Lagrangian Relaxation and Partial Cover

Lagrangian relaxation has been used extensively in the design of approximation algorithms. This paper studies its strengths and limitations when applied to Partial Cover.Comment: 20 pages, extended abstract appeared in STACS 200

An optimal bifactor approximation algorithm for the metric uncapacitated facility location problem

We obtain a 1.5-approximation algorithm for the metric uncapacitated facility location problem (UFL), which improves on the previously best known 1.52-approximation algorithm by Mahdian, Ye and Zhang. Note, that the approximability lower bound by Guha and Khuller is 1.463. An algorithm is a {\em ($\lambda_f$,$\lambda_c$)-approximation algorithm} if the solution it produces has total cost at most $\lambda_f \cdot F^* + \lambda_c \cdot C^*$, where $F^*$ and $C^*$ are the facility and the connection cost of an optimal solution. Our new algorithm, which is a modification of the $(1+2/e)$-approximation algorithm of Chudak and Shmoys, is a (1.6774,1.3738)-approximation algorithm for the UFL problem and is the first one that touches the approximability limit curve $(\gamma_f, 1+2e^{-\gamma_f})$ established by Jain, Mahdian and Saberi. As a consequence, we obtain the first optimal approximation algorithm for instances dominated by connection costs. When combined with a (1.11,1.7764)-approximation algorithm proposed by Jain et al., and later analyzed by Mahdian et al., we obtain the overall approximation guarantee of 1.5 for the metric UFL problem. We also describe how to use our algorithm to improve the approximation ratio for the 3-level version of UFL.Comment: A journal versio

Improved approximation algorithm for k-level UFL with penalties, a simplistic view on randomizing the scaling parameter

The state of the art in approximation algorithms for facility location problems are complicated combinations of various techniques. In particular, the currently best 1.488-approximation algorithm for the uncapacitated facility location (UFL) problem by Shi Li is presented as a result of a non-trivial randomization of a certain scaling parameter in the LP-rounding algorithm by Chudak and Shmoys combined with a primal-dual algorithm of Jain et al. In this paper we first give a simple interpretation of this randomization process in terms of solving an aux- iliary (factor revealing) LP. Then, armed with this simple view point, Abstract. we exercise the randomization on a more complicated algorithm for the k-level version of the problem with penalties in which the planner has the option to pay a penalty instead of connecting chosen clients, which results in an improved approximation algorithm

A new approximation algorithm for the multilevel facility location problem

In this paper we propose a new integer programming formulation for the multi-level facility location problem and a novel 3-approximation algorithm based on LP rounding. The linear program we are using has a polynomial number of variables and constraints, being thus more efficient than the one commonly used in the approximation algorithms for this type of problems

Algorithms for covering multiple submodular constraints and applications

We consider the problem of covering multiple submodular constraints. Given a finite ground set N, a weight function $w: N \rightarrow \mathbb {R}_+$, r monotone submodular functions $f_1,f_2,\ldots ,f_r$ over N and requirements $k_1,k_2,\ldots ,k_r$ the goal is to find a minimum weight subset $S \subseteq N$ such that $f_i(S) \ge k_i$ for $1 \le i \le r$. We refer to this problem as Multi-Submod-Cover and it was recently considered by Har-Peled and Jones (Few cuts meet many point sets. CoRR. arxiv:abs1808.03260Har-Peled and Jones 2018) who were motivated by an application in geometry. Even with $r=1$ Multi-Submod-Cover generalizes the well-known Submodular Set Cover problem (Submod-SC), and it can also be easily reduced to Submod-SC. A simple greedy algorithm gives an $O(\log (kr))$ approximation where $k = \sum _i k_i$ and this ratio cannot be improved in the general case. In this paper, motivated by several concrete applications, we consider two ways to improve upon the approximation given by the greedy algorithm. First, we give a bicriteria approximation algorithm for Multi-Submod-Cover that covers each constraint to within a factor of $(1-1/e-\varepsilon )$ while incurring an approximation of $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon }\log r)$ in the cost. Second, we consider the special case when each $f_i$ is a obtained from a truncated coverage function and obtain an algorithm that generalizes previous work on partial set cover (Partial-SC), covering integer programs (CIPs) and multiple vertex cover constraints Bera et al. (Theoret Comput Sci 555:2–8 Bera et al. 2014). Both these algorithms are based on mathematical programming relaxations that avoid the limitations of the greedy algorithm. We demonstrate the implications of our algorithms and related ideas to several applications ranging from geometric covering problems to clustering with outliers. Our work highlights the utility of the high-level model and the lens of submodularity in addressing this class of covering problems.publishedVersio

