21,358 research outputs found

    On the algorithmic complexity of twelve covering and independence parameters of graphs

    Get PDF
    The definitions of four previously studied parameters related to total coverings and total matchings of graphs can be restricted, thereby obtaining eight parameters related to covering and independence, each of which has been studied previously in some form. Here we survey briefly results concerning total coverings and total matchings of graphs, and consider the aforementioned 12 covering and independence parameters with regard to algorithmic complexity. We survey briefly known results for several graph classes, and obtain new NP-completeness results for the minimum total cover and maximum minimal total cover problems in planar graphs, the minimum maximal total matching problem in bipartite and chordal graphs, and the minimum independent dominating set problem in planar cubic graphs

    Parametrized Complexity of Weak Odd Domination Problems

    Full text link
    Given a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E), a subset B⊆VB\subseteq V of vertices is a weak odd dominated (WOD) set if there exists D⊆V∖BD \subseteq V {\setminus} B such that every vertex in BB has an odd number of neighbours in DD. κ(G)\kappa(G) denotes the size of the largest WOD set, and κ′(G)\kappa'(G) the size of the smallest non-WOD set. The maximum of κ(G)\kappa(G) and ∣V∣−κ′(G)|V|-\kappa'(G), denoted κQ(G)\kappa_Q(G), plays a crucial role in quantum cryptography. In particular deciding, given a graph GG and k>0k>0, whether κQ(G)≤k\kappa_Q(G)\le k is of practical interest in the design of graph-based quantum secret sharing schemes. The decision problems associated with the quantities κ\kappa, κ′\kappa' and κQ\kappa_Q are known to be NP-Complete. In this paper, we consider the approximation of these quantities and the parameterized complexity of the corresponding problems. We mainly prove the fixed-parameter intractability (W[1][1]-hardness) of these problems. Regarding the approximation, we show that κQ\kappa_Q, κ\kappa and κ′\kappa' admit a constant factor approximation algorithm, and that κ\kappa and κ′\kappa' have no polynomial approximation scheme unless P=NP.Comment: 16 pages, 5 figure

    The Parameterized Complexity of Domination-type Problems and Application to Linear Codes

    Full text link
    We study the parameterized complexity of domination-type problems. (sigma,rho)-domination is a general and unifying framework introduced by Telle: a set D of vertices of a graph G is (sigma,rho)-dominating if for any v in D, |N(v)\cap D| in sigma and for any $v\notin D, |N(v)\cap D| in rho. We mainly show that for any sigma and rho the problem of (sigma,rho)-domination is W[2] when parameterized by the size of the dominating set. This general statement is optimal in the sense that several particular instances of (sigma,rho)-domination are W[2]-complete (e.g. Dominating Set). We also prove that (sigma,rho)-domination is W[2] for the dual parameterization, i.e. when parameterized by the size of the dominated set. We extend this result to a class of domination-type problems which do not fall into the (sigma,rho)-domination framework, including Connected Dominating Set. We also consider problems of coding theory which are related to domination-type problems with parity constraints. In particular, we prove that the problem of the minimal distance of a linear code over Fq is W[2] for both standard and dual parameterizations, and W[1]-hard for the dual parameterization. To prove W[2]-membership of the domination-type problems we extend the Turing-way to parameterized complexity by introducing a new kind of non deterministic Turing machine with the ability to perform `blind' transitions, i.e. transitions which do not depend on the content of the tapes. We prove that the corresponding problem Short Blind Multi-Tape Non-Deterministic Turing Machine is W[2]-complete. We believe that this new machine can be used to prove W[2]-membership of other problems, not necessarily related to dominationComment: 19 pages, 2 figure

    (Total) Vector Domination for Graphs with Bounded Branchwidth

    Full text link
    Given a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) of order nn and an nn-dimensional non-negative vector d=(d(1),d(2),…,d(n))d=(d(1),d(2),\ldots,d(n)), called demand vector, the vector domination (resp., total vector domination) is the problem of finding a minimum S⊆VS\subseteq V such that every vertex vv in V∖SV\setminus S (resp., in VV) has at least d(v)d(v) neighbors in SS. The (total) vector domination is a generalization of many dominating set type problems, e.g., the dominating set problem, the kk-tuple dominating set problem (this kk is different from the solution size), and so on, and its approximability and inapproximability have been studied under this general framework. In this paper, we show that a (total) vector domination of graphs with bounded branchwidth can be solved in polynomial time. This implies that the problem is polynomially solvable also for graphs with bounded treewidth. Consequently, the (total) vector domination problem for a planar graph is subexponential fixed-parameter tractable with respectto kk, where kk is the size of solution.Comment: 16 page
    • …
    corecore