2,205 research outputs found

    Comparing techniques for modelling uncertainty in a maritime inventory routing problem

    Get PDF
    Uncertainty is inherent in many planning situations. One example is in maritime transportation, where weather conditions and port occupancy are typically characterized by high levels of uncertainty. This paper considers a maritime inventory routing problem where travel times are uncertain. Taking into account possible delays in the travel times is of main importance to avoid inventory surplus or shortages at the storages located at ports. Several techniques to deal with uncertainty, namely deterministic models with inventory buffers; robust optimization; stochastic programming and models incorporating conditional value-at-risk measures, are considered. The different techniques are tested for their ability to deal with uncertain travel times for a single product maritime inventory routing problem with constant production and consumption rates, a fleet of heterogeneous vessels and multiple ports. At the ports, the product is either produced or consumed and stored in storages with limited capacity. We assume two-stages of decisions, where the routing, the visit order of the ports and the quantities to load/unload are first-stage decisions (fixed before the uncertainty is revealed), while the visit time and the inventory levels at ports are second-stage decisions (adjusted to the observed travel times). Several solution approaches resulting from the proposed techniques are considered. A computational comparison of the resulting solution approaches is performed to compare the routing costs, the amount of inventory bounds deviation, the total quantities loaded and unloaded, and the running times. This computational experiment is reported for a set of maritime instances having up to six ports and five ships.publishe

    Stability metrics for a maritime inventory routing problem under sailing time uncertainty

    Get PDF

    A Modelling of Genetic Algorithm for Inventory Routing Problem Simulation Optimisation

    Get PDF
    This paper presents the simulation optimization modelling for Inventory Routing Problem (IRP) using Genetic Algorithm method. The IRP simulation model is based on the stochastic periodic Can-Deliver policy that allows early replenishment for the retailers who have reached the can-deliver level and consolidates the delivery with other retailers that have reached or fallen below the must-deliver level. The Genetic Algorithm is integrated into the IRP simulation model as optimizer in effort to determine the optimal inventory control parameters that minimized the total cost. This study implemented a Taguchi Method for the experimental design to evaluate the GA performance for different combination of population and mutation rate and to determine the best parameters setting for GA with respect to the computational time and best generation number on determining the optimal inventory control. The result shows that the variations of the mutation rate parameter significantly affect the performance of IRP model compared to population size at 95% confidence level. The implementation of elite preservation during the mutation stage is able to improve the performance of GA by keeping the best solution and used for generating the next population. The results indicated that the best generation number is obtained at GA configuration settings on large population sizes (100) with low mutation rates(0.08). The study also affirms the premature convergence problem faced in GA that required improvement by integrating with the neighbourhood search approach

