Opening the AC-Unification Race

This note reports about the implementation of AC-unification algorithms, based on the variable-abstraction method of Stickel and on the constant-abstraction method of Livesey, Siekmann, and Herold. We give a set of 105 benchmark examples and compare execution times for implementations of the two approaches. This documents for other researchers what we consider to be the state-of-the-art performance for elementary AC-unification problems

A resolution principle for clauses with constraints

We introduce a general scheme for handling clauses whose variables are constrained by an underlying constraint theory. In general, constraints can be seen as quantifier restrictions as they filter out the values that can be assigned to the variables of a clause (or an arbitrary formulae with restricted universal or existential quantifier) in any of the models of the constraint theory. We present a resolution principle for clauses with constraints, where unification is replaced by testing constraints for satisfiability over the constraint theory. We show that this constrained resolution is sound and complete in that a set of clauses with constraints is unsatisfiable over the constraint theory if we can deduce a constrained empty clause for each model of the constraint theory, such that the empty clauses constraint is satisfiable in that model. We show also that we cannot require a better result in general, but we discuss certain tractable cases, where we need at most finitely many such empty clauses or even better only one of them as it is known in classical resolution, sorted resolution or resolution with theory unification

Proceedings of Sixth International Workshop on Unification

Swiss National Science Foundation; Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 314); Christ Church, Oxford; Oxford University Computing Laborator

Pseudo-contractions as Gentle Repairs

Updating a knowledge base to remove an unwanted consequence is a challenging task. Some of the original sentences must be either deleted or weakened in such a way that the sentence to be removed is no longer entailed by the resulting set. On the other hand, it is desirable that the existing knowledge be preserved as much as possible, minimising the loss of information. Several approaches to this problem can be found in the literature. In particular, when the knowledge is represented by an ontology, two different families of frameworks have been developed in the literature in the past decades with numerous ideas in common but with little interaction between the communities: applications of AGM-like Belief Change and justification-based Ontology Repair. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between pseudo-contraction operations and gentle repairs. Both aim to avoid the complete deletion of sentences when replacing them with weaker versions is enough to prevent the entailment of the unwanted formula. We show the correspondence between concepts on both sides and investigate under which conditions they are equivalent. Furthermore, we propose a unified notation for the two approaches, which might contribute to the integration of the two areas

Outline of a Calculus of Type Subsumption

This paper is a brief analysis of the notion of syntactic representation of types followed by a proposal of a formal calculus of type subsumption. The idea which is developed centers on the concept of indexed term, an extension of the definition of algebraic terms relaxing the fixed arity and fixed indexing constraints, and which allows term symbols to have some pre-order structure. It is shown that the structure on the set of symbols can be homomorphically extended to indexed terms to what is defined to be a subsumption ordering. Furthermore, when symbols have a lattice structure, this structure extends to a lattice of indexed terms. The notions of unification and generalization are also shown to fit the extension, and constitute the meet and join operations

Nominal disunification

Dissertação (mestrado)—Universidade de Brasília, Instituto de Ciências Exatas, Departamento de Matemática, 2019.Propõe-se uma extensão para problemas de disunificação de primeira-ordem adicionando suporte a operadores de ligação de acordo com a abordagem nominal. Nesta abordagem, abstração é implementada usando átomos nominais ao invés de variáveis de ligação como na representação clássica de termos e renomeamento de átomos é implementado por permutações. Em lógica nominal problemas de unificação consistem de perguntas equacionais da forma s ≈α ? t (lê-se: s é α-equivalente a t?) consideradas sobre problemas de freshness da forma a# ? t (lê-se: a é fresco em t?) que restringem soluções proibindo ocorrências livres de átomos na instanciação de variáveis. Além dessas questões equacionais e freshness, problemas de disunificação nominal incluem restrições na forma de disequações s ̸≈α ? t (lê-se: s é αdiferente de t?) com soluções dadas por pares consistindo de uma substituição σ e um conjunto de restrições de freshness na forma a#X tal que sobre estas restrições a σ-instanciação de equações, disequações, e problemas de freshness são válidas. Mostra-se, reutilizando noções de unificação nominal, como decidir se dois termos nominais podem ser feitos diferentes módulo α-equivalência. Isso é feito extendendo resultados anteriores sobre disunificação de primeira ordem e definindo a noção de soluções com exceção na linguagem nominal. Uma discussão sobre a semântica de restrições em forma de disequações também é apresentada.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).An extension of first-order disunification problems is proposed by taking into account binding operators according to the nominal approach. In this approach, bindings are implemented through nominal atoms used instead of binding variables and renaming of atoms are implemented by atom permutations. In the nominal setting, unification problems consist of equational questions of the form s ≈α ? t (read: is s α-equivalent to t?) considered under freshness problems a# ? t (read: is a fresh for t?) that restrict solutions by forbidding free occurrences of atoms in the instantiations of variables. In addition to equational and freshness problems, nominal disunification problems also include nominal disunification constraints in the form of disequations s ̸≈α ? t (read: is s α-different to t?) and their solutions consist of pairs of a substitution σ and a finite set of freshness constraints in the form of a#X such that under these restrictions the σ-instantiation of the equations, disequations, and freshness problems holds. By re-using nominal unification techniques, it is shown how to decide whether two nominal terms can be made different modulo α-equivalence. This is done by extending previous results on first-order disunification and by defining the notion of solutions with exceptions in the nominal syntax. A discussion on the semantics of disunification constraints is also given

Logical Algorithms meets CHR: A meta-complexity result for Constraint Handling Rules with rule priorities

This paper investigates the relationship between the Logical Algorithms language (LA) of Ganzinger and McAllester and Constraint Handling Rules (CHR). We present a translation schema from LA to CHR-rp: CHR with rule priorities, and show that the meta-complexity theorem for LA can be applied to a subset of CHR-rp via inverse translation. Inspired by the high-level implementation proposal for Logical Algorithm by Ganzinger and McAllester and based on a new scheduling algorithm, we propose an alternative implementation for CHR-rp that gives strong complexity guarantees and results in a new and accurate meta-complexity theorem for CHR-rp. It is furthermore shown that the translation from Logical Algorithms to CHR-rp combined with the new CHR-rp implementation, satisfies the required complexity for the Logical Algorithms meta-complexity result to hold.Comment: To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP