3,980 research outputs found
Hybrid Rules with Well-Founded Semantics
A general framework is proposed for integration of rules and external first
order theories. It is based on the well-founded semantics of normal logic
programs and inspired by ideas of Constraint Logic Programming (CLP) and
constructive negation for logic programs. Hybrid rules are normal clauses
extended with constraints in the bodies; constraints are certain formulae in
the language of the external theory. A hybrid program is a pair of a set of
hybrid rules and an external theory. Instances of the framework are obtained by
specifying the class of external theories, and the class of constraints. An
example instance is integration of (non-disjunctive) Datalog with ontologies
formalized as description logics.
The paper defines a declarative semantics of hybrid programs and a
goal-driven formal operational semantics. The latter can be seen as a
generalization of SLS-resolution. It provides a basis for hybrid
implementations combining Prolog with constraint solvers. Soundness of the
operational semantics is proven. Sufficient conditions for decidability of the
declarative semantics, and for completeness of the operational semantics are
given
Sequentiality vs. Concurrency in Games and Logic
Connections between the sequentiality/concurrency distinction and the
semantics of proofs are investigated, with particular reference to games and
Linear Logic.Comment: 35 pages, appeared in Mathematical Structures in Computer Scienc
Robust Linear Temporal Logic
Although it is widely accepted that every system should be robust, in the
sense that "small" violations of environment assumptions should lead to "small"
violations of system guarantees, it is less clear how to make this intuitive
notion of robustness mathematically precise. In this paper, we address this
problem by developing a robust version of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL), which we
call robust LTL and denote by rLTL. Formulas in rLTL are syntactically
identical to LTL formulas but are endowed with a many-valued semantics that
encodes robustness. In particular, the semantics of the rLTL formula is such that a "small" violation of the environment
assumption is guaranteed to only produce a "small" violation of the
system guarantee . In addition to introducing rLTL, we study the
verification and synthesis problems for this logic: similarly to LTL, we show
that both problems are decidable, that the verification problem can be solved
in time exponential in the number of subformulas of the rLTL formula at hand,
and that the synthesis problem can be solved in doubly exponential time
From IF to BI: a tale of dependence and separation
We take a fresh look at the logics of informational dependence and
independence of Hintikka and Sandu and Vaananen, and their compositional
semantics due to Hodges. We show how Hodges' semantics can be seen as a special
case of a general construction, which provides a context for a useful
completeness theorem with respect to a wider class of models. We shed some new
light on each aspect of the logic. We show that the natural propositional logic
carried by the semantics is the logic of Bunched Implications due to Pym and
O'Hearn, which combines intuitionistic and multiplicative connectives. This
introduces several new connectives not previously considered in logics of
informational dependence, but which we show play a very natural role, most
notably intuitionistic implication. As regards the quantifiers, we show that
their interpretation in the Hodges semantics is forced, in that they are the
image under the general construction of the usual Tarski semantics; this
implies that they are adjoints to substitution, and hence uniquely determined.
As for the dependence predicate, we show that this is definable from a simpler
predicate, of constancy or dependence on nothing. This makes essential use of
the intuitionistic implication. The Armstrong axioms for functional dependence
are then recovered as a standard set of axioms for intuitionistic implication.
We also prove a full abstraction result in the style of Hodges, in which the
intuitionistic implication plays a very natural r\^ole.Comment: 28 pages, journal versio
General Logic Programs as Infinite Games
In [vE86] M.H. van Emden introduced a simple game semantics for definite logic programs. Recently [RW05,GRW05], the authors extended this game to apply to logic programs with negation. Moreover, under the assumption that the programs have a finite number of rules, it was demonstrated in [RW05,GRW05] that the game is equivalent to the well-founded semantics of negation. In this paper we present work-in-progress towards demonstrating that the game of [RW05,GRW05] is equivalent to the well-founded semantics even in the case of programs that have a countably infinite number of rules. We argue however that in this case the proof of correctness has to be more involved. More specifically, in order to demonstrate that the game is correct one has to define a refined game in which each of the two players in his first move makes a bet in the form of a countable ordinal. Each ordinal can be considered as a kind of clock that imposes a "time limit" to the moves of the corresponding player. We argue that this refined game can be used to give the proof of correctness for the countably infinite case
Probabilistic Programming Concepts
A multitude of different probabilistic programming languages exists today,
all extending a traditional programming language with primitives to support
modeling of complex, structured probability distributions. Each of these
languages employs its own probabilistic primitives, and comes with a particular
syntax, semantics and inference procedure. This makes it hard to understand the
underlying programming concepts and appreciate the differences between the
different languages. To obtain a better understanding of probabilistic
programming, we identify a number of core programming concepts underlying the
primitives used by various probabilistic languages, discuss the execution
mechanisms that they require and use these to position state-of-the-art
probabilistic languages and their implementation. While doing so, we focus on
probabilistic extensions of logic programming languages such as Prolog, which
have been developed since more than 20 years
Proving Correctness and Completeness of Normal Programs - a Declarative Approach
We advocate a declarative approach to proving properties of logic programs.
Total correctness can be separated into correctness, completeness and clean
termination; the latter includes non-floundering. Only clean termination
depends on the operational semantics, in particular on the selection rule. We
show how to deal with correctness and completeness in a declarative way,
treating programs only from the logical point of view. Specifications used in
this approach are interpretations (or theories). We point out that
specifications for correctness may differ from those for completeness, as
usually there are answers which are neither considered erroneous nor required
to be computed.
We present proof methods for correctness and completeness for definite
programs and generalize them to normal programs. For normal programs we use the
3-valued completion semantics; this is a standard semantics corresponding to
negation as finite failure. The proof methods employ solely the classical
2-valued logic. We use a 2-valued characterization of the 3-valued completion
semantics which may be of separate interest. The presented methods are compared
with an approach based on operational semantics. We also employ the ideas of
this work to generalize a known method of proving termination of normal
programs.Comment: To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP). 44
page
Completeness of Flat Coalgebraic Fixpoint Logics
Modal fixpoint logics traditionally play a central role in computer science,
in particular in artificial intelligence and concurrency. The mu-calculus and
its relatives are among the most expressive logics of this type. However,
popular fixpoint logics tend to trade expressivity for simplicity and
readability, and in fact often live within the single variable fragment of the
mu-calculus. The family of such flat fixpoint logics includes, e.g., LTL, CTL,
and the logic of common knowledge. Extending this notion to the generic
semantic framework of coalgebraic logic enables covering a wide range of logics
beyond the standard mu-calculus including, e.g., flat fragments of the graded
mu-calculus and the alternating-time mu-calculus (such as alternating-time
temporal logic ATL), as well as probabilistic and monotone fixpoint logics. We
give a generic proof of completeness of the Kozen-Park axiomatization for such
flat coalgebraic fixpoint logics.Comment: Short version appeared in Proc. 21st International Conference on
Concurrency Theory, CONCUR 2010, Vol. 6269 of Lecture Notes in Computer
Science, Springer, 2010, pp. 524-53
- …