Extending the concept of emotion regulation with model-based fMRI

Effective emotion regulation is essential for our social and emotional well-being. Yet, the concept of emotion regulation, as it is conventionally regarded in the field, does not take important aspects of emotions and emotion regulation into account. The overarching aim of the current thesis was to include such missing aspects and thereby expand the concept of emotion regulation. The expansion occurred in two directions: firstly, the definition of emotion within the field of emotion regulation was widened to include the motivational aspect of emotions in terms of value-based prediction errors and their neural implementation; and secondly, an underestimated type of emotion regulation – the social emotion regulation – and its neural underpinnings were investigated. Projects 1 and 2 of the current thesis expand the emotion part of emotion regulation. Project 1 investigated whether emotion regulation affects not only emotional response-related brain activity but also influences aversive prediction error-related activity, i.e., the motivation-related brain signal. We found that self- initiated reappraisal, a type of cognitive emotion regulation, indeed affected prediction error-related activity, such that this activity was enhanced in the ventral tegmental area, ventral striatum, insula and hippocampus, possibly via a prefrontal-tegmental pathway. Project 2 further examined the way emotion regulation affects emotions and prediction errors, by testing whether self- initiated reappraisal directly targets the brain network for motivated behaviour previously outlined by animal studies. We found that superior (in contrast to inferior) regulators affected the balance of competing influences of ventral striatal afferents on striatal aversive prediction error signals; they reduced the impact of subcortical striatal afferents (i.e., hippocampus, amygdala and ventral tegmental area), while keeping the influence of the prefrontal cortex on ventral striatal prediction errors constant. Inferior regulators, on the other hand, failed to supress subcortical inputs into the ventral striatum and instead counterproductively reduced the prefrontal influence on ventral striatal prediction error signals. Projects 3 and 4 of the thesis extend the regulation part of emotion regulation. Project 3 explored the neural correlates of social cognitive emotion regulation, specifically reappraisal, and directly compared them with those of self-initiated reappraisal. We found that regions of the anterior, the medial parietal, and the lateral temporo-parietal default mode network were specifically involved in social emotion regulation, and that social regulation success and the default mode network involvement during regulation were related to participants’ attachment security scores. Project 4 investigated social emotion modulation and its impact on two distinct types of emotional brain activity – emotional response- and aversive prediction error-related activity. We found – for the simple contrast of being with somebody versus being alone – a three-fold dissociation between signal types and insula subregions, including left and right anterior and posterior insula parts. Social emotion modulation reduced aversive stimulus-related activity in the posterior insula, while simultaneously increasing aversive prediction error-related activity in the anterior insula. Furthermore, the social effect on prediction error-related activity was positively associated with aversive learning in the right, but negatively in the left anterior insula. Altogether, by expanding the concept of emotion regulation, projects of the current thesis provide new insights into both the effects and the neural underpinnings of three distinct emotion regulation types. Considering that problems in both intrapersonal emotion regulation and social interaction are linked to affective disorders, our findings might contribute to a better understanding of these disorders and the disorder-specific emotional and social impairments

Cognitive strategies regulate fictive, but not reward prediction error signals in a sequential investment task.

Computational models of reward processing suggest that foregone or fictive outcomes serve as important information sources for learning and augment those generated by experienced rewards (e.g. reward prediction errors). An outstanding question is how these learning signals interact with top-down cognitive influences, such as cognitive reappraisal strategies. Using a sequential investment task and functional magnetic resonance imaging, we show that the reappraisal strategy selectively attenuates the influence of fictive, but not reward prediction error signals on investment behavior; such behavioral effect is accompanied by changes in neural activity and connectivity in the anterior insular cortex, a brain region thought to integrate subjective feelings with high-order cognition. Furthermore, individuals differ in the extent to which their behaviors are driven by fictive errors versus reward prediction errors, and the reappraisal strategy interacts with such individual differences; a finding also accompanied by distinct underlying neural mechanisms. These findings suggest that the variable interaction of cognitive strategies with two important classes of computational learning signals (fictive, reward prediction error) represent one contributing substrate for the variable capacity of individuals to control their behavior based on foregone rewards. These findings also expose important possibilities for understanding the lack of control in addiction based on possibly foregone rewarding outcomes. Hum Brain Mapp 35:3738-3749, 2014. © 2013 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc

