1,120 research outputs found

    Search-to-Decision Reductions for Lattice Problems with Approximation Factors (Slightly) Greater Than One

    Get PDF
    We show the first dimension-preserving search-to-decision reductions for approximate SVP and CVP. In particular, for any γ1+O(logn/n)\gamma \leq 1 + O(\log n/n), we obtain an efficient dimension-preserving reduction from γO(n/logn)\gamma^{O(n/\log n)}-SVP to γ\gamma-GapSVP and an efficient dimension-preserving reduction from γO(n)\gamma^{O(n)}-CVP to γ\gamma-GapCVP. These results generalize the known equivalences of the search and decision versions of these problems in the exact case when γ=1\gamma = 1. For SVP, we actually obtain something slightly stronger than a search-to-decision reduction---we reduce γO(n/logn)\gamma^{O(n/\log n)}-SVP to γ\gamma-unique SVP, a potentially easier problem than γ\gamma-GapSVP.Comment: Updated to acknowledge additional prior wor

    Solving the Closest Vector Problem in 2n2^n Time--- The Discrete Gaussian Strikes Again!

    Get PDF
    We give a 2n+o(n)2^{n+o(n)}-time and space randomized algorithm for solving the exact Closest Vector Problem (CVP) on nn-dimensional Euclidean lattices. This improves on the previous fastest algorithm, the deterministic O~(4n)\widetilde{O}(4^{n})-time and O~(2n)\widetilde{O}(2^{n})-space algorithm of Micciancio and Voulgaris. We achieve our main result in three steps. First, we show how to modify the sampling algorithm from [ADRS15] to solve the problem of discrete Gaussian sampling over lattice shifts, LtL- t, with very low parameters. While the actual algorithm is a natural generalization of [ADRS15], the analysis uses substantial new ideas. This yields a 2n+o(n)2^{n+o(n)}-time algorithm for approximate CVP for any approximation factor γ=1+2o(n/logn)\gamma = 1+2^{-o(n/\log n)}. Second, we show that the approximate closest vectors to a target vector tt can be grouped into "lower-dimensional clusters," and we use this to obtain a recursive reduction from exact CVP to a variant of approximate CVP that "behaves well with these clusters." Third, we show that our discrete Gaussian sampling algorithm can be used to solve this variant of approximate CVP. The analysis depends crucially on some new properties of the discrete Gaussian distribution and approximate closest vectors, which might be of independent interest

    A new Lenstra-type Algorithm for Quasiconvex Polynomial Integer Minimization with Complexity 2^O(n log n)

    Full text link
    We study the integer minimization of a quasiconvex polynomial with quasiconvex polynomial constraints. We propose a new algorithm that is an improvement upon the best known algorithm due to Heinz (Journal of Complexity, 2005). This improvement is achieved by applying a new modern Lenstra-type algorithm, finding optimal ellipsoid roundings, and considering sparse encodings of polynomials. For the bounded case, our algorithm attains a time-complexity of s (r l M d)^{O(1)} 2^{2n log_2(n) + O(n)} when M is a bound on the number of monomials in each polynomial and r is the binary encoding length of a bound on the feasible region. In the general case, s l^{O(1)} d^{O(n)} 2^{2n log_2(n) +O(n)}. In each we assume d>= 2 is a bound on the total degree of the polynomials and l bounds the maximum binary encoding size of the input.Comment: 28 pages, 10 figure

    On the Lattice Distortion Problem

    Get PDF
    We introduce and study the \emph{Lattice Distortion Problem} (LDP). LDP asks how "similar" two lattices are. I.e., what is the minimal distortion of a linear bijection between the two lattices? LDP generalizes the Lattice Isomorphism Problem (the lattice analogue of Graph Isomorphism), which simply asks whether the minimal distortion is one. As our first contribution, we show that the distortion between any two lattices is approximated up to a nO(logn)n^{O(\log n)} factor by a simple function of their successive minima. Our methods are constructive, allowing us to compute low-distortion mappings that are within a 2O(nloglogn/logn)2^{O(n \log \log n/\log n)} factor of optimal in polynomial time and within a nO(logn)n^{O(\log n)} factor of optimal in singly exponential time. Our algorithms rely on a notion of basis reduction introduced by Seysen (Combinatorica 1993), which we show is intimately related to lattice distortion. Lastly, we show that LDP is NP-hard to approximate to within any constant factor (under randomized reductions), by a reduction from the Shortest Vector Problem.Comment: This is the full version of a paper that appeared in ESA 201
    corecore