Combining Task-level and System-level Scheduling Modes for Mixed Criticality Systems

Different scheduling algorithms for mixed criticality systems have been recently proposed. The common denominator of these algorithms is to discard low critical tasks whenever high critical tasks are in lack of computation resources. This is achieved upon a switch of the scheduling mode from Normal to Critical. We distinguish two main categories of the algorithms: system-level mode switch and task-level mode switch. System-level mode algorithms allow low criticality (LC) tasks to execute only in normal mode. Task-level mode switch algorithms enable to switch the mode of an individual high criticality task (HC), from low (LO) to high (HI), to obtain priority over all LC tasks. This paper investigates an online scheduling algorithm for mixed-criticality systems that supports dynamic mode switches for both task level and system level. When a HC task job overruns its LC budget, then only that particular job is switched to HI mode. If the job cannot be accommodated, then the system switches to Critical mode. To accommodate for resource availability of the HC jobs, the LC tasks are degraded by stretching their periods until the Critical mode exhibiting job complete its execution. The stretching will be carried out until the resource availability is met. We have mechanized and implemented the proposed algorithm using Uppaal. To study the efficiency of our scheduling algorithm, we examine a case study and compare our results to the state of the art algorithms.Comment: \copyright 2019 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other work

Utilization-Based Scheduling of Flexible Mixed-Criticality Real-Time Tasks

Mixed-criticality models are an emerging paradigm for the design of real-time systems because of their significantly improved resource efficiency. However, formal mixed-criticality models have traditionally been characterized by two impractical assumptions: once \textit{any} high-criticality task overruns, \textit{all} low-criticality tasks are suspended and \textit{all other} high-criticality tasks are assumed to exhibit high-criticality behaviors at the same time. In this paper, we propose a more realistic mixed-criticality model, called the flexible mixed-criticality (FMC) model, in which these two issues are addressed in a combined manner. In this new model, only the overrun task itself is assumed to exhibit high-criticality behavior, while other high-criticality tasks remain in the same mode as before. The guaranteed service levels of low-criticality tasks are gracefully degraded with the overruns of high-criticality tasks. We derive a utilization-based technique to analyze the schedulability of this new mixed-criticality model under EDF-VD scheduling. During runtime, the proposed test condition serves an important criterion for dynamic service level tuning, by means of which the maximum available execution budget for low-criticality tasks can be directly determined with minimal overhead while guaranteeing mixed-criticality schedulability. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the FMC scheme compared with state-of-the-art techniques.Comment: This paper has been submitted to IEEE Transaction on Computers (TC) on Sept-09th-201

A Survey of Research into Mixed Criticality Systems

This survey covers research into mixed criticality systems that has been published since Vestal’s seminal paper in 2007, up until the end of 2016. The survey is organised along the lines of the major research areas within this topic. These include single processor analysis (including fixed priority and EDF scheduling, shared resources and static and synchronous scheduling), multiprocessor analysis, realistic models, and systems issues. The survey also explores the relationship between research into mixed criticality systems and other topics such as hard and soft time constraints, fault tolerant scheduling, hierarchical scheduling, cyber physical systems, probabilistic real-time systems, and industrial safety standards

Precise energy efficient scheduling of mixed-criticality tasks & sustainable mixed-criticality scheduling

