Successive vertex orderings of fully regular graphs

A graph G = (V,E) is called fully regular if for every independent set $I\subset V$ , the number of vertices in $V\setminus$ I that are not connected to any element of I depends only on the size of I. A linear ordering of the vertices of G is called successive if for every i, the first i vertices induce a connected subgraph of G. We give an explicit formula for the number of successive vertex orderings of a fully regular graph. As an application of our results, we give alternative proofs of two theorems of Stanley and Gao + Peng, determining the number of linear edge orderings of complete graphs and complete bipartite graphs, respectively, with the property that the first i edges induce a connected subgraph. As another application, we give a simple product formula for the number of linear orderings of the hyperedges of a complete 3-partite 3-uniform hypergraph such that, for every i, the first i hyperedges induce a connected subgraph. We found similar formulas for complete (non-partite) 3-uniform hypergraphs and in another closely related case, but we managed to verify them only when the number of vertices is small.Comment: 14 page

EDGE-ORDERED RAMSEY NUMBERS

We introduce and study a variant of Ramsey numbers for edge-ordered graphs, that is, graphs with linearly ordered sets of edges. The edge-ordered Ramsey number R_e(G) of an edge-ordered graph G is the minimum positive integer N such that there exists an edge-ordered complete graph K_N on N vertices such that every 2-coloring of the edges of K_N contains a monochromatic copy of G as an edge-ordered subgraph of K_N. We prove that the edge-ordered Ramsey number R_e(G) is finite for every edge-ordered graph G and we obtain better estimates for special classes of edge-ordered graphs. In particular, we prove R_e(G) <= 2^{O(n^3\log{n})} for every bipartite edge-ordered graph G on n vertices. We also introduce a natural class of edge-orderings, called \emph{lexicographic edge-orderings}, for which we can prove much better upper bounds on the corresponding edge-ordered Ramsey numbers

Complexity of Grundy coloring and its variants

The Grundy number of a graph is the maximum number of colors used by the greedy coloring algorithm over all vertex orderings. In this paper, we study the computational complexity of GRUNDY COLORING, the problem of determining whether a given graph has Grundy number at least $k$. We also study the variants WEAK GRUNDY COLORING (where the coloring is not necessarily proper) and CONNECTED GRUNDY COLORING (where at each step of the greedy coloring algorithm, the subgraph induced by the colored vertices must be connected). We show that GRUNDY COLORING can be solved in time $O^*(2.443^n)$ and WEAK GRUNDY COLORING in time $O^*(2.716^n)$ on graphs of order $n$. While GRUNDY COLORING and WEAK GRUNDY COLORING are known to be solvable in time $O^*(2^{O(wk)})$ for graphs of treewidth $w$ (where $k$ is the number of colors), we prove that under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), they cannot be solved in time $O^*(2^{o(w\log w)})$. We also describe an $O^*(2^{2^{O(k)}})$ algorithm for WEAK GRUNDY COLORING, which is therefore \fpt for the parameter $k$. Moreover, under the ETH, we prove that such a running time is essentially optimal (this lower bound also holds for GRUNDY COLORING). Although we do not know whether GRUNDY COLORING is in \fpt, we show that this is the case for graphs belonging to a number of standard graph classes including chordal graphs, claw-free graphs, and graphs excluding a fixed minor. We also describe a quasi-polynomial time algorithm for GRUNDY COLORING and WEAK GRUNDY COLORING on apex-minor graphs. In stark contrast with the two other problems, we show that CONNECTED GRUNDY COLORING is \np-complete already for $k=7$ colors.Comment: 24 pages, 7 figures. This version contains some new results and improvements. A short paper based on version v2 appeared in COCOON'1

Consistent random vertex-orderings of graphs

Given a hereditary graph property $\mathcal{P}$, consider distributions of random orderings of vertices of graphs $G\in\mathcal{P}$ that are preserved under isomorphisms and under taking induced subgraphs. We show that for many properties $\mathcal{P}$ the only such random orderings are uniform, and give some examples of non-uniform orderings when they exist

Vertex elimination orderings for hereditary graph classes

We provide a general method to prove the existence and compute efficiently elimination orderings in graphs. Our method relies on several tools that were known before, but that were not put together so far: the algorithm LexBFS due to Rose, Tarjan and Lueker, one of its properties discovered by Berry and Bordat, and a local decomposition property of graphs discovered by Maffray, Trotignon and Vu\vskovi\'c. We use this method to prove the existence of elimination orderings in several classes of graphs, and to compute them in linear time. Some of the classes have already been studied, namely even-hole-free graphs, square-theta-free Berge graphs, universally signable graphs and wheel-free graphs. Some other classes are new. It turns out that all the classes that we study in this paper can be defined by excluding some of the so-called Truemper configurations. For several classes of graphs, we obtain directly bounds on the chromatic number, or fast algorithms for the maximum clique problem or the coloring problem

Bounded Representations of Interval and Proper Interval Graphs

Klavik et al. [arXiv:1207.6960] recently introduced a generalization of recognition called the bounded representation problem which we study for the classes of interval and proper interval graphs. The input gives a graph G and in addition for each vertex v two intervals L_v and R_v called bounds. We ask whether there exists a bounded representation in which each interval I_v has its left endpoint in L_v and its right endpoint in R_v. We show that the problem can be solved in linear time for interval graphs and in quadratic time for proper interval graphs. Robert's Theorem states that the classes of proper interval graphs and unit interval graphs are equal. Surprisingly the bounded representation problem is polynomially solvable for proper interval graphs and NP-complete for unit interval graphs [Klav\'{\i}k et al., arxiv:1207.6960]. So unless P = NP, the proper and unit interval representations behave very differently. The bounded representation problem belongs to a wider class of restricted representation problems. These problems are generalizations of the well-understood recognition problem, and they ask whether there exists a representation of G satisfying some additional constraints. The bounded representation problems generalize many of these problems