Comparison of deterministic and probabilistic approaches to identify the dynamic moving load and damages of a reinforced concrete beam

Two classical civil engineering inverse problems are considered. The first deals with the determination of dynamic moving loads applied to a reinforced concrete beam. The second one corresponds to the monitoring and the damage assessment. The concrete damage due to overloading is modelled by a loss of the concrete Young' modulus, whereas the steel bar damage due to corrosion effects is modelled by a reduction of the steel bar cross section. To identify the loading and damage parameters, deterministic and probabilistic model updating techniques are applied and compared. In the deterministic approach, a gradient descent technique based on adjoint framework is used to minimize the data misfit functional with a Tikhonov regularization term. Regularization by means of Bayes rule is considered in a probabilistic approach. The estimation is of the minimum variance type achieved with the help of the transformed ensemble Kalman filter

Damage identification in bridge structures : review of available methods and case studies

Bridges are integral parts of the infrastructure and play a major role in civil engineering. Bridge health monitoring is necessary to extend the life of a bridge and retain safety. Periodic monitoring contributes significantly in keeping these structures operational and extends structural integrity. Different researchers have proposed different methods for identifying bridge damages based on different theories and laboratory tests. Several review papers have been published in the literature on the identification of damage and crack in bridge structures in the last few decades. In this paper, a review of literature on damage identification in bridge structures based on different methods and theories is carried out. The aim of this paper is to critically evaluate different methods that have been proposed to detect damages in different bridges. Different papers have been carefully reviewed, and the gaps, limitations, and superiority of the methods used are identified. Furthermore, in most of the reviews, future applications and several sustainable methods which are necessary for bridge monitoring are covered. This study significantly contributes to the literature by critically examining different methods, giving guidelines on the methods that identify the damages in bridge structures more accurately, and serving as a good reference for other researchers and future works

The impact of human errors on the performance to failure of concrete bridges

Programa doutoral em Engenharia CivilO colapso de pontes que tiveram lugar em todo o mundo nos últimos 50 anos destacou o erro humano como a principal causa do colapso de pontes. Dadas as implicações financeiras, sociais e psicológicas de tais eventos indesejados, a contribuição do erro humano no colapso de pontes deve ser investigada com o objetivo de compreender como é que a robustez e a segurança estrutural das pontes são afetadas pelos mesmos. A deterioração das pontes, leva à redução das margens de segurança, expondo muitas vezes deficiências causadas por erros de projeto e construção, realçando a importância do desenvolvimento de procedimentos de avaliação estrutural mais abrangentes, tendo em conta numerosas fontes de incertezas. Apesar destes factos conhecidos existem poucos trabalhos disponíveis investigando questões tão relevantes. Neste sentido este trabalho aborda a identificação dos erros humanos em suas inúmeras formas, ou seja, erros de projeto e erros de construção, de acordo com opiniões de especialistas e eventos de colapso de pontes registados. Diferentes erros representam diferentes ameaças à segurança estrutural; como tal o risco relativo dos erros também é investigado. O real impacto dos erros humanos na segurança estrutural é investigado através de três pontes de betão armado, considerando a probabilidade de falha perante um conjunto de incertezas como principal indicador de desempenho. Tal investigação é realizada em duas etapas, uma onde os erros de projeto e construção são introduzidos em cenários onde se entende que eles estão presentes e outra onde a possibilidade de ocorrência de erros de construção é investigada considerando a probabilidade do erro humano e a magnitude do erro. Ocorrências únicas e múltiplas de erros também são discutidas. Modelos de elementos finitos, considerada para fins de análise estrutural não linear, e modelos substitutos são introduzidos como a base das múltiplas análises de fiabilidade estrutural realizadas. Finalmente, a previsão da vida útil de pontes considerando a corrosão induzida por carbonatação e a redução da vida útil das pontes causada por erros de construção são questões também abordadas.The collapse of bridges that have taken place worldwide in the last 50 years has highlighted human error as the main cause of the collapse of bridges. Given the financial, social and phycological implications of such hazardous events, human errors' contribution to the collapse of bridges must be investigated, aiming to understand how their robustness and structural safety are affected. The ageing of bridges leads to safety margin reductions that often expose deficiencies caused by design and construction errors, underling the importance of developing more comprehensive frameworks that consider numerous sources of uncertainty for structural safety assessment purposes. Despite these facts and known needs, few works facing such relevant concerns are available. Accordingly, human errors are identified in their numerous forms, i.e., design errors and construction errors, according to expert opinions and real-world bridge collapse events. Different errors represent different threats to structural safety; thus, their relative risk is also investigated. The actual impact of human errors on structural safety is investigated through one reinforced and two prestressed concrete bridges, using their probability of failure, given a group of uncertainties, as the main performance indicator. Such investigation is performed on two fronts, one where design and construction errors are introduced under scenarios where they are understood to be present, and another where the possibility of occurrence of construction errors is investigated considering probabilistic models to describe human error probabilities and error magnitudes. Single and multiple occurrences of errors are also discussed. Finite element modelling, considered for non-linear structural analysis purposes, and surrogate models are introduced as the backbone of the multiple structural reliability analysis performed. Finally, the service life prediction of bridges considering carbonation-induced corrosion and the service life reduction of bridges due to construction errors are carefully addressed.This work was partially financed by (i) national funds through FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology, under grant agreement “PD/ BD/143003/2018” attributed to the PhD Candidate through the iRail Doctoral program; and (ii) FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC) under the R&D Unit Institute for Sustainability and Innovation in Structural Engineering (ISISE), under reference UIDB/04029/2020

