Space, Time, and Interaction: A Taxonomy of Corner Cases in Trajectory Datasets for Automated Driving

Trajectory data analysis is an essential component for highly automated driving. Complex models developed with these data predict other road users\u27 movement and behavior patterns. Based on these predictions - and additional contextual information such as the course of the road, (traffic) rules, and interaction with other road users - the highly automated vehicle (HAV) must be able to reliably and safely perform the task assigned to it, e.g., moving from point A to B. Ideally, the HAV moves safely through its environment, just as we would expect a human driver to do. However, if unusual trajectories occur, so-called trajectory corner cases, a human driver can usually cope well, but an HAV can quickly get into trouble. In the definition of trajectory corner cases, which we provide in this work, we will consider the relevance of unusual trajectories with respect to the task at hand. Based on this, we will also present a taxonomy of different trajectory corner cases. The categorization of corner cases into the taxonomy will be shown with examples and is done by cause and required data sources. To illustrate the complexity between the machine learning (ML) model and the corner case cause, we present a general processing chain underlying the taxonomy

One Ontology to Rule Them All: Corner Case Scenarios for Autonomous Driving

The core obstacle towards a large-scale deployment of autonomous vehicles currently lies in the long tail of rare events. These are extremely challenging since they do not occur often in the utilized training data for deep neural networks. To tackle this problem, we propose the generation of additional synthetic training data, covering a wide variety of corner case scenarios. As ontologies can represent human expert knowledge while enabling computational processing, we use them to describe scenarios. Our proposed master ontology is capable to model scenarios from all common corner case categories found in the literature. From this one master ontology, arbitrary scenario-describing ontologies can be derived. In an automated fashion, these can be converted into the OpenSCENARIO format and subsequently executed in simulation. This way, also challenging test and evaluation scenarios can be generated.Comment: Daniel Bogdoll and Stefani Guneshka contributed equally. Accepted for publication at ECCV 2022 SAIAD worksho

Concepts in Testing of Autonomous Systems: Academic Literature and Industry Practice

Testing of autonomous systems is extremely important as many of them are both safety-critical and security-critical. The architecture and mechanism of such systems are fundamentally different from traditional control software, which appears to operate in more structured environments and are explicitly instructed according to the system design and implementation. To gain a better understanding of autonomous systems practice and facilitate research on testing of such systems, we conducted an exploratory study by synthesizing academic literature with a focus group discussion and interviews with industry practitioners. Based on thematic analysis of the data, we provide a conceptualization of autonomous systems, classifications of challenges and current practices as well as of available techniques and approaches for testing of autonomous systems. Our findings also indicate that more research efforts are required for testing of autonomous systems to improve both the quality and safety aspects of such systems.Comment: 8 pages, 5 figures, conferenc

Perception Datasets for Anomaly Detection in Autonomous Driving: A Survey

Deep neural networks (DNN) which are employed in perception systems for autonomous driving require a huge amount of data to train on, as they must reliably achieve high performance in all kinds of situations. However, these DNN are usually restricted to a closed set of semantic classes available in their training data, and are therefore unreliable when confronted with previously unseen instances. Thus, multiple perception datasets have been created for the evaluation of anomaly detection methods, which can be categorized into three groups: real anomalies in real-world, synthetic anomalies augmented into real-world and completely synthetic scenes. This survey provides a structured and, to the best of our knowledge, complete overview and comparison of perception datasets for anomaly detection in autonomous driving. Each chapter provides information about tasks and ground truth, context information, and licenses. Additionally, we discuss current weaknesses and gaps in existing datasets to underline the importance of developing further data.Comment: Accepted for publication at IV 202

A Comprehensive Review on Ontologies for Scenario-based Testing in the Context of Autonomous Driving

The verification and validation of autonomous driving vehicles remains a major challenge due to the high complexity of autonomous driving functions. Scenario-based testing is a promising method for validating such a complex system. Ontologies can be utilized to produce test scenarios that are both meaningful and relevant. One crucial aspect of this process is selecting the appropriate method for describing the entities involved. The level of detail and specific entity classes required will vary depending on the system being tested. It is important to choose an ontology that properly reflects these needs. This paper summarizes key representative ontologies for scenario-based testing and related use cases in the field of autonomous driving. The considered ontologies are classified according to their level of detail for both static facts and dynamic aspects. Furthermore, the ontologies are evaluated based on the presence of important entity classes and the relations between them

Critical Scenario Identification for Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems

Background: Autonomous systems have received considerable attention from academia and are adopted by various industrial domains, such as automotive, avionics, etc. As many of them are considered safety-critical, testing is indispensable to verify their reliability and safety. However, there is no common standard for testing autonomous systems efficiently and effectively. Thus new approaches for testing such systems must be developed.Aim: The objective of this thesis is two-fold. First, we want to present an overview of software testing of autonomous systems, i.e., relevant concepts, challenges, and techniques available in academic research and industry practice. Second, we aim to establish a new approach for testing autonomous driving systems and demonstrate its effectiveness by using real autonomous driving systems from industry.Research Methodology: We conducted the research in three steps using the design science paradigm. First, we explored the existing literature and industry practices to understand the state of the art for testing of autonomous systems. Second, we focused on a particular sub-domain - autonomous driving - and proposed a systematic approach for critical test scenario identification. Lastly, we validated our approach and employed it for testing real autonomous driving systems by collaborating with Volvo Cars.Results: We present the results as four papers in this thesis. First, we conceptualized a definition of autonomous systems and classified challenges and approaches, techniques, and practices for testing autonomous systems in general. Second, we designed a systematic approach for critical test scenario identification. We employed the approach for testing two real autonomous driving systems from the industry and have effectively identified critical test scenarios. Lastly, we established a model for predicting the distribution of vehicle-pedestrian interactions for realistic test scenario generation for autonomous driving systems. Conclusion: Critical scenario identification is a favorable approach to generate test scenarios and facilitate the testing of autonomous driving systems in an efficient way. Future improvement of the approach includes (1) evaluating the effectiveness of the generated critical scenarios for testing; (2) extending the sub-components in this approach; (3) combining different testing approaches, and (4) exploring the application of the approach to test different autonomous systems

Software engineering for AI-based systems: A survey

AI-based systems are software systems with functionalities enabled by at least one AI component (e.g., for image-, speech-recognition, and autonomous driving). AI-based systems are becoming pervasive in society due to advances in AI. However, there is limited synthesized knowledge on Software Engineering (SE) approaches for building, operating, and maintaining AI-based systems. To collect and analyze state-of-the-art knowledge about SE for AI-based systems, we conducted a systematic mapping study. We considered 248 studies published between January 2010 and March 2020. SE for AI-based systems is an emerging research area, where more than 2/3 of the studies have been published since 2018. The most studied properties of AI-based systems are dependability and safety. We identified multiple SE approaches for AI-based systems, which we classified according to the SWEBOK areas. Studies related to software testing and software quality are very prevalent, while areas like software maintenance seem neglected. Data-related issues are the most recurrent challenges. Our results are valuable for: researchers, to quickly understand the state-of-the-art and learn which topics need more research; practitioners, to learn about the approaches and challenges that SE entails for AI-based systems; and, educators, to bridge the gap among SE and AI in their curricula.This work has been partially funded by the “Beatriz Galindo” Spanish Program BEAGAL18/00064 and by the DOGO4ML Spanish research project (ref. PID2020-117191RB-I00)Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

The correlation between vehicle vertical dynamics and deep learning-based visual target state estimation:A sensitivity study

Automated vehicles will provide greater transport convenience and interconnectivity, increase mobility options to young and elderly people, and reduce traffic congestion and emissions. However, the largest obstacle towards the deployment of automated vehicles on public roads is their safety evaluation and validation. Undeniably, the role of cameras and Artificial Intelligence-based (AI) vision is vital in the perception of the driving environment and road safety. Although a significant number of studies on the detection and tracking of vehicles have been conducted, none of them focused on the role of vertical vehicle dynamics. For the first time, this paper analyzes and discusses the influence of road anomalies and vehicle suspension on the performance of detecting and tracking driving objects. To this end, we conducted an extensive road field study and validated a computational tool for performing the assessment using simulations. A parametric study revealed the cases where AI-based vision underperforms and may significantly degrade the safety performance of AV

Space, Time, and Interaction: A Taxonomy of Corner Cases in Trajectory Datasets for Automated Driving

Trajectory data analysis is an essential component for highly automated driving. Complex models developed with these data predict other road users' movement and behavior patterns. Based on these predictions — and additional contextual information such as the course of the road, (traffic) rules, and interaction with other road users — the highly automated vehicle (HAV) must be able to reliably and safely perform the task assigned to it, e.g., moving from point A to B. Ideally, the HAV moves safely through its environment, just as we would expect a human driver to do. However, if unusual trajectories occur, so-called trajectory corner cases, a human driver can usually cope well, but an HAV can quickly get into trouble. In the definition of trajectory corner cases, which we provide in this work, we will consider the relevance of unusual trajectories with respect to the task at hand. Based on this, we will also present a taxonomy of different trajectory corner cases. The categorization of corner cases into the taxonomy will be shown with examples and is done by cause and required data sources. To illustrate the complexity between the machine learning (ML) model and the corner case cause, we present a general processing chain underlying the taxonomy