36 research outputs found

    ํŒ๋งค์ด‰์ง„์„ ๋„์ž…ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์š” ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ ์žฌ๊ณ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ๋ชจํ˜•

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์‚ฐ์—…๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ, 2020. 8. ๋ฌธ์ผ๊ฒฝ.As the globalization of markets accelerates competition among companies, sales promotion, which refers to short-term incentives promoting sales of products or services, plays a prominent role. Although there are various types of sales promotions, such as price reduction, buy-x-get-y-free, and trade-in program, the common purpose is to induce the purchase of customers by offering benefits. This successful strategy has caught the attention of researchers, including operations management and supply chain management. Thus, various studies have been conducted to examine strategies for ongoing operations and to demonstrate the effects of the sales promotion, which are based on the strategic level. However, research at the tactical or operational level has been conducted insufficiently. This dissertation examines the inventory models considering (i) markdown sale, (ii) buy one get one free (BOGO), and (iii) trade-in program. First, the newsvendor model is considered. By introducing the decision variable, which represents the start time of markdown sale, the retailer can obtain the optimal combination of the start time of a markdown sale and an order quantity. Under certain conditions in a decentralized system, however, the start time of a markdown sale where the retailer obtains the highest profit is the least profitable for the manufacturer. To avoid irrational ordering behavior by a retailer against a manufacturer, a revenue-sharing contract is proposed. Second, the mobile application, ``My Own Refrigerator'', is considered in the inventory model. It enables customers to store BOGO products in their virtual storage for later use. That is, customers can drop by the store to pick up the extra freebies in the future. The promotion involves a high degree of uncertainty regarding the revisiting date because customers who buy the product do not need to take both products on the day of purchase. To deal with this uncertainty, we propose a robust multiperiod inventory model by addressing the approximation of a multistage stochastic optimization model. Third, the trade-in program is considered. It is one of the sales promotions that companies collect used old-generation products from customers and provide them with new-generation products at a discount price. It also helps to acquire the additional products which are required for the refurbishment service. A multiperiod stochastic inventory model based on the closed-loop supply chain system is proposed by incorporating the trade-in program and refurbishment service simultaneously. The stochastic optimization model is approximated to the robust counterpart, which features a deterministic second-order cone program.์‹œ์žฅ์˜ ์„ธ๊ณ„ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ธฐ์—… ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์ด ๊ฐ€์†ํ™”๋จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ, ๋‹จ๊ธฐ ์ธ์„ผํ‹ฐ๋ธŒ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ณ ๊ฐ์˜ ์ œํ’ˆ ๋˜๋Š” ์„œ๋น„์Šค ๊ตฌ๋งค๋ฅผ ์œ ๋„ํ•˜๋Š” ํŒ๋งค์ด‰์ง„์˜ ์—ญํ• ์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•ด์กŒ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์ธํ•˜, ํ–‰์‚ฌ์ƒํ’ˆ ์ฆ์ •, ํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด๋“œ์ธํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ํŒ๋งค์ด‰์ง„ ์ „๋žต์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ๊ณตํ†ต๋œ ์ฃผ์š” ๋ชฉ์ ์€ ๊ธฐ์—…์ด ๊ณ ๊ฐ์—๊ฒŒ ํ˜œํƒ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ ๊ฐ์˜ ์ˆ˜์š”๋ฅผ ์ฆ๋Œ€์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ํŒ๋งค์ด‰์ง„์˜ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์ธ ์ „๋žต์€ ๊ฒฝ์˜๊ณผํ•™ ๋˜๋Š” ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋ง๊ด€๋ฆฌ ๋ถ„์•ผ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ๊ด€๋ จ ํ•™๊ณ„์˜ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์„ ์ด๋Œ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ง€์†์ ์ธ ์šด์˜์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ „๋žต์„ ๊ฒ€ํ† ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ „๋žต์  ์ˆ˜์ค€ ๊ณ„ํš์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ํŒ๋งค ์ด‰์ง„์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ž…์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์šด์˜ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์†Œ๋งค์—…์ฒด ์ž…์žฅ์—์„œ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฏธํกํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” (i) ๋งˆํฌ ๋‹ค์šด (ii) buy one get one free (BOGO), ๋ฐ (iii) ํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด๋“œ์ธํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์žฌ๊ณ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ๋‹ค๋ฃฌ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ €, ์‹ ๋ฌธ๊ฐ€ํŒ์› ๋ชจํ˜•์— ๋งˆํฌ ๋‹ค์šด ์‹œ์ž‘ ์‹œ์ ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ๊ฒฐ์ • ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋„์ž…ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๋งˆํฌ ๋‹ค์šด ์‹œ์ž‘ ์‹œ์ ๊ณผ ์ฃผ๋ฌธ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ํŠน์ • ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ๋Š” ์†Œ๋งค์—…์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ์ด์ต์„ ์–ป๋Š” ์‹œ์ ์ด ์ œ์กฐ์—…์ž์—๊ฒŒ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ˆ˜์ต์„ฑ์„ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ œ์กฐ์—…์ž์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์†Œ๋งค์—…์ž์˜ ๋น„ํ•ฉ๋ฆฌ์  ์ฃผ๋ฌธ์„ ๋ง‰๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ด์ต๋ถ„๋ฐฐ๊ณ„์•ฝ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด์ต๋ถ„๋ฐฐ๊ณ„์•ฝ์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์ค‘์•™์ง‘๊ถŒํ™” ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์—์„œ ์–ป์€ ์ด์ต์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์†Œ๋งค์—…์ž์™€ ์ œ์กฐ์—…์ž์˜ ์ด์ต์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ด์„ ์ˆ˜์น˜์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ์–ดํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜ ``๋‚˜๋งŒ์˜ ๋ƒ‰์žฅ๊ณ ''๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์žฌ๊ณ ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ์•ฑ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด BOGO ํ–‰์‚ฌ์ œํ’ˆ์„ ๊ตฌ๋งคํ•œ ๊ณ ๊ฐ์€ ์ฆ์ •ํ’ˆ์„ ๊ตฌ๋งค ๋‹น์ผ ๋‚  ๊ฐ€์ ธ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ๋ฏธ๋ž˜์— ์žฌ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธํ•˜์—ฌ ์ˆ˜๋ นํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ˜œํƒ์„ ๋ฐ›๋Š”๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์†Œ๋งค์—…์ž ์ž…์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ ๊ฐ์ด ์ฆ์ •ํ’ˆ์„ ์–ธ์ œ ์ˆ˜๋ นํ•ด ๊ฐˆ ์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ด๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์žฌ๊ณ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ์šด์˜๋ฐฉ์‹์—๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„์ ์ด ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณ ๊ฐ์˜ ์žฌ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ๋ณต์ˆ˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ์ถ”๊ณ„๊ณ„ํš ์žฌ๊ณ ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ด๋ฅผ ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฐ•๊ฑด์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ชจํ˜•์œผ๋กœ ๊ทผ์‚ฌํ™”ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ๋ฆฌํผ์„œ๋น„์Šค์™€ ํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด๋“œ์ธํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ํํšŒ๋กœ ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋ง ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ๋ณต์ˆ˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ์žฌ๊ณ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‹ ์„ธ๋Œ€ ์ œํ’ˆ, ๋ฆฌํผ์„œ๋น„์Šค ๋ฐ ํŠธ๋ ˆ์ด๋“œ์ธํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹คํ•œ ์ˆ˜์š”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ณต์ˆ˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ์ถ”๊ณ„๊ณ„ํš ์žฌ๊ณ ๋ชจํ˜•์ด ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ณต์ˆ˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ์ถ”๊ณ„๊ณ„ํš ์žฌ๊ณ ๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์ด ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ๊ฐ•๊ฑด์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ชจํ˜•์œผ๋กœ ๊ทผ์‚ฌํ™”ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Sales promotion 1 1.2 Inventory management 3 1.3 Research motivations 6 1.4 Research contents and contributions 8 1.5 Outline of the dissertation 10 Chapter 2 Optimal Start Time of a Markdown Sale Under a Two-Echelon Inventory System 11 2.1 Introduction and literature review 11 2.2 Problem description 17 2.3 Analysis of the decentralized system 21 2.3.1 Newsvendor model for a retailer 21 2.3.2 Solution procedure for an optimal combination of the start time of the markdown sale and the order quantity 25 2.3.3 Profi t function of a manufacturer 25 2.3.4 Numerical experiments of the decentralized system 27 2.4 Analysis of a centralized system 35 2.4.1 Revenue-sharing contract 35 2.4.2 Numerical experiments of the centralized system 38 2.5 Summary 40 2.5.1 Managerial insights 41 Chapter 3 Robust Multiperiod Inventory Model with a New Type of Buy One Get One Promotion: "My Own Refrigerator" 43 3.1 Introduction and literature review 43 3.2 Problem description 51 3.2.1 Demand modeling 52 3.2.2 Sequences of the ordering decision 54 3.3 Mathematical formulation of the IMMOR 56 3.3.1 Mathematical formulation of the IMMOR under the deterministic demand 58 3.3.2 Mathematical formulation of the IMMOR under the stochastic demand 58 3.3.3 Distributionally robust optimization approach for the IMMOR 60 3.4 Computational experiments 76 3.4.1 Experiment 1: tractability of the RIMMOR 77 3.4.2 Experiment 2: robustness of the RIMMOR 78 3.4.3 Experiment 3: e ect of duration of the expiry date under the different customers' revisiting propensities 78 3.5 Summary 83 3.5.1 Managerial insights 83 Chapter 4 Robust Multiperiod Inventory Model Considering Refurbishment Service and Trade-in Program 85 4.1 Introduction 85 4.2 Literature review 91 4.2.1 Effects of the trade-in program and strategic-level decisions for the trade-in program 91 4.2.2 Inventory or lot-sizing model in a closed-loop supply chain system 94 4.2.3 Distinctive features of this research 97 4.3 Problem description 100 4.3.1 Demand modeling 103 4.3.2 Decision of the inventory manager 105 4.4 Mathematical formulation 108 4.4.1 Mathematical formulation of the IMRSTIP under the deterministic demand model 108 4.4.2 Mathematical formulation of the IMRSTIP under the stochastic demand model 110 4.4.3 Distributionally robust optimization approach for the IMRSTIP 111 4.5 Computational experiments 125 4.5.1 Demand process 125 4.5.2 Experiment 1: tractability of the RIMRSTIP 128 4.5.3 Experiment 2: approximation error from the expected value given perfect information 129 4.5.4 Experiment 3: protection against realized uncertain factors 130 4.5.5 Experiment 4: di erences between modeling demands from VARMA and ARMA 131 4.5.6 Experiments 5 and 6: comparisons of backlogged refurbishment service with or without trade-in program 133 4.6 Summary 136 Chapter 5 Conclusions 138 5.1 Summary 138 5.2 Future research 140 Bibliography 142 Chapter A 160 A.1 160 A.2 163 A.3 163 A.4 164 A.5 165 A.6 166 Chapter B 168 B.1 168 B.2 171 B.3 172 Chapter C 174 C.1 174 C.2 174 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 179Docto

