Combinatorial optimization and metaheuristics

Today, combinatorial optimization is one of the youngest and most active areas of discrete mathematics. It is a branch of optimization in applied mathematics and computer science, related to operational research, algorithm theory and computational complexity theory. It sits at the intersection of several fields, including artificial intelligence, mathematics and software engineering. Its increasing interest arises for the fact that a large number of scientific and industrial problems can be formulated as abstract combinatorial optimization problems, through graphs and/or (integer) linear programs. Some of these problems have polynomial-time (“efficient”) algorithms, while most of them are NP-hard, i.e. it is not proved that they can be solved in polynomial-time. Mainly, it means that it is not possible to guarantee that an exact solution to the problem can be found and one has to settle for an approximate solution with known performance guarantees. Indeed, the goal of approximate methods is to find “quickly” (reasonable run-times), with “high” probability, provable “good” solutions (low error from the real optimal solution). In the last 20 years, a new kind of algorithm commonly called metaheuristics have emerged in this class, which basically try to combine heuristics in high level frameworks aimed at efficiently and effectively exploring the search space. This report briefly outlines the components, concepts, advantages and disadvantages of different metaheuristic approaches from a conceptual point of view, in order to analyze their similarities and differences. The two very significant forces of intensification and diversification, that mainly determine the behavior of a metaheuristic, will be pointed out. The report concludes by exploring the importance of hybridization and integration methods

Big Data Optimization : Algorithmic Framework for Data Analysis Guided by Semantics

Fecha de Lectura de Tesis: 9 noviembre 2018.Over the past decade the rapid rise of creating data in all domains of knowledge such as traffic, medicine, social network, industry, etc., has highlighted the need for enhancing the process of analyzing large data volumes, in order to be able to manage them with more easiness and in addition, discover new relationships which are hidden in them Optimization problems, which are commonly found in current industry, are not unrelated to this trend, therefore Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms (MOA) should bear in mind this new scenario. This means that, MOAs have to deal with problems, which have either various data sources (typically streaming) of huge amount of data. Indeed these features, in particular, are found in Dynamic Multi-Objective Problems (DMOPs), which are related to Big Data optimization problems. Mostly with regards to velocity and variability. When dealing with DMOPs, whenever there exist changes in the environment that affect the solutions of the problem (i.e., the Pareto set, the Pareto front, or both), therefore in the fitness landscape, the optimization algorithm must react to adapt the search to the new features of the problem. Big Data analytics are long and complex processes therefore, with the aim of simplify them, a series of steps are carried out through. A typical analysis is composed of data collection, data manipulation, data analysis and finally result visualization. In the process of creating a Big Data workflow the analyst should bear in mind the semantics involving the problem domain knowledge and its data. Ontology is the standard way for describing the knowledge about a domain. As a global target of this PhD Thesis, we are interested in investigating the use of the semantic in the process of Big Data analysis, not only focused on machine learning analysis, but also in optimization

A hybrid, auto-adaptive, and rule-based multi-agent approach using evolutionary algorithms for improved searching