In this thesis, the imprecise mixed-criticality model (IMC) is extended to precise scheduling of tasks, and integrated with the dynamic voltage and frequency scaling (DVFS) technique to enable energy minimization. The challenge in precise scheduling of MC systems is to simultaneously guarantee the timing correctness for all tasks, hi and lo, under both pessimistic and optimistic (less pessimistic) assumptions. To the best of knowledge this is the first work to address the integration of DVFS energy conserving techniques with precise scheduling of lo-tasks of the MC model. In this thesis, the utilization based schedulability tests and sufficient conditions for such systems under Earliest Deadline First EDF-VD scheduling policy are presented. Quantitative study in the forms of speedup bound and approximation ratio are also proved for the unified model. Extensive experimental studies are conducted to verify the theoretical results as well as the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. In safety- critical systems, it is essential to perform schedulability analysis prior to run-time. Parameters characterizing the run-time workload are generated by pessimistic techniques; hence, adopting conservative estimates may result in systems performing much better than anticipated during run-time. This thesis also addresses the following questions associated to the better performance of the task system: (i) How does parameter change affect the schedulability of a task set (system)? (ii) In the event that a mixed-criticality system design is deemed schedulable and specific part/parts of the system are reassigned to be of low-criticality, is the system still safe to run? (iii) If a system is presumed to be non-schedulable, does it invariably benefit to reduce the criticality of some task? To answer these questions, in this thesis, we not only study the property of sustainability with regards to criticality levels, but also revisit sustainability of several uniprocessor and multiprocessor scheduling policies with respect to other parameters --Abstract, page iii

How realistic is the mixed-criticality real-time system model?

23rd International Conference on Real-Time Networks and Systems (RTNS 2015). 4 to 6, Nov, 2015, Main Track. Lille, France. Best Paper Award NomineeWith the rapid evolution of commercial hardware platforms, in most application domains, the industry has shown a growing interest in integrating and running independently-developed applications of different “criticalities” in the same multicore platform. Such integrated systems are commonly referred to as mixed-criticality systems (MCS). Most of the MCS-related research published in the state-of-the-art cite the safety-related standards associated to each application domain (e.g. aeronautics, space, railway, automotive) to justify their methods and results. However, those standards are not, in most cases, freely available, and do not always clearly and explicitly specify the requirements for mixed-criticality systems. This paper addresses the important challenge of unveiling the relevant information available in some of the safety-related standards, such that the mixed-criticality concept is understood from an industrialist’s perspective. Moreover, the paper evaluates the state-of-the-art mixed-criticality real-time scheduling models and algorithms against the safety-related standards and clarifies some misconceptions that are commonly encountered

Adaptive Mid-term and Short-term Scheduling of Mixed-criticality Systems

A mixed-criticality real-time system is a real-time system having multiple tasks classified according to their criticality. Research on mixed-criticality systems started to provide an effective and cost efficient a priori verification process for safety critical systems. The higher the criticality of a task within a system and the more the system should guarantee the required level of service for it. However, such model poses new challenges with respect to scheduling and fault tolerance within real-time systems. Currently, mixed-criticality scheduling protocols severely degrade lower criticality tasks in case of resource shortage to provide the required level of service for the most critical ones. The actual research challenge in this field is to devise robust scheduling protocols to minimise the impact on less critical tasks. This dissertation introduces two approaches, one short-term and the other medium-term, to appropriately allocate computing resources to tasks within mixed-criticality systems both on uniprocessor and multiprocessor systems. The short-term strategy consists of a protocol named Lazy Bailout Protocol (LBP) to schedule mixed-criticality task sets on single core architectures. Scheduling decisions are made about tasks that are active in the ready queue and that have to be dispatched to the CPU. LBP minimises the service degradation for lower criticality tasks by providing to them a background execution during the system idle time. After, I refined LBP with variants that aim to further increase the service level provided for lower criticality tasks. However, this is achieved at an increased cost of either system offline analysis or complexity at runtime. The second approach, named Adaptive Tolerance-based Mixed-criticality Protocol (ATMP), decides at runtime which task has to be allocated to the active cores according to the available resources. ATMP permits to optimise the overall system utility by tuning the system workload in case of shortage of computing capacity at runtime. Unlike the majority of current mixed-criticality approaches, ATMP allows to smoothly degrade also higher criticality tasks to keep allocated lower criticality ones