    Robust Storage Assignment in Unit-Load Warehouses

    Get PDF
    Published version made available in SMU repository with permission of INFORMS, 2014, February 28</p

    Multi-stage stochastic and robust optimization for closed-loop supply chain design

    Get PDF
    This dissertation focuses on formulating and solving multi-stage decision problems in uncertain environments using stochastic programming and robust optimization approaches. These approaches are applied to the design of closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) networks, which integrate both traditional flow and the reverse flow of products. The uncertainties associated with this application include forward demands, the quantity and quality of used products to be collected, and the carbon tax rate. The design decisions include long-term facility configurations as well as short-term contracts for transportation capacities by various modes that differ according to their variable costs, fixed costs, and emission rates. This dissertation consists of three papers. The first paper develops a multi-stage stochastic program for a CLSC network design problem with demands and quality of return uncertainties. The second paper focuses on robust optimization; particularly, the question of whether an adjustable robust counterpart (ARC) produces less conservative solutions than the robust counterpart (RC). Using the results of the second paper, a three-stage hybrid robust/stochastic program is proposed in the third paper, in which an ARC is formulated for a mixed integer linear programming model of the CLSC network design problem. In the first paper, a multi-stage stochastic program is proposed for the CLSC network design problem where facility locations are decided in the first stage and in subsequent stages, the capacities of transportation of different modes are contracted under uncertainty about the amounts of new and return products to transport among facilities. We explore the impact of the uncertain quality of returned products as well as uncertain demands with dependencies between periods. We investigate the stability of the solution obtained from scenario trees of varying granularity using a moment matching method for demands and distribution approximation for the quality of returns. Multi-stage solutions are evaluated in out-of-sample tests using simulated historical data and also compared with two-stage model. We observe an instance of overfitting, in which a scenario tree including more outcomes at each stage produces a dramatically different solution that has slightly higher average cost, compared to the solution from a less granular tree, when evaluated against the underlying simulated historical data. We also show that when the scenarios include demand dependencies, the solution performs better in out-of-sample simulation. In the second paper, the ARC of an uncertain linear program extends the RC by allowing some decision variables to adjust to the realizations of some uncertain parameters. The ARC may produce a less conservative solution than the RC does but cases are known in which it does not. While the literature documents some examples of cost savings provided by adjustability (particularly affine adjustability), it is not straightforward to determine in advance whether they will materialize. We establish conditions under which adjustability may lower the optimal cost with a numerical condition that can be checked in small representative instances. The provided conditions include the presence of at least two binding constraints at optimality of the RC formulation, and an adjustable variable that appears in both constraints with implicit bounds from above and below provided by different extreme values in the uncertainty set. The third paper concerns a CLSC network that is subject to uncertainty in demands for both new and returned products. The model structure also accommodates uncertainty in the carbon tax rate. The proposed model combines probabilistic scenarios for the demands and return quantities with an uncertainty set for the carbon tax rate. We constructed a three-stage hybrid robust/stochastic program in which the first stage decisions are long-term facility configurations, the second stage concerns the plan for distributing new and collecting returned products after realization of demands and returns but before realization of the carbon tax rate, and the numbers of transportation units of various modes, as the third stage decisions, are adjustable to the realization of the carbon tax level. For computational tractability, we restrict the transportation capacities to be affine functions of the carbon tax rates. By utilizing our findings in the second paper, we found conditions under which the ARC produces a less conservative solution. To solve the affinely adjustable version, Benders cuts are generated using recent duality developments for robust linear programs. Computational results show that the ability to adjust transportation mode capacities can substitute for building additional facilities as a way to respond to carbon tax uncertainty. The number of opened facilities in ARC solutions are decreased under uncertainty in demands and returns. The results confirm the reduction of total expected cost in the worst case of the carbon tax rate by increasing utilization of transportation modes with higher capacity per unit and lower emission rate

