The Integrated Aircraft Routing and Crew Pairing Problem: ILP Based Formulations

Minimization of cost is very important in airline as great profit is an important objective for any airline system. One way to minimize the costs in airline is by developing an integrated planning process. Airline planning consists of many difficult operational decision problems including aircraft routing and crew pairing problems. These two sub-problems, though interrelated in practice, are usually solved sequentially leading to suboptimal solutions. We propose an integrated aircraft routing and crew pairing problem model, one approach to generate the feasible aircraft routes and crew pairs, followed by three approaches to solve the integrated model. The integrated aircraft routing and crew scheduling problem is to determine a minimum cost aircraft routes and crew schedules while each flight leg is covered by one aircraft and one crew. The first approach is an integer programming solution method, the second formulation is developed in a way to lend itself to be used efficiently by Dantzig Wolfe decomposition whereas the third one is formulated as a Benders decomposition method. Encouraging results are obtained when tested on four types of aircraft based on local flights in Malaysia for one week flight cycle

Un modelo integrado para el enrutamiento de aeronaves y la programación de la tripulación: Relajación lagrangiana y algoritmo metaheurístico

[EN] Airline optimization is a significant problem in recent researches and airline industryl as it can determine the level of service, profit and competition status of the airline. Aircraft and crew are expensive resources that need efficient utilization. This paper focuses simultaneously on two major issues including aircraft maintenance routing and crew scheduling. Several key issues such as aircraft replacement, fairly night flights assignment and long-life aircrafts are considered in this model. We used the flight hours as a new framework to control aircraft maintenance. At first, an integrated mathematical model for aircraft routing and crew scheduling problems is developed with the aim of cost minimization. Then, Lagrangian relaxation and Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm (PSO) are used as the solution techniques. To evaluate the efficiency of solution approaches, model is solved with different numerical examples in small, medium and large sizes and compared with GAMS output. The results show that Lagrangian relaxation method provides better solutions comparing to PSO and also has a very small gap to optimum solution.[ES] La optimización de aerolíneas es un problema importante en investigaciones recientes e industria de aerolíneas, ya que puede determinar el nivel de servicio, el beneficio y el estado de competencia de la aerolínea. Las aeronaves y la tripulación son recursos costosos que necesitan una utilización eficiente. Este artículo se centra simultáneamente en dos cuestiones principales, incluyendo el enrutamiento de mantenimiento de aeronaves y la programación de la tripulación. En este modelo se consideran varios temas clave, como el reemplazo de aeronaves, la asignación de vuelos nocturnos y los aviones envejecidos. Usamos las horas de vuelo como un nuevo marco para controlar el mantenimiento de las aeronaves. Al principio, se desarrolla un modelo matemático integrado para el enrutamiento de aeronaves y los problemas de programación de la tripulación con el objetivo de la minimización de costos. A continuación, se utilizan como técnicas de solución la relajación lagran-giana y el algoritmo “Particle Swarm Optimization” (PSO). Para evaluar la eficiencia de los en-foques de la solución, el modelo se resuelve con diferentes ejemplos numéricos en tamaños pequeños, medianos y grandes y se compara con la salida GAMS. Los resultados muestran que el método de relajación lagrangiana proporciona mejores soluciones en comparación con PSO y también tiene una pequeña diferencia para una solución óptimaMirjafari, M.; Rashidi Komijan, A.; Shoja, A. (2020). An integrated model for aircraft routing and crew scheduling: Lagrangian Relaxation and metaheuristic algorithm. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management. 11(1):25-38. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v11i1.12891OJS2538111Al-Thani, Nayla Ahmad, Ben Ahmed, Mohamed and Haouari, Mohamed (2016). A model and optimization-based heuristic for the operational aircraft maintenance routing problem, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Volume 72, Pages 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.09.004Azadeh, A., HosseinabadiFarahani, M., Eivazy, H., Nazari-Shirkouhi, S., &Asadipour, G. (2013). A hybrid meta-heuristic algorithm for optimization of crew scheduling, Applied Soft Computing, Volume 13, Pages 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.08.012Barnhart C. and Cohn, A. (2004). Airline schedule planning: Accomplishments and opportunities, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 6(1):3-22, 47, 69, 141, 144. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1030.0018Basdere, Mehmet and Bilge, Umit (2014). Operational aircraft maintenance routing problem with remaining time consideration, European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 235, Pages 315-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.066Bazargan, Massoud (2010). Airline Operations and scheduling second edition, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, USA, Ashgate publishing limite.Belien, Jeroen, Demeulemeester, Eric and Brecht (2010). Integrated staffing and scheduling for an aircraft line maintenance problem, HUB RESEARCH PAPER Economics & Management.Ben Ahmed, M., Zeghal Mansour, Farah and Haouari, Mohamed (2018). Robust integrated maintenance aircraft routing and crew pairing, Journal of Air Transport Management, Volume 73, Pages 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2018.07.007Ben Ahmed, M., Zeghal Mansour, F., Haouari, M. (2017). A two-level optimization approach for robust aircraft routing and retiming, Computers and Industrial Engineering, Volume 112, Pages 586-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.09.021Borndorfer, R., Schelten, U., Schlechte, T., Weider, S. (2006). A column generation approach to airline crew scheduling, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Pages 343-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32539-5_54Clarke, L., E. Johnson, G. Nemhauser, Z. Zhu. (1997). The Aircraft Rotation Problem. Annals of Operations Research, 69, Pages 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018945415148Deveci, Muhammet and ÇetinDemirel, Nihan (2018). Evolutionary algorithms for solving the airline crew pairing problem, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Volume 115, Pages 389-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.11.022Dozic, S., Kalic, M. (2015). Three-stage airline fleet planning model, J. Air Transport. Manag, 43, Pages 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.03.011Eltoukhy, A.E., Chan, F.T., Chung, S. (2017). Airline schedule planning: a review and future directions, Ind. Manag. Data Syst, 117(6), Pages 1201-1243. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2016-0358Feo, T. A., J. F. Bard. (1989). Flight Scheduling and Maintenance Base Planning. Management Science, 35(12), Pages 1415-1432. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1415Goffin, J. L. (1977). On the convergence rates of subgradient optimization methods. Math. Programming, 13, Pages 329-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01584346Gopalakrishnan, B., Johnson, E. L (2005). Airline crew scheduling, State-of-the-art. Ann. Oper. Res, 140(1), Pages 305-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-005-3975-3Held, M. and Karp, R.M. (1970). The Traveling-Salesman Problem and Minimum SpanningTrees. Operations Research, 18, 1138-1162. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.18.6.1138Held, M. Wolfe, P., Crowder, H. D. (1974). Validation of subgradient optimization, Math. Programming, 6, 62-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580223Jamili, Amin (2017). A robust mathematical model and heuristic algorithms for integrated aircraft routing and scheduling, with consideration of fleet assignment problem, Journal of Air Transport Management, Volume 58, Pages 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.08.008Jiang, H., Barnhart, C. (2009) Dynamic airline scheduling, Transport. Sci, 43(3), Pages 336-354. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1090.0269Kasirzadeh, A., Saddoune, M., Soumis, F. (2015). Airline crew scheduling: models, algorhitms and data sets, Euro Journal on Transportation and Logistics, 6(2), Pages 111-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13676-015-0080-xLacasse-Guay, E., Desaulniers, G., Soumis, F. (2010). Aircraft routing under different business processes, J. Air Transport. Manag, 16(5), Pages 258-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2010.02.001Muter, İbrahim, Birbil, Ş. İlker, Bülbül, Kerem, Şahin, Güvenç,Yenigün, Hüsnü, Taş,Duygu andTüzün, Dilek (2013). Solving a robust airline crew pairing problem with column generation, Computers & Operations Research, Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages 815-830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2010.11.005Saddoune, Mohammed, Desaulniers, Guy, Elhallaoui, Issmail and François Soumis (2011). Integrated airline crew scheduling: A bi-dynamic constraint aggregation method using neighborhoods, European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 212, Pages 445-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.02.009Safaei, Nima and K.S.Jardine, Andrew (2018). Aircraft routing with generalized maintenance constraints, Omega, Volume 80, Pages 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.08.013Shao Shengzhi (2012). Integrated Aircraft Fleeting, Routing, and Crew Pairing Models and Algorithms for the Airline Industry, Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Industrial and Systems Engineering.Shao, S., Sherali, H.D., Haouari, M. (2017). A novel model and decomposition approach for the integrated airline fleet assignment, aircraft routing, crew pairing problem, Transport. Sci, 51(1), Pages 233-249. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2015.0623Sherali, H.D., Bish, E.K., Zhu, X. (2006). Airline fleet assignment concepts, models and algorithms, Eur. J. Oper. Res, 172(1), Pages 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.01.056Warburg, V., Hansen, T.G., Larsen, A., Norman, H., Andersson, E. (2008). Dynamic airline scheduling: an analysis of potentials of refleeting and retiming, J. Air Transport. Manag. 14(4), Pages 163-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2008.03.004Yan, C. and Kung, J. (2018). Robust aircraft routing, Transport. Sci, 52(1), Pages 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2015.0657Yen, J.W., Birge, J.R., (2006). A stochastic programming approach to the airline crew scheduling problem. Transportation Science, Volume 40, Pages 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1050.0138Yu, G. (1998). Operation Research in the Airline Industry. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5501-8Zeren, Bahadir and Ozkol, Ibrahim (2016). A novel column generation strategy foe large scale airline crew pairing problems, Expert system with applications, Volume 55, Pages 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.01.045Zhang, Dong, Lau, H.Y.K. Henry and Yu, Chuhang (2015). A two stage heuristic algorithm for the integrated aircraft and crew schedule recovery problems, Computers and Industrial Engineering, Volume 87, Pages 436-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.05.03

