Some Issues on Ontology Integration

The word integration has been used with different meanings in the ontology field. This article aims at clarifying the meaning of the word “integration” and presenting some of the relevant work done in integration. We identify three meanings of ontology “integration”: when building a new ontology reusing (by assembling, extending, specializing or adapting) other ontologies already available; when building an ontology by merging several ontologies into a single one that unifies all of them; when building an application using one or more ontologies. We discuss the different meanings of “integration”, identify the main characteristics of the three different processes and proposethree words to distinguish among those meanings:integration, merge and use

Overview of methodologies for building ontologies

A few research groups are now proposing a series of steps and methodologies for developing ontologies. However, mainly due to the fact that Ontological Engineering is still a relatively immature discipline, each work group employs its own methodology. Our goal is to present the most representative methodologies used in ontology development and to perform an analysis of such methodologies against the same framework of reference. So, the goal of this paper is not to provide new insights about methodologies, but to put it all in one place and help people to select which methodology to use

An ontology roadmap for crowdsourcing innovation intermediaries

Ontologies have proliferated in the last years, essentially justified by the need of achieving a consensus in the multiple representations of reality inside computers, and therefore the accomplishment of interoperability between machines and systems. Ontologies provide an explicit conceptualization that describes the semantics of the data. Crowdsourcing innovation intermediaries are organizations that mediate the communication and relationship between companies that aspire to solve some problem or to take advantage of any business opportunity with a crowd that is prone to give ideas based on their knowledge, experience and wisdom, taking advantage of web 2.0 tools. Various ontologies have emerged, but at the best of our knowledge, there isn’t any ontology that represents the entire process of intermediation of crowdsourcing innovation. In this paper we present an ontology roadmap for developing crowdsourcing innovation ontology of the intermediation process. Over the years, several authors have proposed some distinct methodologies, by different proposals of combining practices, activities, languages, according to the project they were involved in. We start making a literature review on ontology building, and analyse and compare ontologies that propose the development from scratch with the ones that propose reusing other ontologies. We also review enterprise and innovation ontologies known in literature. Finally, are presented the criteria for selecting the methodology and the roadmap for building crowdsourcing innovation intermediary ontology.(undefined

A methodology for designing layered ontology structures

Semantic ontologies represent the knowledge from different domains, which is used as a knowledge base by intelligent agents. The creation of ontologies by different developers leads to heterogeneous ontologies, which hampers the interoperability between knowledge-based applications. This interoperability is achieved through global ontologies, which provide a common domain representation. Global ontologies must provide a balance of reusability-usability to minimise the ontology effort in different applications. To achieve this balance, ontology design methodologies focus on designing layered ontologies that classify into abstraction layers the domain knowledge relevant to many applications and the knowledge relevant to specific applications. During the design of the layered ontology structure, the domain knowledge classification is performed from scratch by domain experts and ontology engineers in collaboration with application stakeholders. Hence, the design of reusable and usable ontologies in complex domains takes a significant effort. Software Product Line (SPL) design techniques can be applied to facilitate the domain knowledge classification by analysing the knowledge similarities/differences of existing ontologies. In this context, this thesis aims to define new methodological guidelines to design layered ontology structures that enable to classify the domain knowledge taking as reference existing ontologies, and to apply these guidelines to enable the development of reusable and usable ontologies in complex domains. The MODDALS methodology guides the design of layered ontology structures for reusable and usable ontologies. It brings together SPL engineering techniques and ontology design techniques to enable the classification of the domain knowledge by exploiting the knowledge similarities/differences of existing ontologies. MODDALS eases the design of the layered ontology structure. The MODDALS methodology was evaluated by applying it to design the layered structure of a reusable and usable global ontology for the energy domain. The designed layered structure was taken as reference to develop the ontology. The resulting ontology simplifies the ontology reuse process in different applications. In particular, it reduced the average ontology reuse time by 0.5 and 1.2 person-hours in in two different applications in comparison with a global energy ontology which does not follow a layered structure.Ontologia semantikoak datu domeinu ezberdinen ezagutza irudikatzen dute, agente adimendunek jakintza oinarri bezala erabiltzen dutena. Ontologiak ingeniari desberdinek garatzen dituzte eta heterogeneoak dira, aplikazioen arteko komunikazioa oztopatuz. Komunikazio hau ontologia globalen bidez lortzen da, domeinuaren errepresentazio komun bat ematen baitute. Ontologia globalek berrerabilgarritasunerabilgarritasun oreka eman behar dute aplikazio desberdinetan berrerabiltzeko ahalegina murrizteko. Horretarako, ontologia diseinu metodologiek aplikazio askok erabiltzen duten eta aplikazio zehatzetarako garrantzitsua den ezagutza abstrakzio geruzetan sailkatzea proposatzen dute. Geruza egituraren diseinuan zehar, domeinuko adituek eta ontologiako ingeniariek hutsetik sailkatzen dute jakintza, domeinu konplexuetan ontologia berrerabilgarriak eta erabilgarrien diseinu ahalegina areagotuz. Software produktu lerroak diseinatzeko erabiltzen diren teknikak jakintza sailkatzea erraztu ahal dute, ontologien ezagutza antzekotasunak edo desberdintasunak aztertuz. Testuinguru honetan, honakoa da tesiaren helburua: ezagutza garatutako ontologien arabera sailkatzen duen ontologia berrerabilgarri eta erabilgarrien geruza egitura diseinatzeko metodologia bat garatzea; baita metodologia aplikatu ere, ontologia berrerabilgarri eta erabilgarriak domeinu konplexuetan garatu ahal izateko. MODDALS metodologiak ontologia berrerabilgarri eta erabilgarrien abstrakzio geruzak nola diseinatu azaltzen du. MODDALS-ek software produktu lerro eta ontologia diseinu teknikak aplikatzen ditu ezagutza garatuta dauden ontologien antzekotasunen/desberdintasunen arabera sailkatzeko. Planteamendu honek geruza egitura diseinua errazten du. MODDALS ebaluatu da energia domeinurako ontologia berrerabilgarri eta erabilgarri baten egitura diseinatzeko aplikatuz. Diseinatutako geruza egitura erreferentzia gisa hartu da ontologia gartzeko. Egitura onekin, garatutako ontologia berrerabiltzea errazten du aplikazio desberdinetan. Konkretuki, garatutako ontologiak berrerabilpen denbora 0.5 eta 1.2 pertsona-orduetan murriztu du bi aplikazioetan; geruza egitura jarraitzen ez duen ontologia batekin alderatuz.Las ontologías semánticas representan el conocimiento de diferentes dominios, utilizado como base de conocimiento por agentes inteligentes. Las ontologías son desarrolladas por diferentes ingenieros y son heterogéneas, afectando a la interoperabilidad entre aplicaciones. Esta interoperabilidad se logra mediante ontologías globales que proporcionan una representación común del dominio, las cuales deben proporcionar un balance de reusabilidad-usabilidad para minimizar el esfuerzo de reutilización en diferentes aplicaciones. Para lograr este balance, las metodologías de diseño de ontologías proponen clasificar en capas de abstracción el conocimiento del dominio común a muchas aplicaciones y el que es relevante para aplicaciones específicas. Durante el diseño de la estructura de capas, el conocimiento se clasifica partiendo de cero por expertos del dominio e ingenieros de ontologías. Por lo tanto, el diseño de ontologías reusables y usables en dominios complejos requiere un gran esfuerzo. Las técnicas de diseño de líneas de producto de software pueden facilitar la clasificación del conocimiento analizando las similitudes/diferencias de conocimiento de ontologías existentes. En este contexto, el objetivo de la tesis es crear una metodología de diseño de la estructura de capas para ontologías que permita clasificar el conocimiento tomando como referencia ontologías existentes, y aplicar esta metodología para poder desarrollar ontologías reusables y usables en dominios complejos. La metodología MODDALS explica cómo diseñar estructuras de capas para ontologías reusables y usables. MODDALS adopta técnicas de diseño de líneas de producto en combinación con técnicas de diseño de ontologías para clasificar el conocimiento basándose en las similitudes/diferencias de ontologías existentes. Este enfoque facilita el diseño de la estructura de capas de la ontología. La metodología MODDALS se ha evaluado aplicándola para diseñar la estructura de capas de una ontología global reusable y usable para el dominio de la energía. La estructura de capas diseñada se ha tomado como referencia para desarrollar la ontología. Con esta estructura, la ontología resultante simplifica la reutilización de ontologías en diferentes aplicaciones. En concreto, la ontología redujo el tiempo de reutilización en 0.5 y 1.2 personas-hora en dos aplicaciones respecto a una ontología global que no sigue una estructura por capas