    Distributionally and integer adjustable robust optimization

    Get PDF

    Hybrid Strategies using Linear and Piecewise-Linear Decision Rules for Multistage Adaptive Linear Optimization

    Full text link
    Decision rules offer a rich and tractable framework for solving certain classes of multistage adaptive optimization problems. Recent literature has shown the promise of using linear and nonlinear decision rules in which wait-and-see decisions are represented as functions, whose parameters are decision variables to be optimized, of the underlying uncertain parameters. Despite this growing success, solving real-world stochastic optimization problems can become computationally prohibitive when using nonlinear decision rules, and in some cases, linear ones. Consequently, decision rules that offer a competitive trade-off between solution quality and computational time become more attractive. Whereas the extant research has always used homogeneous decision rules, the major contribution of this paper is a computational exploration of hybrid decision rules. We first verify empirically that having higher uncertainty resolution or more linear pieces in early stages is more significant than having it in late stages in terms of solution quality. Then we conduct a comprehensive computational study for non-increasing (i.e., higher uncertainty resolution in early stages) and non-decreasing (i.e., higher uncertainty resolution in late stages) hybrid decision rules to illustrate the trade-off between solution quality and computational cost. We also demonstrate a case where a linear decision rule is superior to a piecewise-linear decision rule within a simulator environment, which supports the need to assess the quality of decision rules obtained from a look-ahead model within a simulator rather than just using the look-ahead model's objective function value

    Prescriptive PCA: Dimensionality Reduction for Two-stage Stochastic Optimization

    Full text link
    In this paper, we consider the alignment between an upstream dimensionality reduction task of learning a low-dimensional representation of a set of high-dimensional data and a downstream optimization task of solving a stochastic program parameterized by said representation. In this case, standard dimensionality reduction methods (e.g., principal component analysis) may not perform well, as they aim to maximize the amount of information retained in the representation and do not generally reflect the importance of such information in the downstream optimization problem. To address this problem, we develop a prescriptive dimensionality reduction framework that aims to minimize the degree of suboptimality in the optimization phase. For the case where the downstream stochastic optimization problem has an expected value objective, we show that prescriptive dimensionality reduction can be performed via solving a distributionally-robust optimization problem, which admits a semidefinite programming relaxation. Computational experiments based on a warehouse transshipment problem and a vehicle repositioning problem show that our approach significantly outperforms principal component analysis with real and synthetic data sets

    Multiperiod optimisation and strategic planning for chemical processes

    Get PDF
    Il tema รจ l'ottimizzazione multiperiodale applicata a processi chimici, in particolare ottimizzazione dei livelli di scorte e pianificazione strategica
    corecore