19 research outputs found

    Applying genetic algorithms to multi-objective land use planning.

    Get PDF
    This paper explores the application of multi-objective genetic algorithms (mGAs) to rural land-use planning, a spatial allocation problem. Two mGAs are proposed. Both share an underlying structure of: fitness assignment using Pareto-dominance ranking, niche induction and an individual replacement strategy. They are differentiated by their representations: a fixed-length genotype composed of genes that map directly to a land parcel's use, and a variable-length, order-dependent representation making allocations indirectly via a greedy algorithm. The latter representation requires additional breeding operators to be defined and post-processing of the genotype structure, to identify and remove duplicate genotypes. The two mGAs are compared on a real land-use planning problem, and the strengths and weaknesses of the underlying framework - and of each representation - are identified

    Results of Evolution Supervised by Genetic Algorithms

    Full text link
    A series of results of evolution supervised by genetic algorithms with interest to agricultural and horticultural fields are reviewed. New obtained original results from the use of genetic algorithms on structure-activity relationships are reported.Comment: 6 pages, 1 Table, 2 figure

    Results of Evolution Supervised by Genetic Algorithms

    Full text link
    A series of results of evolution supervised by genetic algorithms with interest to agricultural and horticultural fields are reviewed. New obtained original results from the use of genetic algorithms on structure-activity relationships are reported.Comment: 6 pages, 1 Table, 2 figure

    ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋‹ค์ค‘์Šค์ผ€์ผ/๋‹ค๋ชฉ์  ๊ณต๊ฐ„๊ณ„ํš ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ชจ๋ธ ๊ตฌ์ถ•

