentence selection options for language-and domain-independent extractive single-document text summarization on a news report collection. We analyzed several options based on mfss, considering them with graph, genetic, and clustering algorithms. We obtained results superior to the existing state-ofthe- art methods. This book is addressed for students and scientists of the area of Computational Linguistics, and also who wants to know recent developments in the area of Automatic Text Generation of Summaries

Chapter Bibliography

authored support system; contextual machine translation; controlled document authoring; controlled language; document structure; terminology management; translation technology; usability evaluatio

WojoodNER 2023: The First Arabic Named Entity Recognition Shared Task

We present WojoodNER-2023, the first Arabic Named Entity Recognition (NER) Shared Task. The primary focus of WojoodNER-2023 is on Arabic NER, offering novel NER datasets (i.e., Wojood) and the definition of subtasks designed to facilitate meaningful comparisons between different NER approaches. WojoodNER-2023 encompassed two Subtasks: FlatNER and NestedNER. A total of 45 unique teams registered for this shared task, with 11 of them actively participating in the test phase. Specifically, 11 teams participated in FlatNER, while $8$ teams tackled NestedNER. The winning teams achieved F1 scores of 91.96 and 93.73 in FlatNER and NestedNER, respectively

Finding Important Terms for Patients in Their Electronic Health Records: A Learning-to-Rank Approach Using Expert Annotations

BACKGROUND: Many health organizations allow patients to access their own electronic health record (EHR) notes through online patient portals as a way to enhance patient-centered care. However, EHR notes are typically long and contain abundant medical jargon that can be difficult for patients to understand. In addition, many medical terms in patients\u27 notes are not directly related to their health care needs. One way to help patients better comprehend their own notes is to reduce information overload and help them focus on medical terms that matter most to them. Interventions can then be developed by giving them targeted education to improve their EHR comprehension and the quality of care. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a supervised natural language processing (NLP) system called Finding impOrtant medical Concepts most Useful to patientS (FOCUS) that automatically identifies and ranks medical terms in EHR notes based on their importance to the patients. METHODS: First, we built an expert-annotated corpus. For each EHR note, 2 physicians independently identified medical terms important to the patient. Using the physicians\u27 agreement as the gold standard, we developed and evaluated FOCUS. FOCUS first identifies candidate terms from each EHR note using MetaMap and then ranks the terms using a support vector machine-based learn-to-rank algorithm. We explored rich learning features, including distributed word representation, Unified Medical Language System semantic type, topic features, and features derived from consumer health vocabulary. We compared FOCUS with 2 strong baseline NLP systems. RESULTS: Physicians annotated 90 EHR notes and identified a mean of 9 (SD 5) important terms per note. The Cohen\u27s kappa annotation agreement was .51. The 10-fold cross-validation results show that FOCUS achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.940 for ranking candidate terms from EHR notes to identify important terms. When including term identification, the performance of FOCUS for identifying important terms from EHR notes was 0.866 AUC-ROC. Both performance scores significantly exceeded the corresponding baseline system scores (P \u3c .001). Rich learning features contributed to FOCUS\u27s performance substantially. CONCLUSIONS: FOCUS can automatically rank terms from EHR notes based on their importance to patients. It may help develop future interventions that improve quality of care

Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLG

The majority of NLG evaluation relies on automatic metrics, such as BLEU . In this paper, we motivate the need for novel, system- and data-independent automatic evaluation methods: We investigate a wide range of metrics, including state-of-the-art word-based and novel grammar-based ones, and demonstrate that they only weakly reflect human judgements of system outputs as generated by data-driven, end-to-end NLG. We also show that metric performance is data- and system-specific. Nevertheless, our results also suggest that automatic metrics perform reliably at system-level and can support system development by finding cases where a system performs poorly.Comment: accepted to EMNLP 201

Automatic categorization and summarization of documentaries

In this paper, we propose automatic categorization and summarization of documentaries using subtitles of videos. We propose two methods for video categorization. The first makes unsupervised categorization by applying natural language processing techniques on video subtitles and uses the WordNet lexical database and WordNet domains. The second has the same extraction steps but uses a learning module to categorize. Experiments with documentary videos give promising results in discovering the correct categories of videos. We also propose a video summarization method using the subtitles of videos and text summarization techniques. Significant sentences in the subtitles of a video are identified using these techniques and a video summary is then composed by finding the video parts corresponding to these summary sentences. © 2010 The Author(s)

Automatic Generation of Text Summaries - Challenges, proposals and experiments

Los estudiantes e investigadores en el área de procesamiento deenguaje natural, inteligencia artificial, ciencias computacionales y lingüística computacional serán quizá los primeros interesados en este libro. No obstante, también se pretende introducir a público no especializado en esta prometedora área de investigación; por ello, hemos traducido al español algunos tecnicismos y anglicismos, propios de esta disciplina, pero sin dejar de mencionar, en todo momento, su término en inglés para evitar confusiones y lograr que aquellos lectores interesados puedan ampliar sus fuentes de conocimiento.Este libro presenta un método computacional novedoso, a nivel internacional, para la generación automática de resúmenes de texto, pues supera la calidad de los que actualmente se pueden crear. Es decir, es resultado de una investigación que buscó métodos y modelos computacionales lo menos dependientes del lenguaje y dominio

Alternative Approaches to Correction of Malapropisms in AIML Based Conversational Agents

The use of Conversational Agents (CAs) utilizing Artificial Intelligence Markup Language (AIML) has been studied in a number of disciplines. Previous research has shown a great deal of promise. It has also documented significant limitations in the abilities of these CAs. Many of these limitations are related specifically to the method employed by AIML to resolve ambiguities in the meaning and context of words. While methods exist to detect and correct common errors in spelling and grammar of sentences and queries submitted by a user, one class of input error that is particularly difficult to detect and correct is the malapropism. In this research a malapropism is defined a verbal blunder in which one word is replaced by another similar in sound but different in meaning ( malapropism, 2013). This research explored the use of alternative methods of correcting malapropisms in sentences input to AIML CAs using measures of Semantic Distance and tri-gram probabilities. Results of these alternate methods were compared against AIML CAs using only the Symbolic Reductions built into AIML. This research found that the use of the two methodologies studied here did indeed lead to a small, but measurable improvement in the performance of the CA in terms of the appropriateness of its responses as classified by human judges. However, it was also noted that in a large number of cases, the CA simply ignored the existence of a malapropism altogether in formulating its responses. In most of these cases, the interpretation and response to the user\u27s input was of such a general nature that one might question the overall efficacy of the AIML engine. The answer to this question is a matter for further study