6,297 research outputs found
Bounds on the Voter Model in Dynamic Networks
In the voter model, each node of a graph has an opinion, and in every round
each node chooses independently a random neighbour and adopts its opinion. We
are interested in the consensus time, which is the first point in time where
all nodes have the same opinion. We consider dynamic graphs in which the edges
are rewired in every round (by an adversary) giving rise to the graph sequence
, where we assume that has conductance at least
. We assume that the degrees of nodes don't change over time as one can
show that the consensus time can become super-exponential otherwise. In the
case of a sequence of -regular graphs, we obtain asymptotically tight
results. Even for some static graphs, such as the cycle, our results improve
the state of the art. Here we show that the expected number of rounds until all
nodes have the same opinion is bounded by , for any
graph with edges, conductance , and degrees at least . In
addition, we consider a biased dynamic voter model, where each opinion is
associated with a probability , and when a node chooses a neighbour with
that opinion, it adopts opinion with probability (otherwise the node
keeps its current opinion). We show for any regular dynamic graph, that if
there is an difference between the highest and second highest
opinion probabilities, and at least nodes have initially the
opinion with the highest probability, then all nodes adopt w.h.p. that opinion.
We obtain a bound on the convergences time, which becomes for
static graphs
Optimal Multiphase Investment Strategies for Influencing Opinions in a Social Network
We study the problem of optimally investing in nodes of a social network in a
competitive setting, where two camps aim to maximize adoption of their opinions
by the population. In particular, we consider the possibility of campaigning in
multiple phases, where the final opinion of a node in a phase acts as its
initial biased opinion for the following phase. Using an extension of the
popular DeGroot-Friedkin model, we formulate the utility functions of the
camps, and show that they involve what can be interpreted as multiphase Katz
centrality. Focusing on two phases, we analytically derive Nash equilibrium
investment strategies, and the extent of loss that a camp would incur if it
acted myopically. Our simulation study affirms that nodes attributing higher
weightage to initial biases necessitate higher investment in the first phase,
so as to influence these biases for the terminal phase. We then study the
setting in which a camp's influence on a node depends on its initial bias. For
single camp, we present a polynomial time algorithm for determining an optimal
way to split the budget between the two phases. For competing camps, we show
the existence of Nash equilibria under reasonable assumptions, and that they
can be computed in polynomial time
Optimal Opinion Control: The Campaign Problem
Opinion dynamics is nowadays a very common field of research. In this article
we formulate and then study a novel, namely strategic perspective on such
dynamics: There are the usual normal agents that update their opinions, for
instance according the well-known bounded confidence mechanism. But,
additionally, there is at least one strategic agent. That agent uses opinions
as freely selectable strategies to get control on the dynamics: The strategic
agent of our benchmark problem tries, during a campaign of a certain length, to
influence the ongoing dynamics among normal agents with strategically placed
opinions (one per period) in such a way, that, by the end of the campaign, as
much as possible normals end up with opinions in a certain interval of the
opinion space. Structurally, such a problem is an optimal control problem. That
type of problem is ubiquitous. Resorting to advanced and partly non-standard
methods for computing optimal controls, we solve some instances of the campaign
problem. But even for a very small number of normal agents, just one strategic
agent, and a ten-period campaign length, the problem turns out to be extremely
difficult. Explicitly we discuss moral and political concerns that immediately
arise, if someone starts to analyze the possibilities of an optimal opinion
control.Comment: 47 pages, 12 figures, and 11 table
Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies
We consider processes on social networks that can potentially involve three
factors: homophily, or the formation of social ties due to matching individual
traits; social contagion, also known as social influence; and the causal effect
of an individual's covariates on their behavior or other measurable responses.
We show that, generically, all of these are confounded with each other.
Distinguishing them from one another requires strong assumptions on the
parametrization of the social process or on the adequacy of the covariates used
(or both). In particular we demonstrate, with simple examples, that asymmetries
in regression coefficients cannot identify causal effects, and that very simple
models of imitation (a form of social contagion) can produce substantial
correlations between an individual's enduring traits and their choices, even
when there is no intrinsic affinity between them. We also suggest some possible
constructive responses to these results.Comment: 27 pages, 9 figures. V2: Revised in response to referees. V3: Ditt
Collective dynamics of belief evolution under cognitive coherence and social conformity
Human history has been marked by social instability and conflict, often
driven by the irreconcilability of opposing sets of beliefs, ideologies, and
religious dogmas. The dynamics of belief systems has been studied mainly from
two distinct perspectives, namely how cognitive biases lead to individual
belief rigidity and how social influence leads to social conformity. Here we
propose a unifying framework that connects cognitive and social forces together
in order to study the dynamics of societal belief evolution. Each individual is
endowed with a network of interacting beliefs that evolves through interaction
with other individuals in a social network. The adoption of beliefs is affected
by both internal coherence and social conformity. Our framework explains how
social instabilities can arise in otherwise homogeneous populations, how small
numbers of zealots with highly coherent beliefs can overturn societal
consensus, and how belief rigidity protects fringe groups and cults against
invasion from mainstream beliefs, allowing them to persist and even thrive in
larger societies. Our results suggest that strong consensus may be insufficient
to guarantee social stability, that the cognitive coherence of belief-systems
is vital in determining their ability to spread, and that coherent
belief-systems may pose a serious problem for resolving social polarization,
due to their ability to prevent consensus even under high levels of social
exposure. We therefore argue that the inclusion of cognitive factors into a
social model is crucial in providing a more complete picture of collective
human dynamics
- âŠ