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ํ˜‘๋™๊ณผ์ • ์กฐ๊ฒฝํ•™์ „๊ณต, 2019. 2. ์ด๋™๊ทผ.๊ณต๊ฐ„๊ณ„ํš ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๊ด€๊ณ„์ž์™€ ๊ฒฐ๋ถ€๋œ ๋ชฉํ‘œ์™€ ์ œ์•ฝ ์š”๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋น„์„ ํ˜•์  ๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ์„œ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์šด ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์™”๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์ตœ๊ทผ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ์— ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ (genetic algorithms), ๋‹ด๊ธˆ์งˆ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• (simulated annealing), ๊ฐœ๋ฏธ ๊ตฐ์ง‘ ์ตœ์ ํ™” (ant colony optimization) ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋‹ค๋ชฉ์  ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์ด ์‘์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ด€๋ จ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์—ญ์‹œ ๊ธ‰์ฆํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ค‘ ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ถ€๋ฌธ์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋นˆ๋„ ๋†’๊ฒŒ ์ ์šฉ๋œ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์œผ๋กœ exploration๊ณผ exploitation์˜ ๊ท ํ˜•์œผ๋กœ ํ•ฉ๋ฆฌ์ ์ธ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋‚ด์— ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ์ข‹์€ ๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€ ์ข‹์€ ์„ฑ๊ณผ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํŠน์ • ์šฉ๋„ ํ˜น์€ ์‹œ์„ค์˜ ๋ฐฐ์น˜์— ์ง‘์ค‘๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™” ์ ์‘, ์žฌํ•ด ๊ด€๋ฆฌ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฐ์ธํ”„๋ผ ๊ณ„ํš๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ตœ๊ทผ์˜ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์ด์Šˆ๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋ฃฌ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ๋ฏธํกํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜๊ณผ ๋น„์ง€๋ฐฐ ์ •๋ ฌ ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ (non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II)์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™” ์ ์‘, ์žฌํ•ด ๊ด€๋ฆฌ, ๋„์‹œ์˜ ๋…น์ง€ ๊ณ„ํš ๋“ฑ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์ด์Šˆ๋ฅผ ๊ณต๊ฐ„๊ณ„ํš์— ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ผ๋ จ์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ์ด์Šˆ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„, ๋ชฉ์ , ์ œ์•ฝ์š”๊ฑด์ด ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ๋ฒ”์œ„๊ฐ€ ์ข์•„์ง€๊ณ  ๊ณต๊ฐ„ํ•ด์ƒ๋„๋Š” ๋†’์•„์ง€๋Š” ์ˆœ์„œ๋Œ€๋กœ ๋‚˜์—ดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ์ฒซ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ–‰์ •๊ตฌ์—ญ ๋„ ๊ทœ๋ชจ (province scale, ํ•ด์ƒ๋„ 1ใŽข)์—์„œ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜์˜ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”์— ์ ์‘ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ๋ชจ์˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ๋จผ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹Œ, ํ˜„์žฌ ์ด๋ฏธ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ด€๋ จํ•œ ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๊ฐ€ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ ์‘์˜ ํ•„์š”์„ฑ์ด ์ง€์ ๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐํ›„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํšŒ๋ณต ํƒ„๋ ฅ์„ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์„ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๋ณ€ํ™”์‹œ์ผœ์•ผ ํ• ์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก  ์ œ์‹œ๋Š” ๋ฏธํกํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ง€์—ญ๊ณ„ํš์—์„œ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์€ ๋งค์šฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•œ, ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์ธ ์ค‘์žฅ๊ธฐ ์ ์‘ ์ „๋žต์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ชฉ์  ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ (MOGA, multi-objective genetic algorithm)์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆํ•˜์—ฌ 9,982ใŽข์— 350๋งŒ์˜ ์ธ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ฑฐ์ฃผํ•˜๋Š” ํ•œ๊ตญ์˜ ์ถฉ์ฒญ๋‚จ๋„ ๋ฐ ๋Œ€์ „๊ด‘์—ญ์‹œ ์ผ๋Œ€๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™” ์ ์‘์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ง€์—ญ์ ์ธ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™” ์˜ํ–ฅ๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ์—ฌ๊ฑด์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์žฌํ•ด ํ”ผํ•ด ๋ฐ ์ „ํ™˜๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”, ๋ฒผ ์ƒ์‚ฐ๋Ÿ‰, ์ข… ํ’๋ถ€๋„ ๋ณด์ „, ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ๊ฐ€์น˜์˜ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™” ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์„ฏ ๊ฐ€์ง€์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ๋ชฉ์  ๋ณ„ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ณ€ํ™”์‹œํ‚ค๋ฉฐ ์—ฌ์„ฏ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ 17๊ฐœ์˜ ํŒŒ๋ ˆํ†  ์ตœ์  ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋Š” ์ •๋„์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜ ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™” ์ ์‘ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์—์„œ ๋” ์ข‹์€ ํผํฌ๋จผ์Šค๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ, ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํšŒ๋ณตํƒ„๋ ฅ์„ฑ์ด ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์œ ์—ฐํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ, ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ์‹ค๋ฌด์ž ์—ญ์‹œ ๊ฐ€์ค‘์น˜์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ, ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™” ์˜ํ–ฅ ํ‰๊ฐ€์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ž…๋ ฅ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ์ƒ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ–‰์ •๊ตฌ์—ญ ๊ตฐ ๊ทœ๋ชจ (local scale, ํ•ด์ƒ๋„ 100m)์—์„œ ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์žฌํ•ด ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ๋ชจ์˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‚ฐ์•…์ง€ํ˜•์—์„œ ํญ์šฐ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์‚ฐ์‚ฌํƒœ๋Š” ์ธ๋ช…๊ณผ ์žฌ์‚ฐ์— ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”์šฑ์ด ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ฐ•์šฐ์˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋กœ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์‚ฐ์‚ฌํƒœ ๋นˆ๋„ ๋ฐ ๊ฐ•๋„ ์—ญ์‹œ ์ฆ๋Œ€๋  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฐ์‚ฌํƒœ ๋ฆฌ์Šคํฌ๊ฐ€ ๋†’์€ ์ง€์—ญ์„ ํ”ผํ•ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ง€์—ญ์„ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ €๊ฐ ํ˜น์€ ํšŒํ”ผํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ์ „๋žต์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์‹ค์ œ๊ณต๊ฐ„์—์„œ์˜ ๊ณ„ํš์€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋น„์„ ํ˜•์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ์„œ ์ด๊ฒƒ์„ ์‹คํ˜„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์–ด๋ ค์›€์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋น„์ง€๋ฐฐ ์ •๋ ฌ ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ II์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฐ์‚ฌํƒœ ๋ฆฌ์Šคํฌ ๋ฐ ์ „ํ™˜๋Ÿ‰, ํŒŒํŽธํ™”์˜ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋ชฉ์ ์„ ๋งŒ์กฑ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ์ข…ํ•ฉ์ ์ธ ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ๊ณ„ํš์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋Œ€์ƒ์ง€๋Š” 2018๋…„ ๋™๊ณ„์˜ฌ๋ฆผํ”ฝ ๊ฐœ์ตœ์ง€์ธ ํ•œ๊ตญ์˜ ํ‰์ฐฝ๊ตฐ์œผ๋กœ์„œ 2006๋…„์— ์‚ฐ์‚ฌํƒœ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋Œ€๊ทœ๋ชจ์˜ ํ”ผํ•ด๋ฅผ ๊ฒฝํ—˜ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, ์˜ฌ๋ฆผํ”ฝ ํŠน์ˆ˜ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์••๋ ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋‚œ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ด ์šฐ๋ ค๋˜๋Š” ์ง€์—ญ์ด๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ๋ฒˆ์˜ ๋ชจ์˜๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ˜„์žฌ์˜ ํ† ์ง€์ด์šฉ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ ์–ด๋„ ํ•œ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๋ชฉ์ ์—์„œ ์ข‹์€ ํผํฌ๋จผ์Šค๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” 100๊ฐœ์˜ ํŒŒ๋ ˆํ†  ์ตœ์  ๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ 5๊ฐœ์˜ ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์ธ ๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ์„ ์„ ์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฐ์‚ฌํƒœ๋ฆฌ์Šคํฌ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”์™€ ์ „ํ™˜๋Ÿ‰ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ๊ฐ„์— ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์ƒ์‡„ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ธฐํ›„๋ณ€ํ™”์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ ์‘ ์ „๋žต์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝ, ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๊ณ„ํš์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์˜์‚ฌ๊ฒฐ์ •์„ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ง€์›ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ์„ธ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ธ”๋ก ๊ทœ๋ชจ(neighborhood scale, 2m)์—์„œ ๋„์‹œ ๋‚ด ๋…น์ง€๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ์„ ๋ชจ์˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋…น์ง€ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์€ ๋„์‹œ๋ฏผ์˜ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ์— ๊ฒฐ์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๋„์‹œ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๊ณ„ํš์—๋Š” ๋…น์ง€์™€ ์ง ๊ฐ„์ ‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์ „๋žต์ด ํฌํ•จ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋…น์ง€ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์€ ๋„์‹œ์ง€์—ญ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์—ด์„ฌ ํ˜„์ƒ ์™„ํ™”, ์œ ์ถœ๋Ÿ‰ ์ €๊ฐ, ์ƒํƒœ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ์ฆ์ง„ ๋“ฑ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ธ์ •์  ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Œ์ด ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๊ณ„ํš์˜ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ข…ํ•ฉ์ , ์ •๋Ÿ‰์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ ค๋œ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ๋ฏธํกํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋น„์ง€๋ฐฐ ์ •๋ ฌ ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ II์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆํ•˜์—ฌ ๋…น์ง€์˜ ์ƒํƒœ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ ์ฆ์ง„, ์—ด์„ฌ ํšจ๊ณผ ์™„ํ™”์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํšจ๊ณผ์™€ ์„ค์น˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋Š” ๋น„์šฉ์„ ์ข…ํ•ฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋…น์ง€์˜ ์œ ํ˜•๊ณผ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•œ ๋…น์ง€๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ธ”๋ก ๊ทœ๋ชจ์˜ ๊ฐ€์ƒ์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ง€์— ๋ณธ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ ์šฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ 30๊ฐœ์˜ ํŒŒ๋ ˆํ†  ์ตœ์  ๋…น์ง€๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ์„ ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฐ ๋ชฉ์  ๊ฐ„ ํผํฌ๋จผ์Šค๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋…น์ง€์˜ ์—ด์„ฌ ์™„ํ™” ํšจ๊ณผ์™€ ์ƒํƒœ์  ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ ์ฆ์ง„ ํšจ๊ณผ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒ์Šน ๊ด€๊ณ„ (synergistic relationship), ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ธ์ •์  ํšจ๊ณผ์™€ ๋น„์šฉ ์ ˆ๊ฐ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒ์‡„ ํšจ๊ณผ (trade-off relationship)๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ ์ค‘ ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์ธ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ง€๋‹ˆ๋Š” ๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ, ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ์—์„œ ๊ณตํ†ต์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋…น์ง€ ์„ค์น˜๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์„ ํƒ๋œ ์ฃผ์š” ํ›„๋ณด์ง€์—ญ ์—ญ์‹œ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ œ์‹œ๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ์˜ ์ˆ˜์ •์—์„œ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ •๋Ÿ‰์  ํ‰๊ฐ€, ๊ณ„ํš์•ˆ ์„ ํƒ์— ์ด๋ฅด๋Š” ์ผ๋ จ์˜ ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์ˆ˜์—†์ด ๋ฐ˜๋ณตํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋…น์ง€๊ณ„ํš ๊ณผ์ •์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์—ญ์‹œ ๋‹ค์ž๊ฐ„ ํ˜‘๋ ฅ์  ๋””์ž์ธ (co-design)์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ดˆ์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ์„œ ํ™œ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์˜ˆ์ƒํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.The meeting of heterogeneous goals while staying within the constraints of spatial planning is a nonlinear problem that cannot be solved by linear methodologies. Instead, this problem can be solved using multi-objective optimization algorithms such as genetic algorithms (GA), simulated annealing (SA), ant colony optimization (ACO), etc., and research related to this field has been increasing rapidly. GA, in particular, are the most frequently applied spatial optimization algorithms and are known to search for a good solution within a reasonable time period by maintaining a balance between exploration and