1,080 research outputs found
Equivalence-Checking on Infinite-State Systems: Techniques and Results
The paper presents a selection of recently developed and/or used techniques
for equivalence-checking on infinite-state systems, and an up-to-date overview
of existing results (as of September 2004)
A Congruence for Petri Nets
We introduce a way of viewing Petri nets as open systems. This is done by considering a bicategory of cospans over a category of p/t nets and embeddings. We derive a labelled transition system (LTS) semantics for such nets using GIPOs and characterise the resulting congruence. Technically, our results are similar to the recent work by Milner on applying the theory of bigraphs to Petri Nets. The two main differences are that we treat p/t nets instead of c/e nets and we deal directly with a category of nets instead of encoding them into bigraphs
An Operational Petri Net Semantics for the Join-Calculus
We present a concurrent operational Petri net semantics for the
join-calculus, a process calculus for specifying concurrent and distributed
systems. There often is a gap between system specifications and the actual
implementations caused by synchrony assumptions on the specification side and
asynchronously interacting components in implementations. The join-calculus is
promising to reduce this gap by providing an abstract specification language
which is asynchronously distributable. Classical process semantics establish an
implicit order of actually independent actions, by means of an interleaving. So
does the semantics of the join-calculus. To capture such independent actions,
step-based semantics, e.g., as defined on Petri nets, are employed. Our Petri
net semantics for the join-calculus induces step-behavior in a natural way. We
prove our semantics behaviorally equivalent to the original join-calculus
semantics by means of a bisimulation. We discuss how join specific assumptions
influence an existing notion of distributability based on Petri nets.Comment: In Proceedings EXPRESS/SOS 2012, arXiv:1208.244
The Geometry of Concurrent Interaction: Handling Multiple Ports by Way of Multiple Tokens (Long Version)
We introduce a geometry of interaction model for Mazza's multiport
interaction combinators, a graph-theoretic formalism which is able to
faithfully capture concurrent computation as embodied by process algebras like
the -calculus. The introduced model is based on token machines in which
not one but multiple tokens are allowed to traverse the underlying net at the
same time. We prove soundness and adequacy of the introduced model. The former
is proved as a simulation result between the token machines one obtains along
any reduction sequence. The latter is obtained by a fine analysis of
convergence, both in nets and in token machines
A coalgebraic semantics for causality in Petri nets
In this paper we revisit some pioneering efforts to equip Petri nets with
compact operational models for expressing causality. The models we propose have
a bisimilarity relation and a minimal representative for each equivalence
class, and they can be fully explained as coalgebras on a presheaf category on
an index category of partial orders. First, we provide a set-theoretic model in
the form of a a causal case graph, that is a labeled transition system where
states and transitions represent markings and firings of the net, respectively,
and are equipped with causal information. Most importantly, each state has a
poset representing causal dependencies among past events. Our first result
shows the correspondence with behavior structure semantics as proposed by
Trakhtenbrot and Rabinovich. Causal case graphs may be infinitely-branching and
have infinitely many states, but we show how they can be refined to get an
equivalent finitely-branching model. In it, states are equipped with
symmetries, which are essential for the existence of a minimal, often
finite-state, model. The next step is constructing a coalgebraic model. We
exploit the fact that events can be represented as names, and event generation
as name generation. Thus we can apply the Fiore-Turi framework: we model causal
relations as a suitable category of posets with action labels, and generation
of new events with causal dependencies as an endofunctor on this category. Then
we define a well-behaved category of coalgebras. Our coalgebraic model is still
infinite-state, but we exploit the equivalence between coalgebras over a class
of presheaves and History Dependent automata to derive a compact
representation, which is equivalent to our set-theoretical compact model.
Remarkably, state reduction is automatically performed along the equivalence.Comment: Accepted by Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programmin
Reactive Systems over Cospans
The theory of reactive systems, introduced by Leifer and Milner and previously extended by the authors, allows the derivation of well-behaved labelled transition systems (LTS) for semantic models with an underlying reduction semantics. The derivation procedure requires the presence of certain colimits (or, more usually and generally, bicolimits) which need to be constructed separately within each model. In this paper, we offer a general construction of such bicolimits in a class of bicategories of cospans. The construction sheds light on as well as extends Ehrig and Konigās rewriting via borrowed contexts and opens the way to a unified treatment of several applications
Conflict vs causality in event structures
Event structures are one of the best known models for concurrency. Many variants of the basic model and many possible notions of equivalence for them have been devised in the literature. In this paper, we study how the spectrum of equivalences for Labelled Prime Event Structures built by Van Glabbeek and Goltz changes if we consider two simplified notions of event structures: the first is obtained by removing the causality relation (Coherence Spaces) and the second by removing the conflict relation (Elementary Event Structures). As expected, in both cases the spectrum turns out to be simplified, since some notions of equivalence coincide in the simplified settings; actually, we prove that removing causality simplifies the spectrum considerably more than removing conflict. Furthermore, while the labeling of events and their cardinality play no role when removing causality, both the labeling function and the cardinality of the event set dramatically influence the spectrum of equivalences in the conflict-free setting
Distributed Markovian Bisimulation Reduction aimed at CSL Model Checking
The verification of quantitative aspects like performance and dependability by means of model checking has become an important and vivid area of research over the past decade.\ud
\ud
An important result of that research is the logic CSL (continuous stochastic logic) and its corresponding model checking algorithms. The evaluation of properties expressed in CSL makes it necessary to solve large systems of linear (differential) equations, usually by means of numerical analysis. Both the inherent time and space complexity of the numerical algorithms make it practically infeasible to model check systems with more than 100 million states, whereas realistic system models may have billions of states.\ud
\ud
To overcome this severe restriction, it is important to be able to replace the original state space with a probabilistically equivalent, but smaller one. The most prominent equivalence relation is bisimulation, for which also a stochastic variant exists (Markovian bisimulation). In many cases, this bisimulation allows for a substantial reduction of the state space size. But, these savings in space come at the cost of an increased time complexity. Therefore in this paper a new distributed signature-based algorithm for the computation of the bisimulation quotient of a given state space is introduced.\ud
\ud
To demonstrate the feasibility of our approach in both a sequential, and more important, in a distributed setting, we have performed a number of case studies
- ā¦