Functional connectivity and neuronal dynamics: insights from computational methods

International audienceBrain functions rely on flexible communication between microcircuits in distinct cortical regions. The mechanisms underlying flexible information routing are still, however, largely unknown. Here, we hypothesize that the emergence of a multiplicity of possible information routing patterns is due to the richness of the complex dynamics that can be supported by an underlying structural network. Analyses of circuit computational models of interacting brain areas suggest that different dynamical states associated with a given connectome mechanistically implement different information routing patterns between system's components. As a result, a fast, network-wide and self-organized reconfiguration of information routing patterns-and Functional Connectivity networks, seen as their proxy-can be achieved by inducing a transition between the available intrinsic dynamical states. We present here a survey of theoretical and modelling results, as well as of sophisticated metrics of Functional Connectivity which are compliant with the daunting task of characterizing dynamic routing from neural data. Theory: Function follows dynamics, rather than structure Neuronal activity conveys information, but which target should this information be-pushed‖ to, or which source should new information be-pulled‖ from? The problem of dynamic information routing is ubiquitous in a distributed information processing system as the brain. Brain functions in general require the control of distributed networks of interregional communication on fast timescales compliant with behavior, but incompatible with plastic modifications of connectivity tracts (Bressler & Kelso, 2001; Varela et al., 2001). This argument led to notions of connectivity based on information exchange-or more generically, an-interaction‖-between brain regions or neuronal populations, rather than based on the underlying STRUCTURAL CONNECTIVITY (SC, i.e. anatomic). An entire zoo of data-driven metrics has been introduced in the literature and this chapter will review some of them. Notwithstanding, they track simple correlation, or directed causal influence (Friston, 2011) or information transfer (Wibral et al., 2014) between time-series of activity. Thes

Magnetoencephalography as a tool in psychiatric research: current status and perspective

The application of neuroimaging to provide mechanistic insights into circuit dysfunctions in major psychiatric conditions and the development of biomarkers are core challenges in current psychiatric research. In this review, we propose that recent technological and analytic advances in Magnetoencephalography (MEG), a technique which allows the measurement of neuronal events directly and non-invasively with millisecond resolution, provides novel opportunities to address these fundamental questions. Because of its potential in delineating normal and abnormal brain dynamics, we propose that MEG provides a crucial tool to advance our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms of major neuropsychiatric conditions, such as Schizophrenia, Autism Spectrum Disorders, and the dementias. In our paper, we summarize the mechanisms underlying the generation of MEG signals and the tools available to reconstruct generators and underlying networks using advanced source-reconstruction techniques. We then survey recent studies that have utilized MEG to examine aberrant rhythmic activity in neuropsychiatric disorders. This is followed by links with preclinical research, which have highlighted possible neurobiological mechanisms, such as disturbances in excitation/inhibition parameters, which could account for measured changes in neural oscillations. In the final section of the paper, challenges as well as novel methodological developments are discussed which could pave the way for a widespread application of MEG in translational research with the aim of developing biomarkers for early detection and diagnosis

Computational modelling in disorders of consciousness: Closing the gap towards personalised models for restoring consciousness

Disorders of consciousness are complex conditions characterised by persistent loss of responsiveness due to brain injury. They present diagnostic challenges and limited options for treatment, and highlight the urgent need for a more thorough understanding of how human consciousness arises from coordinated neural activity. The increasing availability of multimodal neuroimaging data has given rise to a wide range of clinically- and scientifically-motivated modelling efforts, seeking to improve data-driven stratification of patients, to identify causal mechanisms for patient pathophysiology and loss of consciousness more broadly, and to develop simulations as a means of testing in silico potential treatment avenues to restore consciousness. As a dedicated Working Group of clinicians and neuroscientists of the international Curing Coma Campaign, here we provide our framework and vision to understand the diverse statistical and generative computational modelling approaches that are being employed in this fast-growing field. We identify the gaps that exist between the current state-of-the-art in statistical and biophysical computational modelling in human neuroscience, and the aspirational goal of a mature field of modelling disorders of consciousness; which might drive improved treatments and outcomes in the clinic. Finally, we make several recommendations for how the field as a whole can work together to address these challenges

Emergence of Spatio-Temporal Pattern Formation and Information Processing in the Brain.

The spatio-temporal patterns of neuronal activity are thought to underlie cognitive functions, such as our thoughts, perceptions, and emotions. Neurons and glial cells, specifically astrocytes, are interconnected in complex networks, where large-scale dynamical patterns emerge from local chemical and electrical signaling between individual network components. How these emergent patterns form and encode for information is the focus of this dissertation. I investigate how various mechanisms that can coordinate collections of neurons in their patterns of activity can potentially cause the interactions across spatial and temporal scales, which are necessary for emergent macroscopic phenomena to arise. My work explores the coordination of network dynamics through pattern formation and synchrony in both experiments and simulations. I concentrate on two potential mechanisms: astrocyte signaling and neuronal resonance properties. Due to their ability to modulate neurons, we investigate the role of astrocytic networks as a potential source for coordinating neuronal assemblies. In cultured networks, I image patterns of calcium signaling between astrocytes, and reproduce observed properties of the network calcium patterning and perturbations with a simple model that incorporates the mechanisms of astrocyte communication. Understanding the modes of communication in astrocyte networks and how they form spatial temporal patterns of their calcium dynamics is important to understanding their interaction with neuronal networks. We investigate this interaction between networks and how glial cells modulate neuronal dynamics through microelectrode array measurements of neuronal network dynamics. We quantify the spontaneous electrical activity patterns of neurons and show the effect of glia on the neuronal dynamics and synchrony. Through a computational approach I investigate an entirely different theoretical mechanism for coordinating ensembles of neurons. I show in a computational model how biophysical resonance shifts in individual neurons can interact with the network topology to influence pattern formation and separation. I show that sub-threshold neuronal depolarization, potentially from astrocytic modulation among other sources, can shift neurons into and out of resonance with specific bands of existing extracellular oscillations. This can act as a dynamic readout mechanism during information storage and retrieval. Exploring these mechanisms that facilitate emergence are necessary for understanding information processing in the brain.PHDApplied PhysicsUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/111493/1/lshtrah_1.pd

Prediction and memory: A predictive coding account

The hippocampus is crucial for episodic memory, but it is also involved in online prediction. Evidence suggests that a unitary hippocampal code underlies both episodic memory and predictive processing, yet within a predictive coding framework the hippocampal-neocortical interactions that accompany these two phenomena are distinct and opposing. Namely, during episodic recall, the hippocampus is thought to exert an excitatory influence on the neocortex, to reinstate activity patterns across cortical circuits. This contrasts with empirical and theoretical work on predictive processing, where descending predictions suppress prediction errors to ‘explain away’ ascending inputs via cortical inhibition. In this hypothesis piece, we attempt to dissolve this previously overlooked dialectic. We consider how the hippocampus may facilitate both prediction and memory, respectively, by inhibiting neocortical prediction errors or increasing their gain. We propose that these distinct processing modes depend upon the neuromodulatory gain (or precision) ascribed to prediction error units. Within this framework, memory recall is cast as arising from fictive prediction errors that furnish training signals to optimise generative models of the world, in the absence of sensory data