exploitation. However, despite its good performance and applicability, it has not adequately addressed recent urgent issues such as climate change adaptation, disaster management, and green infrastructure planning. It is criticized for concentrating on only the allocation of specific land use such as urban and protected areas, or on the site selection of a specific facility. Therefore, in this study, a series of spatial optimizations are proposed to address recent urgent issues such as climate change, disaster management, and urban greening by supplementing quantitative assessment methodologies to the spatial planning process based on GA and Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA II). This optimization model needs to be understood as a tool for providing a draft plan that quantitatively meets the essential requirements so that the stakeholders can collaborate smoothly in the planning process. Three types of spatial planning optimization models are classified according to urgent issues. Spatial resolution, planning objectives, and constraints were also configured differently according to relevant issues. Each spatial planning optimization model was arranged in the order of increasing spatial resolution. In the first chapter, the optimization model was proposed to simulate land use scenarios to adapt to climate change on a provincial scale. As climate change is an ongoing phenomenon, many recent studies have focused on adaptation to climate change from a spatial perspective. However, little is known about how changing the spatial composition of land use could improve resilience to climate change. Consideration of climate change impacts when spatially allocating land use could be a useful and fundamental long-term adaptation strategy, particularly for regional planning. Here climate adaptation scenarios were identified on the basis of existing extents of three land use classes using Multi-objective Genetic Algorithms (MOGA) for a 9,982 km2 region with 3.5 million inhabitants in South Korea. Five objectives were selected for adaptation based on predicted climate change impacts and regional economic conditions: minimization of disaster damageand existing land use conversionmaximization of rice yieldprotection of high-species-richness areasand economic value. The 17 Pareto land use scenarios were generated by six weighted combinations of the adaptation objectives. Most scenarios, although varying in magnitude, showed better performance than the current spatial land use composition for all adaptation objectives, suggesting that some alteration of current land use patterns could increase overall climate resilience. Given the flexible structure of the optimization model, it is expected that regional stakeholders would efficiently generate other scenarios by adjusting the model parameters (weighting combinations) or replacing the input data (impact maps) and selecting a scenario depending on their preference or a number of problem-related factors. In the second chapter, the optimization model was proposed to simulate land use scenarios for managing disaster damage due to climate change on local scale. Extreme landslides triggered by rainfall in hilly regions frequently lead to serious damage, including casualties and property loss. The frequency of landslides may increase under climate change, because of the increased variability of precipitation. Developing urban areas outside landslide risk zones is the most effective method of reducing or preventing damageplanning in real life is, however, a complex and nonlinear problem. For such multi-objective problems, GA may be the most appropriate optimization tool. Therefore, comprehensive land use allocation plans were suggested using the NSGA II to overcome multi-objective problems, including the minimization of landslide risk, minimization of change, and maximization of compactness. The study area is Pyeongchang-gun, the host city of the 2018 Winter Olympics in Korea, where high development pressure has resulted in an urban sprawl into the hazard zone that experienced a large-scale landslide in 2006. We obtained 100 Pareto plans that are better than the actual land use data for at least one objective, with five plans that explain the trade-offs between meeting the first and the second objectives mentioned above. The results can be used by decision makers for better urban planning and for climate change-related spatial adaptation. In the third chapter, the optimization model was proposed to simulate urban greening plans on a neighborhood scale. Green space is fundamental to the good quality of life of residents, and therefore urban planning or improvement projects often include strategies directly or indirectly related to greening. Although green spaces generate positive effects such as cooling and reduction of rainwater runoff, and are an ecological corridor, few studies have examined the comprehensive multiple effects of greening in the urban planning context. To fill this gap in this fields literature, this study seeks to identify a planning model that determines the location and type of green cover based on its multiple effects (e.g., cooling and enhancement of ecological connectivity) and the implementation cost using NSGA II. The 30 Pareto-optimal plans were obtained by applying our model to a hypothetical landscape on a neighborhood scale. The results showed a synergistic relationship between cooling and enhancement of connectivity, as well as a trade-off relationship between greenery effects and implementation cost. It also defined critical lots for urban greening that are commonly selected in various plans. This model is expected to contribute to the improvement of existing planning processes by repeating the positive feedback loop: from plan modification to quantitative evaluation and selection of better plans. These optimal plans can also be considered as options for co-design by related stakeholders.1. INTRODUCTION 2. CHAPTER 1: Modelling Spatial Climate Change Land use Adaptation with Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithms to Improve Resilience for Rice Yield and Species Richness and to Mitigate Disaster Risk 2.1. Introduction 2.2. Study area 2.3. Methods 2.4. Results 2.5. Discussion 2.6. References 2.7. Supplemental material 3. CHAPTER 2: Multi-Objective Land-Use Allocation Considering Landslide Risk under Climate Change: Case Study in Pyeongchang-gun, Korea 3.1. Introduction 3.2. Material and Methods 3.3. Results 3.4. Discussion 3.5. Conclusion 3.6. References 4. CHAPTER 3: Multi-Objective Planning Model for Urban Greening based on Optimization Algorithms 3.1. Introduction 3.2. Methods 3.3. Results 3.4. Discussion 3.5. Conclusion 3.6. References 3.7. Appendix 5. CONCLUSION REFERENCESDocto

    Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for land-use management problem

    Get PDF
    Due to increasing population, and human activities on land to meet various demands, land uses are being continuously changed without a clear and logical planning with any attention to their long term environmental impacts. Thus affecting the natural balance of the environment, in the form of global warming, soil degradation, loss of biodiversity, air and water pollution, and so on. Hence, it has become urgent need to manage land uses scientifically to safeguard the environment from being further destroyed. Owing to the difficulty of deploying field experiments for direct assessment, mechanistic models are needed to be developed for improving the understanding of the overall impact from various land uses. However, very little work has been done so far in this area. Hence, NSGA-II-LUM, a spatial-GIS based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, has been developed for three objective functions: maximization of economic return, maximization of carbon sequestration and minimization of soil erosion, where the latter two are burning topics to today's researchers as the remedies to global warming and soil degradation. The success of NSGA-II-LUM has been presented through its application to a Mediterranean landscape from Southern Portugal

    Minimizing vehicular traffic via optimized land use development for a sustainable and equitable future

    Get PDF
    Mixed-use developments and transit-oriented developments are becoming very common in urban areas in an effort to reduce sprawl. Numerous studies have shown that such programs would not be successful unless the mix of land uses and sizes is well-balanced and integrated with the surrounding neighborhood. Developers often ignore this aspect in favor of immediate financial gain and do not realize that there are sustainable financial benefits in land use optimization. In addition, professionals often work with limited logistics, resources, and technical knowledge and therefore struggle in setting goals and suggesting land uses that have less auto dependency based on travel demand characteristics. The current traffic impact assessment methodology (part of the environmental review process for approval of a project) is one-dimensional. It does not consider land use optimization based on the surrounding neighborhood characteristics that have a significant effect in reducing vehicular traffic. These surrounding neighborhood characteristics are often grouped into categories reflecting the โ€œDโ€™s of developmentโ€โ€”Density, Diversity, Design, and Distance to transitโ€”and would have significant benefits in minimizing auto dependence. The objectives of this research are to first develop a methodology to optimize the mix of land uses and sizes to minimize the number vehicular trips and maximize the person trips using a case study of a mixed-use development. This will help to further understand the travel demand and parking behavior. Secondly, this research will use the travel demand characteristics from other approved mixed-use developments from various boroughs of New York City with diverse neighborhood characteristics to validate the land use optimization methodology. The third and ultimate objective of this research is to develop a model that is practical and implementable on a regional level to optimize the mix of land uses and sizes based on localized travel behavior patterns and neighborhood characteristics to minimize vehicle trips. In this study, a genetic algorithm has been developed and tested on one development to demonstrate its application (objective 1) and is subsequently applied to additional developments (objective 2). A stepwise regression analysis is then performed to develop equations for the optimal number of vehicle trips as well as the percent split of individual land use types within a development, all based on the surrounding neighborhood characteristics (objective 3). The research results in a series of equations that can be used to optimize a developmentโ€™s mix of land uses and sizes by minimizing vehicular trips and maximizing person trips. Although the equations vary from city to city, the methodology is adaptable enough such that planning agencies can generate their own equations for their own region and engineers can then use them to forecast trip