Selecting the most appropriate heuristic for solving a specific problem is not easy, for many reasons. This article focuses on one of these reasons: traditionally, the solution search process has operated in a given manner regardless of the specific problem being solved, and the process has been the same regardless of the size, complexity and domain of the problem. To cope with this situation, search processes should mould the search into areas of the search space that are meaningful for the problem. This article builds on previous work in the development of a multi-agent paradigm using techniques derived from knowledge discovery (data-mining techniques) on databases of so-far visited solutions. The aim is to improve the search mechanisms, increase computational efficiency and use rules to enrich the formulation of optimization problems, while reducing the search space and catering to realistic problems.Izquierdo Sebastián, J.; Montalvo Arango, I.; Campbell, E.; Pérez García, R. (2015). A hybrid, auto-adaptive, and rule-based multi-agent approach using evolutionary algorithms for improved searching. Engineering Optimization. 1-13. doi:10.1080/0305215X.2015.1107434S113Becker, U., & Fahrmeir, L. (2001). Bump Hunting for Risk: a New Data Mining Tool and its Applications. Computational Statistics, 16(3), 373-386. doi:10.1007/s001800100073Bouguessa, M., & Shengrui Wang. (2009). Mining Projected Clusters in High-Dimensional Spaces. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(4), 507-522. doi:10.1109/tkde.2008.162Chong, I.-G., & Jun, C.-H. (2005). Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 78(1-2), 103-112. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.12.011CHONG, I., & JUN, C. (2008). Flexible patient rule induction method for optimizing process variables in discrete type. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(4), 3014-3020. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.047Cole, S. W., Galic, Z., & Zack, J. A. (2003). Controlling false-negative errors in microarray differential expression analysis: a PRIM approach. Bioinformatics, 19(14), 1808-1816. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg242FRIEDMAN, J. H., & FISHER, N. I. (1999). Statistics and Computing, 9(2), 123-143. doi:10.1023/a:1008894516817Geem, Z. W. (2006). Optimal cost design of water distribution networks using harmony search. Engineering Optimization, 38(3), 259-277. doi:10.1080/03052150500467430Goncalves, L. B., Vellasco, M. M. B. R., Pacheco, M. A. C., & Flavio Joaquim de Souza. (2006). Inverted hierarchical neuro-fuzzy BSP system: a novel neuro-fuzzy model for pattern classification and rule extraction in databases. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 36(2), 236-248. doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2004.843220Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001). The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer Series in Statistics. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5Chih-Ming Hsu, & Ming-Syan Chen. (2009). On the Design and Applicability of Distance Functions in High-Dimensional Data Space. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(4), 523-536. doi:10.1109/tkde.2008.178Hwang, S.-F., & He, R.-S. (2006). A hybrid real-parameter genetic algorithm for function optimization. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 20(1), 7-21. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2005.09.001Izquierdo, J., Montalvo, I., Pérez, R., & Fuertes, V. S. (2008). Design optimization of wastewater collection networks by PSO. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 56(3), 777-784. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2008.02.007Javadi, A. A., Farmani, R., & Tan, T. P. (2005). A hybrid intelligent genetic algorithm. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 19(4), 255-262. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2005.07.003Jin, X., Zhang, J., Gao, J., & Wu, W. (2008). Multi-objective optimization of water supply network rehabilitation with non-dominated sorting Genetic Algorithm-II. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 9(3), 391-400. doi:10.1631/jzus.a071448Johns, M. B., Keedwell, E., & Savic, D. (2014). Adaptive locally constrained genetic algorithm for least-cost water distribution network design. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 16(2), 288-301. doi:10.2166/hydro.2013.218Jourdan, L., Corne, D., Savic, D., & Walters, G. (2005). Preliminary Investigation of the ‘Learnable Evolution Model’ for Faster/Better Multiobjective Water Systems Design. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, 841-855. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-31880-4_58Kamwa, I., Samantaray, S. R., & Joos, G. (2009). Development of Rule-Based Classifiers for Rapid Stability Assessment of Wide-Area Post-Disturbance Records. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 24(1), 258-270. doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2008.2009430Kang, D., & Lansey, K. (2012). Revisiting Optimal Water-Distribution System Design: Issues and a Heuristic Hierarchical Approach. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 138(3), 208-217. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000165Keedwell, E., & Khu, S.-T. (2005). A hybrid genetic algorithm for the design of water distribution networks. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 18(4), 461-472. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2004.10.001Kehl, V., & Ulm, K. (2006). Responder identification in clinical trials with censored data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 50(5), 1338-1355. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2004.11.015Liu, X., Minin, V., Huang, Y., Seligson, D. B., & Horvath, S. (2004). Statistical Methods for Analyzing Tissue Microarray Data. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 14(3), 671-685. doi:10.1081/bip-200025657Marchi, A., Dandy, G., Wilkins, A., & Rohrlach, H. (2014). Methodology for Comparing Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimization of Water Distribution Systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 140(1), 22-31. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000321Martínez-Rodríguez, J. B., Montalvo, I., Izquierdo, J., & Pérez-García, R. (2011). Reliability and Tolerance Comparison in Water Supply Networks. Water Resources Management, 25(5), 1437-1448. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9753-2McClymont, K., Keedwell, E., Savić, D., & Randall-Smith, M. (2013). A general multi-objective hyper-heuristic for water distribution network design with discolouration risk. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 15(3), 700-716. doi:10.2166/hydro.2012.022McClymont, K., Keedwell, E. C., Savić, D., & Randall-Smith, M. (2014). Automated construction of evolutionary algorithm operators for the bi-objective water distribution network design problem using a genetic programming based hyper-heuristic approach. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 16(2), 302-318. doi:10.2166/hydro.2013.226Michalski, R. S. (2000). Machine Learning, 38(1/2), 9-40. doi:10.1023/a:1007677805582Montalvo, I., Izquierdo, J., Pérez-García, R., & Herrera, M. (2014). Water Distribution System Computer-Aided Design by Agent Swarm Optimization. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 29(6), 433-448. doi:10.1111/mice.12062Montalvo, I., Izquierdo, J., Schwarze, S., & Pérez-García, R. (2010). Multi-objective particle swarm optimization applied to water distribution systems design: An approach with human interaction. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 52(7-8), 1219-1227. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2010.02.017Nguyen, V. V., Hartmann, D., & König, M. (2012). A distributed agent-based approach for simulation-based optimization. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26(4), 814-832. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2012.06.001Nicklow, J., Reed, P., Savic, D., Dessalegne, T., Harrell, L., … Chan-Hilton, A. (2010). State of the Art for Genetic Algorithms and Beyond in Water Resources Planning and Management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 136(4), 412-432. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000053Onwubolu, G. C., & Babu, B. V. (2004). New Optimization Techniques in Engineering. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39930-8Pelikan, M., Goldberg, D. E., & Lobo, F. G. (2002). Computational Optimization and Applications, 21(1), 5-20. doi:10.1023/a:1013500812258Reed, P. M., Hadka, D., Herman, J. D., Kasprzyk, J. R., & Kollat, J. B. (2013). Evolutionary multiobjective optimization in water resources: The past, present, and future. Advances in Water Resources, 51, 438-456. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.01.005Shang, W., Zhao, S., & Shen, Y. (2009). A flexible tolerance genetic algorithm for optimal problems with nonlinear equality constraints. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 23(3), 253-264. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2008.09.001Vrugt, J. A., & Robinson, B. A. (2007). Improved evolutionary optimization from genetically adaptive multimethod search. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(3), 708-711. doi:10.1073/pnas.0610471104Vrugt, J. A., Robinson, B. A., & Hyman, J. M. (2009). Self-Adaptive Multimethod Search for Global Optimization in Real-Parameter Spaces. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 13(2), 243-259. doi:10.1109/tevc.2008.924428Xie, X.-F., & Liu, J. (2008). Graph coloring by multiagent fusion search. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 18(2), 99-123. doi:10.1007/s10878-008-9140-6Xiao-Feng Xie, & Jiming Liu. (2009). Multiagent Optimization System for Solving the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP). IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 39(2), 489-502. doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2008.2006910Zheng, F., Simpson, A. R., & Zecchin, A. C. (2013). A decomposition and multistage optimization approach applied to the optimization of water distribution systems with multiple supply sources. Water Resources Research, 49(1), 380-399. doi:10.1029/2012wr013160Zheng, F., Simpson, A. R., & Zecchin, A. C. (2014). Coupled Binary Linear Programming–Differential Evolution Algorithm Approach for Water Distribution System Optimization. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 140(5), 585-597. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.000036

