1,030 research outputs found

    Proximity results and faster algorithms for Integer Programming using the Steinitz Lemma

    Full text link
    We consider integer programming problems in standard form max{cTx:Ax=b,x0,xZn}\max \{c^Tx : Ax = b, \, x\geq 0, \, x \in Z^n\} where AZm×nA \in Z^{m \times n}, bZmb \in Z^m and cZnc \in Z^n. We show that such an integer program can be solved in time (mΔ)O(m)b2(m \Delta)^{O(m)} \cdot \|b\|_\infty^2, where Δ\Delta is an upper bound on each absolute value of an entry in AA. This improves upon the longstanding best bound of Papadimitriou (1981) of (mΔ)O(m2)(m\cdot \Delta)^{O(m^2)}, where in addition, the absolute values of the entries of bb also need to be bounded by Δ\Delta. Our result relies on a lemma of Steinitz that states that a set of vectors in RmR^m that is contained in the unit ball of a norm and that sum up to zero can be ordered such that all partial sums are of norm bounded by mm. We also use the Steinitz lemma to show that the 1\ell_1-distance of an optimal integer and fractional solution, also under the presence of upper bounds on the variables, is bounded by m(2mΔ+1)mm \cdot (2\,m \cdot \Delta+1)^m. Here Δ\Delta is again an upper bound on the absolute values of the entries of AA. The novel strength of our bound is that it is independent of nn. We provide evidence for the significance of our bound by applying it to general knapsack problems where we obtain structural and algorithmic results that improve upon the recent literature.Comment: We achieve much milder dependence of the running time on the largest entry in $b

    Minimizing the number of lattice points in a translated polygon

    Full text link
    The parametric lattice-point counting problem is as follows: Given an integer matrix AZm×nA \in Z^{m \times n}, compute an explicit formula parameterized by bRmb \in R^m that determines the number of integer points in the polyhedron {xRn:Axb}\{x \in R^n : Ax \leq b\}. In the last decade, this counting problem has received considerable attention in the literature. Several variants of Barvinok's algorithm have been shown to solve this problem in polynomial time if the number nn of columns of AA is fixed. Central to our investigation is the following question: Can one also efficiently determine a parameter bb such that the number of integer points in {xRn:Axb}\{x \in R^n : Ax \leq b\} is minimized? Here, the parameter bb can be chosen from a given polyhedron QRmQ \subseteq R^m. Our main result is a proof that finding such a minimizing parameter is NPNP-hard, even in dimension 2 and even if the parametrization reflects a translation of a 2-dimensional convex polygon. This result is established via a relationship of this problem to arithmetic progressions and simultaneous Diophantine approximation. On the positive side we show that in dimension 2 there exists a polynomial time algorithm for each fixed kk that either determines a minimizing translation or asserts that any translation contains at most 1+1/k1 + 1/k times the minimal number of lattice points

    Max-sum diversity via convex programming

    Get PDF
    Diversity maximization is an important concept in information retrieval, computational geometry and operations research. Usually, it is a variant of the following problem: Given a ground set, constraints, and a function f()f(\cdot) that measures diversity of a subset, the task is to select a feasible subset SS such that f(S)f(S) is maximized. The \emph{sum-dispersion} function f(S)=x,ySd(x,y)f(S) = \sum_{x,y \in S} d(x,y), which is the sum of the pairwise distances in SS, is in this context a prominent diversification measure. The corresponding diversity maximization is the \emph{max-sum} or \emph{sum-sum diversification}. Many recent results deal with the design of constant-factor approximation algorithms of diversification problems involving sum-dispersion function under a matroid constraint. In this paper, we present a PTAS for the max-sum diversification problem under a matroid constraint for distances d(,)d(\cdot,\cdot) of \emph{negative type}. Distances of negative type are, for example, metric distances stemming from the 2\ell_2 and 1\ell_1 norm, as well as the cosine or spherical, or Jaccard distance which are popular similarity metrics in web and image search

    On largest volume simplices and sub-determinants

    Full text link
    We show that the problem of finding the simplex of largest volume in the convex hull of nn points in Qd\mathbb{Q}^d can be approximated with a factor of O(logd)d/2O(\log d)^{d/2} in polynomial time. This improves upon the previously best known approximation guarantee of d(d1)/2d^{(d-1)/2} by Khachiyan. On the other hand, we show that there exists a constant c>1c>1 such that this problem cannot be approximated with a factor of cdc^d, unless P=NPP=NP. % This improves over the 1.091.09 inapproximability that was previously known. Our hardness result holds even if n=O(d)n = O(d), in which case there exists a \bar c\,^{d}-approximation algorithm that relies on recent sampling techniques, where cˉ\bar c is again a constant. We show that similar results hold for the problem of finding the largest absolute value of a subdeterminant of a d×nd\times n matrix

    Diameter of Polyhedra: Limits of Abstraction

    Get PDF
    We investigate the diameter of a natural abstraction of the 11-skeleton of polyhedra. Even if this abstraction is more general than other abstractions previously studied in the literature, known upper bounds on the diameter of polyhedra continue to hold here. On the other hand, we show that this abstraction has its limits by providing an almost quadratic lower bound

    The Support of Integer Optimal Solutions

    Get PDF
    The support of a vector is the number of nonzero-components. We show that given an integral m×nm\times n matrix AA, the integer linear optimization problem max{cTx:Ax=b,x0,xZn}\max\left\{\boldsymbol{c}^T\boldsymbol{x} : A\boldsymbol{x} = \boldsymbol{b}, \, \boldsymbol{x}\ge\boldsymbol{0}, \,\boldsymbol{x}\in\mathbb{Z}^n\right\} has an optimal solution whose support is bounded by 2mlog(2mA)2m \, \log (2 \sqrt{m} \| A \|_\infty), where A \| A \|_\infty is the largest absolute value of an entry of AA. Compared to previous bounds, the one presented here is independent on the objective function. We furthermore provide a nearly matching asymptotic lower bound on the support of optimal solutions

    A Note on Non-Degenerate Integer Programs with Small Sub-Determinants

    Full text link
    The intention of this note is two-fold. First, we study integer optimization problems in standard form defined by AZm×nA \in\mathbb{Z}^{m\times{}n} and present an algorithm to solve such problems in polynomial-time provided that both the largest absolute value of an entry in AA and mm are constant. Then, this is applied to solve integer programs in inequality form in polynomial-time, where the absolute values of all maximal sub-determinants of AA lie between 11 and a constant
    corecore