    Diseรฑo de una metodologรญa y un Sistema de Ayuda a la Decisiรณn Espacial para la planificaciรณn de los usos del suelo rural : aplicaciรณn a la comarca de Terra Chรก

    Get PDF
    Frente a esta necesidad, se ha encontrado la carencia de una metodologรญa que englobe todas las etapas de un proceso de planificaciรณn de usos del suelo y que sea sistemรกticamente aplicada en Galicia. En la presente investigaciรณn se ha diseรฑado una metodologรญa que proporciona un procedimiento cuantitativo para la ayuda en la toma de decisiones en la planificaciรณn de usos del suelo rural. Esta metodologรญa consta de tres etapas relacionadas entre sรญ; la evaluaciรณn de tierras, la optimizaciรณn de las superficies de uso del suelo y la asignaciรณn espacial de las mismas.Facing these demands, we encounter the lack of a methodology which includes all the stages of a land use planning process and is systematically applied in Galicia. In the present research, a methodology which provides a quantitative procedure for decisionmaking support in rural land use planning has been designed. This methodology consists of three interrelated stages; land evaluation, land use areas optimization, and land use allocation

    Land-Cover and Land-Use Study Using Genetic Algorithms, Petri Nets, and Cellular Automata

    Get PDF
    Recent research techniques, such as genetic algorithm (GA), Petri net (PN), and cellular automata (CA) have been applied in a number of studies. However, their capability and performance in land-cover land-use (LCLU) classification, change detection, and predictive modeling have not been well understood. This study seeks to address the following questions: 1) How do genetic parameters impact the accuracy of GA-based LCLU classification; 2) How do image parameters impact the accuracy of GA-based LCLU classification; 3) Is GA-based LCLU classification more accurate than the maximum likelihood classifier (MLC), iterative self-organizing data analysis technique (ISODATA), and the hybrid approach; 4) How do genetic parameters impact Petri Net-based LCLU change detection; and 5) How do cellular automata components impact the accuracy of LCLU predictive modeling. The study area, namely the Tickfaw River watershed (711miร‚ยฒ), is located in southeast Louisiana and southwest Mississippi. The major datasets include time-series Landsat TM / ETM images and Digital Orthophoto Quarter Quadrangles (DOQQรขโ‚ฌโ„ขs). LCLU classification was conducted by using the GA, MLC, ISODATA, and Hybrid approach. The LCLU change was modeled by using genetic PN-based process mining technique. The process models were interpreted and input to a CA for predicting future LCLU. The major findings include: 1) GA-based LCLU classification is more accurate than the traditional approaches; 2) When genetic parameters, image parameters, or CA components are configured improperly, the accuracy of LCLU classification, the coverage of LCLU change process model, and/or the accuracy of LCLU predictive modeling will be low; 3) For GA-based LCLU classification, the recommended configuration of genetic / image parameters is generation 2000-5000, population 1000, crossover rate 69%-99%, mutation rate 0.1%-0.5%, generation gap 25%-50%, data layers 16-20, training / testing data size 10000-20000 / 5000-10000, and spatial resolution 30m-60m; 4) For genetic Petri nets-based LCLU change detection, the recommended configuration of genetic parameters is generation 500, population 300, crossover rate 59%, mutation rate 5%, and elitism rate 4%; and 5) For CA-based LCLU predictive modeling, the recommended configuration of CA components is space 6025 * 12993, state 2, von Neumann neighborhood 3 * 3, time step 2-3 years, and optimized transition rules
    corecore