Introduction to Facial Micro Expressions Analysis Using Color and Depth Images: A Matlab Coding Approach (Second Edition, 2023)

The book attempts to introduce a gentle introduction to the field of Facial Micro Expressions Recognition (FMER) using Color and Depth images, with the aid of MATLAB programming environment. FMER is a subset of image processing and it is a multidisciplinary topic to analysis. So, it requires familiarity with other topics of Artifactual Intelligence (AI) such as machine learning, digital image processing, psychology and more. So, it is a great opportunity to write a book which covers all of these topics for beginner to professional readers in the field of AI and even without having background of AI. Our goal is to provide a standalone introduction in the field of MFER analysis in the form of theorical descriptions for readers with no background in image processing with reproducible Matlab practical examples. Also, we describe any basic definitions for FMER analysis and MATLAB library which is used in the text, that helps final reader to apply the experiments in the real-world applications. We believe that this book is suitable for students, researchers, and professionals alike, who need to develop practical skills, along with a basic understanding of the field. We expect that, after reading this book, the reader feels comfortable with different key stages such as color and depth image processing, color and depth image representation, classification, machine learning, facial micro-expressions recognition, feature extraction and dimensionality reduction. The book attempts to introduce a gentle introduction to the field of Facial Micro Expressions Recognition (FMER) using Color and Depth images, with the aid of MATLAB programming environment.Comment: This is the second edition of the boo

Optimal deployment of components of cloud-hosted application for guaranteeing multitenancy isolation

One of the challenges of deploying multitenant cloud-hosted services that are designed to use (or be integrated with) several components is how to implement the required degree of isolation between the components when there is a change in the workload. Achieving the highest degree of isolation implies deploying a component exclusively for one tenant; which leads to high resource consumption and running cost per component. A low degree of isolation allows sharing of resources which could possibly reduce cost, but with known limitations of performance and security interference. This paper presents a model-based algorithm together with four variants of a metaheuristic that can be used with it, to provide near-optimal solutions for deploying components of a cloud-hosted application in a way that guarantees multitenancy isolation. When the workload changes, the model based algorithm solves an open multiclass QN model to determine the average number of requests that can access the components and then uses a metaheuristic to provide near-optimal solutions for deploying the components. Performance evaluation showed that the obtained solutions had low variability and percent deviation when compared to the reference/optimal solution. We also provide recommendations and best practice guidelines for deploying components in a way that guarantees the required degree of isolation