5th International Probabilistic Workshop: 28-29 November 2007, Ghent, Belgium

These are the proceedings of the 5th International Probabilistic Workshop. Even though the 5th anniversary of a conference might not be of such importance, it is quite interesting to note the development of this probabilistic conference. Originally, the series started as the 1st and 2nd Dresdner Probabilistic Symposium, which were launched to present research and applications mainly dealt with at Dresden University of Technology. Since then, the conference has grown to an internationally recognised conference dealing with research on and applications of probabilistic techniques, mainly in the field of structural engineering. Other topics have also been dealt with such as ship safety and natural hazards. Whereas the first conferences in Dresden included about 12 presentations each, the conference in Ghent has attracted nearly 30 presentations. Moving from Dresden to Vienna (University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences) to Berlin (Federal Institute for Material Research and Testing) and then finally to Ghent, the conference has constantly evolved towards a truly international level. This can be seen by the language used. The first two conferences were entirely in the German language. During the conference in Berlin however, the change from the German to English language was especially apparent as some presentations were conducted in German and others in English. Now in Ghent all papers will be presented in English. Participants now, not only come from Europe, but also from other continents. Although the conference will move back to Germany again next year (2008) in Darmstadt, the international concept will remain, since so much work in the field of probabilistic safety evaluations is carried out internationally. In two years (2009) the conference will move to Delft, The Netherlands and probably in 2010 the conference will be held in Szczecin, Poland. Coming back to the present: the editors wish all participants a successful conference in Ghent

6th International Probabilistic Workshop - 32. Darmstädter Massivbauseminar: 26-27 November 2008 ; Darmstadt, Germany 2008 ; Technische Universität Darmstadt

These are the proceedings of the 6th International Probabilistic Workshop, formerly known as Dresden Probabilistic Symposium or International Probabilistic Symposium. The workshop was held twice in Dresden, then it moved to Vienna, Berlin, Ghent and finally to Darmstadt in 2008. All of the conference cities feature some specialities. However, Darmstadt features a very special property: The element number 110 was named Darmstadtium after Darmstadt: There are only very few cities worldwide after which a chemical element is named. The high element number 110 of Darmstadtium indicates, that much research is still required and carried out. This is also true for the issue of probabilistic safety concepts in engineering. Although the history of probabilistic safety concepts can be traced back nearly 90 years, for the practical applications a long way to go still remains. This is not a disadvantage. Just as research chemists strive to discover new element properties, with the application of new probabilistic techniques we may advance the properties of structures substantially. (Auszug aus Vorwort