Lagrangian Relaxation and Partial Cover (Extended Abstract)

Lagrangian relaxation has been used extensively in the design of approximation algorithms. This paper studies its strengths and limitations when applied to Partial Cover. We show that for Partial Cover in general no algorithm that uses Lagrangian relaxation and a Lagrangian Multiplier Preserving (LMP) $alpha$-approximation as a black box can yield an approximation factor better than~$frac{4}{3} alpha$. This matches the upper bound given by K"onemann et al. (ESA 2006, pages 468--479). Faced with this limitation we study a specific, yet broad class of covering problems: Partial Totally Balanced Cover. By carefully analyzing the inner workings of the LMP algorithm we are able to give an almost tight characterization of the integrality gap of the standard linear relaxation of the problem. As a consequence we obtain improved approximations for the Partial version of Multicut and Path Hitting on Trees, Rectangle Stabbing, and Set Cover with $ho$-Blocks

Covering Clients with Types and Budgets

In this paper, we consider a variant of the facility location problem. Imagine the scenario where facilities are categorized into multiple types such as schools, hospitals, post offices, etc. and the cost of connecting a client to a facility is realized by the distance between them. Each client has a total budget on the distance she/he is willing to travel. The goal is to open the minimum number of facilities such that the aggregate distance of each client to multiple types is within her/his budget. This problem closely resembles to the set cover and r-domination problems. Here, we study this problem in different settings. Specifically, we present some positive and negative results in the general setting, where no assumption is made on the distance values. Then we show that better results can be achieved when clients and facilities lie in a metric space

Approximation Algorithms for Minimum-Load k-Facility Location

We consider a facility-location problem that abstracts settings where the cost of serving the clients assigned to a facility is incurred by the facility. Formally, we consider the minimum-load k-facility location (MLkFL) problem, which is defined as follows. We have a set F of facilities, a set C of clients, and an integer k > 0. Assigning client j to a facility f incurs a connection cost d(f, j). The goal is to open a set F\u27 of k facilities, and assign each client j to a facility f(j) in F\u27 so as to minimize maximum, over all facilities in F\u27, of the sum of distances of clients j assigned to F\u27 to F\u27. We call this sum the load of facility f. This problem was studied under the name of min-max star cover in [6, 2], who (among other results) gave bicriteria approximation algorithms for MLkFL for when F = C. MLkFL is rather poorly understood, and only an O(k)-approximation is currently known for MLkFL, even for line metrics. Our main result is the first polynomial time approximation scheme (PTAS) for MLkFL on line metrics (note that no non-trivial true approximation of any kind was known for this metric). Complementing this, we prove that MLkFL is strongly NP-hard on line metrics. We also devise a quasi-PTAS for MLkFL on tree metrics. MLkFL turns out to be surprisingly challenging even on line metrics, and resilient to attack by the variety of techniques that have been successfully applied to facility-location problems. For instance, we show that: (a) even a configuration-style LP-relaxation has a bad integrality gap; and (b) a multi-swap k-median style local-search heuristic has a bad locality gap. Thus, we need to devise various novel techniques to attack MLkFL. Our PTAS for line metrics consists of two main ingredients. First, we prove that there always exists a near-optimal solution possessing some nice structural properties. A novel aspect of this proof is that we first move to a mixed-integer LP (MILP) encoding the problem, and argue that a MILP-solution minimizing a certain potential function possesses the desired structure, and then use a rounding algorithm for the generalized-assignment problem to "transfer" this structure to the rounded integer solution. Complementing this, we show that these structural properties enable one to find such a structured solution via dynamic programming