Domination in graphs of minimum degree at least two and large girth

We prove that for graphs of order n, minimum degree 2 and girth g 5 the domination number satisfies 1 3 + 2 3gn. As a corollary this implies that for cubic graphs of order n and girth g 5 the domination number satisfies 44 135 + 82 135gn which improves recent results due to Kostochka and Stodolsky (An upper bound on the domination number of n-vertex connected cubic graphs, manuscript (2005)) and Kawarabayashi, Plummer and Saito (Domination in a graph with a 2-factor, J. Graph Theory 52 (2006), 1-6) for large enough girth. Furthermore, it confirms a conjecture due to Reed about connected cubic graphs (Paths, stars and the number three, Combin. Prob. Comput. 5 (1996), 267-276) for girth at least 83

Domination number of graphs with minimum degree five

We prove that for every graph $G$ on $n$ vertices and with minimum degree five, the domination number $\gamma(G)$ cannot exceed $n/3$. The proof combines an algorithmic approach and the discharging method. Using the same technique, we provide a shorter proof for the known upper bound $4n/11$ on the domination number of graphs of minimum degree four.Comment: 17 page

Improved upper bounds on the domination number of graphs with minimum degree at least five

An algorithmic upper bound on the domination number $\gamma$ of graphs in terms of the order $n$ and the minimum degree $\delta$ is proved. It is demonstrated that the bound improves best previous bounds for any $5\le \delta \le 50$. In particular, for $\delta=5$, Xing et al.\ proved in 2006 that $\gamma \le 5n/14 < 0.3572 n$. This bound is improved to $0.3440 n$. For $\delta=6$, Clark et al.\ in 1998 established $\gamma <0.3377 n$, while Bir\'o et al. recently improved it to $\gamma <0.3340 n$. Here the bound is further improved to $\gamma < 0.3159 n$. For $\delta=7$, the best earlier bound $0.3 088 n$ is improved to $\gamma < 0.2927 n$

Locating-dominating sets and identifying codes in graphs of girth at least 5

Locating-dominating sets and identifying codes are two closely related notions in the area of separating systems. Roughly speaking, they consist in a dominating set of a graph such that every vertex is uniquely identified by its neighbourhood within the dominating set. In this paper, we study the size of a smallest locating-dominating set or identifying code for graphs of girth at least 5 and of given minimum degree. We use the technique of vertex-disjoint paths to provide upper bounds on the minimum size of such sets, and construct graphs who come close to meet these bounds.Comment: 20 pages, 9 figure

Locating-dominating sets and identifying codes in Graphs of Girth at least 5

Locating-dominating sets and identifying codes are two closely related notions in the area of separating systems. Roughly speaking, they consist in a dominating set of a graph such that every vertex is uniquely identified by its neighbourhood within the dominating set. In this paper, we study the size of a smallest locating-dominating set or identifying code for graphs of girth at least 5 and of given minimum degree. We use the technique of vertex-disjoint paths to provide upper bounds on the minimum size of such sets, and construct graphs who come close to meeting these bounds.Award-winningPostprint (author’s final draft

In the complement of a dominating set

A set D of vertices of a graph G=(V,E) is a dominating set, if every vertex of D\V has at least one neighbor that belongs to D. The disjoint domination number of a graph G is the minimum cardinality of two disjoint dominating sets of G. We prove upper bounds for the disjoint domination number for graphs of minimum degree at least 2, for graphs of large minimum degree and for cubic graphs.A set T of vertices of a graph G=(V,E) is a total dominating set, if every vertex of G has at least one neighbor that belongs to T. We characterize graphs of minimum degree 2 without induced 5-cycles and graphs of minimum degree at least 3 that have a dominating set, a total dominating set, and a non-empty vertex set that are disjoint.A set I of vertices of a graph G=(V,E) is an independent set, if all vertices in I are not adjacent in G. We give a constructive characterization of trees that have a maximum independent set and a minimum dominating set that are disjoint and we show that the corresponding decision problem is NP-hard for general graphs. Additionally, we prove several structural and hardness results concerning pairs of disjoint sets in graphs which are dominating, independent, or both. Furthermore, we prove lower bounds for the maximum cardinality of an independent set of graphs with specifed odd girth and small average degree.A connected graph G has spanning tree congestion at most s, if G has a spanning tree T such that for every edge e of T the edge cut defined in G by the vertex sets of the two components of T-e contains at most s edges. We prove that every connected graph of order n has spanning tree congestion at most n^(3/2) and we show that the corresponding decision problem is NP-hard