1,553 research outputs found

    Receive Combining vs. Multi-Stream Multiplexing in Downlink Systems with Multi-Antenna Users

    Full text link
    In downlink multi-antenna systems with many users, the multiplexing gain is strictly limited by the number of transmit antennas NN and the use of these antennas. Assuming that the total number of receive antennas at the multi-antenna users is much larger than NN, the maximal multiplexing gain can be achieved with many different transmission/reception strategies. For example, the excess number of receive antennas can be utilized to schedule users with effective channels that are near-orthogonal, for multi-stream multiplexing to users with well-conditioned channels, and/or to enable interference-aware receive combining. In this paper, we try to answer the question if the NN data streams should be divided among few users (many streams per user) or many users (few streams per user, enabling receive combining). Analytic results are derived to show how user selection, spatial correlation, heterogeneous user conditions, and imperfect channel acquisition (quantization or estimation errors) affect the performance when sending the maximal number of streams or one stream per scheduled user---the two extremes in data stream allocation. While contradicting observations on this topic have been reported in prior works, we show that selecting many users and allocating one stream per user (i.e., exploiting receive combining) is the best candidate under realistic conditions. This is explained by the provably stronger resilience towards spatial correlation and the larger benefit from multi-user diversity. This fundamental result has positive implications for the design of downlink systems as it reduces the hardware requirements at the user devices and simplifies the throughput optimization.Comment: Published in IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 16 pages, 11 figures. The results can be reproduced using the following Matlab code: https://github.com/emilbjornson/one-or-multiple-stream

    A Hierarchical Rate Splitting Strategy for FDD Massive MIMO under Imperfect CSIT

    Full text link
    In a multiuser MIMO broadcast channel, the rate performance is affected by the multiuser interference when the Channel State Information at the Transmitter (CSIT) is imperfect. To tackle the interference problem, a Rate-Splitting (RS) approach has been proposed recently, which splits one user's message into a common and a private part, and superimposes the common message on top of the private messages. The common message is drawn from a public codebook and should be decoded by all users. In this paper, we propose a novel and general framework, denoted as Hierarchical Rate Splitting (HRS), that is particularly suited to FDD massive MIMO systems. HRS simultaneously transmits private messages intended to each user and two kinds of common messages that can be decoded by all users and by a subset of users, respectively. We analyse the asymptotic sum rate of HRS under imperfect CSIT. A closed-form power allocation is derived which provides insights into the effects of system parameters. Finally, simulation results validate the significant sum rate gain of HRS over various baselines.Comment: Accepted paper at IEEE CAMAD 201

    Fundamental Limits in Correlated Fading MIMO Broadcast Channels: Benefits of Transmit Correlation Diversity

    Full text link
    We investigate asymptotic capacity limits of the Gaussian MIMO broadcast channel (BC) with spatially correlated fading to understand when and how much transmit correlation helps the capacity. By imposing a structure on channel covariances (equivalently, transmit correlations at the transmitter side) of users, also referred to as \emph{transmit correlation diversity}, the impact of transmit correlation on the power gain of MIMO BCs is characterized in several regimes of system parameters, with a particular interest in the large-scale array (or massive MIMO) regime. Taking the cost for downlink training into account, we provide asymptotic capacity bounds of multiuser MIMO downlink systems to see how transmit correlation diversity affects the system multiplexing gain. We make use of the notion of joint spatial division and multiplexing (JSDM) to derive the capacity bounds. It is advocated in this paper that transmit correlation diversity may be of use to significantly increase multiplexing gain as well as power gain in multiuser MIMO systems. In particular, the new type of diversity in wireless communications is shown to improve the system multiplexing gain up to by a factor of the number of degrees of such diversity. Finally, performance limits of conventional large-scale MIMO systems not exploiting transmit correlation are also characterized.Comment: 29 pages, 8 figure

    Free Probability based Capacity Calculation of Multiantenna Gaussian Fading Channels with Cochannel Interference

    Get PDF
    During the last decade, it has been well understood that communication over multiple antennas can increase linearly the multiplexing capacity gain and provide large spectral efficiency improvements. However, the majority of studies in this area were carried out ignoring cochannel interference. Only a small number of investigations have considered cochannel interference, but even therein simple channel models were employed, assuming identically distributed fading coefficients. In this paper, a generic model for a multi-antenna channel is presented incorporating four impairments, namely additive white Gaussian noise, flat fading, path loss and cochannel interference. Both point-to-point and multiple-access MIMO channels are considered, including the case of cooperating Base Station clusters. The asymptotic capacity limit of this channel is calculated based on an asymptotic free probability approach which exploits the additive and multiplicative free convolution in the R- and S-transform domain respectively, as well as properties of the eta and Stieltjes transform. Numerical results are utilized to verify the accuracy of the derived closed-form expressions and evaluate the effect of the cochannel interference.Comment: 16 pages, 4 figures, 1 tabl
    corecore