    ๊ณต์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋ง

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์‚ฐ์—…๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ, 2021. 2. ๋ฌธ์ผ๊ฒฝ.Due to a remarkable surge in global trade volumes led by maritime transportation, shipping companies should make a great effort in managing their container flows especially in case of carrier-owned containers. To do so, they comprehensively implement empty container management strategies and accelerate the flows in a cost- and time-efficient manner to minimize total relevant costs while serving the maximal level of customers demands. However, many critical issues in container flows universally exist due to high uncertainty in reality and hinder the establishment of an efficient container supply chain. In this dissertation, we fully discuss such issues and provide mathematical models along with specific solution procedures. Three types of container supply chain are presented in the following: (i) a two-way four-echelon container supply chain; (ii) a laden and empty container supply chain under decentralized and centralized policies; (iii) a reliable container supply chain under disruption. These models explicitly deal with high risks embedded in a container supply chain and their computational experiments offer underlying managerial insights for the management in shipping companies. For (i), we study empty container management strategy in a two-way four-echelon container supply chain for bilateral trade between two countries. The strategy reduces high maritime transportation costs and long delivery times due to transshipment. The impact of direct shipping is investigated to determine the number of empty containers to be repositioned among selected ports, number of leased containers, and route selection to satisfy the demands for empty and laden containers for exporters and importers in two regions. A hybrid solution procedure based on accelerated particle swarm optimization and heuristic is presented, and corresponding results are compared. For (ii), we introduce the laden and empty container supply chain model based on three scenarios that differ with regard to tardiness in the return of empty containers and the decision process for the imposition of fees with the goal of determining optimal devanning times. The effectiveness of each type of policy - centralized versus decentralized - is determined through computational experiments that produce key performance measures including the on-time return ratio. Useful managerial insights on the implementation of these polices are derived from the results of sensitivity analyses and comparative studies. For (iii), we develop a reliability model based on container network flow while also taking into account expected transportation costs, including street-turn and empty container repositioning costs, in case of arc- and node-failures. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to analyze the impact of disruption on container supply chain networks, and a benchmark model was used to determine disruption costs. More importantly, some managerial insights on how to establish and maintain a reliable container network flow are also provided.ํ•ด์ƒ ์ˆ˜์†ก์ด ์ฃผ๋„ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์ „ ์„ธ๊ณ„ ๋ฌด์—ญ๋Ÿ‰์ด ๊ธ‰์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ํšŒ์‚ฌ ์†Œ์œ  ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ๋Š” ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋งŽ์€ ๋…ธ๋ ฅ์„ ๊ธฐ์šธ์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ณต ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ์ „๋žต์„ ํฌ๊ด„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์ˆ˜์†ก ๋น„์šฉ ๋ฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์ ˆ๊ฐ ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ์›ํ™œํžˆ ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ด€๋ จ ์ด๋น„์šฉ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์‹œ์— ๊ณ ๊ฐ์˜ ์ˆ˜์š”๋ฅผ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ถฉ์กฑํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ํ˜„์‹ค์—์„œ๋Š” ๋†’์€ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ํ๋ฆ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋งŽ์€ ์ฃผ์š”ํ•œ ์ด์Šˆ๊ฐ€ ๋ณดํŽธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์กด์žฌํ•˜๊ณ  ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋ง ๊ตฌ์ถ•์„ ๋ฐฉํ•ดํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ด์Šˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋…ผ์˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ํ•ด๋ฒ•๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋ง์„ ๋‹ค๋ฃฌ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ € (i) ์–‘๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ๋„ค ๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋ง, (ii) ๋ถ„๊ถŒํ™” ๋ฐ ์ค‘์•™ ์ง‘์ค‘ํ™” ์ •์ฑ…์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ โˆ™๊ณต ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋ง; ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  (iii) disruption ์ƒํ™ฉ ์†์—์„œ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋Š” ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋ง์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ชจํ˜•์€ ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋ง์— ๋‚ด์žฌ ๋œ ๋†’์€ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ์ง์ ‘ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๋ฉฐ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์‹คํ—˜์€ ํ•ด์šด ํšŒ์‚ฌ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์˜์ง„์ด๋‚˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„์ž๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ฃผ์š”ํ•œ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ์ธ์‚ฌ์ดํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. (i)์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋‘ ์ง€์—ญ ๊ฐ„ ์–‘์ž ๋ฌด์—ญ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์–‘๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ๋„ค ๋‹จ๊ณ„ ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋ง์—์„œ ๊ณต ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ์ „๋žต์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ „๋žต์€ ํ™˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋†’์€ ํ•ด์ƒ ์šด์†ก ๋น„์šฉ๊ณผ ๊ธด ๋ฐฐ์†ก ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ์ค„์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์งํ•ญ ์ˆ˜์†ก์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ ํƒ๋œ ํ•ญ๊ตฌ ์ค‘ ์žฌ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ํ•  ๊ณต ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ์ˆ˜, ์ž„๋Œ€ ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ์ˆ˜, ๋‘ ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ถœ์—…์ž์™€ ์ˆ˜์ž…์—…์ž์˜ ์ โˆ™๊ณต ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์š”๋ฅผ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ์„ ํƒ์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค. APSO ๋ฐ ํœด๋ฆฌ์Šคํ‹ฑ์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ํ•ด๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋น„๊ต ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. (ii)์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ตœ์  devanning time ๊ฒฐ์ •์„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ๊ณต ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ์˜ ๋ฐ˜ํ™˜ ์ง€์—ฐ๊ณผ ํ•ด๋‹น ์ˆ˜์ˆ˜๋ฃŒ ๋ถ€๊ณผ ๊ฒฐ์ • ํ”„๋กœ์„ธ์Šค์™€ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ โˆ™๊ณต ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋ง ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ์ •์ฑ…์ (๋ถ„๊ถŒํ™” ๋ฐ ์ค‘์•™ ์ง‘์ค‘ํ™”) ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ •์‹œ ๋ฐ˜ํ™˜์œจ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์ฃผ์š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ธก์ •์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฒฐ์ •๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ •์ฑ… ์‹คํ–‰์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ ์šฉํ•œ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ์ธ์‚ฌ์ดํŠธ๋Š” ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ๋น„๊ต ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์—์„œ ๋„์ถœํ•œ๋‹ค. (iii)์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์‹œ์— ์•„ํฌ ๋ฐ ๋…ธ๋“œ failure๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์„ ๋•Œ street-turn ๋ฐ ๊ณต ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ์žฌ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ ์ด ๋น„์šฉ์„ ๊ตฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ค‘๋‹จ์ด ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋ง ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ disruption ๋น„์šฉ์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋”๋ถˆ์–ด ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์ปจํ…Œ์ด๋„ˆ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ํ๋ฆ„์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ์„ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์  ์ธ์‚ฌ์ดํŠธ๋„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค.Abstract i Contents ii List of Tables vi List of Figures viii 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Empty Container Repositioning Problem 1 1.2 Reliability Problem 3 1.3 Research Motivation and Contributions 4 1.4 Outline of the Dissertation 7 2. Two-Way Four-Echelon Container Supply Chain 8 2.1 Problem Description and Literature Review 8 2.2 Mathematical Model for the TFESC 15 2.2.1 Overview and Assumptions 15 2.2.2 Notation and Formulation 19 2.3 Solution Procedure for the TFESC 25 2.3.1 Pseudo-Function-based Optimization Problem 25 2.3.2 Objective Function Evaluation 28 2.3.3 Heuristics for Reducing the Number of Leased Containers 32 2.3.4 Accelerated Particle Swarm Optimization 34 2.4 Computational Experiments 37 2.4.1 Heuristic Performances 39 2.4.2 Senstivity Analysis of Varying Periods 42 2.4.3 Senstivity Analysis of Varying Number of Echelons 45 2.5 Summary 48 3. Laden and Empty Container Supply Chain under Decentralized and Centralized Policies 50 3.1 Problem Description and Literature Review 50 3.2 Scenario-based Model for the LESC-DC 57 3.3 Model Development for the LESC-DC 61 3.3.1 Centralized Policy 65 3.3.2 Decentralized Policies (Policies I and II) 67 3.4 Computational Experiments 70 3.4.1 Numerical Exmpale 70 3.4.2 Sensitivity Analysis of Varying Degree of Risk in Container Return 72 3.4.3 Sensitivity Analysis of Increasing L_0 74 3.4.4 Sensitivity Analysis of Increasing t_r 76 3.4.5 Sensitivity Analysis of Decreasing es and Increasing e_f 77 3.4.6 Sensitivity Analysis of Discounting ใ€–pnใ€—_{f1} and ใ€–pnใ€—_{f2} 78 3.4.7 Sensitivity Analysis of Different Container Fleet Sizes 79 3.5 Managerial Insights 81 3.6 Summary 83 4. Reliable Container Supply Chain under Disruption 84 4.1 Problem Description and Literature Review 84 4.2 Mathematical Model for the RCNF 90 4.3 Reliability Model under Disruption 95 4.3.1 Designing the Patterns of q and s 95 4.3.2 Objective Function for the RCNF Model 98 4.4 Computational Experiments 103 4.4.1 Sensitivity Analysis of Expected Failure Costs 106 4.4.2 Sensitivity Analysis of Different Network Structures 109 4.4.3 Sensitivity Analysis of Demand-Supply Variation 112 4.4.4 Managerial Insights 115 4.5 Summary 116 5. Conclusions and Future Research 117 Appendices 120 A Proof of Proposition 3.1 121 B Proof of Proposition 3.2 124 C Proof of Proposition 3.3 126 D Sensitivity Analyses for Results 129 E Data for Sensitivity Analyses 142 Bibliography 146 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 157 ๊ฐ์‚ฌ์˜ ๊ธ€ 160Docto

    Optimising the climate resilience of shipping networks

    Get PDF
    Climate catastrophes (e.g. hurricane, flooding and heat waves) are generating increasing impact on port operations and hence configuration of shipping networks. This paper formulates the routing problem to optimise the resilience of shipping networks, by taking into account the disruptions due to climate risks to port operations. It first describes a literature review with the emphasis on environmental sustainability, port disruptions due to climate extremes and routing optimisation in shipping operations. Second, a centrality assessment of port cities by a novel multi-centrality-based indicator is implemented. Third, a climate resilience model is developed by incorporating the port disruption days by climate risks into shipping route optimisation. Its main contribution is constructing a novel methodology to connect climate risk indices, centrality assessment, and shipping routing to observe the changes of global shipping network by climate change impacts
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore