Foundations of Session Types and Behavioural Contracts

International audienceBehavioural type systems, usually associated to concurrent or distributed computations, encompass concepts such as interfaces, communication protocols, and contracts, in addition to the traditional input/output operations. The behavioural type of a software component specifies its expected patterns of interaction using expressive type languages, so that types can be used to determine automatically whether the component interacts correctly with other components. Two related important notions of behavioural types are those of session types and behavioural contracts. This paper surveys the main accomplishments of the last twenty years within these two approaches

An algebra of behavioural types

Special thanks to Gérard Boudol, Ilaria Castellani, Silvano Dal Zilio, and Massimo Merro, for fruitful discussions and careful reading of parts of this document. Several anonymous referees made useful comments.We propose a process algebra, the Algebra of Behavioural Types, as a language for typing concurrent objects. A type is a higher-order labelled transition system that characterises all possible life cycles of a concurrent object. States represent interfaces of objects; state transitions model the dynamic change of object interfaces. Moreover, a type provides an internal view of the objects that inhabits it: a synchronous one, since transitions correspond to message reception. To capture this internal view of objects we define a notion of bisimulation, strong on labels and weak on silent actions. We study several algebraic laws that characterise this equivalence, and obtain completeness results for image-finite types.publishersversionpublishe

Two sides of the same coin: session types and game semantics

Game semantics and session types are two formalisations of the same concept: message-passing open programs following certain protocols. Game semantics represents protocols as games, and programs as strategies; while session types specify protocols, and well-typed π-calculus processes model programs. Giving faithful models of the π-calculus and giving a precise description of strategies as a programming language are two difficult problems. In this paper, we show how these two problems can be tackled at the same time by building an accurate game semantics model of the session π-calculus. Our main contribution is to fill a semantic gap between the synchrony of the (session) π-calculus and the asynchrony of game semantics, by developing an event-structure based game semantics for synchronous concurrent computation. This model supports the first truly concurrent fully abstract (for barbed congruence) interpretation of the synchronous (session) π-calculus.We further strengthen this correspondence, establishing finite definability of asynchronous strategies by the internal session π-calculus. As an application of these results, we propose a faithful encoding of synchronous strategies into asynchronous strategies by call-return protocols, which induces automatically an encoding at the level of processes. Our results bring session types and game semantics into the same picture, proposing the session calculus as a programming language for strategies, and strategies as a very accurate model of the session calculus. We implement a prototype which computes the interpretation of session processes as synchronous strategies

A structural operational semantics of a concurrent class calculus

The concurrent $\nu$-calculus has been investigated as a core calculus for imperative, object-oriented languages with multithreading and heap-allocated objects. From an abstract point of view, the combination of this form of concurrency with objects corresponds to features known from the popular language Java. One distinctive feature, however, of the concurrent object calculus is that it is \emph{object-based}, where as the mainstream of object-oriented languages is \emph{class-based.} This technical report extends the concurrent $\nu$-calculus by introducing classes and explores some of the semantical consequences. The semantics will serve asthe basis for a proof of full abstraction wrt.\ to a may-testing based notion of observability

Multi-modal meaning – An empirically-founded process algebra approach

Humans communicate with different modalities. We offer an account of multi-modal meaning coordination, taking speech-gesture meaning coordination as a prototypical case. We argue that temporal synchrony (plus prosody) does not determine how to coordinate speech meaning and gesture meaning. Challenging cases are asynchrony and broadcasting cases, which are illustrated with empirical data. We propose that a process algebra account satisfies the desiderata. It models gesture and speech as independent but concurrent processes that can communicate flexibly with each other and exchange the same information more than once. The account utilizes the psi-calculus, allowing for agents, input-output-channels, concurrent processes, and data transport of typed lambda-terms. A multi-modal meaning is produced integrating speech meaning and gesture meaning into one semantic package. Two cases of meaning coordination are handled in some detail: the asynchrony between gesture and speech, and the broadcasting of gesture meaning across several dialogue contributions. This account can be generalized to other cases of multi-modal meaning