Railway Crew Rescheduling with Retiming

Railway operations are disrupted frequently, e.g. the Dutch railway network experiences about three large disruptions per day on average. In such a disrupted situation railway operators need to quickly adjust their resource schedules. Nowadays, the timetable, the rolling stock and the crew schedule are recovered in a sequential way. In this paper, we model and solve the crew rescheduling problem with retiming. This problem extends the crew rescheduling problem by the possibility to delay the departure of some trains. In this way we partly integrate timetable adjustment and crew rescheduling. The algorithm is based on column generation techniques combined with Lagrangian heuristics. In order to prevent a large increase in computational time, retiming is allowed only for a limited number of trains where it seems very promising. Computational experiments with real-life disruption data show that, compared to the classical approach, it is possible to find better solutions by using crew rescheduling with retiming

Railway Crew Rescheduling with Retiming

Railway operations are disrupted frequently, e.g. the Dutch railway network experiences about three large disruptions per day on average. In such a disrupted situation railway operators need to quickly adjust their resource schedules. Nowadays, the timetable, the rolling stock and the crew schedule are recovered in a sequential way. In this paper, we model and solve the crew rescheduling problem with retiming. This problem extends the crew rescheduling problem by the possibility to delay the departure of some trains. In this way we partly integrate timetable adjustment and crew rescheduling. The algorithm is based on column generation techniques combined with Lagrangian heuristics. In order to prevent a large increase in computational time, retiming is allowed only for a limited number of trains where it seems very promising. Computational experiments with real-life disruption data show that, compared to the classical approach, it is possible to find better solutions by using crew rescheduling with retiming.

Empirical investigations of properties of robust aircraft routing models

The airline schedule planning process is an important component of airline operations, and it involves considerably complex problems. This research focuses on the aircraft routing phase. We introduce the concept of robustness in aircraft routing problems, and find solutions that can stand uncertainty. We categorize the delays in flight operations into two components – independent delay and propagated delay. In the data driven approach, independent delay can be regarded as constant, but propagated delay can be worked on. An example of aircraft swap is given to show that aircraft routing can potentially reduce the flight delays. To solve robust aircraft routing problems, we propose a list of formulations. They are in three categories – Lan, Clarke, Barnhart’s approach, chance-constrained programming approach, and extreme value approach. We conduct experiments with two airline networks – a 50-flight network and a 165-flight network. The K-fold cross validation approach is incorporated into aircraft routing problems to eliminate overfitting. According to the three evaluation metrics – on time performance, average total propagated delay and passenger disruptions, several good formulations are identified, which are recommended for airline schedule planners. We also explain the reasons behind the solution differences

Combining robustness and recovery for airline schedules

In this thesis, we address different aspects of the airline scheduling problem. The main difficulty in this field lies in the combinatorial complexity of the problems. Furthermore, as airline schedules are often faced with perturbations called disruptions (bad weather conditions, technical failures, congestion, crew illness…), planning for better performance under uncertainty is an additional dimension to the complexity of the problem. Our main focus is to develop better schedules that are less sensitive to perturbations and, when severe disruptions occur, are easier to recover. The former property is known as robustness and the latter is called recoverability. We start the thesis by addressing the problem of recovering a disrupted schedule. We present a general model, the constraint-specific recovery network, that encodes all feasible recovery schemes of any unit of the recovery problem. A unit is an aircraft, a crew member or a passenger and its recovery scheme is a new route, pairing or itinerary, respectively. We show how to model the Aircraft Recovery Problem (ARP) and the Passenger Recovery Problem (PRP), and provide computational results for both of them. Next, we present a general framework to solve problems subject to uncertainty: the Uncertainty Feature Optimization (UFO) framework, which implicitly embeds the uncertainty the problem is prone to. We show that UFO is a generalization of existing methods relying on explicit uncertainty models. Furthermore, we show that by implicitly considering uncertainty, we not only save the effort of modeling an explicit uncertainty set: we also protect against possible errors in its modeling. We then show that combining existing methods using explicit uncertainty characterization with UFO leads to more stable solutions with respect to changes in the noise's nature. We illustrate these concepts with extensive simulations on the Multi-Dimensional Knapsack Problem (MDKP). We then apply the UFO to airline scheduling. First, we study how robustness is defined in airline scheduling and then compare robustness of UFO models against existing models in the literature. We observe that the performance of the solutions closely depend on the way the performance is evaluated. UFO solutions seem to perform well globally, but models using explicit uncertainty have a better potential when focusing on a specific metric. Finally, we study the recoverability of UFO solutions with respect to the recovery algorithm we develop. Computational results on a European airline show that UFO solutions are able to significantly reduce recovery costs