Development of Blast Risk Assessment Framework for Financial Loss and Casualty Estimation

The entire study can be divided into four main studies. Study I presents the development of probabilistic version of popular Kingery and Bulmash (KB) blast model. The probabilistic model was developed by considering the uncertainty in the model quantified using available experimental data. The model was then applied to generate fragility curves are developed for three types of glazing under three common bombing scenarios and study 1995 Oklahoma City damage. Study II discusses on development a blast loss estimation framework for buildings where demand loads are calculated using the probabilistic blast model and capacity form seismic design. Loss for archetypes buildings designed with three levels of seismic design category were estimated using the loss estimation framework. The objective was to see if there is potential benefit in terms of monetary value for three design categories. The results showed that as design level increased from ordinary, intermediate to special moment frame the blast performance was improved for some blast scenarios. In Study III concept of protection zones is presented which are zones in building with varying level of security, has been introduced based on the principle - as security increases the probable size of bomb should decrease. Probable bombs are uniformly placed at each protection zone to create many possible scenarios of terrorism event. The Brussels’ Airport attack of 2016 is studied using this framework and loss values are obtained to understand the associated risk. The results showed that the actual attack could have been worse. Strategies for improving security are employed in protection zones and its influence on threat reduction is studied. Study IV is about development of a probabilistic injury model to estimate the consequence of blast injuries to people. The blast parameters (pressure and impulse) are calculated using Kingery and Bulmash blast model. Monte Carlo simulation is used to randomly distribute people on each floor and estimate injury states for each blast scenario due to primary and secondary effects blast. An agent-based model (ABM) was developed to track movement of people in case of multiple blast scenario. The model was used to study three case studies – Brussels’ Airport bombing, Manchester Arena’s Bombing and Oklahoma City Bombing

Robust design of bridges : robustness analysis of Sjölundaviadukt bridge

Robustness of structural systems is as yet not explicitly defined nor is there a clearly defined method for incorporating robustness in design/construction. Robustness can be simply defined as the ability of a structural system to survive unforeseen/extraordinary exposures or circumstances that would otherwise cause it to fail. The structure must have enough residual capacity during and after the event to maintain at least some of its intended function intact. The level of robustness of a structure has to be analyzed in terms of the causes and consequences of failure; i.e. the consequences of structural damages should not be disproportional to the original cause (see 2.1 (3) of EN 1990:2002). This master thesis deals with the robustness of bridge structures. It examines common circumstances of failure and investigates methods and strategies towards incorporating structural robustness into the design of bridges. A robustness analysis is conducted for the Sjölundaviadukten Bridge; a 5-span post-tensioned frame bridge in Malmö

Health monitoring of civil infrastructures by subspace system identification method: an overview

Structural health monitoring (SHM) is the main contributor of the future's smart city to deal with the need for safety, lower maintenance costs, and reliable condition assessment of structures. Among the algorithms used for SHM to identify the system parameters of structures, subspace system identification (SSI) is a reliable method in the time-domain that takes advantages of using extended observability matrices. Considerable numbers of studies have specifically concentrated on practical applications of SSI in recent years. To the best of author's knowledge, no study has been undertaken to review and investigate the application of SSI in the monitoring of civil engineering structures. This paper aims to review studies that have used the SSI algorithm for the damage identification and modal analysis of structures. The fundamental focus is on data-driven and covariance-driven SSI algorithms. In this review, we consider the subspace algorithm to resolve the problem of a real-world application for SHM. With regard to performance, a comparison between SSI and other methods is provided in order to investigate its advantages and disadvantages. The applied methods of SHM in civil engineering structures are categorized into three classes, from simple one-dimensional (1D) to very complex structures, and the detectability of the SSI for different damage scenarios are reported. Finally, the available software incorporating SSI as their system identification technique are investigated