Combined Scheduling of Time-Triggered Plans and Priority Scheduled Task Sets

© Owner/Author (2016). This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive Version of Record was published in ACM SIGAda Ada Letters, 36(1), 68-76, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/10.1145/2971571.2971580.[EN] Preemptive, priority-based scheduling on the one hand, and time-triggered scheduling on the other, are the two major techniques in use for development of real-time and embedded software. Both have their advantages and drawbacks with respect to the other, and are commonly adopted in mutual exclusion. In a previous paper, we proposed a software architecture that enables the combined and controlled execution of time-triggered plans and priority-scheduled tasks. The goal was to take advantage of the best of both approaches by providing deterministic, jitter-controlled execution of time-triggered tasks (e.g., control tasks), coexisting with a set of priority-scheduled tasks, with less demanding jitter requirements. In this paper, we briefly describe the approach, in which the time-triggered plan is executed at the highest priority level, controlled by scheduling decisions taken only at particular points in time, signalled by recurrent timing events. The rest of priority levels are used by a set of concurrent tasks scheduled by static or dynamic priorities. We also discuss several open issues such as schedulability analysis, use of the approach in multiprocessor architectures, usability in mixed-criticality systems and needed changes to make this approach Ravenscar compliant.This work has been partly supported by the Spanish Government’s project M2C2 (TIN2014-56158-C4-1-P-AR) and the European Commission’s project EMC2 (ARTEMIS-JU Call 2013 AIPP-5, Contract 621429).Real Sáez, JV.; Sáez Barona, S.; Crespo Lorente, A. (2016). Combined Scheduling of Time-Triggered Plans and Priority Scheduled Task Sets. Ada Letters. 36(1):68-76. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971571.2971580S6876361T. P. Baker and A. Shaw. The cyclic executive model and Ada. In Proceedings IEEE Real Time Systems Symposium 1988, Huntsville, Alabama, pages 120--129, 1988.P. Balbastre, I. Ripoll, J. Vidal, and A. Crespo. A Task Model to Reduce Control Delays. Real-Time Systems, 27(3):215--236, September 2004.A. Burns and R. Davis. Mixed Criticality Systems - A Review. Technical report, Depatment of Computer Science, University of York, 2013.A. Cervin. Integrated Control and Real-Time Scheduling. PhD thesis, Lund Institute of Technology, April 2003.R. Dobrin. Combining Offline Schedule Construction and Fixed Priority Scheduling in Real-Time Computer Systems. PhD thesis, Mälardalen University, 2005.S. Hong, X. Hu, and M. Lemmon. Reducing Delay Jitter of Real-Time Control Tasks through Adaptive Deadline Adjustments. In IEEE Computer Society, editor, 22nd Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems -- ECRTS, pages 229--238, 2010.J. W. S. Liu. Real-Time Systems. Prentice-Hall Inc., 2000.J. Palencia and M. González-Harbour. Schedulability Analysis for Tasks with Static and Dynamic Offsets. In 9th IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium, 1998.M. J. Pont. The Engineering of Reliable Embedded Systems: LPC1769 edition. Number ISBN: 978-0-9930355-0-0. SafeTTy Systems Limited, 2014.J. Real and A. Crespo. Incorporating Operating Modes to an Ada Real-Time Framework. Ada Letters, 30(1):73--85, April 2010.J. Real, S. Sáez, and A. Crespo. Combining time-triggered plans with priority scheduled task sets. In M. Bertogna and L. M. Pinho, editors, Reliable Software Technologies -- Ada-Europe 2016, volume 9695 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, June 2016.S. Sáez, J. Real, and A. Crespo. An integrated framework for multiprocessor, multimoded real-time applications. In M. Brorsson and L. Pinho, editors, Reliable Software Technologies -- Ada-Europe 2012, volume 7308, pages 18--34. Springer-Verlag, June 2012.S. Sáez, J. Real, and A. Crespo. Implementation of Timing-Event Anities in Ada/Linux. Ada Letters, 35(1), April 2015.A. J. Wellings and A. Burns. A Framework for Real-Time Utilities for Ada 2005. Ada Letters, XXVII(2), August 2007