Ontology Building: An Integrative View of Methodologies

Ontologies are being developed and used in many disciplines now a day and they have become a key tool of data integration and knowledge representation in different domains of interest. The ontology building process identifies the stages through which the ontology should go through during its development. There is a certain set of activities to be performed in each stage of the ontology development process and different methodologies have been proposed by researchers for formalizing the different stages. The present paper investigates the most representative methodologies used in the ontology development to look at the different activities that are performed during the process of ontology development. The paper further attempts to provide an integrative view of the most representative methodologies used in the ontology development to look at the set of different activities that can be performed during the process of the ontology development. DOI: 10.17762/ijritcc2321-8169.15076

Knowledge formalization in experience feedback processes : an ontology-based approach

Because of the current trend of integration and interoperability of industrial systems, their size and complexity continue to grow making it more difficult to analyze, to understand and to solve the problems that happen in their organizations. Continuous improvement methodologies are powerful tools in order to understand and to solve problems, to control the effects of changes and finally to capitalize knowledge about changes and improvements. These tools involve suitably represent knowledge relating to the concerned system. Consequently, knowledge management (KM) is an increasingly important source of competitive advantage for organizations. Particularly, the capitalization and sharing of knowledge resulting from experience feedback are elements which play an essential role in the continuous improvement of industrial activities. In this paper, the contribution deals with semantic interoperability and relates to the structuring and the formalization of an experience feedback (EF) process aiming at transforming information or understanding gained by experience into explicit knowledge. The reuse of such knowledge has proved to have significant impact on achieving themissions of companies. However, the means of describing the knowledge objects of an experience generally remain informal. Based on an experience feedback process model and conceptual graphs, this paper takes domain ontology as a framework for the clarification of explicit knowledge and know-how, the aim of which is to get lessons learned descriptions that are significant, correct and applicable

Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies. Where is their meeting point?

In this paper we review and compare the main methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies that have been reported in the literature, as well as the main relationships among them. Ontology technology is nowadays mature enough: many methodologies, tools and languages are already available. The future work in this field should be driven towards the creation of a common integrated workbench for ontology developers to facilitate ontology development, exchange, evaluation, evolution and management, to provide methodological support for these tasks, and translations to and from different ontology languages. This workbench should not be created from scratch, but instead integrating the technology components that are currently available