Extending the concept of emotion regulation with model-based fMRI

Effective emotion regulation is essential for our social and emotional well-being. Yet, the concept of emotion regulation, as it is conventionally regarded in the field, does not take important aspects of emotions and emotion regulation into account. The overarching aim of the current thesis was to include such missing aspects and thereby expand the concept of emotion regulation. The expansion occurred in two directions: firstly, the definition of emotion within the field of emotion regulation was widened to include the motivational aspect of emotions in terms of value-based prediction errors and their neural implementation; and secondly, an underestimated type of emotion regulation – the social emotion regulation – and its neural underpinnings were investigated. Projects 1 and 2 of the current thesis expand the emotion part of emotion regulation. Project 1 investigated whether emotion regulation affects not only emotional response-related brain activity but also influences aversive prediction error-related activity, i.e., the motivation-related brain signal. We found that self- initiated reappraisal, a type of cognitive emotion regulation, indeed affected prediction error-related activity, such that this activity was enhanced in the ventral tegmental area, ventral striatum, insula and hippocampus, possibly via a prefrontal-tegmental pathway. Project 2 further examined the way emotion regulation affects emotions and prediction errors, by testing whether self- initiated reappraisal directly targets the brain network for motivated behaviour previously outlined by animal studies. We found that superior (in contrast to inferior) regulators affected the balance of competing influences of ventral striatal afferents on striatal aversive prediction error signals; they reduced the impact of subcortical striatal afferents (i.e., hippocampus, amygdala and ventral tegmental area), while keeping the influence of the prefrontal cortex on ventral striatal prediction errors constant. Inferior regulators, on the other hand, failed to supress subcortical inputs into the ventral striatum and instead counterproductively reduced the prefrontal influence on ventral striatal prediction error signals. Projects 3 and 4 of the thesis extend the regulation part of emotion regulation. Project 3 explored the neural correlates of social cognitive emotion regulation, specifically reappraisal, and directly compared them with those of self-initiated reappraisal. We found that regions of the anterior, the medial parietal, and the lateral temporo-parietal default mode network were specifically involved in social emotion regulation, and that social regulation success and the default mode network involvement during regulation were related to participants’ attachment security scores. Project 4 investigated social emotion modulation and its impact on two distinct types of emotional brain activity – emotional response- and aversive prediction error-related activity. We found – for the simple contrast of being with somebody versus being alone – a three-fold dissociation between signal types and insula subregions, including left and right anterior and posterior insula parts. Social emotion modulation reduced aversive stimulus-related activity in the posterior insula, while simultaneously increasing aversive prediction error-related activity in the anterior insula. Furthermore, the social effect on prediction error-related activity was positively associated with aversive learning in the right, but negatively in the left anterior insula. Altogether, by expanding the concept of emotion regulation, projects of the current thesis provide new insights into both the effects and the neural underpinnings of three distinct emotion regulation types. Considering that problems in both intrapersonal emotion regulation and social interaction are linked to affective disorders, our findings might contribute to a better understanding of these disorders and the disorder-specific emotional and social impairments

The Neurobiology of Personal Control During Reward Learning and Its Relationship to Mood

Copyright © 2018 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Regulating craving by anticipating positive and negative outcomes : a multivariate pattern analysis and network connectivity approach

During self-control, we may resist short-term temptations in order to reach a favorable future (e.g., resisting cake to stay healthy). The neural basis of self-control is typically attributed to “cold,” unemotional cognitive control mechanisms which inhibit affect-related regions via the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Here, we investigate the neural underpinnings of regulating cravings by mentally evoking the positive consequences of resisting a temptation (e.g., being healthy) as opposed to evoking the negative consequences of giving in to a temptation (e.g., becoming overweight). It is conceivable that when using these types of strategies, regions associated with emotional processing [e.g., striatum, ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)] are involved in addition to control-related prefrontal and parietal regions. Thirty-one participants saw pictures of unhealthy snacks in the fMRI scanner and, depending on the trial, regulated their craving by thinking of the positive consequences of resisting, or the negative consequences of not resisting. In a control condition, they anticipated the pleasure of eating and thus, allowed the craving to occur (now-condition). In line with previous studies, we found activation of a cognitive control network during self-regulation. In the negative future thinking condition, the insula was more active than in the positive condition, while there were no activations that were stronger in the positive (> negative) future thinking condition. However, additionally, multivariate pattern analysis showed that during craving regulation, information about the valence of anticipated emotions was present in the vmPFC, the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and the insula. Moreover, a network including vmPFC and PCC showed higher connectivity during the positive (> negative) future thinking condition. Since these regions are often associated with affective processing, these findings suggest that “hot,” affective processes may, at least in certain circumstances, play a role in self-control

Flexibly adapting to emotional cues: Examining the functional and structural correlates of emotional reactivity and emotion control in healthy and depressed individuals

The ability of emotionally significant stimuli to bias our behaviour is an evolutionarily adaptive phenomenon. However, sometimes emotions become excessive, inappropriate, and even pathological, like in major depressive disorder (MDD). Emotional flexibility includes both the neural processes involved in reacting to, or representing, emotional significance, and those involved in controlling emotional reactivity. MDD represents a potentially distinct form of emotion (in)flexibility, and therefore offers a unique perspective for understanding both the integration of conflicting emotional cues and the neural regions involved in actively controlling emotional systems. The present investigation of emotional flexibility began by considering the functional neural correlates of competing socio-emotional cues and effortful emotion regulation in MDD using both negative and positive emotions. Study 1 revealed greater amygdala activity in MDD relative to control participants when negative cues were centrally presented and task-relevant. No significant between-group differences were observed in the amygdala for peripheral task-irrelevant negative distracters. However, controls demonstrated greater recruitment of the ventrolateral (vlPFC) and dorsomedial prefrontal cortices (dmPFC) implicated in emotion control. Conversely, attenuated amygdala activity for task-relevant and irrelevant positive cues was observed in depressed participants. In Study 2, effortful emotion regulation using strategies adapted from cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) revealed greater activity in regions of the dorsal and lateral prefrontal cortices in both MDD and control participants when attempting to either down-regulate negative or up-regulate positive emotions. During the down-regulation of negative cues, only controls displayed a significant reduction of amygdala activity. In Study 3, an individual differences approach using multiple regression revealed that while greater amygdala-vmPFC structural connectivity was associated with low trait-anxiety, greater connectivity between amygdala and regions of occipitotemporal and parietal cortices was associated with high trait-anxiety. These findings are discussed with respect to current models of emotional reactivity and emotion control derived from studies of both healthy individuals and those with emotional disorders, particularly depression. The focus is on amygdala variability in differing contexts, the role of the vmPFC in the modulation of amygdala activity via learning processes, and the modulation of emotion by attention or cognitive control mechanisms initiated by regions of frontoparietal cortices